Ngày đăng: 14/05/2018, 13:53

**Dynamic** Modeling **and** Econometrics in Economics **and** Finance 18 Carl Chiarella Willi Semmler Chih-Ying Hsiao Lebogang Mateane **Sustainable** **Asset** **Accumulation** **and** **Dynamic** **Portfolio** **Decisions** **Dynamic** Modeling **and** Econometrics in Economics **and** Finance Volume 18 Editors Stefan Mittnik Ludwig Maximillian University Munich Munich, Germany Willi Semmler Bielefeld University Bielefeld, Germany **and** New School for Social Research New York, USA More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/5859 Carl Chiarella • Willi Semmler • Chih-Ying Hsiao • Lebogang Mateane **Sustainable** **Asset** **Accumulation** **and** **Dynamic** **Portfolio** **Decisions** 123 Carl Chiarella School of Finance **and** Economics University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Willi Semmler Henry Arnhold Professor of Economics Department of Economics New School for Social Research New York, NY, USA **and** Bielefeld University Bielefeld, Germany Chih-Ying Hsiao School of Finance **and** Economics University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia Lebogang Mateane Department of Economics New School for Social Research New York, NY, USA ISSN 1566-0419 ISSN 2363-8370 (electronic) **Dynamic** Modeling **and** Econometrics in Economics **and** Finance ISBN 978-3-662-49228-4 ISBN 978-3-662-49229-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-49229-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016942551 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 This work is subject to copyright All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, **and** transmission or information storage **and** retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws **and** regulations **and** therefore free for general use The publisher, the authors **and** the editors are safe to assume that the advice **and** information in this book are believed to be true **and** accurate at the date of publication Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made Printed on acid-free paper This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg Preface The global economy experienced a worldwide meltdown of **asset** markets in the years 2007–2009 This posed great challenges for **asset** **and** **portfolio** managers Many funds such as university endowments, sovereign wealth funds, **and** pension funds were overexposed to risky returns **and** suffered considerable losses On the other hand, the long-run upswing in the stock market since 2010, induced by a monetary policy of quantitative easing in the USA, **and** later in Europe **and** Asia, led to **asset** price booms **and** new wealth formation In both cases quite significant differences in **asset** management **and** wealth **accumulation** were visible Our book aims at dealing with **sustainable** wealth formation **and** **dynamic** decision making We have three perspectives in mind A first perspective is how wealth formation **and** the proper management of financial funds can help to buffer income risk sufficiently **and** to obtain adequate risk-free income at a later stage of life This is an important concern in the current public debate on **asset** **accumulation** **and** wealth disparity In whatever institutional form saving takes place, in mutual funds, public pension funds, corporate pension funds, or private saving accounts, the generic issue is how much to save **and** invest **and** how to make proper **asset** allocation **decisions** A second important issue for **sustainable** wealth **accumulation** is that many agents **and** institutions in financial markets tend to put some constraints on the **accumulation** **and** allocation of assets—following some rules, guidelines **and** restrictions concerning risk-taking, safeness of investments, as well as social, ethical, environmental, **and** climate change aspects Thus investments are often restricted to certain risk classes, classes of assets or particular assets Much investment **and** **asset** allocation **decisions** are therefore made following behavioral **and** institutional rules, responding to some given constraints **and** guidelines, without necessarily being optimal in the narrow sense A third perspective of **sustainable** wealth formation is that we want to move more toward **dynamic** decision making **and** **dynamic** re-balancing of portfolios **Portfolio** **decisions** are frequently modeled as static **decisions** problems Yet, how should the investors respond to expected future returns, changing return differentials, global or idiosyncratic risk, change of inflation rates, affecting the real value of their assets, v vi Preface **and** so on? In standard literature, the modeling of savings **and** wealth **accumulation** are often separated from **asset** allocation **decisions** We pursue a simultaneous **and** **dynamic** treatment of both savings behavior **and** **portfolio** decision making, taking into account expected returns Expected returns are evaluated here, using a new method—harmonic estimations of returns In order to solve such **dynamic** decision problems in **portfolio** theory **and** **portfolio** practice—solving saving as well as **asset** **accumulation** problems simultaneously—we put forward **dynamic** programming as a procedure for **dynamic** decision making that allows to integrate **sustainable** wealth **accumulation** as well as **asset** allocation **decisions** Although some shortcomings of this procedure exist, a careful use of it can help to not only undertake **dynamic** modeling but also aid online decision making once some pattern of expected returns of different **asset** classes, for example estimated through using harmonic estimations, has been recognized The book is written in a way that it can be used by researchers **and** in graduate classes on financial economics, **asset** pricing **and** **portfolio** theory, finance **and** macro, **portfolio** theory **and** practice, pension fund theory **and** management, socially responsible investment decisions, financial market **and** wealth disparities, methodology of **dynamic** **portfolio** theory, intertemporal **asset** allocation **and** households’ saving, **and** applied **dynamic** programming Parts of the book are based on lectures delivered at the University of Bielefeld, Germany, the University of Technology, Sydney, Australia, The New School for Social Research, New York City, USA, **and** University of Economics, Vienna, Austria, as well as conferences **and** workshops at the ZEW, Mannheim, Germany We are very grateful to our colleagues at those institutions as well as to several generations of students who took our classes in this area **and** gave comments on these lectures in their formative stages We are also grateful for discussions with Hans Amman, Lucas Bernard, Raphaele Chappe, Peter Flaschel, Lars Gruene, Stefan Mittnik, Unra Nyambuu, Eckhard Platen, **and** James Ramsey Individually, many of the chapters of the book have been presented at conferences, workshops, **and** seminars throughout the United States, Europe, **and** Australia Many chapters of this book are also based on previous article by the authors, published with a variety of different coauthors Each chapter acknowledges the particular coauthors involved, **and** a general acknowledgment can be found below In preparing this manuscript, we in particular relied on the help of Tony Bonen **and** Uwe Koeller whom we want to thank for extensive assistance in editing this volume Willi Semmler wants to thank the Fulbright Foundation for a Fulbright Professorship at the University of Economics, Vienna, in the Winter Term 2011, as well as the German Research Foundation for financial support Sydney, NSW, Australia New York, NY, USA Sydney, NSW, Australia New York, NY, USA December 10, 2015 Carl Chiarella Willi Semmler Chi-Ying Hsiao Lebogang Mateane Acknowledgements The following material **and** journal articles have been used as foundations for various chapters of the book The chapters have to some extent been reworked in the light of new developments in their subject areas **and** are not necessarily identical in their titles to the ones of the original papers We thank the editors **and** publishers of this material for the permission of reusing it in this book • Chap 4: Semmler, W., L Gruene **and** L Oehrlein (2009), **Dynamic** Consumption **and** **Portfolio** **Decisions** with Time Varying **Asset** Returns, Journal of Wealth Management, vol 12, no • Chap 5: Semmler, W **and** C-Y Hsiao (2009), **Dynamic** Consumption **and** **Portfolio** **Decisions** with Low Frequency Movements of **Asset** Returns, Journal of Wealth Management, vol 14, no 2: 101-111 • Chap 6: Semmler, W., ”Dynamic Consumption **and** **Portfolio** **Decisions** with Estimated Low Frequency Movements of **Asset** Returns **and** Labor Income”, Journal of Wealth Management, vol 14, no 2:101-111, 2012 • Chap 7: Some of this material has been published in the edited volume “Financial Econometrics Modeling – derivatives pricing, hedge fund **and** term structure models”, MacMillan vii Contents Introduction 1.1 Institutions, Models **and** Empirics 1.2 **Dynamic** Programming as Solution Method 1.3 Previous Work 1.4 Outline **and** Results Forecasting **and** Low Frequency Movements of **Asset** Returns 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Limits on Forecasting **Asset** Returns 2.3 The Use of Periodic Returns 2.4 Conclusions 9 14 17 **Portfolio** Modeling with Sustainability Constraints 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Mean-Variance **Portfolio** Models 3.3 Description of Statistical Properties of Returns Data 3.3.1 Computing Expected Real Returns on Risky Assets 3.3.2 Variance-Covariance **and** Correlation Matrices **and** Volatility of Real Returns 3.3.3 Eigenvalue **and** Eigenvector Properties of the Empirical Covariance **and** Correlation Matrix 3.4 Estimation Results of the **Portfolio** Models 3.5 Conclusion Appendix 19 19 21 27 27 33 37 47 48 **Dynamic** Saving **and** **Portfolio** Decisions-Theory 4.1 Introduction 4.2 The Model with One **Asset** **and** Constant Returns 4.2.1 Numerical Results for the Benchmark Model 4.2.2 Variation of Risk Aversion, Returns **and** Discount Rate 53 53 53 55 57 30 ix 174 **Asset** **Accumulation** **and** **Portfolio** **Decisions** Under Inflation Risk Using the definition of 0D r in (8.18) we rewrite the equation above as d Brr / C Brr /Är rt d d 2 C Ar / Brr /.Är r r gr / C gr Brr / : d (8.72) Since rt is a stochastic process, the equation above holds if **and** only if d Ar / d d Brr / C Brr /Är D ; d 2 Brr /.Är r r gr / C gr Brr / D : (8.73) (8.74) Then, Brr / is solved as (8.29) **and** Ar / is solved as (8.30) The first part the model is of a multi-factor Gaussian model The solution is similar to the second part The solution process can be found, for example, in Brigo **and** Mercurio (2001) t u Proof of Property 8.2 Without loss of generality we set Q D Let O t be the factor when its mean is set to be zero The shifted factor t is obtained by t D O t C Let An / Bnr /, **and** Bn / be the coefficients in (8.28), (8.26) **and** (8.27) based on the factor O t of zero mean Let An /, Bnr /, **and** Bn / be those coefficients based on the factor t with the mean The shift change does not change the mean-reverting parameters (Är **and** Ä ) Also the market prices of risk rt **and** t remain the same Let tO D lO0 C lO1 O t be the market price of risk for Wt Because tO D t D l0 C l1 t , we have lO1 D l1 **and** lO0 D l0 C l1 Therefore, Bnr / D Bnr /, Bn / D Bn / due to the formulas (8.26) **and** (8.27) **And** An / An / D ÄQ D Bn / g l1 C Ä ÄQ Bn / C 0; /C 0 due to the formula (8.28), where the relation ÄQ D Ä C g l1 is used Using the transformations above, the nominal bond yield based on the shifted factor t is calculated by Yn t; T/ D D D An / An / An / C C C Bnr / rt C Bn / Bnr / rt C Bn / C Bn / t Ot C C Bnr / C rt C : Bn / Ot C Appendix 175 If the last bracket is equal to zero, meaning C D 0 ; then the nominal yield based on the shifted factor factor O t t is equivalent to that on the t u Proof of Property 8.3 We aim to prove rt D limT#t Yr t; T/ Taking t D T in (8.20) we have I t; 0/ D r t; 0/ C t Subtracting (8.23) at D by (8.24) we have I t; 0/ D rt C t Therefore we obtain r t; 0/ D rt Taking D in (8.18) we know r t; 0/ D A0r 0/ C B0rr 0/rt Therefore lim Yr t; T/ D A0r 0/ C B0rr 0/rt D rt T#t t u holds Proof of Property 8.5 The proof utilizes the technique of solving HLB equation (8) in Liu (2007) to solve the HJB equation (8.52) in this paper We map the terms in the HJB equations as specified in the following table The key point that we can apply Liu’s solution technique here is that with the addition terms due to the price uncertainty the HJB equation (8.52) still falls in Liu’s quadratic **asset** return class We map the terms in our HJB equation (8.52) to Liu’s HJB equation (8) **and** show that all terms satisfy Liu’s conditions defined through his Eqs (9)–(11) **and** (13)–(17) in Liu (2007) Terms in Liu’s equation (8) fO (a) (b) (c) ˙X˙X > X ˙X ˙ r/ Terms in Eq (8.52) ˚ Liu’s condition Gt RXX G> t Ft Gt RXA RAA ˙t Liu’s equation (10) Liu’s equation (9) Liu’s equation (15) /2 (d) (e) ˙X˙X 2 > > ˙X >˙X r/> ˙˙ > / r/ 1 1 r t Rt 1/ Gt RXA RAA RAI I /Gt RXI I RXX RXA RAA RAX t Rt 1/> ˙t RAA ˙t> / 2 C (f) 1 2 Rt 1/ Liu’s equation (16) Liu’s equation (14) /3 I RIA RAA RAI >˙ > 1R 1R R 1/ t t AI I AA t 2 I C I /2 Rt t) Liu’s equation (13) Our term in the mapping (a) satisfies Liu’s condition equation (10) where Â h0 D g2r gr g r gr g g2 Ã r ; h D ; h D ; Á D I2 : Our term in the mapping (b) satisfies Liu’s condition equation (9) where (8.75) 176 **Asset** **Accumulation** **and** **Portfolio** **Decisions** Under Inflation Risk Â Är r kD Ä Ã Â Är ; K2 D ; Á D I2 ; KO D K : ; KD Ä Ã (8.76) O h1 **and** h2 in Eqs (8.76) **and** (8.75) satisfy Liu’s condition equation The K, Á, K, (11) Our term in the mapping (c) is rewritten into Gt D Gt RXA RAA ˙t C rt C 1000 B B l0 C l1 t C B C A 0100 @ I ! /2 Rt 1/ t RXA RAA RAI rI ! C 1000 B B IC B C 0100 @1A /2 S D Gt D C rt l0 C l1 t 1 gr gr gr g l0 ! ! C I I ! I / rI I I sI ! / C I rI // I I rI I /RXI I gr 0 g l1 ! I ! rt : t Map it to Liu’s equation (15) we have Â gr g0 D g l0 gr gr Ã I rI I I Â Ã gr ; g1 D ; Á D I2 ; gO D g1 ; g2 D 0: g l1 (8.77) For mapping (d) our term RXX RXA RAA1 RAX is equal zero It is because the risks Wt in the **asset** returns in (8.39) include the risks WXt in the factor dynamics (8.36) Map it to Liu’s equation (16) we have l0 D ; l1 D ; l2 D ; Á D I2 : (8.78) For mapping (e) we rewrite our term first with ˙t t Rt 1/ D C 1X ; X WD Â Ã rt t based on Eq (8.40) **and** /3 2 I RIA RAA RAI 2 I C I D 2 I : 8.6 Conclusions 177 Now rewriting the term in mapping (3) using the results above D C 2 > 1 X/ RAA C > RAA 2 > RAA C 1X C C X/ 2 2 I /X : /2 C > 1 X/ RAA RAI I /2 I C X> I I > 1 RAA Map it to Liu’s equation (14) we have H0 D H1 D > RAA > RAA C I 2.1 ; H2 D / (8.79) I I > 1 RAA ; Á D I2 : Using Eq (8.32) to rewrite our term in mapping (f) **and** mapping it to Liu’s equation (13), we have ı0 D I I ; ı1 D Â Ã ; ı2 D ; Á D I2 : (8.80) The g1 , Á, gO , g2 , l1 **and** l2 in Eqs (8.77)–(8.79) satisfy the restriction Liu’s restriction in Eq (17) Then we apply Eqs (18)–(20) in Liu (2007) with D T t then we obtain the results (8.54)–(8.56) t u Proof of Property 8.7 For proving this property we just need to insert the following results: Bn / Bnr / Brr /Bnr / gr D g D ID B Bn / C Bnr / Brr /Bnr / B 0C > g D g D D B C r I ˙t / D B C 0 @ A I 0 S with Â Bnr / Bnr / D WD det Bn / Bn / 10 B0 1C C RAA1 RAX D B @0 0A ; 00 Ã ; B 0C C RAA1 RAI D B @1A ; (8.81) **and** the result of the factor elasticity in Property 8.6 into Eq (8.51) t u Chapter Concluding Remarks In this book we have combined theoretical **and** empirical work to study the issue of **sustainable** **asset** **accumulation** **and** **dynamic** **portfolio** **decisions** We mostly considered **asset** income but frequently included labor income in **portfolio** modeling in order to explore important issues regarding pension **and** retirement funds as well as wealth disparities Empirically, most chapters used actual US time series data to estimate the low frequency components of **asset** returns **and** labor income After fitting the US time series data to low frequency components in returns, our numerical procedure was used to solve for **dynamic** consumption **and** **asset** allocation **decisions** To some extent, we followed Campbell **and** Viceira (2002) **and** explored **dynamic** **asset** **accumulation** **and** allocation **decisions** for varying return, varying risk aversion, varying time horizon across investors, **and** for varying initial conditions As discussed in this book, our method appears to be more accurate than the method proposed by Campbell **and** Viceira (2002) The optimal saving decisions, the allocation of assets, investors’ wealth **and** welfare can be explored without linearization techniques The impact of varying return, risk aversion, time horizons **and** initial wealth differentials across investors on the dynamics of **asset** allocation **and** the evolution of wealth were traced We observed that there are cyclical movements in wealth **accumulation** as well as well upward **and** downward trends, depending on risk aversion, discount rates, the size of labor income, the saving rate **and** the size of the **asset** returns, as well as initial conditions This allowed us to study the extent to which financial markets could contribute to a secular rise in wealth disparity Wealth disparity, at least in terms of financial wealth, seems to arise not only from higher **asset** returns, lower risk aversion **and** discount rates, but also higher labor income, higher saving rates, **and** better access to leveraging The **dynamic** **portfolio** decision models presented here also allow for on-line decision updating as information on low frequency **asset** returns **and** labor income © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 C Chiarella et al., **Sustainable** **Asset** **Accumulation** **and** **Dynamic** **Portfolio** Decisions, **Dynamic** Modeling **and** Econometrics in Economics **and** Finance 18, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-49229-1_9 179 180 Concluding Remarks data evolves This suggests a practical method to rebalance portfolios as new information on returns **and** labor income are available The method is set up in such a way so as to help various types of institutions **and** investors to make optimal pension **and** retirement fund **decisions** As mentioned, more should be done on behavioral models of **asset** **accumulation** **and** allocation, though other authors have already begun to undertake this work.1 Specifically, more work should be pursued on socially **and** environmentally responsible investments To this end, Chap provides a method to undertake investment **decisions** with restrictions such as social, ethical **and** environmental guidelines, rules, **and** constraints concerning risk taking or safeness of investments Those rules **and** guidelines are likely to have considerable impact on not only a static mean-variance portfolio, but also on an intertemporal **portfolio** model through, for example, risk aversion or other behavioral parameters Most chapters employed models built on an infinite horizon decision making framework, as is common in this area But the limits of intertemporal modeling **and** the practicality of it have been laid out carefully Moreover, modeling **and** solution procedures could be more flexible **and** consider finite time **decisions** problems **and** solve such models for shorter time horizons Examples of this are given in Chappe **and** Semmler (2016), in which finite horizon model variants with changing behavior are discussed.2 Such models are open to wide behavioral interpretation since neither the objective functions nor the investment decision reaching it need to be fixed They be fixed only over a short planning horizon We can allow agents to switch objective function **and** investment strategies over the longer horizon as new challenges emerge In particular, as shown in Chappe **and** Semmler (2016), the NMPC solution method based on Grüne et al (2015), is quite flexible to permit such studies It allows for learning when knowledge of the agents is insufficient **and** needs to be improved along the paths Also, it might be that trajectories can become unstable, leading to deteriorations Agents can then switch behavior **and** one can allow for self-corrections so that after switching the behavior becomes more stabilizing and/or the targets are achieved through other means Finally, we also want to note that there can be extensive positive **and** negative externalities from the social behavior of agents in financial markets Social interactions can manifest itself as swarm **and** synchronized behavior, but also as behavior taking into account social interactions in preferences, **and** the impact of social norms, band wagon effects, imitations, learning **and** macro-level effects Many of those important aspects of behavior in **asset** markets could be built into such models, as proposed here, which should be the subject of future research See Grüne **and** Semmler (2008), **and** Zhang **and** Semmler (2009) In this work the nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) technique is used Appendix A **Dynamic** Programming as Solution Method We here briefly describe the **dynamic** programming algorithm as applied in Grüne **and** Semmler (2004) that enables us to numerically solve our **dynamic** model variants The feature of the **dynamic** programming algorithm is an adaptive discretization of the state space which leads to high numerical accuracy with moderate use of memory Such algorithm is applied to discounted infinite horizon optimal control problems of the type introduced for the study of the global dynamics In our model variants we have to numerically compute V.x/ for Z V.x/ D max u e Ât f x; u/dt s.t xP D g.x; u/ where u represents a vector of control variables **and** x a vector of state variables which represents, in our case, wealth **accumulation** **and** a time index In the first step, the continuous time optimal control problem has to be replaced by a first order discrete time approximation given by Vh x/ D max Jh x; u/; Jh x; u/ D h j X C Âh/O{ f xh i/; ui / (A.1) iD0 where xu is defined by the discrete dynamics xh 0/ D x; xh i C 1/ D xh i/ C hg.xi ; ui / (A.2) **and** h > is the discretization time step Note that j D ji /i2N0 here denotes a discrete control sequence © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 C Chiarella et al., **Sustainable** **Asset** **Accumulation** **and** **Dynamic** **Portfolio** Decisions, **Dynamic** Modeling **and** Econometrics in Economics **and** Finance 18, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-49229-1 181 182 A **Dynamic** Programming as Solution Method The optimal value function is the unique solution of a discrete Hamilton-JacobiBellman equation such as Vh x/ D maxfhf x; uo / C C Âh/Vh xh 1//g j (A.3) where xh 1/ denotes the discrete solution corresponding to the control **and** initial value x after one time step h Abbreviating Th Vh /.x/ D maxfhf x; uo / C C Âh/Vh xh 1//g j (A.4) the second step of the algorithm now approximates the solution on a grid covering a compact subset of the state space, i.e a compact interval Œ0; K in our setup Denoting the nodes of by xi ; i D 1; : : : ; P, we are now looking for an approximation Vh satisfying Vh xi / D Th Vh /.xi / (A.5) for each node xi of the grid, where the value of Vh for points x which are not grid points (these are needed for the evaluation of Th ) is determined by linear interpolation We refer to the paper cited above for the description of iterative methods for the solution of (A.5) Note that an approximately optimal control law (in feedback form for the discrete dynamics) can be obtained from this approximation by taking the value j x/ D j for j realizing the maximum in (A.3), where Vh is replaced by Vh This procedure in particular allows the numerical computation of approximately optimal trajectories In order the distribute the nodes of the grid efficiently, we make use of a posteriori error estimation For each cell Cl of the grid we compute Ál WD max j Th Vh /.k/ k2cl Vh k/ j More precisely we approximate this value by evaluating the right hand side in a number of test points It can be shown that the error estimators Ál give upper **and** lower bounds for the real error (i.e., the difference between Vj **and** Vh ) **and** hence serve as an indicator for a possible local refinement of the grid It should be noted that this adaptive refinement of the grid is very effective for computing steep value functions **and** models with non-differential value functions **and** multiple equilibria, see Grüne **and** Semmler (2004) Bibliography Ait-Sahalia, Y (1996) Testing continuous-time models of the spot interest rate The Review of Financial Studies, 9(2), 385–426 Ait-Sahalia, Y (1999) Transition densities for interest rate **and** other nonlinear diffusions Journal of Finance, 54(4), 1361–1395 Ait-Sahalia, Y (2002) Maximum likelihood estimation of discretely sampled diffusions: A closedform approximation approach Econometrica, 70, 223–262 Altug, P., & Labadie, S (2008) **Asset** pricing for **dynamic** economies Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Amini, S., Hudson, R., & Keasey, K (2010) Stock return predictability despite low autocorrelation Economics Letters, 108, 101–103 Andersen, T., & Lund, J (1997) Estimating continuous-time stochastic volatility models of the short-term interest rate Journal of Econometrics, 77, 343–377 Ang, A (2012) Mean-Variance Investing Columbia Business School Research Paper No 12/49, Columbia Business School - Finance **and** Economics, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Ang, A., & Bekaert, G (2007) Stock return predictability: Is it there? The Review of Financial Studies, 20(3), 651–707 Ang, A., Bekaert, G., & Wei, M (2008) The term structure of real rates **and** expected inflation Journal of Finance, 63(2), 797–849 Artis, M., Clavel, J G., Hoffmann, M., & Nachane, D (2007) Harmonic Regression Models: A Comparative Working Paper No 333, Univerisity of Zuerich, September 2007 Baz, J., Breedon, F., Naik, V., & Peress, J (2001) Optimal portfolios of foreign currencies: Trading on the forward bias The Journal of **Portfolio** Management, 28(1), 102–111 Beber, A., & Pagano, M (2013) Short-selling bans around the world: Evidence from the 2007–09 crisis Journal of Finance, 68(1), 343–381 Becker, S., Grüne, L., & Semmler, W (2007) Comparing second order approximation with **dynamic** programming Computational Economics, 30(1), 65–91 Bellman, R (1967) Introduction to the mathematical theory of control processes In R Bellman (Ed.), Mathematics in science **and** engineering (Vol 40) Academic Benhabib, J., Bisin, A., & Zhu, S (2014) The Wealth Distribution in Bewley Models with Investment Risk NBER Working Papers 20157, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc Bertsekas, D P (1999) Nonlinear programming (2nd ed.) Belmont, MA: Athena Scientific © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 C Chiarella et al., **Sustainable** **Asset** **Accumulation** **and** **Dynamic** **Portfolio** Decisions, **Dynamic** Modeling **and** Econometrics in Economics **and** Finance 18, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-49229-1 183 184 Bibliography Best, M J., & Grauer, R R (1991) On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in **asset** means: Some analytical **and** computational results The Review of Financial Studies, 4(2), 315–342 Black, F., & Litterman, R (1992) Global **portfolio** optimization Financial Analysts Journal, 48(5), 28–43 Blanchard, O (1985) Debt, deficit **and** finite horizon Journal of Political Economy, 93(2), 223– 247 Bollerslev, T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307–327 Bossaerts, P., & Hillian, P (1999) Implementing statistical criteria to select return forecasting models: What we learn The Review of Financial Studies, 12(2), 405–428 Bouchaud, J.-P., & Potters, M (2011) Financial applications of random matrix theory: A short review In G Akemann, J Baik, & P D Francesco (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of random matrix theory Oxford University Press Box, G., Jenkins, G., & Reinsel, G (1994) Time series analysis (3rd ed.) Prentice Hall Box, G., & Pierce, D (1970) Distribution of residual autocorrelations in autoregressive-integrated moving average time series models Journal of American Statistical Association, 65, 1509– 1526 Brandimarte, P (2006) Numerical methods in finance **and** economics: A MATLAB-based introduction (2nd ed.) Wiley Breiman, L (1973) Statistics Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Brenner, R., Harjes, R., & Kroner, K (1996) Another look at models of the short-term interest rate Journal of Financial **and** Quantitative Analysis, 31(1), 85–107 Brennan, M J., Schwartz, E., & Lagnado, R (1997) Strategic **asset** allocation Journal of Economic Dynamics **and** Control, 21, 1377–1403 Brennan, M J., & Xia, Y (2002) **Dynamic** **asset** allocation under inflation Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1201–1238 Brigo, D., & Mercurio, F (2001) Interest rate models, theory **and** practice Springer Brunnermeier, M., & Sannikov, Y (2014) A macroeconomic model with a financial sector American Economic Review, 104(2), 379–421 Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S Department of Commerce (2008) Wage **and** Salary Data, NIPA data Washington, DC Cagetti, M., & De Nardi, M (2006) Entrepreneurship, frictions, **and** wealth Journal of Political Economy, 114(5), 835–870 Campbell, J Y (1993) Intertemporal **asset** pricing without consumption data The American Economic Review, 83(3), 487–512 Campbell, J Y., & Koo, H K (1997) A comparison of numerical **and** analytic approximate solutions to an intertemporal consumption choice problem Journal of Economic Dynamics **and** Control, 21, 273–295 Campbell, J., & Shiller, R (1989) The dividend price ratio **and** expectations of future dividends **and** discount factors Review of Financial Studies, 1, 195–228 Campbell, J Y., & Thompson, S B (2008) Predicting the equity premium out of sample: Can anything beat the historical average Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), 1509–1531 Campbell, J Y., & Viceira, L M (1999) Consumption **and** **portfolio** **decisions** when expected returns are time varying The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2), 433–495 Campbell, J Y., & Viceira, L M (2001) Who should buy long term bonds American Economic Review, 9, 99–127 Campbell, J Y., & Viceira, L M (2002) Strategic **asset** allocation: **Portfolio** choice for long-term investors Clarendon lectures in economics Oxford University Press Carroll, C., Slacalek, J., & Tokuoka, K (2014) The Distribution of Wealth **and** the Marginal Propensity to Consume Working Paper Series 1655, European Central Bank Chan, K., Karolyi, G., Longstaff, F., & Sanders, A (1992) An empirical comparison of alternative models of the short-term interest rate Journal of Finance, 47(3), 1209–1227 Bibliography 185 Chappe, R., & Semmler, W (2016) Disparity in wealth **accumulation** – a financial market approach SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2727819 Chen, W.-P., Chung, H., Ho, K.-Y., & Hsu, T.-L (2010) **Portfolio** optimization model **and** meanvariance spanning tests Handbook of quantitative finance **and** risk management (pp 165–184) New York: Springer Chiarella, C., He, X.-Z & Nikitopoulos, C S (2015) Derivative security pricing techniques, methods **and** applications Berlin: Springer Chiu, S (1989) Detecting period components in a white Gaussian time series Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52(2), 249–259 Cochrane, J (2001) **Asset** pricing Princeton University Press Cochrane, J (2006) Financial markets **and** the real economy Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Cox, J C., & Huang, C F (1989) Optimal consumption **and** **portfolio** policies when **asset** prices follow a diffusion process Journal of Economic Theory, 49, 33–83 Cox, J., Ingersoll, J., & Ross, S (1985a) An intertemporal general equilibrium model of **asset** prices Econometrica, 53(2), 363–384 Cox, J., Ingersoll, J., & Ross, S (1985b) A theory of the term structure of interest rates Econometrica, 53(2), 385–407 Dacunha-Castelle, D., & Florens-Zmirou, D (1986) Estimation of the coefficients of a diffusion from discrete observations Stochastics, 19, 263–284 Dai, Q., & Singleton, K (2003) Term structure dynamics in theory **and** reality Review of Financial Studies, 16(3), 631–678 Daly, J., Crane., M., & Ruskin, H J (2008) Random matrix theory filters in **portfolio** optimisation: A stability **and** risk assessment Physica A: Statistical Mechanics **and** Its Applications, 387(16– 17), 4248–4260 Daly, J., Crane., M., & Ruskin, H J (2010) Random matrix theory filters **and** currency **portfolio** optimisation Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 221, 012003 Danthine, J.-P., & Donaldson, J B (2005) Intermediate financial theory Advanced finance series (2nd ed.) Academic Dechow, P M., Hutton, A P., Meulbroek, L., & Sloan, R G (2001) Short-sellers, fundamental analysis **and** stock returns Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 77–106 de Jong, F (2000) Time series **and** cross-section information in affine term structure models Journal of Business **and** Economic Statistics, 18(3), 300–314 Diebold, F.X., Rudebusch, G.D., & Auroba, S.B (2006) The macroeconomy **and** the yield curve: a **dynamic** latent factor approach Journal of Econometrics, 131, 309–338 Dornbusch, R (1980) Exchange Rate Risk **and** the Macroeconomics of Exchange Rate Determination NBER Working Paper No 493 Duffie, D., & Glynn, P (2004) Estimation of continuous time Markov processes sampled at random time intervals Econometrica, 72, 1773–1808 Durbin, J (1970) Testing for serial correlation in least-squares regression when some of the regressors are lagged dependent variables Biometrika, 38, 410–421 Eggertsson, G., & Mehrotra, N (2014) A Model of Secular Stagnation NBER Working Paper 20574 http://www.nber.org/papers/w20574 Elerian, O (1998) A note on the existence of a closed form conditional transition density for the Milstein scheme http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/users/elerian/milpaper.pdf Engle, R F (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation Econometrica, 50(4), 987–1007 Fabozzi, F J., Kolm, P N., Pachamanova, D., & Focardi, S M (2007) Robust **portfolio** optimization **and** management New York: Wiley Fama, E F (1965) Random walks in stock market prices? Financial Analysts Journal, 21(5), 55–59 Feldstein, M., & Liebman, J B (2001) Social Security NBER Working Paper No 8451 Ferreira, M A., & Santa-Clara, P (2011) Forecasting stock market returns: The sum of the parts is more than the whole Journal of Financial Economics, 100(2011), 514–537 186 Bibliography Frahm, G., & Jaekel, U (2008) Random matrix theory **and** robust covariance matrix estimation for financial data arXiv:physics/0503007v1 [physics.soc.ph] Gallant, A., & Tauchen, G (1996) Which moments to match Econometric Theory, 12, 657–681 Gallant, A., & White, H (1990) A unified theory of estimation **and** inference for nonlinear **dynamic** system Journal of Economic Literature, 28(1), 90–92 Ghilarducci (2008), When I’m sixty-four: The plot against pensions **and** the plan to save them Princeton University Press Ghysels, E., & Osborn, D R (2001) The economic analysis of seasonal time series Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A., & Renault, E (1993) Indirect inference Journal of Applied Econometrics, 8, 85–118 Goyal, A., & Welch, I (2003) Predicting the equity premium with dividend ratios Management Science Informs, 49(5), 639–654 Green, R C., & Hollifield, B (1992) When will mean-variance efficient portfolios be well diversified? Journal of Finance, 47(5), 1785–1809 Greene, W H (2011) Econometric Analysis (7th ed.) Prentice Hall Grüne, L., (1997) An adaptive grid scheme for discrete Hamilton Jacobi-Bellman equations Numerical Mathematics, 79, 319–337 Grüne, L., & Semmler, W (2004) Using **dynamic** programming with adaptive grid scheme for optimal control problems in economics Journal of Economic Dynamics **and** Control, 28, 2427– 2456 Grüne, L., & Semmler, W (2007) **Asset** pricing with **dynamic** programming Computational Economics, 29(3–4), 233–265 Grüne, L., & Semmler, W (2008) **Asset** pricing with loss aversion Journal of Economic Dynamics **and** Control, 32(10), 3253–3274 Grüne, L., Semmler, W., & Stieler, M (2015) Using NMPC for solving **dynamic** decision problems in economics Journal of Economic Dynamics **and** Control, 60, 112–133 Hall, R (2010), Forward-looking decision making: **Dynamic** programming models applied to health, risk, employment, **and** financial stability Princeton University Press Hamilton, J D (1994) Time series analysis Princeton: Princeton University Press Hansen, L., & Scheinkman, J (1995) Back to the future: Generating moment implications for continuous-time Markov processes Econometrica, 63(4), 767–804 Harvey, C R., Liechty, J C., Liechty, M W., & Müller, P (2010) **Portfolio** selection with higher moments Quantitative Finance, 10(5), 469–485 Hsiao, C Y (2006) Intertemporal **Asset** Allocation Under Inflation Risk (Ph.D thesis) Bielefeld University, Germany http://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/publication/2305881 Hsiao, C.-Y., & Semmler, W (2009) Harmonic Analysis of Long Run Financial Data Working Paper http://www.newschool.edu/nssr/cem/papers/wp/financial/HsiaoSemmlerHarmonicFit pdf Jacoby, S (2008) Finance **and** Labor: Risk **and** Inequality University of Berkeley, Working Paper http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/management-and-organizations/facultyjacoby-research Jarrow, R., & Yildirim, Y (2003) Pricing treasury inflation protected securities **and** related derivations using an HJM model Journal of Financial **and** Quantitative Analysis, 38(2), 337– 358 Jones, C M., & Lamont, O A (2002) Short-sale constraints **and** stock returns Journal of Financial Economics, 66, 207–239 Jorion, P (1994) Mean/variance analysis of currency overlays Financial Analysts Journal, 50(3), 48–56 Kamien, M., & Schwarz, N (1997) **Dynamic** optimization: The calculus of variations **and** optimal control in economics **and** management New York/Amsterdam: Elsevier Karatzas, I., & Shreve, S (1991) Brownian motion **and** stochastic calculus New York: Springer Kauermann, G., Semmler, W., & Krivobokova, T (2011) Filtering time series with penalized splines Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics **and** Econometrics, 15, 21–26 Bibliography 187 Kim, T S., & Omberg, E (1996) **Dynamic** nonmyopic **portfolio** behavior The Review of Financial Studies, 9(1), 141–161 Kloeden, P E., & Platen, E (1992) Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations Berlin: Springer Koedijk, K., Nissen, F., Schotman, P., & Wolff, C (1997) The dynamics of short-term interest rate volatility European Finance Review, 1, 105–130 Kolm, P N., Tütüncü, R., & Fabozzi, F J (2014) 60 years of **portfolio** optimization: Practical challenges **and** current trends European Journal of Operational Research, 234, 356–371 Kotlikoff, L., & Burns, S (2005) The coming generational storm: What you need to know about America’s economic future Cambridge: MIT Press Kumhof, M., Ranciere, R., & Winant, P (2015) Inequality, leveraging **and** crises American Economic Review, 105(3), 1217–45 Laloux, L., Cizeau, P., Bouchaud, J.-P., & Potters, M (1999) Noise dressing of financial correlation matrices Physical Review Letters, 83(7), 1467 Laloux, L., Cizeau, P., Bouchaud, J.-P., & Potter, M (2000) Random matrix theory **and** financial correlations International Journal of Theoretical **and** Applied Finance, 3(3), 391–397 Lettau, M., & Ludvigson, S (2001) Consumption, aggregate wealth **and** expected stock returns Journal of Finance, 54(3), 815–849 Lettau, M., & Ludvigson, S (2005) Expected returns **and** expected dividend growth Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 583–626 Lettau, M., & van Nieuwerburgh, S (2008) Reconciling the return predictability evidence Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), 1607–1652 Liu, J (2007) **Portfolio** selection in stochastic environments The Review of Financial Studies, 20(1), 1–39 Lo, A (1988) Maximum likelihood estimation of generalized Itô processes with discretely sampled data Econometric Theory, 4, 231–247 Lo, W A., & MacKinlay, A C (1988) Stock market prices not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test The Review of Financial Studies, 1(1), 41–66 Lütkepohl, H (2005) New introduction to multiple time series analysis Berlin: Springer Markowitz, H (1952) **Portfolio** selection Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91 Markowitz, H (2010), **Portfolio** theory: As I still see it The Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2(1), 1–23 Markowitz, H (2014) Mean-variance approximations to expected utility European Journal of Operational Research, 234, 346–355 Merton, R C (1971) Optimum consumption **and** **portfolio** rules in a continuous time model Journal of Economic Theory, 23, 373–413 Merton, R C (1973) An intertemporal **asset** pricing model Econometrica, 41(5), 867–887 Merton, R C (1990) Continuous time finance Oxford: Blackwell Milanovic, B (2010) Worlds apart Measuring international **and** global inequality Princeton: Princeton University Press Modigliani, F (1976) Individual thrift, life cycle, **and** the wealth of nation American Economic Review, 76(3), 297–313 Munk, C., Soerensen, C., & Nygaard Vinther, T (2004) **Dynamic** **asset** allocation under meanreverting returns, stochastic interest rates, **and** inflation uncertainty: Are popular recommendations consistent with rational behavior? International Review of Economics **and** Finance, 13, 141–166 Nell, E., & Semmler, W (1991) Nicholas Kaldor **and** Mainstream Economics: Confrontation **and** Convergence Essays from the Kaldor Conference London: Macmillan Øksendal, B (2000) Stochastic differential equations (6th ed.) Berlin: Springer Pafka, S., & Kondor, I (2002) Noisy covariance matrices **and** **portfolio** optimization The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter **and** Complex Systems, 27(2), 277–280 Pafka, S., & Kondor, I (2004) Estimated correlation matrices **and** **portfolio** optimization Physica A: Statistical Mechanics **and** its Applications, 343, 623–634 188 Bibliography Perdersen, A (1995) A new approach to maximum likelihood estimation for stochastic differential equations based on discrete observations Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 22, 55–71 Piketty, T (2014) Capital in the twenty-first century Boston: Harvard University Press Plerou, V., Gopikrishnan, P., Rosenow, B., Amaral, L A N., & Stanley, H E (1999) Universal **and** non-universal properties of cross correlations in financial time series Physical Review Letters, 83(7), 1471 Plerou, V., Gopikrishnan, P., Rosenow, B., Amaral, L A N., & Stanley, H E (2000) Econophysics: Financial time series from a statistical physics point of view Physica A: Statistical Mechanics **and** Its Applications, 279(1), 443–456 Plerou, V., Gopikrishnan, P., Rosenow, B., Amaral, L A N., & Stanley, H E (2001) Collective behavior of stock price movements - A random matrix theory approach Physica A: Statistical Mechanics **and** Its Applications, 299(1), 175–180 Rapach, D E., & Zhou, G (2013, July) Forecasting stock returns In Handbooks of economic forecasting (Vol 2, in press) Elsevier Ratner, M (1992) **Portfolio** diversification **and** the inter-temporal stability of international stock indices Global Finance Journal, 3(1), 67–77 Richard, S F (1978) An arbitrage model of the term structure of interest rates Journal of Financial Economics, 6, 33–57 Semmler, W (2011) **Asset** prices, booms **and** recessions Heidelberg, NY: Springer Publishing House Semmler, W., Grüne, L., & Öhrlein, L (2009) **Dynamic** consumption **and** **portfolio** **decisions** with time varying **asset** returns Journal of Wealth Management, 12(3), 5–47 Semmler, W., & Hsiao, C.-Y (2011) **Dynamic** consumption **and** **portfolio** **decisions** with low frequency movements of **asset** returns The Journal of Wealth Management, 14(2), 101–111 Sharifi, S., Crane, M., Shamaie, A., & Ruskin, H (2004) Random matrix theory for **portfolio** optimization: A stability approach Physica A: Statistical Mechanics **and** its Applications, 353(3), 629–643 Shiller, R (2012) Finance **and** the Good Society Princeton: Princeton University Press Shiller, R (2014) Online data Robert Shiller http://www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller/data.htm Shoji, I., & Ozaki, T (1997) Comparative study of estimation methods for continuous time stochastic processes Journal of Time Series Analysis, 18(5), 485–506 Shoji, I., & Ozaki, T (1998) Estimation for nonlinear stochastic differential equations by local linearization method Stochastic Analysis **and** Applications, 16(4), 733–752 Shoven, J., & Slavov, S (2006) Political Risk **and** Social Security NBER Working Paper No 12135 Stein, J (2012) Stochastic optimal control **and** the US financial debt crisis New York: Springer Stock J., & Watson, M (1999) Business cycle fluctuations **and** U.S macroeconomic times series In Handbook of macroeconomics (Vol 1, pp 3–64) North Holland Tobin, J (1958) Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk The Review of Economic Studies, 25(2), 65–86 Thompson, S (2002) Evaluating the Goodness of Fit of Conditional Distributions, with an Application to Affine Term Structure Models Working Paper, Harvard University Tsay, R S (2005) Analysis of financial time series (2nd ed.) Wiley series in probability **and** statistics Wiley Vasicek, O (1977) An equilibrium characterization of the term structure Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 177–188 Viciera, L (2001) Optimal **portfolio** choice for long-horizon investors with nontradable labor income Journal of Finance, 56(2), 433–470 Wachter, J (2002) **Portfolio** **and** consumption **decisions** under mean-reverting returns: An exact solution for complete markets Journal of Financial **and** Quantitative Analysis, 37(1), 63–91 Wachter, J (2003) Risk aversion **and** allocation to long-term bonds Journal of Economic Theory, 112, 325–333 Welch, I., & Goyal, A (2008) A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), 1455–1508 Bibliography 189 Wolff, E (2013) The **Asset** Price Meltdown **and** the Wealth of the Middle Class NBER Working Paper No 18559 Woolridge, J R., & Dickinson, A (1994) Short selling **and** common stock prices Financial Analysts Journal, 50(1), 20–28 Zhang, W., & Semmler, W (2009) Prospect theory for the stock markets: empirical evidence with time-series data Journal of Economic Behavior **and** Organization, 72, 835–849 Zhou, G (2010) How much stock return predictability can we expect from an **asset** pricing model? Economics Letters, 108, 184–186 ... market, wealth accumulation and disparity See Ghilarducci (2008) © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 C Chiarella et al., Sustainable Asset Accumulation and Dynamic Portfolio Decisions, Dynamic. .. introduced in asset accumulation and allocation decisions Savings and asset allocation decisions are long-horizon decisions and expected inflation rates have to be properly taken into account in dynamic. .. al., Sustainable Asset Accumulation and Dynamic Portfolio Decisions, Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance 18, DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-49229-1_2 10 Forecasting and Low Frequency

- Xem thêm -
Xem thêm: Sustainable asset accumulation and dynamic portfolio decisions , Sustainable asset accumulation and dynamic portfolio decisions , 1 Institutions, Models and Empirics, 3 Dynamic Consumption and Portfolio Decisions: Two Assets and Time Varying Returns, 3 Business Cycles, Asset Returns and Labor Income