agreement between the united states of america and the socialist republic of vietnam on trade relations

. and othersWTO: World Trade OrganizationASEAN: Association of Southeast Asian Nations Vietnam: The Socialist Republic of Vietnam U.S : The United States of America iiiBecause the signing of. to choose ’Some Register Featuresin Agreement between the United States of America and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam on Trade Relations to be the theme of our study.Hopefully, this study,. one of whichis the USA; causes that the USA does not make to other countries are notdemanded to meet from Vietnam 2.1.3. The result Agreement between the United States of America and the Socialist...

. and the substantiveeconomic provisions of: A. the Geneva Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms AgainstUnauthorized Duplication of their Phonograms, 1971 (Geneva Convention);B.. provide the competent authorities the authority to inform the rightholder of the names and addresses of the consignor, the importer and the consignee, and of the quantity of the goods in question.32Article. International Convention for the Protection of Performers,Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations, the UPOV Convention (1978), the UPOV Convention (1991) or the Treaty on Intellectual...

. country other than the United States of America or the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, that is a party to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, done at New. country other than the United States of America or the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. 4. The parties to the dispute, unless otherwise agreed between them, should specify as the place of arbitration. adoption of arbitration for the settlement of disputes arising out of commercial transactions concluded between nationals or companies of the United States of America and nationals or companies of...

. 33.Plaintiffspossessedadequateincome and assets and hadadequatecr~dithistorytoqualifyfor the loansrequested, the value and/ or the e~itytheyhadintheirpropertiesweresufficienttosupport the loans, and Defendantwasaware of thosefacts.34.Defendant'sdiscriminationagainstPlaintiffswasintentional and willful.WHEREFORE,eachPlaintiffasksjUdgmentagainstDefendantfor:(a)Actualdamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(b)Compensatorydamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(c)Punitivedamages,notexceeding the lesser of $500,000oronepercentum of the networth of the Defendant;(d)Appropriateinjunctiverelief;(e)Reasonableattorneys'fees and costs of suit; and (f)Furtherreliefasthiscourtdeemsjust and proper.COUNTIIFAIRHOUSINGACT35.Plaintiffsadopt and reallege~~1through28 of thisComplaint and incorporatethembyreferenceas~35 of CountII.36.Thisclaimisbroughtunder the FairHousingAct,42U.S.C.§§3601,et~section3613(a)(1)(A) of thisActallowsacivilactiontobebroughtbyanypersondamaged.under the Act.sections3605(a) and (b)(1)providesthatitshallbeunlawfulforanypersonorentitywhosebusinessincludesengaginginresidentialreal-estate-relatedtransactionsto8JURISDICTION AND VENUE2.Jurisdiction of thiscourtarisesunder28U.S.C.§1343(a)(4),42U.S.C.§3613(a)(1)(A) and 15U.S.C.§1691e(f).3.Venueisproperin the NorthernDistrict of Illinoissincesome of the acts and transactionscomplained of occurredinthisdistrict. THE PARTIES4.PlaintiffSelmaS.Buycks-RobersonisanAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinBroadview,Illinois.5.PlaintiffReneeBrooksisanAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinChicago,Illinois.6.PlaintiffCalvinR.RobersonisanAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinChicago,Illinois.7.Defendantcitibankisafederalsavingsbankthatoffersresidentialmortgageloans("homeloans").CLASSACTIONSALLEGATIONS8.(a)Plaintiffsarecitibankhomeloanapplicants;theybringthisaction on behalf of themselves and allotherAfrican-Americanhomeloanapplicantssimilarlysituated.ThisactionisbroughtasaclassactionpursuanttoRule23(b)(2) and Rule23(b)(3) of the FederalRules of CivilProcedure.(b) The classconsists of allAfrican-Americanswhofiledapplicationsforhomeloanstocitibank and wererejected on orafterJuly6,1992becausetheyareAfrican-American and/ or2§1691(a); and (iii)whetherPlaintiffsareentitledtoanaward of actual,compensatoryorpunitivedamages.(f) The wrongfulconductallegedhereinhasbeentakengenerallyagainstallmembers of the classinthatAfrican-Americanhomeloanapplicantshavehadtheirloanapplicationsrejected on the basis of theirraceorcolor,orbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated,orboth,pursuantto the policies,practicesorprocedures of Defendant.(g) The commonquestions of fact and lawpredominateoverquestionsaffectingonlyindividualclassmembers.(h)Aclassactionissuperiortootheravailablemethodsfor the fair and efficientadjudication of the controversyinthat:(i)amUltiplicity of suitswithconsequentburden on the courts and Defendantshouldbeavoided; and (ii)itwouldbeundulyburdensomeforallclassmemberstointerveneasparties-plaintiffsinthisaction. THE FACTSMs.Buycks-Roberson9. On oraboutApril4,1992,PlaintiffSelmaBuycks-Robersonappliedforahomeloan of approximately$43,700fromcitibank.10. The purpose of the loanwastorefinanceanexistingmortgage of approximately$43,500 on Ms.Buycks-Roberson'shome,locatedat2057South25thAvenueinBroadview,Illinois.11. The propertythatMs.Buycks-Robersonattemptedtorefinanceislocatedinaneighborhoodinwhich the African-4because the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocatedwaspredominantlyAfrican-American.(c) The classissonumerousthatjoinder of allpersonsisimpracticable.Plaintiffsareinformed and believethatmanyhomeloanapplicationstoDefendantbyAfrican-Americanswereillegallyrejected. On information and belief,Defendantrejected the homeloanapplications of manydozens of African-Americanapplicantsbecause of theirraceorcolor, and/ orbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated.(d)Plaintiffswillfairly and adequatelyprotect the interests of allclassmembers,astheyaremembers of the class and theirclaimsaretypical of the claims of allclassmembers.Plaintiffsareincensedby the treatmenttheyhavereceived and willaggressivelypursuetheiraswellas the class'sinterests.Plaintiffs'interestsinobtaininginjunctiverelief and monetarydamagesfor the violations of the above-mentionedfederalstatutesareconsistentwith and notantagonistictothose of anypersonwithin the class.(e) The commonquestions of law and factinclude:(i)whetherDefendanthadapolicy,practiceorproceduretorejecthomeloanapplications on the basis of the applicants'raceor on the basis of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated;(ii)whether the conductallegedhereinisinviolation of Title42U.S.C.§§1981 and 1982;42U.S.C.§3605 and 15U.S.C.343.Because of the Defendant'smaliciousrefusaltodealwithPlaintiffs and itspolicy of discriminationagainstPlaintiffsbecause of raceorcolor,Plaintiffsclaimpunitiveorexemplarydamages.WHEREFORE,PlaintiffsaskjUdgmentagainstDefendantfor:(a)Actualdamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(b)Compensatorydamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(c)Punitivedamages;(d)Appropriateinjunctiverelief;(e)Reasonableattorneys'fees and costs of suit; and (f)FurtherreliefasthisCourtdeemsjust and proper.SELMAS.BUYCKS-ROBERSON;. 33.Plaintiffspossessedadequateincome and assets and hadadequatecr~dithistorytoqualifyfor the loansrequested, the value and/ or the e~itytheyhadintheirpropertiesweresufficienttosupport the loans, and Defendantwasaware of thosefacts.34.Defendant'sdiscriminationagainstPlaintiffswasintentional and willful.WHEREFORE,eachPlaintiffasksjUdgmentagainstDefendantfor:(a)Actualdamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(b)Compensatorydamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(c)Punitivedamages,notexceeding the lesser of $500,000oronepercentum of the networth of the Defendant;(d)Appropriateinjunctiverelief;(e)Reasonableattorneys'fees and costs of suit; and (f)Furtherreliefasthiscourtdeemsjust and proper.COUNTIIFAIRHOUSINGACT35.Plaintiffsadopt and reallege~~1through28 of thisComplaint and incorporatethembyreferenceas~35 of CountII.36.Thisclaimisbroughtunder the FairHousingAct,42U.S.C.§§3601,et~section3613(a)(1)(A) of thisActallowsacivilactiontobebroughtbyanypersondamaged.under the Act.sections3605(a) and (b)(1)providesthatitshallbeunlawfulforanypersonorentitywhosebusinessincludesengaginginresidentialreal-estate-relatedtransactionsto8JURISDICTION AND VENUE2.Jurisdiction of thiscourtarisesunder28U.S.C.§1343(a)(4),42U.S.C.§3613(a)(1)(A) and 15U.S.C.§1691e(f).3.Venueisproperin the NorthernDistrict of Illinoissincesome of the acts and transactionscomplained of occurredinthisdistrict. THE PARTIES4.PlaintiffSelmaS.Buycks-RobersonisanAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinBroadview,Illinois.5.PlaintiffReneeBrooksisanAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinChicago,Illinois.6.PlaintiffCalvinR.RobersonisanAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinChicago,Illinois.7.Defendantcitibankisafederalsavingsbankthatoffersresidentialmortgageloans("homeloans").CLASSACTIONSALLEGATIONS8.(a)Plaintiffsarecitibankhomeloanapplicants;theybringthisaction on behalf of themselves and allotherAfrican-Americanhomeloanapplicantssimilarlysituated.ThisactionisbroughtasaclassactionpursuanttoRule23(b)(2) and Rule23(b)(3) of the FederalRules of CivilProcedure.(b) The classconsists of allAfrican-Americanswhofiledapplicationsforhomeloanstocitibank and wererejected on orafterJuly6,1992becausetheyareAfrican-American and/ or2§1691(a); and (iii)whetherPlaintiffsareentitledtoanaward of actual,compensatoryorpunitivedamages.(f) The wrongfulconductallegedhereinhasbeentakengenerallyagainstallmembers of the classinthatAfrican-Americanhomeloanapplicantshavehadtheirloanapplicationsrejected on the basis of theirraceorcolor,orbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated,orboth,pursuantto the policies,practicesorprocedures of Defendant.(g) The commonquestions of fact and lawpredominateoverquestionsaffectingonlyindividualclassmembers.(h)Aclassactionissuperiortootheravailablemethodsfor the fair and efficientadjudication of the controversyinthat:(i)amUltiplicity of suitswithconsequentburden on the courts and Defendantshouldbeavoided; and (ii)itwouldbeundulyburdensomeforallclassmemberstointerveneasparties-plaintiffsinthisaction. THE FACTSMs.Buycks-Roberson9. On oraboutApril4,1992,PlaintiffSelmaBuycks-Robersonappliedforahomeloan of approximately$43,700fromcitibank.10. The purpose of the loanwastorefinanceanexistingmortgage of approximately$43,500 on Ms.Buycks-Roberson'shome,locatedat2057South25thAvenueinBroadview,Illinois.11. The propertythatMs.Buycks-Robersonattemptedtorefinanceislocatedinaneighborhoodinwhich the African-4because the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocatedwaspredominantlyAfrican-American.(c) The classissonumerousthatjoinder of allpersonsisimpracticable.Plaintiffsareinformed and believethatmanyhomeloanapplicationstoDefendantbyAfrican-Americanswereillegallyrejected. On information and belief,Defendantrejected the homeloanapplications of manydozens of African-Americanapplicantsbecause of theirraceorcolor, and/ orbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated.(d)Plaintiffswillfairly and adequatelyprotect the interests of allclassmembers,astheyaremembers of the class and theirclaimsaretypical of the claims of allclassmembers.Plaintiffsareincensedby the treatmenttheyhavereceived and willaggressivelypursuetheiraswellas the class'sinterests.Plaintiffs'interestsinobtaininginjunctiverelief and monetarydamagesfor the violations of the above-mentionedfederalstatutesareconsistentwith and notantagonistictothose of anypersonwithin the class.(e) The commonquestions of law and factinclude:(i)whetherDefendanthadapolicy,practiceorproceduretorejecthomeloanapplications on the basis of the applicants'raceor on the basis of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated;(ii)whether the conductallegedhereinisinviolation of Title42U.S.C.§§1981 and 1982;42U.S.C.§3605 and 15U.S.C.343.Because of the Defendant'smaliciousrefusaltodealwithPlaintiffs and itspolicy of discriminationagainstPlaintiffsbecause of raceorcolor,Plaintiffsclaimpunitiveorexemplarydamages.WHEREFORE,PlaintiffsaskjUdgmentagainstDefendantfor:(a)Actualdamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(b)Compensatorydamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(c)Punitivedamages;(d)Appropriateinjunctiverelief;(e)Reasonableattorneys'fees and costs of suit; and (f)FurtherreliefasthisCourtdeemsjust and proper.SELMAS.BUYCKS-ROBERSON;. 33.Plaintiffspossessedadequateincome and assets and hadadequatecr~dithistorytoqualifyfor the loansrequested, the value and/ or the e~itytheyhadintheirpropertiesweresufficienttosupport the loans, and Defendantwasaware of thosefacts.34.Defendant'sdiscriminationagainstPlaintiffswasintentional and willful.WHEREFORE,eachPlaintiffasksjUdgmentagainstDefendantfor:(a)Actualdamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(b)Compensatorydamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(c)Punitivedamages,notexceeding the lesser of $500,000oronepercentum of the networth of the Defendant;(d)Appropriateinjunctiverelief;(e)Reasonableattorneys'fees and costs of suit; and (f)Furtherreliefasthiscourtdeemsjust and proper.COUNTIIFAIRHOUSINGACT35.Plaintiffsadopt and reallege~~1through28 of thisComplaint and incorporatethembyreferenceas~35 of CountII.36.Thisclaimisbroughtunder the FairHousingAct,42U.S.C.§§3601,et~section3613(a)(1)(A) of thisActallowsacivilactiontobebroughtbyanypersondamaged.under the Act.sections3605(a) and (b)(1)providesthatitshallbeunlawfulforanypersonorentitywhosebusinessincludesengaginginresidentialreal-estate-relatedtransactionsto8JURISDICTION AND VENUE2.Jurisdiction of thiscourtarisesunder28U.S.C.§1343(a)(4),42U.S.C.§3613(a)(1)(A) and 15U.S.C.§1691e(f).3.Venueisproperin the NorthernDistrict of Illinoissincesome of the acts and transactionscomplained of occurredinthisdistrict. THE PARTIES4.PlaintiffSelmaS.Buycks-RobersonisanAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinBroadview,Illinois.5.PlaintiffReneeBrooksisanAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinChicago,Illinois.6.PlaintiffCalvinR.RobersonisanAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinChicago,Illinois.7.Defendantcitibankisafederalsavingsbankthatoffersresidentialmortgageloans("homeloans").CLASSACTIONSALLEGATIONS8.(a)Plaintiffsarecitibankhomeloanapplicants;theybringthisaction on behalf of themselves and allotherAfrican-Americanhomeloanapplicantssimilarlysituated.ThisactionisbroughtasaclassactionpursuanttoRule23(b)(2) and Rule23(b)(3) of the FederalRules of CivilProcedure.(b) The classconsists of allAfrican-Americanswhofiledapplicationsforhomeloanstocitibank and wererejected on orafterJuly6,1992becausetheyareAfrican-American and/ or2§1691(a); and (iii)whetherPlaintiffsareentitledtoanaward of actual,compensatoryorpunitivedamages.(f) The wrongfulconductallegedhereinhasbeentakengenerallyagainstallmembers of the classinthatAfrican-Americanhomeloanapplicantshavehadtheirloanapplicationsrejected on the basis of theirraceorcolor,orbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated,orboth,pursuantto the policies,practicesorprocedures of Defendant.(g) The commonquestions of fact and lawpredominateoverquestionsaffectingonlyindividualclassmembers.(h)Aclassactionissuperiortootheravailablemethodsfor the fair and efficientadjudication of the controversyinthat:(i)amUltiplicity of suitswithconsequentburden on the courts and Defendantshouldbeavoided; and (ii)itwouldbeundulyburdensomeforallclassmemberstointerveneasparties-plaintiffsinthisaction. THE FACTSMs.Buycks-Roberson9. On oraboutApril4,1992,PlaintiffSelmaBuycks-Robersonappliedforahomeloan of approximately$43,700fromcitibank.10. The purpose of the loanwastorefinanceanexistingmortgage of approximately$43,500 on Ms.Buycks-Roberson'shome,locatedat2057South25thAvenueinBroadview,Illinois.11. The propertythatMs.Buycks-Robersonattemptedtorefinanceislocatedinaneighborhoodinwhich the African-4because the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocatedwaspredominantlyAfrican-American.(c) The classissonumerousthatjoinder of allpersonsisimpracticable.Plaintiffsareinformed and believethatmanyhomeloanapplicationstoDefendantbyAfrican-Americanswereillegallyrejected. On information and belief,Defendantrejected the homeloanapplications of manydozens of African-Americanapplicantsbecause of theirraceorcolor, and/ orbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated.(d)Plaintiffswillfairly and adequatelyprotect the interests of allclassmembers,astheyaremembers of the class and theirclaimsaretypical of the claims of allclassmembers.Plaintiffsareincensedby the treatmenttheyhavereceived and willaggressivelypursuetheiraswellas the class'sinterests.Plaintiffs'interestsinobtaininginjunctiverelief and monetarydamagesfor the violations of the above-mentionedfederalstatutesareconsistentwith and notantagonistictothose of anypersonwithin the class.(e) The commonquestions of law and factinclude:(i)whetherDefendanthadapolicy,practiceorproceduretorejecthomeloanapplications on the basis of the applicants'raceor on the basis of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated;(ii)whether the conductallegedhereinisinviolation of Title42U.S.C.§§1981 and 1982;42U.S.C.§3605 and 15U.S.C.343.Because of the Defendant'smaliciousrefusaltodealwithPlaintiffs and itspolicy of discriminationagainstPlaintiffsbecause of raceorcolor,Plaintiffsclaimpunitiveorexemplarydamages.WHEREFORE,PlaintiffsaskjUdgmentagainstDefendantfor:(a)Actualdamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(b)Compensatorydamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(c)Punitivedamages;(d)Appropriateinjunctiverelief;(e)Reasonableattorneys'fees and costs of suit; and (f)FurtherreliefasthisCourtdeemsjust and proper.SELMAS.BUYCKS-ROBERSON;...

. signer of the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and the United States Constitution, transferring 42 shares of Bank of the United States stock to Joseph Ball on October. renewal of the charter and expansion of the bank’s capitalization to $30 million from $10 million. Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804)Alexander Hamilton was born on the island of Nevis in the British. in the United States. A staunch supporter of Alexander Hamilton, Willing resigned his position with the bank to accept the post of president of the rst Bank of the United States. Image of...

. until the 1930s), the 1893 crisis, the panic of 1907, and the Great Depression. Given that all of the earlier crises predate the creation of deposit insurance in 1933, and that three of the four. sample. On the whole, however, the conclusion would have to be that in the five years since the onset of the financial crisis the United States has performed better in terms of output per capita and. better thought of as the Second Great Contraction” (after Friedman and Schwartz’s characterization of the Great Depression as the Great Contraction.) Secondly, we assess how has the US has fared,...

. uses storage and software products, and offers storage and software services, to consumers in the United States and, more particularly, in the Eastern District of Texas. JURISDICTION AND VENUE. ships, distributes, offers for sale, sells, and advertises its products and offers its products and services in the United States, the State of Texas, and the Eastern District of Texas. Rackspace. 10. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35, United States Code. Jurisdiction as to these claims is conferred on this Court by...

. The conflict concerning the interpretation of the Hay-Pauncefote Treaty throws a flood of light on the practice of the United States respecting the relations between International Law and her. settle them. In acceding to such a solution of the point of difference between the two Powers, the honor of the United States and Great Britain surely will be as safe in the hands of their respective. of the Clayton-Bulwer Treaty, p. 23— The motive for, and the condition of, the substitution of the HayBulwer Treaty, p. 24— The rules of the Suez Canal Treaty which serve as the basis of the...

. weight and time the influence of each of these events on the relationship between the supply of and the demand formoney. The ceteris-paribus laws of economic theory are strictlyqualitative and only. of specialization on the market. As Rothbard explains:28 A History of Money and Banking in the United States: The Colonial Era to World War II44One of the first expositions of the operation. to the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The praxeological reasoning of Austrian monetary theory also leads to the conclusion thatthose who stand to reap the lion’s share of the economic...