Encyclopedia of chromatography by jack cazes 1

1000 790 1
Encyclopedia of chromatography by jack cazes 1

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

b -Agonist Residues in Food, Analysis by LC Nikolaos A Botsoglou Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece INTRODUCTION b-Agonists are synthetically produced compounds that, in addition to their regular therapeutic role in veterinary medicine as bronchodilatory and tocolytic agents, can promote live weight gain in food-producing animals They are also referred to as repartitioning agents because their effect on carcass composition is to increase the deposition of protein while reducing fat accumulation For use in lean-meat production, doses of to 15 times greater than the recommended therapeutic dose would be required, together with a more prolonged period of in-feed administration, which is often quite near to slaughter to obviate the elimination problem Such use would result in significant residue levels in edible tissues of treated animals, which might in turn exert adverse effects in the cardiovascular and central nervous systems of the consumers.[1] There are a number of well-documented cases where consumption of liver and meat from animals that have been illegally treated with these compounds, particularly clenbuterol, has resulted in massive human intoxification.[1] In Spain, a foodborne clenbuterol poisoning outbreak occurred in 1989–1990, affecting 135 persons Consumption of liver containing clenbuterol in the range 160–291 ppb was identified as the common point in the 43 families affected, while symptoms were observed in 97% of all family members who consumed liver In 1992, another outbreak occurred in Spain, affecting this time 232 persons Clinical signs of poisoning in more than half of the patients included muscle tremors and tachycardia, frequently accompanied by nervousness, headaches, and myalgia Clenbuterol levels in the urine of the patients were found to range from 11 to 486 ppb In addition, an incident of food poisoning by residues of clenbuterol in veal liver occurred in the fall of 1990 in the cities of Roanne and Clermont-Ferrand, France Twenty-two persons from eight families were affected Apart from the mentioned cases, two farmers in Ireland were also reported to have died while preparing clenbuterol for feeding to livestock Although, without exception, these incidents have all been caused by the toxicity of clenbuterol, the entire group of b-agonists are now treated with great suspicion by regulatory authorities, and use of all b-agonists in farm Encyclopedia of Chromatography DOI: 10.1081/E-ECHR 120028860 Copyright D 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved animals for growth-promoting purposes has been prohibited by regulatory agencies in Europe, Asia, and the Americas Clenbuterol, in particular, has been banned by the FDA for any animal application in the United States, whereas it is highly likely to be banned even for therapeutic use in the United States in the near future However, veterinary use of some b-agonists, such as clenbuterol, cimaterol, and ractopamine, is still licensed in several parts of the world for therapeutic purposes MONITORING Monitoring programs have shown that b-agonists have been used illegally in parts of Europe and United States by some livestock producers.[1] In addition, newly developed analogues, often with modified structural properties, are continuously introduced in the illegal practice of application of growth-promoting b-agonists in cattle raising As a result, specific knowledge of the target residues appropriate to surveillance is very limited for many of the b-agonists that have potential black market use.[2] Hence, continuous improvement of detection methods is necessary to keep pace with the rapid development of these new, heretofore unknown b-agonists Both gas and liquid chromatographic methods can be used for the determination of b-agonist residues in biological samples However, LC methods are receiving wider acceptance because gas chromatographic methods are generally complicated by the necessity of derivatization of the polar hydroxyl and amino functional groups of b-agonists In this article, an overview of the analytical methodology for the determination of b-agonist in food is provided ANALYSIS OF b -AGONISTS BY LC Included in this group of drugs are certain synthetically produced phenethanolamines such as bambuterol, bromobuterol, carbuterol, cimaterol, clenbuterol, dobutamine, fenoterol, isoproterenol, mabuterol, mapenterol, metaproterenol, pirbuterol, ractopamine, reproterol, rimiterol, ritodrine, salbutamol, salmeterol, terbutaline, and ORDER tulobuterol These drugs fall into two major categories, i.e., substituted anilines, including clenbuterol, and substituted phenols, including salbutamol This distinction is important because most methods for drugs in the former category depend on pH adjustment to partition the analytes between organic and aqueous phases The pH dependence is not valid, however, for drugs within the latter category, because phenolic compounds are charged under all practical pH conditions REPRINTS b-Agonist Residues in Food, Analysis by LC ether/n-butanol as extraction solvents.[5,7,8] The organic extracts are then either concentrated to dryness, or repartitioned with dilute acid to facilitate back extraction of the analytes into the acidic solution A literature survey shows that liquid–liquid partitioning cleanup resulted in good recoveries of substituted anilines such as clenbuterol,[7,8] but it was less effective for more polar compounds such as salbutamol.[5] Diphasic dialysis can also be used for purification of the primary sample extract This procedure was only applied in the determination of clenbuterol residues in liver using tert-butylmethyl ether as the extraction solvent.[6] EXTRACTION PROCEDURES b-Agonists are relatively polar compounds that are soluble in methanol and ethanol, slightly soluble in chloroform, and almost insoluble in benzene When analyzing liquid samples for residues of b-agonists, deconjugation of bound residues, using 2-glucuronidase/ sulfatase enzyme hydrolysis prior to sample extraction, is often recommended.[3,4] Semisolid samples, such as liver and muscle, require usually more intensive sample pretreatment for tissue breakup The most popular approach is sample homogenization in dilute acids such as hydrochloric or perchloric acid or aqueous buffer.[3–6] In general, dilute acids allow high extraction yields for all categories of b-agonists, because the aromatic moiety of these analytes is uncharged under acidic conditions, whereas their aliphatic amino group is positively ionized Following centrifugation of the extract, the supernatant may be further treated with b-glucuronidase/ sulfatase or subtilisin A to allow hydrolysis of the conjugated residues CLEANUP PROCEDURES The primary sample extract is subsequently subjected to cleanup using several different approaches, including conventional liquid–liquid partitioning, diphasic dialysis, solid-phase extraction, and immunoaffinity chromatography cleanup In some instances, more than one of these procedures is applied in combination to achieve better extract purification SOLID-PHASE EXTRACTION Solid-phase extraction is, generally, better suited to the multiresidue analysis of b-agonists This procedure has become the method of choice for the determination of b-agonists in biological matrices because it is not labor and material intensive It is particularly advantageous because it allows better extraction of the more hydrophilic b-agonists, including salbutamol b-Agonists are better suited to reversed-phase solid-phase extraction due, in part, to their relatively non-polar aliphatic moiety, which can interact with the hydrophobic octadecyl- and octyl-based sorbents of the cartridge.[9–11] By adjusting the pH of the sample extracts at values greater than 10, optimum retention of the analytes can be achieved Adsorption solid-phase extraction, using a neutral alumina sorbent, has also been recommended for improved cleanup of liver homogenates.[5] Ion-exchange solid-phase extraction is another cleanup procedure that has been successfully used in the purification of liver and tissue homogenates.[12] Because multiresidue solid-phase extraction procedures covering b-agonists of different types generally present analytical problems, mixed-phase solid-phase extraction sorbents, which contained a mixture of reversed-phase and ion-exchange material, were also used to improve the retention of the more polar compounds Toward this goal, several different sorbents were designed, and procedures that utilized both interaction mechanisms have been described.[5,9,13] IMMUNOAFFINITY CHROMATOGRAPHY LIQUID–LIQUID PARTITION Liquid–liquid partitioning cleanup is generally performed at alkaline conditions using ethyl acetate, ethyl acetate/ tert-butanol mixture, diethyl ether, or tert-butylmethyl Owing to its high specificity and sample cleanup efficiency, immunoaffinity chromatography has also received widespread acceptance for the determination of b-agonists in biological matrices.[3,4,12,14] The potential ORDER REPRINTS b-Agonist Residues in Food, Analysis by LC of online immunoaffinity extraction for the multiresidue determination of b-agonists in bovine urine was recently demonstrated, using an automated column switching system.[14] SEPARATION PROCEDURES Following extraction and cleanup, b-agonist residues are analyzed by liquid chromatography Gas chromatographic separation of b-agonists is generally complicated by the necessity of derivatization of their polar hydroxyl and amino functional groups LC reversed-phase columns are commonly used for the separation of the various b-agonist residues due to their hydrophobic interaction with the C18 sorbent Efficient reversed-phase ion-pair separation of b-agonists has also been reported, using sodium dodecyl sulfate as the pairing counterion.[15] DETECTION PROCEDURES Following LC separation, detection is often performed in the ultraviolet region at wavelengths of 245 or 260 nm However, poor sensitivity and interference from coextractives may appear at these low detection wavelengths unless sample extracts are extensively cleaned up and concentrated This problem may be overcome by postcolumn derivatization of the aromatic amino group of the b-agonist molecules to the corresponding diazo dyes through a Bratton-Marshall reaction, and subsequent detection at 494 nm.[15] Although spectrophotometric detection is generally acceptable, electrochemical detection appears more appropriate for the analysis of b-agonists due to the presence on the aromatic part of their molecule of oxidizable hydroxyl and amino groups This method of detection has been applied in the determination of clenbuterol residues in bovine retinal tissue with sufficient sensitivity for this tissue.[8] CONFIRMATION PROCEDURES Confirmatory analysis of suspected liquid chromatographic peaks can be accomplished by coupling liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry Ion spray LC-MSMS has been used to monitor five b-agonists in bovine urine,[14] whereas atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization LC-MS-MS has been used for the identification of ractopamine residues in bovine urine.[9] CONCLUSION This literature overview shows that a wide range of efficient extraction, cleanup, separation, and detection procedures is available for the determination of b-agonists in food However, continuous improvement of detection methods is necessary to keep pace with the ongoing introduction of new unknown b-agonists that have potential black market use, in the illegal practice REFERENCES Botsoglou, N.A.; Fletouris, D.J Drug Residues in Food Pharmacology, Food Safety, and Analysis; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2001 Kuiper, H.A.; Noordam, M.Y.; Van Dooren-Flipsen, M.M.H.; Schilt, R.; Roos, A.H Illegal use of betaadrenergic agonists—European Community J Anim Sci 1998, 76, 195 – 207 Van Ginkel, L.A.; Stephany, R.W.; Van Rossum, H.J Development and validation of a multiresidue method for beta-agonists in biological samples and animal feed J AOAC Int 1992, 75, 554 – 560 Visser, T.; Vredenbregt, M.J.; De Jong, A.P.J.M.; Van Ginkel, L.A.; Van Rossum, H.J.; Stephany, R.W Cryotrapping gas-chromatography Fourier-transform infrared spectrometry—A new technique to confirm the presence of beta-agonists in animal material Anal Chim Acta 1993, 275, 205 – 214 Leyssens, L.; Driessen, C.; Jacobs, A.; Czech, J.; Raus, J Determination of beta-2-receptor agonists in bovine urine and liver by gas-chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry J Chromatogr 1991, 564, 515 – 527 Gonzalez, P.; Fente, C.A.; Franco, C.; Vazquez, B.; Quinto, E.; Cepeda, A Determination of residues of the beta-agonist clenbuterol in liver of medicated farm-animals by gas-chromatography mass-spectrometry using diphasic dialysis as an extraction procedure J Chromatogr 1997, 693, 321 – 326 Wilson, R.T.; Groneck, J.M.; Holland, K.P.; Henry, A.C Determination of clenbuterol in cattle, sheep, and swine tissues by electron ionization gas-chromatography massspectrometry J AOAC Int 1994, 77, 917 – 924 Lin, L.A.; Tomlinson, J.A.; Satzger, R.D Detection of clenbuterol in bovine retinal tissue by high performance liquid-chromatography with electrochemical detection J Chromatogr 1997, 762, 275 – 280 Elliott, C.T.; Thompson, C.S.; Arts, C.J.M.; Crooks, S.R.H.; Van Baak, M.J.; Verheij, E.R.; Baxter, G.A Screening and confirmatory determination of ractopamine residues in calves treated with growth-promoting doses of the beta-agonist Analyst 1998, 123, 1103 – 1107 10 Van Rhijn, J.A.; Heskamp, H.H.; Essers, M.L.; Van de Wetering, H.J.; Kleijnen, H.C.H.; Roos, A.H Possibilities for confirmatory analysis of some beta-agonists using ORDER REPRINTS b-Agonist Residues in Food, Analysis by LC 11 12 13 different derivatives simultaneously J Chromatogr 1995, 665, 395 – 398 Gaillard, Y.; Balland, A.; Doucet, F.; Pepin, G Detection of illegal clenbuterol use in calves using hair analysis J Chromatogr 1997, 703, 85 – 95 Lawrence, J.F.; Menard, C Determination of clenbuterol in beef-liver and muscle-tissue using immunoaffinity chromatographic cleanup and liquid-chromatography with ultraviolet absorbency detection J Chromatogr 1997, 696, 291 – 297 Ramos, F.; Santos, C.; Silva, A.; Da Silveira, M.I.N Beta(2)-adrenergic agonist residues—Simultaneous meth- 14 15 ylboronic and butylboronic derivatization for confirmatory analysis by gas-chromatography mass-spectrometry J Chromatogr 1998, 716, 366 – 370 Cai, J.; Henion, J Quantitative multi-residue determination of beta-agonists in bovine urine using online immunoaffinity extraction coupled-column packed capillary liquidchromatography tandem mass-spectrometry J Chromatogr 1997, 691, 357 – 370 Courtheyn, D.; Desaever, C.; Verhe, R High-performance liquid-chromatographic determination of clenbuterol and cimaterol using postcolumn derivatization J Chromatogr 1991, 564, 537 – 549 Absorbance Detection in Capillary Electrophoresis Robert Weinberger CE Technologies, Inc., Chappaqua, New York, U.S.A Introduction The CLOD can be calculated using Beer’s Law: Most forms of detection in High-Performance Capillary Electrophoresis (HPCE) employ on-capillary detection Exceptions are techniques that use a sheath flow such as laser-induced fluorescence [1] and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry [2] In high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), postcolumn detection is generally used This means that all solutes are traveling at the same velocity when they pass through the detector flow cell In HPCE with on-capillary detection, the velocity of the solute determines the residence time in the flow cell This means that slowly migrating solutes spend more time in the optical path and thus accumulate more area counts [3] Because peak areas are used for quantitative determinations, the areas must be normalized when quantitating without standards Quantitation without standards is often used when determining impurity profiles in pharmaceuticals, chiral impurities, and certain DNA applications The correction is made by normalizing (dividing) the raw peak area by the migration time When a matching standard is used, it is unnecessary to perform this correction If the migration times are not reproducible, the correction may help, but it is better to correct the situation causing this problem CLOD ϭ A ϫ 10Ϫ5 ϭ ϫ 10Ϫ6M ϭ ab 150002 15 ϫ 102 Ϫ3 (1) where A is the absorbance (AU), a is the molar absorptivity (AU/cm/M), b is the capillary diameter or optical path length (cm), and CLOD is the concentration (M) The noise of a good detector is typically ϫ 10Ϫ5 AU A modest chromophore has a molar absorptivity of 5000 Then in a 50-␮m-inner diameter (i.d.) capillary, a CLOD of ϫ 10Ϫ6 M is obtained at a signal-to-noise ratio of 1, assuming no other sources of band broadening Detector Linear Dynamic Range The noise level of the best detectors is about ϫ 10Ϫ5 AU Using a 50-␮m-i.d capillary, the maximum signal that can be obtained while yielding reasonable peak shape is ϫ 10Ϫ1 AU This provides a linear dynamic range of about 104 This can be improved somewhat through the use of an extended path-length flow cell In any event, if the background absorbance of the electrolyte is high, the noise of the system will increase regardless of the flow cell utilized Classes of Absorbance Detectors Limits of Detection The limit of detection (LOD) of a system can be defined in two ways: the concentration limit of detection (CLOD) and the mass limit of detection (MLOD) The CLOD of a typical peptide is about ␮g /mL using absorbance detection at 200 nm If 10 nL are injected, this translates to an MLOD of 10 pg at three times the baseline noise The MLOD illustrates the measuring capability of the instrument The more important parameter is the CLOD, which relates to the sample itself The CLOD for HPCE is relatively poor, whereas the MLOD is quite good, especially when compared to HPLC In HPLC, the injection size can be 1000 times greater compared to HPCE Ultraviolet /visible absorption detection is the most common technique found in HPCE Several types of absorption detectors are available on commercial instrumentation, including the following: Encyclopedia of Chromatography DOI: 10.1081/E-Echr 120004560 Copyright © 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved Fixed-wavelength detector using mercury, zinc, or cadmium lamps with wavelength selection by filters Variable-wavelength detector using a deuterium or tungsten lamp with wavelength selection by a monochromator Filter photometer using a deuterium lamp with wavelength selection by filters Scanning ultraviolet (UV) detector Photodiode array detector Each of these absorption detectors have certain attributes that are useful in HPCE Multiwavelength detectors such as the photodiode array or scanning UV detector are valuable because spectral as well as electrophoretic information can be displayed The filter photometer is invaluable for low-UV detection The use of the 185-nm mercury line becomes practical in HPCE with phosphate buffers because the short optical path length minimizes the background absorption Photoacoustic, thermo-optical, or photothermal detectors have been reported in the literature [4] These detectors measure the nonradiative return of the excited molecule to the ground state Although these can be quite sensitive, it is unlikely that they will be used in commercial instrumentation Optimization of Detector Wavelength Because of the short optical path length defined by the capillary, the optimal detection wavelength is frequently much lower into the UV compared to HPLC In HPCE with a variable-wavelength absorption detector, the optimal signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio for peptides is found at 200 nm To optimize the detector wavelength, it is best to plot the S/N ratio at various wavelengths The optimal S/N is then easily selected Extended Path-Length Capillaries Increasing the optical path length of the capillary window should increase S/N simply as a result of Beer’s Law This has been achieved using a z cell (LC Packings, San Francisco CA) [5], bubble cell (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE), or a high-sensitivity cell (Agilent Technologies) Both the z cell and bubble cell are integral to the capillary The high-sensitivity cell comes in three parts: an inlet capillary, an outlet capillary, and the cell body Careful assembly permits the use of this cell without current leakage The bubble cell provides approximately a threefold improvement in sensitivity using a 50-␮m capillary, whereas the z cell or high-sensitivity cell improves things by an order of magnitude This holds true only when the background electrolyte (BGE) has low absorbance at the monitoring wavelength Absorbance Detection in Capillary Electrophoresis Indirect Absorbance Detection To determine ions that not absorb in the UV, indirect detection is often utilized [6] In this technique, a UV-absorbing reagent of the same charge (a co-ion) as the solutes is added to the BGE The reagent elevates the baseline, and when nonabsorbing solute ions are present, they displace the additive As the separated ions migrate past the detector window, they are measured as negative peaks relative to the high baseline For anions, additives such as trimellitic acid, phthalic acid, or chromate ions are used at –10 mM concentrations For cations, creatinine, imidazole, or copper(II) are often used Other buffer materials are either not used or added in only small amounts to avoid interfering with the detection process It is best to match the mobility of the reagent to the average mobilities of the solutes to minimize electrodispersion, which causes band broadening [7] When anions are determined, a cationic surfactant is added to the BGE to slow or even reverse the electroosmotic flow (EOF) When the EOF is reversed, both electrophoresis and electro-osmosis move in the same direction Anion separations are performed using reversed polarity Indirect detection is used to determine simple ions such as chloride, sulfate, sodium, and potassium The technique is also applicable to aliphatic amines, aliphatic carboxylic acids, and simple sugars [8] References Y F Cheng and N J Dovichi, SPIE, 910: 111 (1988) E C Huang, T Wachs, J J Conboy, and J D Henion, Anal Chem 62: 713 (1990) X Huang, W F Coleman, and R N Zare, J Chromatogr 480: 95 (1989) J M Saz and J C Diez-Masa, J Liq Chromatogr 17: 499 (1994) J P Chervet, R E J van Soest, and M Ursem, J Chromatogr 543: 439 (1991) P Jandik, W R Jones, A Weston, and P R Brown, LC– GC 9: 634 (1991) R Weinberger, Am Lab 28: 24 (1996) X Xu, W T Kok, and H Poppe, J Chromatogr A 716: 231 (1995) Acoustic Field-Flow Fractionation for Particle Separation Niem Tri Ronald Beckett Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Introduction Field-flow fractionation (FFF) is a suite of elution methods suitable for the separation and sizing of macromolecules and particles [1] It relies on the combined effects of an applied force interacting with sample components and the parabolic velocity profile of carrier fluid in the channel For this to be effective, the channel is unpacked and the flow must be under laminar conditions Field or gradients that are commonly used in generating the applied force are gravity, centrifugation, fluid flow, temperature gradient, and electrical and magnetic fields Each field or gradient produces a different subtechnique of FFF, which separates samples on the basis of a particular property of the molecules or particles Research and Developments The potential for using acoustic radiation forces generated by ultrasonic waves to extend the versatility of FFF seems very promising Although only very preliminary experiments have been performed so far, the possibility of using such a gentle force would appear to have huge potential in biology, medicine, and environmental studies Acoustic radiation or ultrasonic waves are currently being exploited as a noncontact particle micromanipulation technique [2] The main drive to develop such techniques comes from the desire to manipulate biological cells and blood constituents in biotechnology and fine powders in material engineering In a propagating wave, the acoustic force, Fac , acting on a particle is a function of size given by [1] Fac ϭ pr2EYp (1) where r is the particle radius, E is the sound energy density, and Yp is a complicated function depending on the characteristics of the particle which approaches unity if the wavelength used is much smaller than the particle Particles in a solution subjected to a propagat- ing sound wave will be pushed in the direction of sound propagation Therefore, sized-based separations may be possible if this force is applied to generate selective transport of different components in a mixture In a FFF channel, it is likely that the receiving wall will reflect at least some of the emitted wave If the channel thickness corresponds exactly to one-half wavelength, then a single standing wave will be created (see Fig 1) For a single standing wave, it is interesting to note that three pressure (force) nodes are generated, one at each wall and one in the center of the channel Yasuda and Kamakura [3] and Mandralis and coworkers [4] have demonstrated that it is possible to generate standing-wave fields between a transducer and a reflecting wall, although of much larger dimensions (1–20 cm) than across a FFF channel Sound travels at a velocity of 1500 m/s through water, which translates to a wave of frequency of approximately MHz for a 120-µm thick FFF channel The force experienced by a particle in a stationary acoustic wave was reported by Yosioka and Kawasima [5] to be Fac ϭ 4pr3kEac A sin12kx2 (2) where r is the particle radius, k is the wave number, Eac is the time-averaged acoustic energy density, and A is the acoustic contrast factor given by Aϭ gp 5rp Ϫ 2rl a Ϫ b gl rl ϩ 2rp (3) where rp and gp are the particle density and compressibility, respectively, and rl and gl are the liquid density and compressibility, respectively Thus, in a propagating wave, the force on a particle has a second-order dependence, and in a standing wave, the force is third order This should give rise to increased selectivity for separations being carried out in a standing wave [6] Due to the nature of the acoustic fields, the distribution of the particles will depend on the particle size and the compressibility and density of the particle rel- Encyclopedia of Chromatography DOI: 10.1081/E-Echr 120004561 Copyright © 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved Acoustic FFF for Particle Separation (a) (b) Fig Acoustic FFF channels suitable for particles with (a) A , and (b) A 0, utilizing a divided acoustic FFF channel ative to the fluid medium Closer examination of the acoustic contrast factor shows that is may be negative (usually applicable to biological cells which are more compressible and less dense relative to the surrounding medium) or positive (as is in many inorganic and polymer colloids) Therefore, acoustic FFF (AcFFF) has tremendous potential in very clean separations of cells from other particles One important application may be for the separation of bacterial and algal cells in soils and sediments If the acoustic contrast factor A , 0, then a conventional FFF channel will enable normal and steric mode FFF separations to be carried out (Fig 1a) However, if A 0, then the particles will migrate toward the center of the channel In this case, a divided FFF cell could be used as shown in Fig 1b This ensures that particles are driven to an accumulation wall rather than the center of the channel where the velocity profile is quite flat and selectivity would be minimal Johnson and Feke [7] effectively demonstrated that latex spheres migrate to the nodes (center of the cell) and Hawkes and co-workers [8] showed that yeast cells migrate to the antinodes (walls of the cell) These authors used a method similar to SPLITT, which is another technique closely related to FFF, also originally developed by Giddings [9] Semyonov and Maslow [10] demonstrated that acoustic fields in a FFF channel af- fected the retention time of a sphere of 3.8 µm diameter when subjected to varying acoustic fields However, the high resolution inherent in FFF has not yet been exploited Naturally, with some design modifications to the FFF channel, SPLITT cells could be used for sample concentration or fluid clarification References 10 J C Giddings, J Chem Phys 49: 81 (1968) T Kozuka, T Tuziuti, H Mitome, and T Fukuda, Proc IEEE 435 (1996) K Yasuda and T Kamakura, Appl Phys Lett 71: 1771 (1997) Z Mandralis, W Bolek, W Burger, E Benes, and D L Feke, Ultrasonics 32: 113 (1994) K Yosioka and Y Kawasima, Acustica 5: 167 (1955) A Berthod and D W Armstrong, Anal Chem 59: 2410 (1987) D A Johnson and D L Feke, Separ Technol 5: 251 (1995) J J Hawkes, D Barrow, and W T Coakley, Ultrasonics 36: 925 (1998) J C Giddings, Anal Chem 57: 945 (1985) S N Semyonov and K I Maslow, J Chromatogr 446: 151 (1998) Additives in Biopolymers, Analysis by Chromatographic Techniques A Roxana A Ruseckaite University of Mar del Plata, Mar del Plata, Argentina Alfonso Jime´nez University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain INTRODUCTION Biopolymers are naturally occurring polymers that are formed in nature during the growth cycles of all organisms; they are also referred to as natural polymers.[1] Their synthesis generally involves enzyme-catalyzed, chain growth polymerization reactions, typically performed within cells by metabolic processes Biodegradable polymers can be processed into useful plastic materials and used to supplement blends of the synthetic and microbial polymer.[2] Among the polysaccharides, cellulose and starch have been the most extensively used Cellulose represents an appreciable fraction of the waste products The main source of cellulose is wood, but it can also be obtained from agricultural resources Cellulose is used worldwide in the paper industry, and as a raw material to prepare a large variety of cellulose derivatives Among all the cellulose derivatives, esters and ethers are the most important, mainly cellulose acetate, which is the most abundantly produced cellulose ester They are usually applied as films (packaging), fibers (textile fibers, cigarette filters), and plastic molding compounds Citric esters (triethyl and acetyl triethyl acetate) were recently introduced as biodegradable plasticizers in order to improve the rheological response of cellulose acetate.[2] Starch is an enormous source of biomass and most applications are based on this natural polymer It has a semicrystalline structure in which their native granules are either destroyed or reorganized Water and, recently, low-molecular-weight polyols,[2] are frequently used to produce thermoplastic starches Starch can be directly used as a biodegradable plastic for film production because of the increasing prices and decreasing availability of conventional film-forming materials Starch can be incorporated into plastics as thermoplastic starch or in its granular form Recently, starch has been used in various formulations based on biodegradable synthetic polymers in order to obtain totally biodegradable materials Thermoplastic and granular starch was blended with polycaprolactone (PCL),[3] polyvinyl alcohol and its co polymers, Encyclopedia of Chromatography DOI: 10.1081/E-ECHR 120018660 Copyright D 2003 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved and polydroxyalcanoates (PHAs).[4] Many of these materials are commercially available, e.g., Ecostar (polyethylene/starch/unsaturated fatty acids), Mater Bi Z (polycaprolactone/starch/natural additives) and Mater Bi Y (polyvinylalchol-co-ethylene/starch/natural additives) Natural additives are mainly polyols The proteins, which have found many applications, are, for the most part, neither soluble nor fusible without degradation Therefore, they are used in the form in which they are found in nature.[1] Gelatin, an animal protein, is a water-soluble and biodegradable polymer that is extensively used in industrial, pharmaceutical, and biomedical applications.[2] A method to develop flexible gelatin films is by adding polyglycerols Quite recently, gelatin was blended with poly(vinyl alcohol) and sugar cane bagasse in order to obtain films that can undergo biodegradation in soil The results demonstrated the potential use of such films as self-fertilizing mulches.[5] Other kinds of natural polymers, which are produced by a wide variety of bacteria as intracellular reserve material, are receiving increasing scientific and industrial attention, for possible applications as melt processable polymers The members of this family of thermoplastic biopolymers are the polyhydroxyalcanoates (PHAs) Poly-(3-hydroxy)butyrate (PHB), and poly(3-hydroxy)butyrate-hydroxyvalerate (PHBV) copolymers, which are microbial polyesters exhibiting useful mechanical properties, present the advantages of biodegradability and biocompatibility over other thermoplastics Poly(3-hydroxy)butyrate has been blended with a variety of low- and high-cost polymers in order to apply PHB-based blends in packaging materials or agricultural foils Blends with nonbiodegradable polymers, including poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc), poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), and poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA), are reported in the literature.[4] Poly(3-hydroxy)butyrate has been also blended with synthetic biodegradable polyesters, such as poly(lactic acid) (PLA), poly(caprolactone), and natural polymers including cellulose and starch.[2] Plasticizers are also included into the formulations in order to prevent degradation of the polymer during processing Polyethylene glycol, Octanol–Water Partition Coefficients by CCC Alain Berthod Laboratoire des Sciences Analytiques, CNRS, Université de Lyon I, Villeurbanne, France Introduction Hydrophobicity, from the greek hydro water and phobia aversion, is a term referring to the way a molecule “likes” or “does not like” water A compound with a high hydrophobicity will not be water soluble It is apolar Conversely, a compound with a low hydrophobicity is said to be hydrophilic or polar It is likely to be water soluble In between the two extremes, the hydrophobicity varies A scale is needed The problem is that the hydrophobicity, or the polarity of a compound, depends on several parameters such as the dipole moment, the dielectric constant, the polarizability, the proton donor or acceptor character, or even the boiling point to molecular mass ratio Since the end of the nineteenth century, the octanol–water partition coefficient, Po/w , was used with success as a measure of hydrophobicity The log Po/w is the convenient scale Compounds with a positive log Po/w value are more and more hydrophobic or apolar as the value increases Compounds with a negative log Po/w value are hydrophilic or polar [1] It is of paramount importance to be able to measure, accurately, the Po/w and log Po/w value of a compound, because it is the accepted parameter used by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and many other international drug and environmental agencies to estimate the tendency of an organic chemical to bioconcentrate into living cells A new drug cannot be accepted by the FDA and EPA without the Po/w parameter The most extensive and useful sets of Po/w data were obtained by simply shaking a solute with the two immiscible octanol and water phases and then analyzing the solute concentration in one or both phases For many solutes, repeated inversion (say ϳ100) of a 25-mL tube with ϳ0.01M solute and the two phases establishes equilibrium in ϳ15 Very vigorous shaking can produce troublesome emulsions The solute can be analyzed in only one phase and the concentration in the other can be obtained by the difference The phase analysis is most often done by gas chromatography, liquid chromatogra- phy, or ultraviolet (UV)-visible spectroscopy The shake flask method gives reliable results over the wide 10Ϫ4–104 Po/w range However, it requires highly pure solutes and is very sensitive to the smallest contamination Reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), capillary electrophoresis (CE), micellar liquid chromatography (MLC), and electrochromatography (EC) can be used to estimate values of log Po/w from the corresponding log k values; k is the retention factor, directly related to the retention parameter of the solute of interest Good correlations are generally found between log k and log Po/w for structural congeners Unfortunately, the correlations are much poorer with dissimilar compounds Trace amounts of octanol were added in the mobile phase to enhance log k– log Po/w correlations with a wide variety of solutes The Po/w range is 1–105.5 The advantages of the RPLC method are its relative simplicity and the fact that it does not need highly pure solutes At the moment, the correlation remains the main drawback Direct Po / w Measurement by CCC The decisive advantage of countercurrent chromatography (CCC) in Po/w measurement is that there is no correlation at all Water, saturated with octanol, is the mobile phase Octanol saturated with water is the stationary phase The octanol–water partition coefficient of a given solute is the only physicochemical parameter responsible for the solute retention If the solute is not highly pure, it is likely that the impurities will have differing Po/w values This means that if the impurities have differing retention volumes, they are separated during the measurement from the solute of interest The Po/w value is easily derived from the CCC retention equation: VR ϭ VM ϩ PVS (1) using Encyclopedia of Chromatography DOI: 10.1081/E-Echr 120005243 Copyright © 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved Po/w ϭ VR Ϫ VC VR Ϫ VM ϭ1ϩ VS VS (2) Octanol–Water Partition Coefficients by CCC If octanol is the stationary phase and water the mobile phase, Po/w is the octanol–water partition coefficient without any assumption Correlations of the Po/w or log Po/w values obtained with the same liquid system by the shake flask method and by CCC produce straight lines with a slope unity and a negligible intercept The validity and solidity of the method was assessed by Gluck and Martin for Po/w coefficients [2] The Po/w range that can be obtained directly by CCC is 0.05 –200 [1] It is limited on the high side by the experiment duration A Po/w value of 200 corresponds to a VR retention volume of L with a VS value of only 30 mL [Eq (1)] This is 1200 or 20 h with a 5mL /min flow rate The lower-side limitation is due to experimental precision The difference between the retention volume VR and the dead volume VM is equal to PVS [Eq (1)] With a 30-mL VS volume, the Po/w value of 0.05 corresponds to a VR Ϫ VM value of only 1.5 mL Such a low value may be difficult to evaluate with an acceptable accuracy To increase the measurable Po/w range, the fact that the CCC stationary phase is a liquid can be used This led to the dual-mode use of CCC and the cocurrent operation Dual-Mode CCC The idea is simple: Solutes with very high Po/w values move very slowly in the octanol phase; they need too long a time to emerge from the apparatus To force them out of the CCC apparatus, the role of the aqueous and octanol phases and their flow directions are reversed after some reasonable flowing time in the normal direction The dual-mode operation is illustrated in Fig It was demonstrated that the Po/w value can be simply expressed by Po/w ϭ Vaq/Voct (3) in which Vaq is the aqueous-phase volume passed in the normal way (descending or head to tail, Steps and 2) and Voct is the octanol-phase volume passed in the reversed way (ascending or tail to head, Step 3) The highest Po/w value that can be measured is again limited by the lowest Voct volume that can be accurately determined Due to band broadening, the practical minimum Voct value is about mL [1] Then, with a 6000-mL Vaq volume, the corresponding Po/w value is 2000 Table shows the experimental conditions corresponding to the dual-mode measurement of some Po/w values in the 40 –3000 range It was shown that the error on the Po/w determination was minimized when the octanol flow rate in the reversed mode was very low Elution volume (mL) Fig Dual-mode CCC Cocurrent CCC The cocurrent CCC operation takes advantage of the liquid nature of the stationary phase If a lipophilic solute stays too long inside the CCC apparatus, why not push it out, pushing the liquid stationary phase, slowly, in the same direction as the mobile phase? The theoretical treatment [3] and the practical promise of the method were established [4] Three pumps are needed Pump allows the adjustment of the aqueous-phase flow rate in the few milliliter per minute range Pump governs the octanol phase flow rate in the microliter per minute range Pump is used to add a clarifying agent to the phase mixture leaving the CCC apparatus The clarifying agent can be 2-propanol; it solubilizes the trace amounts of octanol present in the aqueous phase The interest of the method is that there is no Octanol–Water Partition Coefficients by CCC Table Some Practical Examples of Po/w Measurements by CCC Solute Direct measurement VR (mL) tR (h) Benzamide Acetophenone 2-Chlorobenzoic acid 2-Chlorophenol 240 1,020 2,280 3,270 0.8 3.4 7.6 10.9 Voct (mL) tR (h) Po/w 0.8 2.2 9.0 65 75.4 180,0 480,0 19,600,0 VR (mL) tR (h) Po/w 2,530 6,520 15,500 9,790 10.5 12 28.6 18.1 107 500 5,100 20,000 Dual-Mode CCC Vaq (mL) Benzoic acid 2-Chlorophenol Toluene Biphenyl 178 487 2,630 19,600 Cocurrent CCC Voct (mL) Benzene Toluene Naphthalene Phenanthrene 29.7 20.2 20.2 22.2 2.36 2.71 5.50 1.00 Po/w 4.4 40,0 97,0 145,0 log Po/w CCC log Po/w Literature 0.643 1.60 1.99 2.16 0.64 1.6 2.0 2.15 log Po/w log Po/w (lit.) 1.88 2.25 2.68 4.29 1.87 2.15 2.71 3.80 log Po/w log Po/w (lit.) 2.03 2.70 3.7 4.3 2.14 2.71 3.2 4.4 Source: Data from Refs 1– abrupt change; that is, it is continuous The octanol volume retained in the CCC system is very stable, more stable than with other methods because there is a constant input of octanol The octanol volume changes, due to dissolution that was noted in the direct method or due to phase reversal as noted in the back-flushing method, not exist with the cocurrent CCC method The Voct volume was determined using a test solute (2-chlorophenol, Po/w ϭ 147 in Ref 4) Another very important effect that was experimentally observed is the increased peak efficiency due to the octanol flow rate The measurable Po/w range was extended up to 20,000 (log Po/w ϭ 4.3) Table lists the actual conditions of some Po/w measurements by the cocurrent CCC method The CCC methods presented here were extensively used to measure the Po/w value of molecular compounds They were recently adapted to measure the Po/w values of ionizable compounds using buffered octanolsaturated aqueous phases [5] References A Berthod, Liquid–liquid partition coefficients, in Centrifugal Partition Chromatography (A P Foucault, ed.), Chromatographic Science Series Vol 68, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 1995, pp 167–198 S J Gluck and E J Martin, J Liquid Chromatogr 13: 2529 –2551 (1990) A Berthod, Analusis 18: 352 –358 (1990) A Berthod, R A Menges, and D W Armstrong, J Liquid Chromatogr 15: 2769 –2785 (1992) A Berthod, S Carda-Broch, and M C G AlvarezCoque, Anal Chem 71: 879 – 888 (1999) On-Column Injection for GC Mochammad Yuwono Gunawan Indrayanto Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia INTRODUCTION The injection system in a GC analysis provides a means of introducing the sample onto the column This is normally a simple injector design when packed columns are used Capillary or open tubular columns require, however, more sophisticated design than packed columns, because of their very low capacities and small internal diameters A number of different injector designs have been recently developed Unfortunately, no universal injector has so far been commercially available to handle all sample types This article will discuss various approaches to sample injection SELECTION OF INJECTION MODE The selection of the most suitable injection system becomes important, especially when samples containing widely different boiling point components and different concentrations are to be analyzed.[1,2] Today, the most commonly used injectors for capillary GC fall into one of four techniques, i.e., split, splitless, on-column injection, and programmed-temperature vaporizers (PTV) The split injection mode was the first sample introduction system developed for capillary GC which, as the name signifies, splits the vaporized sample into two unequal portions, allowing only the smaller portion of it into the column and venting the larger from the system The injector involves a heated chamber including a glass liner, into which the sample is introduced through an injection septum For many applications, it is the most convenient sampling method, as it is very easy to operate, producing perfect peak shapes and good resolution after injecting concentrated samples in the same manner as for packed column systems.[3] A major drawback of the split injection technique is the so-called sample discrimination due to the uneven flash vaporization of the sample The discrimination means that not all components of the vaporized samples are brought quantitatively into the column When a sample containing compounds with widely different boiling points is analyzed with the split Encyclopedia of Chromatography DOI: 10.1081/E-ECHR-120040675 Copyright D 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved sampling technique, the less volatile components are discriminated Consequently, the resultant chromatogram does not truly describe the real composition of the sample components; so the quantitative analysis becomes unreliable.[3,4] To minimize or prevent this, the use of other injection techniques is suggested, such as cooled needle injection, very fast injection, cold on-column or programmable vaporization.[5] Using an internal standard or an autosampler can also greatly enhance the accuracy of the results With split techniques, problems arise also in analyzing thermally labile compounds which may decompose at the injection operating temperature Introducing the samples using cold on-column injection technique is the best solution to solve this problem.[5,6] Because the split technique is beneficial for analysis of samples containing compounds at high concentration, the splitless injection mode was then developed for analyzing trace-level compounds In this splitless technique, the entire vaporized sample volume is directed into the column by closing the split vent (purge off mode) In this way, the sample is transferred completely and slowly into the column; this ensures quantitative and representative sample introduction Most split injectors today can operate in the splitless mode These injectors are normally called split/splitless injectors, which can be operated first in a splitless mode (usually less than min), allowing to gradually force the majority of the vaporized sample to the column inlet The mode is then operated in split mode to purge the excess solvent The method does not need fast vaporization, so that it is advantageous for the analysis of thermally unstable compounds However, the solvent focusing techniques and other parameters must be gently optimized; otherwise, the results obtained are not reproducible and are low in accuracy.[5,7] The splitless injection technique is still used for the routine determination of trace-level compounds, such as for pesticide residues, drug impurities, etc Direct and on-column flash vaporization injection has also been applied recently, which offers some advantages over the splitless technique for trace samples.[8] For the same purpose, cold on-column injection is also increasing in popularity as a technique for the analysis of the trace compounds, because of its higher precision and accuracy ORDER DIRECT AND ON-COLUMN INJECTION Direct injection is often confused with on-column injection Direct injection allows the injection of liquid samples into a heated injection port After injection, the sample is subsequently vaporized and then completely directed onto the column.[5,9] The evaporation of sample occurs in the inlet, which is heated independently from the column oven The most commonly used inlet is a glass liner, and no sample splitting or venting occurs during or after injection Direct injection is limited to widebore or megabore columns.[5] In on-column injection, the sample enters the column directly from the syringe and does not contact other surfaces On-column injection generally indicates cold on-column injection for capillary columns.[5] The terms ‘‘hot on-column injection’’ and ‘‘oncolumn flash vaporization’’ are elsewhere introduced.[9] The hot on-column mode is different from the direct injection in the inlet that is used and in the termination point of the syringe needle during injection.[8] The technique is called direct injection when a glass inlet sleeve is used, and the evaporation of the injected sample occurs outside the column With an on-column injection, a specially designed liner or a part of the column is used as inlet which allows the injection of the liquid sample inside the column and the evaporation of the sample also occurs on the column wall surface.[5,9] This simple technique is usually used for packed column GC However, it has recently become popular because it can also be used with capillary columns (0.32 and 0.53 mm ID) Specially designed injection port inlet sleeves have been available on the market for direct and hot on-column injection.[7,8] In the direct injection mode, 2–4-mm-ID inlet sleeves are commonly used, which permit a sufficient space for sample evaporation; however, the on-column mode is usually performed by inserting a 26gauge needle inside a 0.53-mm-ID column Direct injection is more favorable because it is less problematic than the hot on-column mode.[9] Because the liner can trap nonvolatile residues before entering the column, this technique is suitable for dirty samples Compared to the splitless mode, the direct injection is advantageous, involving less adsorption of the solutes and better sensitivity However, with this technique, the adsorption of the sample may occur on the inlet sleeve during the evaporation process.[9] In this case, the hot on-column mode offers more benefits COLD ON-COLUMN INJECTION TECHNIQUE As the name indicates, the cold on-column injector allows the injection of the sample directly as a liquid onto the column, of which the inlet and/or outlet section is REPRINTS On-Column Injection for GC maintained at a lower temperature than the oven After the solutes are focused in the inlet section of column, the sample is then vaporized as the oven temperature is increased In this way, all of the sample components are transferred into the column, so that the sample discrimination attributed to the syringe needle heating during injection is eliminated; it is also convenient for the analysis of thermally labile compounds.[1,10] The possibility of peak broadening is due only to band broadening in space.[5,11] This technique yields excellent quantitative precision and accuracy for samples that contain less volatile and highly volatile compounds.[12–14] Unlike the on-column flash vaporization injection, cold on-column is the true on-column technique, because both the injection of the sample and the evaporation occur inside the column An injector device for on-column work was first introduced by Schomburg in 1977.[15] In 1978, Grob and Grob[16] developed an excellent injector design which requires, principally, a syringe guide and a stop valve A standard syringe with stainless steel needle of 0.23 mm ID (32-gauge) and cm in length was used for the commonly used 0.32-mm-ID glass capillary column The needle is introduced through a conical aperture into the 0.3-mm inlet channel, close to the stop valve By pushing down the syringe and guiding the needle into the capillary column, the sample is injected onto the column After injection, the syringe is moved back, the valve is closed, and the syringe is finally withdrawn The bottom of the body is cooled by a fan-driven air circulator to maintain the low temperature of the column inlet This is called primary cooling Complete construction of the design was described by Grob and Grob.[16] Further development of the cold oncolumn injection device included the use of secondary cooling, which is done by circulating air directed from a jacket surrounding the capillary inlet toward the injection area of the column.[17] The secondary cooling system is to cool the area of the column where the sample is actually injected The use of secondary cooling can totally eliminate syringe discrimination and ensures that the temperature of the needle channel can be controlled to avoid solvent evaporation The secondary cooling is advantageous, especially when the injector is combined with temperature programming.[1,18] Figure shows a typical on-column injector with provision for secondary cooling of the column inlet The evolution of the cold oncolumn injection technique occurred because syringes with fused silica needles had been introduced to replace commonly employed metal needles; the injection onto a capillary column of 0.22 mm ID then became reality The fused silica needles are inert and perfectly straight.[5,7] This innovative work makes the on-column injection technique gain more acceptance The programmedtemperature on-column injector was then developed, in ORDER On-Column Injection for GC Fig Schematic diagram of a typical cold on-column injector with provision for secondary cooling of the column inlet 1: Rotating valve, 2: carrier gas, 3: capillary column, 4: secondary cooling which the column inlet is housed in a separate injection oven, so that the column inlet temperature can be programmed from subambient to about 350°C and thermostated independently of the column oven.[1] For thermally labile compounds, it is suggested that the temperature is programmed at a low heating rate, whereas a rapid rise is favored for vaporization of samples containing highly different boiling point components.[6,7] A version of an on-column injector design that offers a low thermal mass, which facilitates cooling, has been developed In this injector, a duck-bill valve constructed from a soft elastomer, such as in a flexible septum, is applied to form a gas-tight seal compressed by the column inlet pressure When the needle guide is depressed, the isolation valve is parted and the metal guide is forced through the duck-bill valve.[5] This permits the syringe needle to pass the valve and enter the column When the plunger is released, gas flow through the column is restored The system can be performed for manual and automated injections The duck-bill valve is modified with a disk septum when automated cool on-column injection is applied (Fig 2) A movable on-column injector has also been introduced to facilitate the up-and-down movement of the column oven wall.[13] The cold on-column injection technique can now be operated in the constant-pressure, constant-flow, or pressure-programmed modes, allowing the reduction of analysis times Moreover, electronic REPRINTS pressure programming offers the advantages that column pressure can be controlled accurately and precisely, resulting in very low relative standard deviations of retention time reproducibility.[5] The most suitably used carrier gas is hydrogen.[5,6] The attractive features of cold on-column injection are that they allow analysis at a low temperature; thus it is the most convenient method for analysis for thermally unstable compounds Compared with the flash vaporizing injection technique, it is also the method of choice for analysis of the samples with widely different boiling point components, because the cold on-column injection technique enables quantitative transfer of a sample and thereby provides a more accurate result However, there are also difficulties with this method, such as peak splitting and peak spreading due to band broadening in space These effects frequently result when large volume injections are performed Because the sample enters the column inlet as a liquid plug, the injection of larger sample volumes forms several meters of a layer distributed on the column wall and they remain there until the column temperature increased This is called a Fig Schematic diagram of a cross section of a cold oncolumn injector with a duck-bill valve 1: Cool tower needle guide, 2A: disk septum for automated injections, 2B: isolation valve for manual injections, 3: frit, 4: carrier gas, 5: oven wall, 6: ferrule, 7: capillary column, 8: column nut (Modified from Ref [5].) ORDER REPRINTS flooded zone situation, which is responsible for peak broadening and double peaks The length of the flooded zone is related to the volume sample injected, the polarity difference between the solvent and the stationary phase, and the column temperature used Injecting a small sample volume (2 mL), can minimize the peak distortion The retention gap is a length of fused silica tubing connected to the front of the analytical column by means of a suitable connector It is actually a precolumn that does not contain any stationary phase, and the surface is deactivated to reduce solute interaction Unlike the usual fused silica column, the retention gap has, consequently, a low or negligible retention character To obtain a uniform sample film on the column wall, the solvent used should be selected in such a way that it wets the surface of the retention gap Injection of the sample into the retention gap is followed by the evaporation of the solvent, leading to focusing of the sample components When the solvent has completely evaporated, the solutes are sharply focused on the stationary phase This approach has shown great success to improve peak shapes for many types of samples As a general rule, typically used retention gaps are 25 to 50 cm in length, or about 25–30 cm for each microliter of solvent injected A retention gap of m  0.32 mm ID enables injection of volumes up to about 50 mL; whereas 250 mL can be injected using a 10-m  0.53-mm-ID uncoated precolumn The use of a retention gap offers some advantages; it allows the operation of an automated injection with regular syringe needles.[20,21] Moreover, the retention gap can act as guard column which reduces contamination when ‘‘dirty samples’’ are analyzed.[4,6] On-column injection with a retention gap technique performs better than PTV solvent splitting for the analysis of volatile, labile, and high-boiling components, but it is sensitive to contamination of the precolumns with nonevaporating sample by-products Large-volume, cold oncolumn injections are increasing in popularity as methods for analysis of trace-level components and, especially, for environmental analysis.[22–25] On-Column Injection for GC CONCLUSION Cold on-column injection is an injection technique for GC which offers some advantages: elimination of sample discrimination, elimination of sample alteration, and high analytical precision and accuracy Peak splitting or peak distortion, which may occur as a result of polarity mismatches of solvent, stationary phase, and solutes, can be reduced by means of a retention gap Today, the cold on-column technique using a retention gap is one of the most commonly employed techniques for largevolume injections ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank DAAD (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst), Bonn, Germany, for the financial support during our short visit at TU Braunschweig and at the University of Duesseldorf in 2002 We are also grateful to Miss Ivy Widjaja and Mr Dedy Triono for their technical assistance REFERENCES Schomburg, G Gas Chromatography, A Practical Course; VCH Verlagsgesellschaft: Weinheim, 1990 Sandra, P Sample Introduction in Capillary Gas Chromatography; Huăthig: Heidelberg, 1985 Grob, K Split and Splitless Injection in Capillary GC; Huăthig: Heidelberg, 1998 Poole, C.F.; Poole, S.K Chromatography Today; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1991 Sandra, P Sample Introduction In High Resolution Gas Chromatography; Hyver, K.J., Ed.; Hewlett-Packard Co., 1989 Ravindranath, B Principles and Practice of Chromatography; Ellis Horwood Limited: Chichester, 1989 Fowlis, I.A Gas Chromatography: Analytical Chemistry by Open Learning; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1995 http://www.chromtech.net.au/pdf/rtxflash.pdf (accessed in January 2004) Sandra, J.F Gas Chromatography In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH: Weinheim, 2002 10 Grob, R.L Modern Practice of Gas Chromatography; Wiley Interscience: New York, 1997 11 Adamovics, J.A.; Eschbach, J.C Gas chromatography in Chromatographic Analysis of Pharmaceutical; Marcel Dekker Inc: New York, 1997 12 Badings, H.T.; De Jong, C Glass capillary gas chromatography of fatty acid methyl esters A study of conditions for the quantitative analysis of short- and long-chain fatty acids in lipids J Chromatogr 1983, 279, 493 – 506 ORDER REPRINTS On-Column Injection for GC 13 Geeraert, E.; Sandra, P.; De Schepper, D On-column injection in the capillary gas chromatography analysis of fats and oils J Chromatogr 1983, 279, 287 – 295 14 Bonilla, M.; Enriquez, L.G.; McNair, H.M Use of cold oncolumn injection for the analysis of putrescine and cadaverine by gas chromatography J Chromatogr Sci 1997, 35 (2), 53 – 56 15 Schomburg, G Sampling technique in capillary gas chromatography J Chromatogr 1977, 142, 87 – 102 16 Grob, K.; Grob, K., Jr On-column injection on to glass capillary columns J Chromatogr 1978, 151, 311 – 320 17 Galli, M.; Trestianu, S Benefits of a special cooling system to improve precision and accuracy in nonvaporizing on-column injection procedures J Chromatogr 1981, 203, 193 – 205 18 http://www.gaschromatographs.com/sample.asp (accessed in January 2004) 19 Hinshaw, J Capillary inlet systems for gas chromatographic trace analysis J Chromatogr Sci 1988, 26, 49 – 55 20 Grob, K On-column injection of large volumes using the retention gap technique in capillary gas chromatography J Chromatogr 1985, 334, 129 – 155 21 David, F.; Sandra, P.; Stafford, S.S Application of Retention Gaps for Optimized Capillary GC In Application Note 228–245, Publ No 43; Hewlett-Packard Co., March 1994; 5962E – 7904E 22 http://www.textronica.com/aplicate/struktur/an9142.pdf (accessed in January 2004) ! LVIOCI 23 http://www.jtbaker.com/techlib/documents/quest2.htm (accessed in January 2004) 24 http://www.chem.agilent.com/cpdocs/5890%20Series%20II%20Cool%20On%20Column%20Operating%20Manual.pdf (accessed in January 2004) 25 Wilson, B.; Nixon, D.; Klee, M Large-Volume Injection for Gas Chromatography Using COC-SVE In Application Note 228–377, Publication No 23; Agilent Technology, March 1997; 5965E – 7923E SUGGESTED FURTHER READING Grob, K On Column Injection in Capillary Gas Chromatography; Huăthig: Heidelberg, 1998 Open-Tubular (Capillary) Columns Raymond P.W Scott Scientific Detectors Ltd., Banbury, Oxfordshire, England Introduction Open-tubular columns were discovered by Golay [1] in the late 1950s and the first commercial columns were introduced in the early 1960s The first capillary columns were fabricated from copper tubing 0.01 in inner diameter but, due to their somewhat variable geometry, were quickly replaced with the more rigid cupronickel tubing and, subsequently, by stainless-steel tubing Discussion Metal capillary columns need to be cleaned to remove traces of extrusion lubricants by washing them with methylene dichloride, methanol, and then water They should also be washed with dilute acid to remove any metal oxides or corrosion products that remain adhering to the walls The acid is removed with water and the tubing is again washed with methanol and methylene dichloride and dried in a stream of hot nitrogen Metal columns provide the expected high efficiencies and were used successfully for the analysis of lowpolarity materials such as petroleum and fuel oils and, today, they are still extensively used for the analysis of hydrocarbons Metal columns, however, although easily coated with dispersive stationary phases (e.g., squalane, Apiezon grease, etc.), not coat well with the more polar stationary phases such as Carbowax ® In addition, the hot metal surface can cause decomposition and molecular rearrangement of many thermally labile materials that are being separated (e.g., the terpenes in essential oils) Metal can also react directly with some solutes by chelation and, as a result of surface adsorption, produce asymmetric and tailing peaks Nevertheless, metal columns are rugged, easy to handle, and easy to remove and replace in the chromatograph, so their use has persisted in many applications despite the introduction of fused-silica columns In an attempt to eliminate surface activity, Desty et al [2] introduced the first silica-based columns and invented an extremely clever device for drawing soft glass capillary columns Desty produced both rigid soft glass and rigid Pyrex capillary columns, although their permanent circular shape rendered them a little difficult to connect to the injector and detector It was found that, with special surface treatment, the rigid glass tubes could be coated with polar stationary phases The demand for special surface processing evoked a large number of proprietary methods for column treatment Fortunately, the frenetic interest in the surface deactivation of soft glass capillary tubes was curtailed by the introduction of the flexible fused-silica capillary columns by Dandenau and Zenner [3] The quartz fiber drawing technique used in the manufacture of data transmission lines was used to produce flexible fused-silica tubing Basically, the solid quartz rod used in quartz fiber drawing was replaced by a quartz tube In a similar manner to that used in the quartz fiber production, the quartz tubes were coated with polyimide to prevent moisture from attacking the surface and producing stress corrosion Soft glass capillaries can be produced by the same technique at much lower temperatures [4], but the tubes are not as mechanically strong or as inert as quartz capillaries Flexibility was the main advantage to quartz capillaries, as it greatly facilitated the installation of the columns in the chromatograph However, surface treatment is still necessary with a fused-quartz column to reduce adsorption and catalytic activity and render the surface wettable for efficient coating The treatment may involve washing with acid, silanization, and other types of chemical treatment, including the use of surfactants Deactivation procedures used for commercial columns also tend to be highly proprietary A deactivation program for silica and soft glass columns that is suitable for most applications would first entail an acid wash The column is filled with 10% (w/w) hydrochloric acid, the ends sealed, and the column then heated to 100°C for h The column is then washed free of acid with distilled water and dried This procedure is believed to remove traces of heavy metal ions that can cause adsorption and peak tailing The column is then filled with a solution of hexamethyldisilazane, sealed, and heated to the boiling point of the solvent for h This procedure blocks any hydroxyl groups on the surface that were generated during the acid wash A polar Encyclopedia of Chromatography DOI: 10.1081/E-Echr 120005244 Copyright © 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved or semipolar silane reagent might be preferable to facilitate coating if a polar stationary phase is to be used The column is then washed with the pure solvent, dried at an elevated temperature in a stream of pure nitrogen, and is ready for coating Open-tubular columns can be coated internally with a liquid stationary phase or with polymeric materials that are subsequently polymerized to form a relatively rigid polymer coating The two methods of coating are the dynamic method of coating and the static method of coating In the dynamic coating procedure, a plug of solvent containing the stationary phase is placed at the beginning of the column The strength of the solution, among other factors, determines the thickness of the stationary-phase film In general, the film thickness of an open-tubular column ranges from 0.25 mm to about 1.5 mm As an estimate, a 5% (w/w) solution of stationary phase will provide a stationary film thickness of about 0.5 mm After the plug has been run into the front of the column (sufficient solution should be added to fill about 10% of the column length), a gas pressure is used to force the plug through the column at about – mm/s When the plug has passed through the column, the gas flow is continued for about h The gas flow should not be increased too soon, as ripples of stationary phase solution will form on the walls of the tube, which produces a very uneven film After h, the flow rate is increased and the column stripped of solvent The last traces of the solvent are removed by heating the column above the boiling point of the solvent at an increased gas flow rate In static coating, the entire column is filled with a solution of the stationary phase and one end connected to a vacuum As the solvent evaporates, it retreats back down the tube, leaving a coating on the walls The optimum concentration will depend on the stationary phase, the solvent, the temperature, and the condition of the wall surface This process is very timeconsuming but can proceed without attention and is often carried out overnight This procedure is more repeatable than the dynamic method of coating, but, in general, it produces columns having a similar performance to those dynamically coated However well the column may be coated, the stability of the column depends on the stability of the stationary phase film, and thus on the constant nature of the surface tension forces holding it to the column wall These surface tension forces can change with temperature or be effected by the samples used for analysis As a consequence, the surface tension can be suddenly reduced and the film break up It follows that the stationary phase should be bonded in some way to the Open-Tubular (Capillary) Columns column walls or polymerized in situ Such coatings are called immobilized stationary phases and cannot be removed by solvent washing Some stationary phases that are polymeric in nature can sometimes be formed by coating the monomers or dimers on the walls and then initiating polymerization either by heat or a suitable catalyst This locks the stationary phase to the column wall and is thus completely immobilized Polymer coatings can be formed in the same way using dynamic coating Techniques used for immobilizing the stationary phases are highly proprietary and little is known of the methods used In any event, most chromatographers not want to go to the trouble of coating their own columns and are usually content to purchase proprietary columns Porous-Layer Open-Tubular Columns There are two basic disadvantages to the coated capillary column First, the limited solute retention that results from the small quantity of stationary phase in the column Second, if a thick film is coated on the column to compensate for this low retention, the film becomes unstable resulting in rapid column deterioration Initially, attempts were made to increase the stationaryphase loading by increasing the internal surface area of the column Attempts were first made to etch the internal column surface, which produced very little increase in surface area and very scant improvement Attempts were then made to coat the internal surface with diatomaceous earth, to form a hybrid between a packed column and coated capillary None of the techniques were particularly successful and the work was suddenly eclipsed by the production of immobilize films firmly attached to the tube walls This solved both the problem of loading, because thick films could be immobilized on the tube surface, and that of phase stability As a consequence, porous-layer open-tubular (PLOT) columns are not extensively used The PLOT column, however, has been found to be an attractive alternative to the packed column for gas–solid chromatography (GSC) and effective methods for depositing adsorbents on the tube surface have been developed The open-tubular column is, by far, the most popular type of GC column in use today As a result of its small internal cross section, however, extracolumn dispersion can become a serious problem This means that open-tubular columns must be used with special types of injector and reduced volume connectors, and certain detectors must have specially designed sensor cells to avoid impairing column performance Open-Tubular (Capillary) Columns References Suggested Further Reading Scott, R P W., Techniques and Practice of Chromatography, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1996 Scott, R P W., Introduction to Analytical Gas Chromatography, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1998 M J E Golay, Gas Chromatography 1958 (D H Desty, ed.), Butterworths, London, 1958, p 36 D H Desty, A Goldup, and B F Wyman, J Inst Petrol 45: 287 (1959) R D Dandenau and E M Zenner, J High Resolut Chromatogr 2: 351 (1979) K L Ogan, C Reese, and R P W Scott, J Chromatogr Sci 20: 425 (1982) Open-Tubular and Micropacked Columns for Supercritical Fluid Chromatography Brian Jones Selerity Technologies, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A Introduction Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) with opentubular columns was first demonstrated in 1981 by Novotny and co-workers [1] This technique, known as capillary SFC, was made available to the analytical community through the introduction of several commercial instruments in 1986 Initially difficult to use, improvements in instrumentation and hardware, coupled with a wider array of columns and restrictor options designed specifically for the technique, becoming available, have led to a general acceptance of the method in many laboratories Not only useful as a research tool, capillary SFC is firmly established as an essential analytical method for production support and quality control in many industries Some of these include chemical and petroleum manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, polymers, and environmental monitoring Packed columns have also been used in SFC for many years, predating capillaries by nearly 20 years Many columns originally developed for liquid chromatography have found utility in SFC and have varied in internal diameter from smaller than 50 mm to very large-preparative-scale sizes Definitions vary, but for purposes here, micropacked columns are considered to have internal diameters less than mm These smallerdiameter columns are also in wide use and offer significant benefits with regard to mobile-phase consumption and detector compatibility than their largebore counterparts The selectivity and performance of micropacked columns are complimentary to those of capillaries, and instrumentation is available that is compatible with both separation techniques, allowing for the separation of a wide range of analytes and rapid switchover between methods Several reviews have been published [2 – 4] Pressure Drop Effects Elution of a particular compound in SFC is a function of its extent of interaction with the column stationary phase and the solvating strength of the mobile phase, with the latter being a direct function of density The density is affected by temperature and pressure and, in the case of separations with capillary columns that are inherently open and exhibit little pressure drop across their length, it is essentially constant throughout By contrast, packed columns exhibit much more resistance to mobile-phase flow and can experience a considerable density drop during SFC analysis, producing a potentially significant loss in separation efficiency Commercial packed columns, tested only by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), may not show these deficiencies in their test reports The only reliable gauge of suitability of a column for SFC is a performance test in the SFC mode Columns tested under SFC conditions and tested for suitability for a specific SFC method have been commercially available for some time The pressure drop effect limits the usable length of packed columns to approximately 25 cm, although micropacked columns prepared specifically for SFC can be used to longer lengths [5] The particle size also plays a role, with packing materials smaller than mm producing the highest pressure drops Whereas short columns dominate in packed column SFC, typical parameters for capillary columns are –10 m in length, 50 mm in inner diameter, and a stationary-phase film thickness of 0.25 mm, which give the best compromise in loadability, analysis speed, and efficiency Calculated practical efficiencies for a compound with a capacity factor of and a CO2 mobile phase are shown for each type of column in Table It is clear that capillary columns are capable of delivering high efficiency separations in SFC, but at the expense of analysis time when compared to packed columns Activity Silica surfaces are the chief source of activity in columns for SFC and, even though many of the columns are well deactivated, the residual silanol sites can lead to tailing or adsorption of analytes The low surface area of capillary columns is responsible for much higher levels of inertness than their packed counterparts based on silica particles Capillary columns have been used successfully in the analysis of active com- Encyclopedia of Chromatography DOI: 10.1081/E-Echr 120005245 Copyright © 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved Open-Tubular and Micropacked Columns for Supercritical Fluid Chromatography Table Calculated Practical Efficiencies for Compound with a Capacity Factor of and CO2 Mobile Phase Column type Particle diameter, internal diameter (mm) Packed Capillary 05 50 Length (m) Plates at low density (100 atm, 100°C) Plates at high density (400 atm, 100°C) Linear velocity (cm/s) at low density Linear velocity (cm/s) at high density 00.1 10.0 005,200 102,000 09,100 19,000 0.6 2.5 2.1 5.8 Source: Data from Ref pounds, including isocyanates, acid halides, organic acids, amines, peroxides, azo compounds, and many others The low temperatures required for elution make analysis of active and labile compounds viable Silica particles have high surface areas and usually contain a large number of exposed residual silanol groups after derivatization These groups impart a significant degree of polarity to packed columns and can be used to advantage, for example, in the determination of aromatics in fuels [6] For more active solutes, modifiers are used to reduce tailing and improve quantitation connections The injector must deliver a small, narrow band of material onto the head of the column and must not contain any void volume or unswept area in the flow path Several methods of injection are in common use, including the following: Modifiers The addition of cosolvents to the mobile phase can be effective in adjusting selectivity and improving sample solubility As the most dramatic effect with polar modifiers is seen in the interaction with the surface silanol groups, even small amounts of cosolvents change the elution characteristics of packed columns With capillary columns, the effect is related more to solvent strength of the mobile phase than surface modification, and higher modifier levels are required to produce significant changes in retention One of the drawbacks of using modifiers is their response in some of the detectors The flame ionization detector (FID) is very popular with capillary and micropacked columns in SFC because of its near-universal response and high sensitivity and the lack of response of CO2 as the most popular mobile phase The low mass flow rate of the mobile phase in small columns allows for a direct interfacing of the column to the FID and other detectors without flow splitting or back-pressure regulation Split, where the column is placed in the injector such that it intercepts a portion of the sample stream with the excess carried past and out of the system through a flow restrictor This method gives the highest efficiencies, but it can produce some sample discrimination Timed-split, where the sample loop is placed in the flow stream for short periods, and the time in the inject position determines the amount on column This is the most popular injection method and gives good efficiency and reproducibility It requires fast actuation and an internal sample loop Split-splitless, which is performed with a split assembly and a split vent shutoff valve This method enables larger volumes to be admitted onto the columns and the split activates to reduce tailing by sweeping residual amounts of material out of the system The use of a retention gap can allow for higher efficiencies and larger injection volumes on capillary columns [7] The retention gap is a section of uncoated tubing placed between the column and the injector, which allows the analytes to refocus into a narrow band at the head of the column This uncoated section can be built right into the capillary column such that no additional connections are required Restrictors Sample Introduction The small internal volume and low mobile-phase mass flow rates in capillary and micropacked column SFC place significant demands on the injection system and Restrictors are required at the ends of SFC columns to maintain supercritical conditions throughout the column and to limit overall flow Several options exist, with frit restrictors being the most popular, followed by integral and linear formats The frit restrictor is Open-Tubular and Micropacked Columns for Supercritical Fluid Chromatography made by casting a porous ceramic material inside fused-silica tubing with the flow rate dependent on length and pore size These restrictors are robust and are easily tuned to the desired flow rate by trimming small sections off of the frit end The multiple flow paths are also resistant to plugging Frit restrictors are supplied in varied porosities in the end of deactivated 50-mm-inner diameter tubing and are attached to the end of the column using low dead-volume connectors Integral restrictors are made by heating fused-silica tubing to its melting point and allowing it to collapse to a single orifice of very small diameter The end can be ground to form a larger opening, but this process requires considerable patience This type of restrictor can be fabricated in the end of the column such that no connectors are required, but the single orifice is more susceptible to plugging with stray particles than are other types Linear restrictors are made from short lengths of fused-silica tubing with narrow internal diameters These are interfaced to the column with lowdead-volume connectors, but the long pressure drop across the tubing length can cause some analytes to precipitate prematurely and produce detector spiking Stationary Phases A wide variety of stationary phases and bonded-phase particles for SFC are available Capillary columns are coated with substituted and cross-linked polysiloxanes, which exhibit good inertness, efficiency, and stability There are three main classes of capillary column stationary phases for SFC: apolar, polarizable, and polar Apolar Methyl silicone, 5% phenyl-substituted silicone, and 50% octyl-substituted silicone separate generally on the basis of solute volatility The most significant interactions are inherently weak van der Waal’s These phases have the highest diffusion properties and give the highest efficiencies Highly polar materials overload easily on these columns and produce wedgeshaped peaks Polarizable The 50% phenyl-substituted silicone and 30% biphenyl-substituted silicone stationary phases are moderately polar and contain polarizable aromatic rings that exhibit induced dipoles in the presence of dipolar solutes such as alcohols, phenols, amines, nitriles, ketones, and so forth They give selectivity with- out extended retention of polar solutes because the dipole-induced–dipole interaction is relatively weak Temperature affects the extent of this polarization and can be used as a variable in optimizing separations Polar The 25% and 50% cyanopropyl phases exhibit permanent dipoles that interact strongly with polar solutes Because this translates into longer retention times for polar solutes, only lower-molecular-weight materials of this type can be eluted Polarizable (aromatic and unsaturated hydrocarbons) and weakly dipolar solutes are good candidates for analysis with these phases Aliphatic hydrocarbons overload easily but elute rapidly Micropacked columns are available with most of the bonded-phase packings used in high-performance liquid chromatography Porous and nonporous silica particles are optionally functionalized with covalently bound silanes or other strongly adsorbed materials Alkyl-bonded silicas produce separations, generally based on solute volatility, but with the potential for selectivity differences based on interaction with silanol groups Underivatized silica is popular for petroleum separations of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons Silver-ion-containing silica columns are selective for olefin separations Fluoroalkyl-bonded silicas produce unique selectivities and show good sample capacities for fluorocarbons Polybutadiene-derivatized zirconia particles have also been used in SFC as have particles based on cross-linked organic polymers These latter types show different selectivities because of the absence of surface silanol groups Chiral-bonded phases capable of resolving enantiomers are seeing wide use, particularly in the pharmaceutical market Recent Advances Recent developments in capillary and micropacked column SFC have centered on making the technique easier and more reliable to use Columns are available that are fitted with restrictors, performance tested by SFC, and are ready to install Dead-volume issues have been resolved with low-mass couplers and auto-depthadjusting fingertight fittings suitable for high-pressure use Packed columns have been developed and optimized for SFC use that have low pressure drops and high stabilities The future should see a continuation of this trend, with more column options and formats becoming available and additional methods utilizing them seeing wide acceptance Open-Tubular and Micropacked Columns for Supercritical Fluid Chromatography References M Novotny, S R Springston, P A Peaden, J C Fjeldstead, and M L Lee, Anal Chem 53: 407A (1981) M L Lee and K E Markides (eds.), Analytical Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Extraction, Chromatography Conferences, Provo, UT, 1990 M Caude and D Thiebaut (eds.), Practical Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Extraction, Harwood, Amsterdam, 1999 L G Blomberg, M Demirbueker, I Haegglund, and P E Andersson, Trends Anal Chem 13(3): 126 –137 (1994) W Li, A Malik, and M L Lee, J Microcol Separ 6: 557–563 (1994) W Li, A Malik, M L Lee, B A Jones, N L Porter, and B E Richter, Anal Chem 67(3): 647– 654 (1995) T L Chester and D P Innis, Anal Chem 67(17): 3057–3063 (1995) ... and a solid Encyclopedia of Chromatography DOI: 10 .10 81/ E-Echr 12 0004562 Copyright © 2002 by Marcel Dekker, Inc All rights reserved Adhesion of Colloids by FFF substrate is a function of the particle... optimization of the chiral resolution of the pollutant, and the use of large amounts of solvents and sample volumes are the main drawbacks of HPLC Conversely, Encyclopedia of Chromatography DOI: 10 .10 81/ E-ECHR... limit of the detection was enhanced by almost order of magnitude from 1 10 À M (10 pmol) to 3 10 À M (0.36 pmol) In the same study, the authors reported 2.5  10 À M and 1 10 À M as the limits of

Ngày đăng: 05/03/2018, 13:20

Từ khóa liên quan

Mục lục

  • Cover

  • b-Agonist Residues in Food, Analysis by LC

  • Acoustic Field-Flow Fractionation for Particle Separation

  • Additives in Biopolymers, Analysis by

  • Adhesion of Colloids on Solid Surfaces by

  • Adsorption Chromatography

  • Adsorption Studies by Field-Flow Fractionation

  • Advances in Chiral Pollutants

  • Affinity Chromatography with Immobilized Antibodies

  • Affinity Chromatography: An Overview

  • Aggregation of Colloids by Field-Flow Fractionation

  • Alumina-Based Supports for

  • Amino Acid Analysis by HPLC

  • Amino Acids and Derivatives: Analysis by TLC

  • Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins: Analysis by CE

  • Analysis of Alcoholic Beverages by Gas Chromatography

  • Analysis of Food Colors by Thin-Layer

  • Analysis of Mycotoxins by TLC

  • Analysis of Plant Toxins by TLC

  • Analysis of Terpenoids by Thin-Layer Chromatography

  • Analyte–Analyte Interactions, Effect on

  • Antibiotics: Analysis by TLC

  • Antioxidant Activity: An Adaptation for

  • Application of Capillary Electrochromatography

  • Applications of Evaporative Light-Scattering

  • Applied Voltage: Effect on Mobility, Selectivity,

  • Aqueous Two-Phase Solvent Systems

  • Argon Detector

  • Assessment of Lipophilicity by Reversed-Phase

  • Asymmetric Flow FFF in Biotechnology

  • Automation and Robotics in Planar Chromatography

  • Axial Dispersion Correction Methods in GPC–SEC

  • Band Broadening in Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Band Broadening in Size-Exclusion Chromatography

  • Barbiturates, Analysis by Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Binding Constants: Determination

  • Binding Molecules Via SH Groups

  • Biopharmaceuticals by Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Biopolymer Separations by

  • Biotic Dicarboxylic Acids, CCC Separation with

  • Bonded Phases in HPLC

  • Buffer Systems for Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Buffer Type and Concentration, Effect on Mobility, Selectivity,

  • Calibration of GPC–SEC with Narrow

  • Calibration of GPC–SEC with Universal

  • Capacity

  • Capillary Electrochromatography: An Introduction

  • Capillary Electrophoresis and HPLC for Analysis of

  • Capillary Electrophoresis in Nonaqueous Media

  • Capillary Electrophoresis–Inductively Coupled

  • Capillary Electrophoresis on Chips

  • Capillary Electrophoresis: Introduction and Overview

  • Capillary Isoelectric Focusing of Peptides,

  • Capillary Isoelectric Focusing: An Overview

  • Capillary Isotachophoresis

  • Carbohydrates as Affinity Ligands

  • Carbohydrates: Analysis by Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Carbohydrates: Analysis by HPLC

  • Carbohydrates: Analysis by TLC—New Visualization

  • Catalyst Characterization by Reversed Flow

  • CCC Solvent Systems

  • CE–MS: Large-Molecule Applications

  • Cell Sorting Using Sedimentation Field Flow Fractionation:

  • Centrifugal Partition Chromatography: An Overview

  • Centrifugal Precipitation Chromatography

  • Ceramides: Analysis by Thin-Layer Chromatography

  • Channeling and Column Voids

  • Characterization of Metalloproteins

  • Chelating Sorbents for Affinity Chromatography (IMAC)

  • Chemometrics in Chromatography

  • Chiral Chromatography by Subcritical

  • Chiral Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Chiral Separations by Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Chiral Separations by GC

  • Chiral Separations by HPLC

  • Chiral Separations by Micellar Electrokinetic

  • Chromatographic Methods Used to Identify and

  • Classification of Organic Solvents

  • Coil Planet Centrifuges

  • Cold-Wall Effects in Thermal FFF

  • Comprehensive Thermodynamic Approach to Ion

  • Concentration Effects on Polymer Separation

  • Concentration of Dilute Colloidal Samples

  • Conductivity Detection in Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Conductivity Detection in HPLC

  • Congener-Specific PCB Analysis

  • Copolymer Analysis by LC Methods,

  • Copolymer Composition by GPC–SEC

  • Copolymer Molecular Weights by GPC–SEC

  • Coriolis Force in Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Corrected Retention Time and Corrected

  • Coumarins: Analysis by TLC

  • Countercurrent Chromatographic Separation

  • Countercurrent Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

  • Creatinine and Purine Derivatives, Analysis by HPLC

  • Cross-Axis Coil Planet Centrifuge

  • CZE of Biopolymers

  • Dead Point (Volume or Time)

  • Degassing of Solvents

  • Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers:

  • Derivatization of Acids for GC Analysis

  • Derivatization of Amines, Amino Acids,

  • Derivatization of Analytes in Chromatography:

  • Derivatization of Carbohydrates for GC Analysis

  • Derivatization of Carbonyls for GC Analysis

  • Derivatization of Hydroxy Compounds for GC Analysis

  • Derivatization of Steroids for GC Analysis

  • Detection (Visualization) of TLC Zones

  • Detection in Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Detection Methods in Field-Flow Fractionation

  • Detection Principles

  • Detector Linear Dynamic Range

  • Detector Linearity and Response Index

  • Detector Noise

  • Displacement Chromatography

  • Displacement Thin-Layer Chromatography

  • Distribution Coefficient

  • DNA Sequencing Studies by CE

  • Drug Residues in Food, Detection/Confirmation by LC-MS

  • Dry-Column Chromatography

  • Dual Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Dyes: Separation by Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Eddy Diffusion in Liquid Chromatography

  • Effect of Organic Solvents on Ion Mobility

  • Effect of Temperature and Mobile Phase Composition

  • Efficiency in Chromatography

  • Efficiency of a Thin-Layer Chromatography Plate

  • Electro-osmotic Flow

  • Electro-osmotic Flow in Capillary Tubes

  • Electro-osmotic Flow Nonuniformity: Influence

  • Electrochemical Detection

  • Electrochemical Detection in CE

  • Electrokinetic Chromatography Including

  • Electron-Capture Detector

  • Electrospray Ionization Interface for CE–MS

  • Eluotropic Series of Solvents for

  • Elution Chromatography

  • Elution Modes in Field-Flow Fractionation

  • Enantiomer Separations by TLC

  • Enantioseparation by Capillary Electrochromatography

  • End Capping

  • Enoxacin: Analysis by Capillary Electrophoresis and HPLC

  • Environmental Applications of SFC

  • Environmental Pollutants Analysis by

  • Essential Oils Analysis by Gas Chromatography

  • Evaporative Light Scattering Detection

  • Exclusion Limit in GPC–SEC

  • Extra-Column Dispersion

  • Extra-Column Volume

  • Fast Gas Chromatography

  • Field-Flow Fractionation Data Treatment

  • Field-Flow Fractionation Fundamentals

  • Field-Flow Fractionation with Electro-osmotic Flow

  • Flame Ionization Detector for GC

  • Flavonoids, Analysis by Supercritical

  • Flow Field-Flow Fractionation: Introduction

  • Fluorescence Detection in Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Fluorescence Detection in HPLC

  • Foam Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Focusing Field-Flow Fractionation

  • Forensic Applications of Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Forskolin Purification Using an Immunoaffinity Column

  • Fraction Collection Devices

  • Frit-Inlet Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation

  • Frontal Chromatography

  • Fronting of Chromatographic Peaks: Causes

  • Gas Chromatography System Instrumentation

  • Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry Systems

  • Golay Dispersion Equation

  • GPC–SEC Analysis of Nonionic Surfactants

  • GPC–SEC Viscometry from Multiangle Light Scattering

  • GPC–SEC–HPLC Without Calibration: Multiangle Light

  • GPC–SEC: Effect of Experimental Conditions

  • GPC–SEC: Introduction and Principles

  • Gradient Development in Thin-Layer Chromatography

  • Gradient Elution

  • Gradient Elution in Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Gradient Elution: Overview

  • Gradient Generation Devices and Methods

  • Headspace Sampling

  • Helium Detector

  • High-Speed SEC Methods

  • High-Temperature High-Resolution Gas Chromatography

  • Histidine in Body Fluids, Specific Determination by HPLC

  • HPLC Analysis of Amino Acids

  • HPLC Analysis of Flavonoids

  • HPLC Column Maintenance

  • Hybrid Micellar Mobile Phases

  • Hydrodynamic Equilibrium in CCC

  • Hydrophilic Vitamins, Analysis by TLC

  • Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography

  • Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography

  • Immunoaffinity Chromatography

  • Immunodetection

  • Industrial Applications of CCC

  • Influence of Organic Solvents on pKa

  • Injection Techniques for Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Inorganic Analysis by CCC

  • Instrumentation of Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Intrinsic Viscosity of Polymers: Determination by GPC

  • Ion Chromatography Principles,

  • Ion Exchange: Mechanism and Factors Affecting Separation

  • Ion-Exchange Buffers

  • Ion-Exchange Stationary Phases

  • Ion-Exclusion Chromatography

  • Ion-Interaction Chromatography

  • Ion-Pairing Techniques

  • Katharometer Detector for Gas Chromatography

  • Kovats Retention Index System

  • Large-Volume Injection for Gas Chromatography

  • Large-Volume Sample Injection in FFF

  • Laser-Induced Fluorescence Detection

  • LC-NMR and LC-MS-NMR:

  • Lewis Base–Modified Zirconia as

  • Lipid Analysis by HPLC

  • Lipid Classes: Purification by Solid-Phase Extraction

  • Lipid Separation by Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Lipids Analysis by Thin-Layer Chromatography

  • Lipids Analysis by TLC

  • Lipophilic Vitamins by Thin-Layer Chromatography

  • Lipophilicity Determination of Organic Substances

  • Lipoprotein Separation by Combined Use

  • Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

  • Liquid–Liquid Partition Chromatography

  • Long-Chain Polymer Branching: Determination by

  • Longitudinal Diffusion in Liquid Chromatography

  • Magnetic FFF and Magnetic SPLITT

  • Mark–Houwink Relationship

  • Mass Transfer Between Phases

  • Metal-Ion Enrichment by Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Metal-Ion Separation by Micellar High

  • Metals and Organometallics: Gas Chromatography

  • Metformin and Glibenclamide, Simultaneous

  • Microcystin, Isolation by Supercritical Fluid Extraction

  • Migration Behavior: Reproducibility

  • Minimum Detectable Concentration (Sensitivity)

  • Mixed Stationary Phases in GC

  • Mobile Phase Modifiers for SFC: Influence on Retention

  • Molecular Interactions in GC

  • Molecular Weight and Molecular-Weight

  • Molecularly Imprinted Polymers

  • Monolithic Disk Supports for HPLC

  • Multidimensional TLC

  • Natural Products Analysis by CE

  • Natural Rubber: GPC–SEC Analysis

  • Neuropeptides and Neuroproteins

  • Neurotransmitter and Hormone Receptors:

  • Nitrogen /Phosphorus Detector

  • Nonionic Surfactants: GPC–SEC Analysis

  • Normal-Phase Chromatography

  • Normal-Phase Stationary Packings

  • Nucleic Acids, Oligonucleotides, and DNA:

  • Octanol–Water Partition Coefficients by CCC

  • On-Column Injection for GC

  • Open-Tubular (Capillary) Columns

  • Open-Tubular and Micropacked Columns

  • Optical Activity Detectors

  • Optical Quantification (Densitometry) in TLC

  • Optimization of Thin-Layer Chromatography

  • Organic Acids, Analysis by Thin Layer Chromatography

  • Organic Extractables from Packaging Materials:

  • Overpressured Layer Chromatography

  • Packed Capillary Liquid Chromatography

  • Particle Size Determination by Gravitational FFF

  • Peak Identification with a Diode Array Detector

  • Peak Purity Determination with a Diode Array Detector

  • Peak Skimming for Overlapping Peaks

  • Pellicular Supports for HPLC

  • Penicillin Antibiotics in Food: Liquid

  • Peptide Analysis by HPLC

  • Peptide Separation by Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Pesticide Analysis by Gas Chromatography

  • Pesticide Analysis by Thin-Layer Chromatography

  • pH, Effect on MEKC Separation

  • pH-Peak-Focusing and pH-Zone-Refining

  • Pharmaceuticals: Analysis by TLC

  • Phenolic Acids in Natural Plants: Analysis by HPLC

  • Phenolic Compounds, Analysis by HPLC

  • Phenolic Drugs, New Visualizing Reagents

  • Phenols and Acids: Analysis by TLC

  • Photodiode-Array Detection

  • Photophoretic Effects in FFF of Particles

  • Plant Extracts: Analysis by TLC

  • Plate Number, Effective

  • Plate Theory

  • Pollutant–Colloid Association by Field-Flow

  • Pollutants in Water by HPLC

  • Polyamide Analysis by GPC–SEC

  • Polycarbonates: GPC–SEC Analysis

  • Polyester Analysis by GPC–SEC

  • Polymer Additives: Analysis by

  • Polymer Degradation in GPC–SEC Columns

  • Polymerase Chain Reaction Products:

  • Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Environmental

  • Porous Graphitized Carbon Columns in

  • Potential Barrier Field-Flow Fractionation

  • Preparative HPLC Optimization

  • Preparative TLC

  • Procyanidin Separation by CCC with

  • Programmed Flow Gas Chromatography

  • Programmed Temperature Gas Chromatography

  • Prostaglandins: Analysis by HPLC

  • Protein Analysis by HPLC

  • Protein Immobilization

  • Protein Separations by Flow Field-Flow Fractionation

  • Proteins as Affinity Ligands

  • Purge-Backflushing Techniques in Gas Chromatography

  • Purification of Cyanobacterial Hepatotoxin

  • Purification of Peptides with Immobilized Enzymes

  • Pyrolysis–Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

  • Quantitation by External Standard

  • Quantitation by Internal Standard

  • Quantitation by Normalization

  • Quantitation by Standard Addition

  • Quantitative Structure–Retention Relationship

  • Quinolone Antibiotics in Food, Analysis by LC

  • Radiochemical Detection

  • Radius of Gyration Measurement by GPC–SEC

  • Rate Theory in Gas Chromatography

  • Refractive Index Detector

  • Resin Microspheres as Stationary Phase for

  • Resolution in HPLC: Selectivity, Efficiency, and Capacity

  • Resolving Power of a Column

  • Response Spectrum in Chromatographic Analysis

  • Retention Factor: Effect on MEKC Separation

  • Retention Gap Injection Method

  • Retention Time and Retention Volume

  • Reversed-Phase Chromatography:

  • Reversed-Phase Stationary Phases

  • Rf

  • Rotation Locular Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Sample Application in TLC

  • Sample Preparation

  • Sample Preparation and Stacking

  • Sample Preparation Prior to HPLC

  • Scale-up of Countercurrent Chromatography

  • SEC with On-Line Triple Detection: Light Scattering,

  • Sedimentation Field-Flow Fractionation of Living Cells

  • Selection of a Gradient HPLC System

  • Selection of an Isocratic HPLC System

  • Selectivity

  • Selectivity: Factors Affecting,

  • Separation of Alkaloids by Countercurrent Chromatography

  • Separation of Antibiotics

  • Separation of Chiral Compounds

  • Separation of Flavonoids by

  • Separation of Metal Ions by Centrifugal

  • Separation Ratio

  • Sequential Injection Analysis in HPLC

  • Settling Time of Two-Phase Solvent Systems

  • Silica Capillaries: Chemical Derivatization

  • Silica Capillaries: Epoxy Coating

  • Silica Capillaries: Polymeric Coating

  • Silver Ion TLC of Fatty Acids

  • Size Separations by Capillary Electrophoresis

  • Solute Focusing Injection Method

  • Solute Identification in TLC

  • Solvent Effects on Polymer Separation by ThFFF

  • Spacer Groups for Affinity Chromatography

  • Spiral Disk Assembly: An Improved Column Design for

  • Split /Splitless Injector

  • Stationary Phases for Packed Column

  • Stationary-Phase Retention

  • Steroid Analysis by Gas Chromatography

  • Steroid Analysis by TLC

  • Supercritical Fluid Chromatography

  • Supercritical Fluid Chromatoraphy

  • Supercritical Fluid Chromatography

  • Supercritical Fluid Chromatography: An Overview

  • Supercritical Fluid Extraction

  • Surface Phenomena in Sedimentation FFF

  • Surfactants: Analysis by HPLC

  • Synergistic Effects of Mixed Stationary

  • Systematic Selection of Solvent Systems for

  • Taxanes Analysis by HPLC

  • Taxines Analysis by HPLC

  • Taxoids Analysis by TLC

  • Temperature Program: Anatomy

  • Temperature: Effect on MEKC Separation

  • Temperature: Effects on Mobility, Selectivity,

  • Terpenoids, Separation by HPLC

  • Theory and Mechanism of Thin-Layer Chromatography

  • Thermal FFF of Polymers and Particles

  • Thermal FFF of Polystyrene

  • Thermal FFF: Basic Introduction and Overview

  • Thermodynamics of GPC–SEC Separation

  • Thermodynamics of Retention in Gas Chromatography

  • Thin-Layer Chromatographic Study of Quantitative

  • Thin-Layer Chromatography of Natural Pigments

  • Thin-Layer Chromatography of Synthetic Dyes

  • Thin-Layer Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

  • Three-Dimensional Effects in Field-Flow

  • TLC Immunostaining of Steroidal Alkaloid Glycosides

  • TLC Sandwich Chamber

  • TLC Sorbents

  • Topological Indices, Use in HPLC

  • Trace Enrichment

  • Troubleshooting HPLC Instrumentation

  • Two-Dimensional Thin-Layer Chromatography

  • Ultrathin-Layer Gel Electrophoresis

  • Unified Chromatography

  • Uremic Toxins in Biofluids, Analysis by HPLC

  • Validation of HPLC Instrumentation

  • Validation of TLC Analyses

  • van’t Hoff Curves

  • Vinyl Pyrrolidone Homopolymer

  • Viscometric Detection in GPC–SEC

  • Vitamin B12 and Related Compounds in Food,

  • Void Volume in Liquid Chromatography

  • Weak Affinity Chromatography

  • Wheat Protein by Field-Flow Fractionation

  • Whey Proteins, Anion-Exchange Separation

  • Zeta-Potential

  • Zirconia–Silica Stationary Phases for HPLC:

  • Zone Dispersion in Field-Flow Fractionation

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan