The big picture marcoeconomics 12e parkin chapter 13

12 15 0
  • Loading ...
1/12 trang

Thông tin tài liệu

Ngày đăng: 16/04/2018, 10:29

W H AT I S E C O N O M I C S ? 19 C h a p t e r 13 FISCAL POLICY The Big Picture Where we have been: This chapter extensively uses the aggregate supply-aggregate demand model introduced in Chapter 10 It also makes use of Chapter 11’s discussion of multipliers The material on the labor market and potential GDP from Chapter is important when discussing the supply-side effects of fiscal policy Where we are going: Chapter 14 on monetary policy completes the material on macroeconomic stabilization policies N e w i n t h e Tw e l f t h E d i t i o n This chapter is rich with data, which has all been updated to 2014 The At Issue section has updated content while it continues to have President Obama and Paul Ryan’s contrasting policy suggestions The Economics in the News feature at the end of the chapter discusses a 2014 article on Japan’s challenges with its debt and deficit The Worked Problem explores the short-run and long-run consequences on economic growth and other variables of an increase in infrastructural expenditure and a decrease in taxes The AD-SAS model is used to answer the questions To include the new Worked Problem without lengthening the chapter, some problems have been removed from the Study Plan Problem and Applications These problems are still in the MyEconLab and are called Extra Problems 19 Lecture Notes Fiscal Policy   Fiscal policy refers to changes in government expenditure and taxes Fiscal policy impacts both aggregate supply and aggregate demand I The Federal Budget The annual statement of the outlays and receipts of the government of the United States together with the laws and regulations that approve and support those outlays and receipts make up the federal budget The use of the federal budget to achieve macroeconomic objectives such as full employment, sustained economic growth, and price level stability is called fiscal policy The Institutions and Laws   The President submits a budget proposal to Congress Congress debates, amends, and enacts the budget The budget operates within the framework of the Employment Act of 1946, which states: “… it is the continuing policy and responsibility of the Federal Government to use all practicable means … to coordinate and utilize all its plans, functions, and resources … to promote maximum employment, production, and purchasing power.” The Council of Economic Advisers monitors the economy and keeps the President and the public well informed about the current state of the economy and the best available forecasts of where it is heading Highlights of the 2015 Budget    Receipts come from four sources: personal income taxes ($1,505 billion), social security taxes ($1,176 billion), corporate income taxes ($537 billion), and indirect taxes and other receipts ($296 billion) Outlays are classified in three categories: transfer payments ($2,649 billion), expenditure on goods and services ($1,030 billion), and debt interest ($479 billion) Budget balance = Receipts – Outlays  If receipts exceed outlays, the government has a budget surplus  If outlays exceed receipts, the government has a budget deficit  If receipts equal outlays, the government has a balanced budget The U.S Budget in Historical Perspective and in Global Perspective    Since 1990, except between 1998 to 2001, the U.S government has had a budget deficit Government debt is the total amount that the government has borrowed A budget deficit adds to the government debt In 2014, all of the world’s major economies except Germany had a budget deficit The newly industrialized economies of Asia had the smallest deficits while Japan, the United States, the United Kingdom (in that order) had the largest deficits as a fraction of GDP The U.S deficit was about percent of GDP The At Issue detail presents arguments about different budget plans President Obama’s plan keeps the budget deficit constant at $500 billion through 2024, while Representative Paul Ryan’s plan would slash the deficit to $100 billion over the same time period Deficit and debt Many students need help with the distinction between the deficit and the debt (and with what happens to the debt when there is a surplus) Use the student loan or credit card analogy Explain that the budget balance (the deficit or surplus) is just like a personal budget balance (the amount that a student borrows or pays back during a given year) The debt—the total amount owed by the government—is like the balance on a FISCAL POLICY student loan or credit card account Students (usually) have a budget deficit and increasing debt And graduates with a job (usually) have a budget surplus and decreasing debt An interesting historical episode During the mid-1830s—a long time ago—the U.S government had virtually repaid all its debt At that time the government faced a problem that doesn’t occur today: it had a surplus and didn’t know what to with it The decision was made to transfer money to the state governments Each state was to receive $400,000 in four payments of $100,000 each The first three payments were made, but the last one was postponed because of a recession in 1837 that lowered the federal government’s revenue and then was never made In the 1970s, faced with a severe budget crunch, the State of New York sued to receive that last payment plus interest The state lost the suit and so the last payment probably will never be made! (You might remark that $100,000 invested in 1837 at the average interest rate would have accumulated to about $30 billion by 2015!) II Supply-Side Effects of Fiscal Policy The effects of fiscal policy on employment, potential GDP, and aggregate supply are known as supply-side effects The Effects of Taxes on Full Employment and Potential GDP      The labor market determines the full employment quantity of labor, which, together with the production function, determine potential GDP The equilibrium quantity of employment is determined in the labor market The first figure shows the labor market In the figure equilibrium employment is 250 billion hours per year This amount of employment is fullemployment The second figure shows the production function With employment of 250 billion hours, the production function shows that real GDP is $13 trillion An income tax decreases the supply of labor and shifts the supply of labor curve leftward In the top figure, the LS curve shifts leftward Because of the tax wedge, the level of employment decreases In the bottom figure the decrease in employment decreases potential GDP An income tax drives a tax wedge between the before-tax wage rate that firms pay and the after-tax wage rate that workers receive Other taxes, such as sales taxes, add to the tax wedge by effectively lowering the real wage rate Some Real World Tax Wedges … Does the Tax Wedge Matter? Tax wedges vary across countries, being much higher in France than in the United States According to supply-side economists such as Ed Prescott, the tax wedge has a large impact on 131 132 CHAPTER 13 potential GDP Potential GDP per person in France is 30 percent below that in the United States and Prescott asserts that the entire difference can be attributed to the difference in the countries’ tax wedges FISCAL POLICY Taxes and the Incentive to Save and Invest   A tax on interest income decreases the supply of saving and shifts the supply of loanable funds curve leftward The tax drives a wedge between the after-tax interest rate received by savers and the interest rate paid by firms The tax does not change the demand for loanable funds The figure shows the result: the real interest rate paid by borrowers rises (from percent to percent in the figure) and the equilibrium quantity of loanable funds and investment decrease The decrease in investment lowers the growth rate of potential GDP Tax Revenues and the Laffer Curve   The relationship between the tax rate and the amount of tax collected is called the Laffer curve The Laffer curve shows that at a high enough tax rate, an increase in tax rates decreases tax revenues Tax revenues decrease because individuals find ways to avoid the high taxes, including by working less Most economists believe that taxes have an effect on the supply of labor, but that in the U.S economy, the tax rate is low enough so that an increase in the tax rate increases tax revenues Laffer Curve and Napkins: Students get a kick out of the napkin roots of the Laffer Curve The story that Laffer himself cannot deny nor confirm is that he first drew the Laffer curve on a napkin during one of his first attempts to persuade someone of his supply side theory Draw the Laffer curve and ask what side of the curve are we on? Ask them what they think the highest tax rate was in the United States, they are usually shocked to learn that we had marginal rates in the 70% range as recently as the 1970 This a great discussion point on how high tax rates can deter work! Consumption Tax: Students enjoy exploring the controversial idea of abolishing the IRS in favor of a consumption tax Whether you agree with it or not, the Fairtax plan (Google Fairtax plan to find the website) covers many issues from this chapter and is an awesome way to bring together many of the topics from the course Students engage with the concept of a revenue neutral switch from our mixed tax system to 100% consumption tax I assign a short paper for them to investigate one of the many sub-topics within the plan The Economics in the News detail compares the U.S corporate tax rate with those in other countries and explores how the tax wedge affects the U.S loanable funds market III Generational Effects of Fiscal Policy Generational accounting is an accounting system that measures the lifetime tax burden and benefits of government programs to each generation Generational Accounting and Present Value To compare the costs and benefits that occur at different points in the future, which is necessary in generational accounting, the concept of present value is used A present value is an amount of money that, if invested today, will grow to equal a given future amount when the interest that it earns is taken into account Because there is uncertainty about the 133 134 CHAPTER 13 proper interest rate to use when calculating present values, plausible alternative numbers are used to estimate a range of present values The Social Security Time Bomb   Fiscal imbalance is the present value of the government’s commitments to pay benefits minus the present value of its tax revenues In 2014, the fiscal imbalance was estimated to be $68 trillion and growing by about $2 trillion every year The fiscal imbalance is high because of obligations under Social Security laws and Medicare There are four alternatives for redressing the fiscal imbalance: raise income taxes, raise Social Security taxes, cut Social Security benefits, or cut federal government discretionary spending But the changes needed would be severe It is estimated that income taxes would need to be raised by 69 percent; or Social Security taxes raised by 95 percent; or Social Security benefits cut by 56 percent Generational Imbalance Generational imbalance is the division of the fiscal imbalance between the current and future generations assuming that the current generation will enjoy the current levels of taxes and benefits It is estimated that the current generation will pay 83 percent of the fiscal imbalance and the future generations will pay 17 percent IV Fiscal Stimulus   A fiscal action that is initiated by an act of Congress is called discretionary fiscal policy A fiscal action that is triggered by the state of the economy is called automatic fiscal policy Automatic Fiscal Policy and Cyclical and Structural Budget Balances    Tax revenues and needs-tested spending change with the business cycle  The government sets tax rates As incomes vary with the business cycle, the tax revenue collected changes Tax revenue automatically falls in recessions and automatically rises in expansions  Government expenditure on programs that pay benefits to people and businesses depending on their economic status is called needs-tested spending Needs-tested spending automatically increases in a recession and automatically decreases in an expansion, helping to stabilize the economy Induced taxes and needs-tested spending mean that the federal budget deficit is counter-cyclical, with the deficit increasing in a recession and decreasing in an expansion The structural surplus or deficit is the budget balance that would occur if the economy were at full employment and real GDP were equal to potential GDP The cyclical surplus or deficit is the actual surplus or deficit minus the structural surplus or deficit  In 2014 the total U.S budget deficit was $0.64 trillion According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) the cyclical deficit was $0.18 trillion so the structural deficit was $0.46 trillion  The structural deficit skyrocketed after 2008 By their nature, automatic fiscal policy implies federal budget deficits in recessions as tax revenues fall and spending increases By contrast, balanced budget rules for state and local governments mean that these governments not conduct stabilizing fiscal policy In the 2008 recession, the sharp decline in state and local tax revenues meant that state spending programs had to be cut and, in some states, taxes raised Such policies are the opposite of the policies that can be used to help stabilize the business cycle FISCAL POLICY  Automatic fiscal policy helps stabilize the business cycle because it provides an automatic stimulus during a recession and an automatic contraction during an expansion Discretionary Fiscal Stimulus   The government expenditure multiplier is the quantitative effect of a change in government expenditure on real GDP An increase in government expenditure increases aggregate expenditures setting in motion the multiplier process The tax multiplier is the quantitative effect of a change in taxes on real GDP A decrease in taxes increases disposable income and hence consumption expenditure, setting in motion the multiplier process  The effect on aggregate demand from a tax cut is less than that from a similar sized increase in government expenditure A $1 tax cut generates less than a $1 increase in consumption expenditure since only a fraction (equal to the MPC) of the $1 increase in disposable income is spent on consumption expenditure 135 136 CHAPTER 13 Fiscal Stimulus   Expansionary fiscal policy (an increase in government expenditure or a decrease in taxes) seeks to eliminate a recessionary gap If timed correctly and of the correct magnitude, fiscal policy can be used to push the economy to potential GDP The figure shows the effect of expansionary fiscal policy on aggregate demand At the initial equilibrium, $15 trillion real GDP and price level of 110, there is a recessionary gap The expansionary policy increases aggregate demand and the multiplied effect shifts the AD curve rightward from AD0 to AD1 The recessionary gap is eliminated and the economy moves to its new equilibrium, $16 trillion real GDP (which equals potential GDP) and price level of 115 Fiscal Stimulus and Aggregate Supply The focus so far has been on only aggregate demand But fiscal policy also impacts aggregate supply  Government Expenditure: An increase in government expenditure increases the budget deficit The demand for loanable funds increases, so the real interest rate rises and investment is crowded out The decrease in investment offsets the expansionary effect from the increase in government expenditure The crowding-out effect is strong enough so that the government expenditure is less than  Tax Cut: A tax cut also has effects on aggregate supply A tax cut increases the supply of labor and the supply of loanable funds, both of which increase aggregate supply The supply-side effects make the tax multiplier larger than the government expenditure multiplier There is quite a bit of controversy about the size of the multipliers and this controversy is nicely covered in an Economics in Action detail Christina Romer, while working for the Obama administration, asserted that the government expenditure multiplier was 1.5 Robert Barro, of Harvard University, says his research shows the multiplier is 0.5 These differences are dramatic and students can appreciate their importance and real-world relevance Highlight the Ricardo-Barro effect as a possible argument for smaller multipliers Limitations of Discretionary Fiscal Policy In practice, discretionary fiscal policy is hampered by three time lags:    Recognition Lag: The recognition lag is the time it takes to figure out that fiscal policy actions are needed Law-Making Lag: The law-making lag is the amount of time it takes Congress to pass the laws needed to change taxes or spending Impact Lag: The impact lag is the time it takes from passing a tax or spending change to implementing the new arrangements and feeling their effects on real GDP Fiscal policy in practice Most economists acknowledge that, in principle, discretionary fiscal policy can be used for stabilization purposes, but in practice such stabilization is extremely difficult because of long legislative lags It is worth reminding the students that the equilibrium in the AS-AD model takes time to work out The multiplier is a long drawn FISCAL POLICY out process An increase in government expenditure shifts the AD curve rightward but the new equilibrium price level and real GDP take time to occur It is also useful to discuss the length of time it took the Congress to pass the 2002 “stimulus package” and the time it took in the Fall of 2008 to decide on a fiscal policy to be used after the initial “bailout package.” The law-making lag can be substantial and the outcomes questionable! 137 138 CHAPTER 13 Additional Problems The government is proposing to lower the tax rate on labor income and asks you to report on the supply-side effects of such an action Answer the following questions and describe what happens on the relevant graph You are being asked about directions of change, not exact magnitudes a What will happen to the supply of labor and why? b What will happen to the demand for labor and why? c What will happen to the equilibrium level of employment and why? d What will happen to the equilibrium before-tax wage rate? e What will happen to the equilibrium after-tax wage rate? f What will happen to potential GDP? How Reagan Would Fix the Economy Many Republicans look at Reagan’s policies in the early 1980s and assert that tax cuts pay for themselves That’s wrong—Reagan’s rate cuts for the rich paid for themselves, but the tax cuts for the poor, the middle class and corporations did not The deficit increased But there is a limit to the deficit At some time the government debt grows so large that it starts to harm the economy through higher interest rates, bigger debt payments, a weaker currency, etc Time, May 26, 2008 a Explain why Reagan’s tax rate cuts for high income taxpayers may have paid for themselves, but cuts for lower-income and middle-income taxpayers did not b Explain the negative consequences of running persistently large budget deficits Explain why extending unemployment insurance benefits has both a supplyside and demand-side effect on real GDP and the price level Solutions to Additional Problems a The supply of labor increases The supply of labor curve shifts rightward The supply of labor increases because at each real wage rate, the after-tax wage rate received by workers will be higher given a decrease in the tax rate on labor income b The demand for labor remains the same The demand for labor depends on the productivity of labor, which remains the same following the decrease in the tax rate on labor income c The equilibrium level of employment increases With the rightward shift in the supply of labor curve, the real wage rate decreases and the quantity of labor demanded increases along the demand for labor curve Equilibrium employment increases d The equilibrium pre-tax wage rate decreases The rightward shift of the supply of labor curve leads to movement down along the demand for labor curve e The equilibrium after-tax wage rate increases The decrease in the tax rate on labor income decreases the wedge between the before-tax wage rate and the after-tax wage rate The before-tax wage rate decreases but not by as much as the decrease in tax So the after-tax wage rate increases FISCAL POLICY f Potential GDP increases The equilibrium level of employment is the full employment quantity of labor So as full employment increases, potential GDP increases along the production function a High-income taxpayers faced very high tax rates For these taxpayers, the cut in tax rates probably lead to large increases in the quantity of labor they supplied so that the tax revenue from high-income taxpayers increased But middle-income and lower-income taxpayers did not face such high rates For these groups the tax cut increased the quantity of labor they supplied but by only a small amount so that the tax revenue from middle-income and low-income taxpayers decreased b Persistently running large budget deficits increases the government debt, which increases the interest the government must pay and contributes to larger budget deficits in the future Budget deficits also crowd out investment, so persistently running budget deficits decreases investment and the capital stock is less than otherwise Because the capital stock is smaller, U.S potential GDP is lower Extending unemployment insurance benefits increases the amount of time unemployed workers search for new jobs, which decreases employment The decrease in employment decreases aggregate supply Simultaneously extending unemployment insurance benefits increases the income received by unemployed workers The increase in income increases consumption expenditure, which increases aggregate demand Additional Discussion Questions 11 What is the distinction between the government’s budget deficit and the government’s debt? The budget deficit is the amount the government is borrowing in any given year The government debt is the total amount the government has borrowed over all the years The budget deficit adds to the (total) government debt 12 Suppose that the government increases its expenditures payments by $100 billion and pays for the increase by raising taxes by $100 billion What is the effect on aggregate demand and real GDP of each change individually and of the two combined? The increase in government expenditure adds directly to aggregate demand so that aggregate demand and real GDP both increase The increase in taxes indirectly decreases aggregate demand by decreasing consumption expenditure The decrease in aggregate demand leads to a decrease in real GDP The magnitude of the increase in aggregate demand from the increase in government expenditure exceeds the magnitude of the decrease from the increase in taxes So when both effects are combined, on net aggregate demand increases so that real GDP increases 13 Why does a change in income taxes have a different effect on aggregate supply than a change in government expenditures? A change in income taxes changes the tax wedge and affects people’s incentives to supply labor The supply of labor changes, which affects employment and hence potential GDP For example, if income taxes are boosted, the supply of labor decreases With the decrease in the supply of labor, employment decreases so that potential GDP decreases The decrease in potential GDP decreases aggregate supply A change in government expenditures does not have this same incentive effect Because it does not have this effect, it has no impact on aggregate supply 139 140 CHAPTER 13 14 Suppose because of a recession, most state governments experience reductions in tax revenues, and respond by reducing their expenditures and increasing their taxes to keep their state budgets in balance (a constitutional requirement in many U.S states) Will this have any effect on the recession, and if so, what? This policy on the part of states deepens the recession In a recession fiscal policy generally aims to increase aggregate demand because the increase in aggregate demand increases real GDP Cutting state government spending and raising taxes decreases aggregate demand A decrease in aggregate demand decreases real GDP and worsens the recession In 2012, the looming “Fiscal Cliff” meant that there would be an increase in taxes coupled with a decrease in government spending Meanwhile the Federal Reserve was continuing “Quantitative Easing.” Discuss the combined effects of these events on the economy The fiscal cliff is a combination of two contractionary fiscal policies which would decrease aggregate demand Quantitative Easing is an expansionary monetary policy meant to increase aggregate demand Chairman Bernanke stated during the fourth quarter of 2012 that the Fed was pursuing that policy in part to hedge against the negative effects of the fiscal cliff should it happen ... someone of his supply side theory Draw the Laffer curve and ask what side of the curve are we on? Ask them what they think the highest tax rate was in the United States, they are usually shocked... took in the Fall of 2008 to decide on a fiscal policy to be used after the initial “bailout package.” The law-making lag can be substantial and the outcomes questionable! 137 138 CHAPTER 13 Additional... decrease in the tax rate on labor income b The demand for labor remains the same The demand for labor depends on the productivity of labor, which remains the same following the decrease in the tax
- Xem thêm -

Xem thêm: The big picture marcoeconomics 12e parkin chapter 13 , The big picture marcoeconomics 12e parkin chapter 13 , III. Generational Effects of Fiscal Policy

Gợi ý tài liệu liên quan cho bạn

Nhận lời giải ngay chưa đến 10 phút Đăng bài tập ngay