Pay variation in family firms

209 137 0
Pay variation in family firms

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

Familienunternehmen und KMU Jörg Schäfer Pay Variation in Family Firms Familienunternehmen und KMU Edited by A Hack, Berne A Calabrò, Witten/Herdecke H Frank, Vienna F W Kellermanns, Charlotte, Vallendar T Zellweger, St Gallen Both Family Firms and Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SME) feature a number of distinct behaviors and characteristics which could provide them with a competitive advantage in the market but could also lead to certain risks The scientific series at hand presents research which provides an empirical and theoretical contribution to the investigation on these specific characteristics and their impact on business practice The overall aim of this series is to advance the development of theory in the areas of family firm and SME management Edited by Professor Dr Andreas Hack University of Berne Professor Dr Hermann Frank Vienna University of Economics and Business Professor Dr Thomas Zellweger University of St Gallen Professor Dr Andrea Calabrò University of Witten/Herdecke Professor Franz W Kellermanns, Ph.D University of North Carolina Charlotte WHU – Otto Beisheim School of ­Management Vallendar, Germany Jörg Schäfer Pay Variation in Family Firms Foreword by Prof Dr Andreas Hack Jörg Schäfer Witten/Herdecke, Germany Dissertation Witten/Herdecke University, 2015 Familienunternehmen und KMU ISBN 978-3-658-14546-0 ISBN 978-3-658-14547-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-14547-7 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016942530 Springer Gabler © Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016 This work is subject to copyright All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made Printed on acid-free paper This Springer Gabler imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH To my parents Ingrid and Peter, to my wife Ulrike and to my family Thank you for your love and for being always there for me Foreword For years the issue of pay equity and pay dispersion has been discussed intensely and critically on an economic but especially also on a socio-political level However, this is not a new issue People have always been extremely sensitive to perceived equality of pay Moreover, important social developments such as the establishment of unions had, among others, their origin in disputes about pay equality Yet, increasing discontent is perceivable in society with recent pay developments Is this due to the perceived “predomination” of anonymous public corporations in our economic systems which are characterized by their orientation towards criteria of performance? What does the reality look like when it comes to the companies that account for the largest share in our economy, i.e family owned businesses? Does the influence of entrepreneurial families actually impact pay dispersion and thus the perceived equality of pay? In his thesis, Jörg Schäfer addresses this "historic" but still red-hot issue of personnel management which unfolds its power deep into the socio-political debate Besides this focus on personnel management aspects, the paper opens up another equally interesting area of research For some decades, scientists have been investigating the impacts of the influence of entrepreneurial families on economic decisions This influence is empirically approximated by means of relatively simple key figures, such as family property, participation of family members in the company management or number of family generations involved The underlying value structures of the entrepreneurial family are mostly disregarded The thesis is based on this aspect and analyses the concrete influence of socioemotional wealth (SEW) - considerations on pay-strategic decisions in detail Responding to the research questions raised is without doubt a highly ambitious project, which Mr Schäfer has mastered exceptionally well Firstly, the author deals with the current literature on both issues in a well-structured and highly informative manner Secondly, and this demonstrates the relevance of this thesis, Mr Schäfer presents a comprehensive set of original data on German family businesses which is unique in terms of quality and the amount of information The theoretically derived hypotheses can thus be tested empirically for the first time VIII Foreword With his dissertation, Mr Schäfer connects and answers two major research questions in an innovative approach and provides a particular enhancement to the current discourse pertaining to payment structures and also to the heterogeneity of family businesses and especially to measuring the influence of families Addressing two independent research areas at the same time clearly increases the complexity of the argumentation and represents an extraordinary challenge for a dissertation thesis Jörg Schäfer meets this challenge with a precise, well-structured and sophisticated research design which is based on a sound theoretical basis The scientific value of this thesis can hardly be overestimated Furthermore, it is a very courageous thesis since it puts previous research on family companies into question Hence, the thesis demands a lot of the international research community, namely the fundamental reconsideration of its traditional research design I am certain that the present dissertation thesis will have a sustainable influence on research about family businesses Therefore, I hope that it will be broadly received in science But first and foremost, I hope that this thesis will find a diverse general readership because its results demonstrate yet again that entrepreneurial families bear a particular responsibility for a fairer world of employment Prof Dr Andreas Hack Acknowledgements This doctoral thesis project is ultimately a product of many people Even though it was a major challenge for me to compose it, it was probably also one of the best times in my life – and this is true for many reasons Apart from being able to live again, after five years of strategy consulting, a different lifestyle dependent 99% on my own discipline and time management (and to be in Brazil to see all of Germany’s games leading to the winning of the world soccer cup), it was also largely due to the many people I was blessed to get to know and who supported me that made this project a success in the end Therefore, I would like to thank those people explicitly as they definitely deserve First of all, I have to express my gratitude to Prof Dr Andreas Hack who had to endure my being a non-standard, slightly more senior consultant, with all the problems and challenges that go along with it regarding time planning and change in working mode to adapt to this “new research world” I am very grateful for his patience, support, guidance, availability whenever I really needed him, and encouragement without which I would not have completed this doctoral program Having arrived at the goal line and knowing many colleagues telling different stories, I cannot imagine anyone better Of course, I would also like to explicitly thank Prof Dr Marcel Hülsbeck for being my second reviewer and investing his time into this project In line with my two reviewers it is at least as important to mention Dr Nils Kraiczy of the IOP in Bern who was something like my mentor I would like to thank Nils for always supporting me, for encouraging me when it was necessary, for just having fun (and trash talk) to shift perspective and for providing me on many occasions with important knowledge and information that was necessary to the successful completion of this thesis project Furthermore, I have to thank my friend Dr Hannes Hauswald for recommending Andreas Hack and his team to me, for telling me that doing this doctorate leave will be great fun and interesting at the same time The fun part is also true for my friend Dr Thorsten Schäffler It is also important to thank all those family businesses and family business members that invested their time into answering my questionnaire and, thus, providing me with the data I needed for this dissertation X Acknowledgements I would also like to thank Dr Thomas Pijanowski, Annika Geyer, Tatjana Schutte, Thomas Wittig and all the other researchers, staff and doctoral students at the WIFU and its research colloquium for camaraderie, eating lunch with me in Düsseldorf, having so much fun, providing such a constructive research atmosphere, and helping me whenever I was in need Further, I would like to thank my employer OC&C Strategy Consultants GmbH and its partners for giving me this doctoral leave and all employees who had to endure me walking through the office while they had to “serious” work Along those lines, I would also like to thank my OC&C and research colleagues Hendrik Walter, Sebastian Schmidt and Matthias Guffler who worked on their thesis projects while I worked on mine and who always supported me, shared an office with me or just had fun with me Finally, I would like to thank all my friends for sharing their time with me and providing the distraction I needed to again be productive I hope I have not forgotten anyone but if you feel like I did just feel thanked as well Dr Jörg Schäfer References 177 Kidwell, R., Kellermanns, F., & Eddleston, K 2012 Harmony, justice, confusion, and conflict in family firms: Implications for ethical climate and the 'Fredo Effect' Journal of Business Ethics, 106(4): 503–517 Kienbaum 2014 Kienbaum-Studie: Das verdienen Geschäftsführer in Deutschland Retrieved from http://www.kienbaum.de/desktopdefault.aspx/tabid-16/149_read-1251/ January 21, 2015 Klein, P., Shapiro, D., & Young, J 2005 Corporate governance, family ownership and firm value: the Canadian evidence Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6): 769– 784 Klein, S B 2000 Family businesses in Germany: Significance and structure Family Business Review, 13(3): 157–182 Klein, S B., Astrachan, J H., & Smyrnios, K X 2005 The F-PEC Scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3): 321–339 Kline, P 2000 The handbook of psychological testing: Routledge Koch, M J., & McGrath, R G 1996 Improving labor productivity: Human resource management policies matter Strategic Management Journal, 17(5): 335–354 Kole, S R 1997 The complexity of compensation contracts Journal of financial Economics, 43(1): 79–104 Kotey, B 2005a Are performance differences between family and non-family SMEs uniform across all firm sizes? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 11(6): 394–421 Kotey, B 2005b Goals, management practices, and performance of family SMEs International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 11(1): 3–24 Kraiczy, N D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F W 2014a New product portfolio performance in family firms Journal of Business Research, 67(6): 1065–1073 Kraiczy, N D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F W 2014b What makes a family firm innovative? CEO risk-taking propensity and the organizational context of family firms Journal of Product Innovation Management 178 References Kräkel, M 2008 Emotions and compensation Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR), 60(2): 145–159 Kruger, J., & Dunning, D 1999 Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments Journal of personality and social psychology, 77(6): 1121 et seq La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R 2002 Investor protection and corporate valuation Journal of Finance, 57(3): 1147–1170 Labaki, R., Michael-Tsabari, N., & Zachary, R K 2013 Emotional dimensions within family business: towards a conceptualizataion: Handbook of Research on Family Business by Poutziouris, P.; Smyrnios, K.; Goel, S.: Edward Elgar Lambert, R A., Larcker, D F., & Weigelt, K 1993 The structure of organizational incentives Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3): 438–461 Landesarbeitsgericht Geheimhaltung Mecklenburg-Vorpommern der Vergütungshöhe - 2009 Verschwiegenheitspflicht AGB-Kontrolle Retrieved - from http://www.landesrechtmv.de/jportal/portal/page/bsmvprod.psml?showdoccase=1&doc.id=JURE100053339&st= ent Landis, R S., Beal, D J., & Tesluk, P E 2000 A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models Organizational Research Methods, 3(2): 186–207 Lansberg, I 1988 The succession conspiracy Family Business Review, 1(2): 119–143 Lansberg, I 1999 Succeeding generations: Realizing the dream of families in business (Hardcover) In Harvard Business School Press Books : Harvard Business School Press Books Lansberg, I., Davis, J A., Gersick, K F., & Hampton, M M 1996 Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business Harvard Business School Press Books Lansberg, I S 1983 Managing human resources in family firms: The problem of institutional overlap Organizational Dynamics, 12(1): 39–46 Laplume, A O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R A 2008 Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us Journal of Management, 34(6): 1152–1189 References 179 Laverty, K J 1996 Economic "short-termism": The debate, the unresolved issues, and the implications for management practice and research Academy of Management Review, 21(3): 825–860 Laverty, K J 2004 Managerial myopia or systemic short-termism?: The importance of managerial systems in valuing the long term Management Decision, 42(8): 949–962 Lawler, E E 1973 Motivation in work organizations Lawler, E E 1981 Pay and organization development: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Lazear, E P 1979 Why is there mandatory retirement? Journal of Political Economy, 87(6): 1261–1284 Lazear, E P 1989 Pay equality and industrial politics Journal of Political Economy, 97(3): 561– 580 Lazear, E P 1995 Personnel economics: MIT Press Lazear, E P 1999 Personnel economics: Past lessons and future directions Journal of Labor Economics, 17(2): 199–236 Lazear, E P., & Rosen, S 1981 Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts Journal of Political Economy, 89(5): 841–864 Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D 2013 Socioemotional wealth across the family firm life cycle: A commentary on 'family business survival and the role of boards' Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6): 1391–1397 Lee, J 2006 Family firm performance: Further evidence Family Business Review, 19(2): 103– 114 Lee, K W., Lev, B., & Yeo, G H H 2008 Executive pay dispersion, corporate governance, and firm performance Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 30(3): 315–338 Lee, M.-S., & Rogoff, E G 1996 Research note: Comparison of small businesses with family participation versus small businesses without family participation: An investigation of differences in goals, attitudes, and family/business conflict Family Business Review, 9(4): 423–437 Leonard, J S 1990 Executive pay and firm performance Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 43(3): 13S–29S 180 References Levine, D I 1991 Cohesiveness, productivity, and wage dispersion Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 15(2): 237–255 Ling, Y., & Kellermanns, F W 2010 The effects of family firm specific sources of TMT diversity: The moderating role of information exchange frequency Journal of Management Studies, 47(2): 322–344 Litz, R A (Ed.) 1995 The family business: Toward definitional clarity: Academy of Management Lubatkin, M H., Durand, R., & Ling, Y 2007 The missing lens in family firm governance theory: A self-other typology of parental altruism Journal of Business Research, 60(10): 1022–1029 Lubatkin, M H., Schulze, W S., Ling, Y., & Dino, R N 2005 The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3): 313– 330 Lyman, A R 1991 Customer service: Does family ownership make a difference? Family Business Review, 4(3): 303–324 Mahoney, T A 1991 Job evaluation: Endangered species or anachronism Human Resource Management Review, 1(2): 155–162 Main, Brian G M., O'Reilly III, Charks A., & Wade, J 1993 Top executive pay: tournament or teamwork? Journal of Labor Economics, 11(4): 606–628 Major, B., & Forcey, B 1985 Social comparisons and pay evaluations: Preferences for samesex and same-job wage comparisons Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21(4): 393–405 Marginson, D., & McAulay, L 2008 Exploring the debate on short-termism: a theoretical and empirical analysis Strategic Management Journal, 29(3): 273–292 Marques, P., Presas, P., & Simon, A 2014 The heterogeneity of family firms in CSR engagement: The role of values Family Business Review, 27(3): 206–227 Martin, J 1981 Relative deprivation: A theory of distributive injustice for an era of shrinking resources Research in Organizational Behavior, 3: 53 et seq Martin, J 1982 The fairness of earnings differentials: An experimental study of the perceptions of blue-collar workers Journal of Human Resources, 17(1): 110–122 References 181 Mattingly, J E 2004 Stakeholder salience, structural development, and firm performance: Structural and performance correlates of sociopolitical stakeholder management strategies Business & Society, 43(1): 97–114 Mazen, A Magid M., Graf, L A E E., Kellog, C E., & Hemmasi, M 1987 Statistical power in contemporary management research Academy of Management Journal, 30(2): 369–380 Mazen, A Magid M., Hemmasi, M., & Lewis, M F 1987 Assessment of statistical power in contemporary stratetgy research Strategic Management Journal, 8(4): 403–410 McConaughy, D L 2000 Family CEOs vs nonfamily CEOs in the family-controlled firm: An examination of the level and sensitivity of pay to performance Family Business Review, 13(2): 121–131 McConnell, J J., & Wahal, S 2000 Do institutional investors exacerbate managerial myopia? Journal of Corporate Finance, (6): 307–329 McKenzie, R B & Lee, D R 1998 Managing through incentives: New York: Oxford University Press McKinley, W., Mone, M A., & Moon, G 1999 Determinants and development of schools in organization theory Academy of Management Review, 24(4): 634–648 Mehrotra, V., Morck, R., Shim, J., & Wiwattanakantang, Y 2011 Must love kill the family firm? Some exploratory evidence Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6): 1121–1148 Meindl, J R., Ehrlich, S B., & Dukerich, J M 1985 The romance of leadership Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(1): 78–102 Melin, L., & Nordqvist, M 2007 The reflexive dynamics of institutionalization: the case of the family business Strategic Organization, 5(3): 321–333 Messersmith, J G., Guthrie, J P., Yong-Yeon Ji, & Jeong-Yeon Lee 2011 Executive turnover: The influence of dispersion and other pay system characteristics Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3): 457–469 Meulbroek, L K., & Mitchell, M L 1990 Shark repellents and managerial myopia: An empirical test Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): 1108–1117 Micelotta, E R., & Raynard, M 2011 Concealing or revealing the family?: Corporate brand identity strategies in family firms Family Business Review, 24(3): 197–216 182 References Michiels, A., Voordeckers, W., Lybaert, N., & Steijvers, T 2013 CEO compensation in private family firms: Pay-for-performance and the moderating role of ownership and management Family Business Review, 26(2): 140–160 Milkovich, G T., Newman, J M., & Gerhart, B A 2014 Compensation (11th ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin Miller, D., & Breton-Miller, I L 2005 Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses: Harvard Business School Press Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I 2005 Management insights from great and struggling family businesses Long Range Planning, 38(6): 517–530 Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I 2014 Deconstructing socioemotional wealth Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2014: 713–720 Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Lester, R H 2011 Family and lone founder wwnership and srategic bhaviour: Social context, identity, and institutional logics Journal of Management Studies, 48(1): 1–25 Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Lester, R H 2013 Family firm governance, strategic conformity, and performance: Institutional vs strategic perspectives Organization Science, 24(1): 189–209 Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R H., & Cannella, A A 2007 Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5): 829–858 Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., & Scholnick, B 2008 Stewardship vs stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 51–78 Miller, D., Lee, J., Chang, S., & Le Breton-Miller, I 2009 Filling the institutional void: The social behavior and performance of family vs non-family technology firms in emerging markets Journal of International Business Studies, 40(5): 802–817 Mishel, L., & Sabadish, N 2012 CEO pay and the top 1%: How executive compensation and financial-sector pay have fueled income inequality Economic Policy Institute, Mitra, A., Gupta, N., & Jenkins Jr, G Douglas 1997 A drop in the bucket: when is a pay raise a pay raise? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2): 117–137 References 183 Mondello, M., & Maxcy, J 2009 The impact of salary dispersion and performance bonuses in NFL organizations Management Decision, 47(1): 110–123 Montemayor, E F 1996 Congruence between pay policy and competitive strategy in highperforming firms Journal of Management, 22(6): 889–908 Moz-Bullón, F., & Sánchez-Bueno, M J 2014 The use of incentive compensation among board members in family firms Group & Organization Management, 39(2): 162–189 Murphy, K J., & Zábojník, J 2004 CEO pay and appointments: A market-based explanation for recent trends American Economic Review, 94(2): 192–196 Mustakallio, M., Autio, E., & Zahra, S A 2002 Relational and contractual governance in family firms: Effects on strategic decision making Family Business Review, 15(3): 205–222 Myers, R H 1990 Classical and modern regression with applications: Duxbury/Thompson Learning Nakazato, M., Ramseyer, J Mark, & Rasmusen, E B 2011 Executive compensation in Japan: Estimating levels and determinants from tax records Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(3): 843–885 Naldi, L., Cennamo, C., Corbetta, G., & Gomez-Mejia, L 2013 Preserving socioemotional wealth in family firms: Asset or liability? The moderating role of business context Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6): 1341–1360 Nelson, D L., & Quick, J C 2007 Understanding organizational behavior: Thomson/SouthWestern Newby, R., Watson, J., & Woodliff, D 2003 SME survey methodology: Response rates, data quality, and cost effectiveness Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2): 163–173 Nichols, D., & Subramaniam, C 2001 Executive compensation: Excessive or equitable? Journal of Business Ethics, 29(4): 339–351 Nunnally, J C., & Bernstein, I H 1994 Psychometric theory (3rd ed.) McGraw-Hill series in psychology New York: McGraw-Hill Oppenheim, A N 2000 Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement (New ed., repr) London: Continuum 184 References O'Reilly, C., & Chatman, J 1986 Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3): 492–499 Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F L., & Rynes, S L 2003 Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis Organization Studies (01708406), 24(3): 403–441 Ostroff, C., & Clark, M A 2001 Maintaining an internal market: Antecedents of willingness to change jobs Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3): 425–453 Ouchi, W G 1980 Markets, bureaucracies, and clans Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(1): 129–141 Paletta, D 2010 It has a name: The Dodd/Frank Act Wall Street Journal: 25 et seq Pearce II, John A., & Robbins, D Keith 1987 The impact of grand strategy and planning formality on financial performance Strategic Management Journal, 8(2): 125–134 Pedhazur, E J., & Schmelkin, L P 2013 Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach: Taylor & Francis Pérez, A., & Bosque, Ignacio Rodríguez del 2015 Corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty: exploring the role of identification, satisfaction and type of company Journal of Services Marketing, 29(1): 15–25 Pérez-González, F 2006 Inherited control and firm performance The American Economic Review: 1559–1588 Peter, J Paul 1981 Construct validity: A review of basic issues and marketing practices Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 18(2): 133–145 Peter, J Paul, & Churchill Jr, Gilbert A 1986 Relationships among research design choices and psychometric properties of rating scales: A meta-analysis Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 23(1): 1–10 Pettigrew, A M 1992 On studying managerial elites Strategic Management Journal, 13: 163– 182 Pfeffer, J., & Davis-Blake, A 1987 Understanding organizational wage structures: A resource dependence approach Academy of Management Journal, 30(3): 437–455 References 185 Pfeffer, J., & Davis-Blake, A 1992 Salary dispersion, location in the salary distribution, and turnover among college administrators Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 45(4): 753– 763 Pfeffer, J., & Langton, N 1993 The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3): 382–407 Phillips, R A 1997 Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness Business Ethics Quarterly: 51–66 Piore, M., & Doeringer, P 1971 Internal labor markets and manpower analysis Lexington, Mass., Heath Podsakoff, P M., MacKenzie, S B., Jeong-Yeon Lee, & Podsakoff, N P 2003 Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879–903 Podsakoff, P M., & Organ, D W 1986 Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects Journal of Management, 12(4): 531–544 Rockwell, R C 1975 Assessment of multicollinearity: The haitovsky test of the determinant Sociological Methods & Research, 3(3): 308–320 Roome, N., & Wijen, F 2006 Stakeholder power and organizational learning in corporate environmental management Organization Studies (01708406), 27(2): 235–263 Rosenbaum, J E 1984 Career mobility in a corporate hierarchy: Academic Press New York Rousseau, D M., & Ho, V T 2000 Psychological contract issues in compensation Compensation in organizations: Current research and practice: 273–310 Rowley, T J 1997 Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 887–910 Russo, M V., & Fouts, P A 1997 A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability Academy of Management Journal, 40(3): 534–559 Salop, J., & Salop, S 1976 Self-selection and turnover in the labor market The Quarterly Journal of Economics: 619–627 Sapp, S G 2008 The impact of corporate governance on executive compensation European Financial Management, 14(4): 710–746 186 References Schulze, W S., Lubatkin, M H., & Dino, R N 2003 Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4): 473–490 Schulze, W S., Lubatkin, M H., Dino, R N., & Buchholtz, A K 2001 Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence Organization Science, 12(2): 99–116 Sharma, P 2004 An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future Family Business Review, 17(1): 1–36 Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J J 1999 Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3): 11–27 Sharma, P., Chrisman, J J., & Chua, J H 1997 Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges Family Business Review, 10(1): 1–35 Sharma, P., Chrisman, J J., & Gersick, K E 2012 25 years of family business review: Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future Family Business Review, 25(1): 5–15 Sharma, P., & Manikutty, S 2005 Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3): 293–311 Sharma, P., & Sharma, S 2011 Drivers of proactive environmental strategy in family firms Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(2): 309–334 Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H 1998 Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable Strategic Management Journal, 19(8): 729 et seq Sharma, Z., & Huang, W 2014 When pay spreads influence firm value? Applied Financial Economics, 24(11): 723–737 Shaw, J D., Gupta, N., & Delery, J E 2002 Pay dispersion and workforce performance: Moderating effects of incentives and interdependence Strategic Management Journal, 23(6): 491–512 Shaw, Jason D Gupta, Nina 2007 Pay system characteristics and quit patterns of good, average, and poor performers Personnel Psychology, 60(4): 903–928 Sheehan, K B 2001 E-mail survey response rates: A review Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2) SIC 2014 Industry codes Retrieved from http://siccode.com/en December 2014 References 187 Siegel, P A., & Hambrick, D C 2005 Pay disparities within top management groups: Evidence of harmful effects on performance of high-technology firms Organization Science, 16(3): 259–274 Simon, H A 1957 Models of man; social and rational Sirmon, D G., & Hitt, M A 2003 Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4): 339–358 Smirnova, E., & Lange, C 2010 Executive compensation of family-owned firms Proceedings of the Northeast Business & Economics Association: 372–375 Smyrnios, K., Tanewski, G., & Romano, C 1998 Development of a measure of the characteristics of family business Family Business Review, 11(1): 49–60 Speckbacher, G., & Wentges, P 2012 The impact of family control on the use of performance measures in strategic target setting and incentive compensation: A research note Management Accounting Research, 23(1): 34–46 Stavrou, E., Kassinis, G., & Filotheou, A 2007 Downsizing and stakeholder orientation among the Fortune 500: Does family ownership matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 72(2): 149–162 Stavrou, E T., & Swiercz, P M 1998 Securing the ruture of the family enterprise: A model of offspring intentions to join the business Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(2): 19– 39 Stevens, J 2002 Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences : Bd 1: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Stevens, J P 2012 Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (Fifth Edition): Taylor & Francis Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M 2003 Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 397–415 Surroca, J., Tribó, J A., & Waddock, S 2010 Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources Strategic Management Journal, 31(5): 463– 490 Suwina Cheng, & Firth, M 2006 Family ownership, corporate governance, and top executive compensation Managerial & Decision Economics, 27(7): 549–561 188 References Sweeney, P D., & McFarlin, D B 2005 Wage comparisons with similar and dissimilar others Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 78(1): 113–131 Swimberghe, K R., & Wooldridge, B R 2014 Drivers of customer relationships in quick-service restaurants: The role of corporate social responsibility Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(4): 354–364 Tabachnick, B G., & Fidell, L S 2007 Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.) Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J 1996 Bivalent attributes of the family firm Family Business Review, 9(2): 199–208 Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J A 1992 On the goals of successful family companies Family Business Review, 5(1): 43–62 Tang, H 2014 Are CEO stock option grants optimal? Evidence from family firms and nonfamily firms around the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Review of Quantitative Finance & Accounting, 42(2): 251–292 Tang, J., Tang, Z., & Katz, J A 2014 Proactiveness, stakeholder-firm power difference, and product safety and quality of Chinese SMEs Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(5): 1129–1157 Teal, E J., Upton, N., & Seaman, S L 2003 A comparitive analysis of strategic marketing practices of high-growth U.S family and non-family firms Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8(2): 177–195 Theeravanich, A 2013 Director compensation in emerging markets: A case study of Thailand Journal of Economics & Business, 70: 71–91 Thompson, B 2004 Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications (1st ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Thornton, P H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M 2012 The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process Oxford: Oxford University Press Thurow, L C 1975 Generating Inequality: Basic Books Topp, N W., & Pawloski, B 2002 Online data collection Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2): 173–178 References 189 Tremblay, M., St-Onge, S., & Toulouse, J.-M 1997 Determinants of salary referents relevance: A field study of managers Journal of Business and Psychology, 11(4): 463–484 Trevor, C O., Reilly, G., & Gerhart, B 2012 Reconsidering pay dispersion's effect on the performance of interdependent work: Reconciling sorting and pay inequality Academy of Management Journal, 55(3): 585–610 Trevor, C O., & Wazeter, D L 2006 A contingent view of reactions to objective pay conditions: Interdependence among pay structure characteristics and pay relative to internal and external referents Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6): 1260–1275 Tsang, Eric W K 2002 Learning from overseas venturing experience: The case of Chinese family businesses Journal of Business Venturing, 17(1): 21–40 Uhlaner, L 2006 Business family as a team: underyling force for sustained competitive advantage published in Handbook of research on family business by Poutziouris, Panikkos, Smyrnios, Kosmas, Klein, Sabine, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar United States Department of Labor 2014 Minimum wage laws in the States - September 1, 2014 Retrieved from http://www.dol.gov/whd/minwage/america.htm December 2014 Uzzi, B 1997 Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35–67 Van der Merwe, S 2009 Determinants of family employee work performance and compensation in family businesses South African Journal of Business Management, 40(1): 51–63 van Gils, A., Dibrell, C., Neubaum, D O., & Craig, J B 2014 Social issues in the family enterprise Family Business Review, 27(3): 193–205 Villalonga, B., & Amit, R 2006 How family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of financial Economics, 80(2): 385–417 Volpin, P F 2002 Governance with poor investor protection: evidence from top executive turnover in Italy Journal of financial Economics, 64(1): 61–90 Vroom, V H 1964 Work and motivation NY: John Wiley &sons Wade, J B., O'Reilly, III, Charles A., & Pollock, T G 2006 Overpaid CEOs and underpaid managers: Fairness and executive compensation Organization Science, 17(5): 527–544 190 References Walsh, J P 2008 CEO compensation and the responsibilities of the business scholar to society Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(2): 26–33 Ward, J L 1988 The special role of strategic planning for family businesses Family Business Review, 1(2): 105–117 Warren, D E 2003 Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations Academy of Management Review, 28(4): 622–632 Weisberg, S 2013 Applied linear regression: Wiley Westhead, P., & Cowling, M 1998 Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1): 31–56 Westhead, P., Cowling, M., & Howorth, C 2001 The development of family companies: Management and ownership imperatives Family Business Review, 14(4): 369–385 Westhead, P., & Howorth, C 2007 'Types' of private family firms: an exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(5): 405–431 Westley, F 1991 Strategic bridging: The collaboration between environmentalists and business in the marketing of green products The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(1): 65–90 Westley, F., & Vredenburg, H 1997 Interorganizational collaboration and the preservation of global biodiversity Organization Science, 8(4): 381–403 Wicks, A C., Gilbert, Jr, Daniel R., & Freeman, R E 1994 A feminist reinterpretation of the stakeholder concept Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4): 475–497 Williamson, O E 1975 Markets and hierarchies: antitrust analysis and implications The Free Press New York Wiseman, R M., & Gomez-Mejia, L R 1998 A behavioral agency model of managerial risk taking Academy of Management Review, 23(1): 133–153 Wortman, M S 1994 Theoretical foundations for family-owned business: A conceptual and research-based paradigm Family Business Review, 7(1): 3–27 Wright, K B 2005 Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3) References 191 Wu, C.-H 2013 Family ties, board compensation and firm performance Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 23(4): 255–271 Yang, Y., Syam, N., & Hess, J 2013 Thrill of victory and agony of defeat: Emotional rewards and sales force compensation Quantitative Marketing & Economics, 11(4): 379–402 Young, C.-S., & Tsai, L.-C 2008 The sensitivity of compensation to social capital: Family CEOs vs nonfamily CEOs in the family business groups Journal of Business Research, 61(4): 363– 374 Zahra, S A., & Sharma, P 2004 Family business research: A strategic reflection Family Business Review, 17(4): 331–346 Zellweger, T M 2006 Risk, return and value in the family firm University of St Gallen, Business Dissertations: 1–295 Zellweger, T M., & Astrachan, J H 2008 On the emotional value of owning a firm Family Business Review, 21(4): 347–363 Zellweger, T M., Eddleston, K A., & Kellermanns, F W 2010 Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1): 54– 63 Zellweger, T M., Kellermanns, F W., Chrisman, J J., & Chua, J H 2012 Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control Organization Science, 23(3): 851–868 ... and pay variation (2.3.2.) in family firms 2.1 Research on family firms This chapter on research on family firms serves two major purposes First, getting acquainted with basic definitions of family. .. contribute to pay variation literature, identifying key antecedents of pay range when analysing family business as the dominant economic force Additionally, I add to pay variation data in family firm... 2.1., of pay variation in 2.2 and of the combination of both in 2.3 In these chapters, brief definitions of family firm (2.1.1.) and pay variation (2.2.1.) are provided In the research on family

Ngày đăng: 14/05/2018, 15:41

Mục lục

  • Foreword

  • Acknowledgements

  • Contents

  • Figures

  • Tables

  • Abbreviations

  • 1. Introduction

    • 1.1. Background, relevance and research question

    • 1.2. Motivation and research problem

    • 1.3. Research overview of the dissertation

    • 1.4. Thesis structure

    • 2. Theoretical framework: Definitions, theories, limitations

      • 2.1. Research on family firms

        • 2.1.1. Basic definition of family firm

        • 2.1.2. Socioemotional Wealth Concept

        • 2.1.3. The FIBER Approach

        • 2.1.4. Proactive Stakeholder Engagement in family firms

        • 2.2. Research on pay variation – Definition and theories

          • 2.2.1. Basic definition of pay variation

          • 2.2.2. Equity Theory

          • 2.2.3. Tournament Theory

          • 2.3. Research on pay variation and compensation in family firms

            • 2.3.1. Compensation in family firms

            • 2.3.2. Pay variation in family firms

            • 2.4. Thesis contribution on identified research gaps

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan