CÁC NHÂN tố tác ĐỘNG đến THOÁT NGHÈO của hộ GIA ĐÌNH ở NÔNG THÔN VIỆT NAM đại học kinh tế 2015

79 297 0
CÁC NHÂN tố tác ĐỘNG đến THOÁT NGHÈO của hộ GIA ĐÌNH ở NÔNG THÔN VIỆT NAM đại học kinh tế 2015

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

C - m 2015 C - Da 1.7 2.2 2.2.3 Thu 11 11 14 17 21 21 24 24 3.1.3 25 27 27 28 28 29 33 35 37 37 39 4.1 41 43 4.2.1 H 43 46 52 Ch 56 55 57 5.2.1 57 5.2.2 57 60 T uan AusAID GSO VASS VHLSS WTO UNDP A Trang - 2008 22 h chun 22 24 25 008 26 28 31 37 38 40 41 41 44 46 47 48 52 B Trang - 2008 21 h 3.2 35 42 43 54 ; (2) ; (3) ; (5) ; (4) ; (6) ; (7) 2006 Gi i thi u 1.1 tv Trong hai th p k qua, Vi t Nam cc c nh ng qu c t u ng v gi m m t qu c gia thu c di th gi i, Vi ng kinh t nh n 58, l thu c di m xu c a T ng c c Th Vi t Nam - gi i (T ng c c Th 2010) Trong gi v nhanh l i khu t l ac c ng t p trung ch y n xu p h c v n th ch , h t ng h n gi tv gi uc t nhi uv Vi t ng Vi i Vi t Nam, h c thi u s ng s ng, 2012) n c ah H uh uv nhi u qu h gi i ng h ph thu c th p, ch h ,t l t ch ho cao, di , h u cho th y nh ng h n, ti n g i v t i l i s ng cao t v m ( ng s , 2005; Aref, 2011; ng h p Nam, nh s ng c a nh ah t Vi c nh n di t ns ah ng m nh nh p trung kh ng th t k nh t ng m c hi n nhi c i thi u tr is ng n gi m h ho tr o ngh mi ah m c nh i di s h tr c a hi u qu c u tr th b ng cho h gi t bi n ah n r c s mang l i hi u qu gi n gi ah t p trung nh n bi t ns ah ng c ng nh ng T , t s ki n ngh v m t h m c ti n th c i nh ng bi n s d ng l i ns c m ah n t ng cho nh hy v ng b 1.2 M Vi t Nam v i u u - Nh n bi t ng ns c ah Vi t Nam; - ng g m t Nam m m c ti gia 57 S ng r t l So v ah ng ng b u 5.2 Ki n ngh 5.2.1 Ki n ngh v m i quy binary logistic ng t t vi c d ah th c hi n C k t h p gi ng y ut ah t ng t Nam th c hi n b ng ng v uv ng th i k t h p v i ph ng v n nh ng h Nh ng n u ti p theo li , 2012 Vi t Nam cs d ng b d li p nh b d ng th n kh n v ng c a h ng h ch n s d ng b d li u l um Chu m th i c kh c nh t th i gian us u bao g u ki n s ng, ti p c yt c, o hi ng b u nh n 5.2.2 Ki n ngh v m T k t qu ts g tr h d c thi u s c thi u s Theo Cuong (2012) n Vi t Nam ch y u sinh s ng , thu nh p ch y u t s n xu chuy m i t s n xu ng th pc i 58 c thi u s nh p l a ho i gian l n c thi u s tr thu nh p t ho S ng s n xu p, nh n p i ph thu ah gi m s i ph thu c gi m t l n th c hi n k ho ch ba c kh ty ut v ng qua r t nhi ch u ng n ym tv tr c n thi ng h c cung c p d ng c ph c v cho vi c gi ng d c t p, t u ki ng vi c tr nh t th n h c t p t t c khuy tinh , trao h c b ng cho tr u h c Kinh doanh s n xu t ho c th c hi n chuy t s n xu doanh, s n xu u c n thi t p sang kinh t ic n xu t c hi n vi c chuy n c h t, c hi u bi t c a h v c kinh t doanh, v h i nh p kinh t qu c t khuy n xu ph n ho p im t ng s n xu s n, ch bi n th c ph m, s n xu t s n ph m ti u th nh p ho t s n xu pv p, t m u ki n cho h , th c hi n chuy 59 Di i gia - 2012 di p ng b gi k t i gi m xu ng (Nguy n H i ho ti p t c gi m c th n th c hi n , h n ch t c chuy p nh p ng th i khuy p t qu ho t t tr hoang m r ng di ch s d ng u kh ng t t ho h m ts g d ng ngu n v n u qu : th nh t, thi t k n c th ng vay, s ng cho h c vay, th ho ch s n xu v n n xu h iv n g cn p ng th i c pv ng nh n xu h p v i nhu c u th th pc n th c c vi c s d nv n c s d ng v ah Kh h nhi mi n n xu t kinh doanh ah B c th p ng ng b u Long c ah t n th t cho vay; th t h p v i khuy y c th theo t n 60 i n c tri n khai Vi t Nam hi c nh c nh m c v d c bi t c T yh c du ng b y, a ts u Long nh nh c n nh n c h tr n tr ng s theo m c tr cho h ng xu t v m t u v i mong mu n k t qu c Ch c ch n nh ng gi tham gia c a nh ho thi t k gi u qu di n nh t 5.3 H n ch c u g p m t s h n ch Th nh t, nh nh ng ah t c ch n l ph gi ut ch c a b d li ng th i s h n u nhi ah n ng h n v i c a h gia Th hai, b u ch 2006- ys c, B d ng s n t ch s 05/2013/TTLT-UBDT-BNNPTNTK ho ah ng h -BTC- a 61 m th c a nh ns Th ba, d li c u n v ng c a h ch s d ng nh t b d li u Kh s ng h a T ng c c Th 2006 n th d li c c kh m hi n t i b d li u Kh c s ng h gia Cu c m i quan h c kh e c gi i kh c uh pd thi u h c kh tm ng ki m thu nh p c i thi n cu c s ng cd vi t t tri n hi c tv cs T nm nh d c ng t t d um ns n v ng c a h n b nh [1] Andersson M et al., 2006 Determinants of poverty in Lao PDR Country Economic Report 2005:10 Sweden: Published by SIDA [2] Appleton S., 2001 Education, incomes and poverty in Uganda in the 1990s CREDIT Research Paper No 01/22, University of Nottingham [3] Aref A., 2011 Perceived impact of education on poverty reduction in rural areas of Iran Life Science Hournal, 8(2), pp 498-501 [4] Arif G M and Bilquees F., 2006 Chronic and transient poverty in Pakistan: Evidence from a longitudinal household survey MIMAP Technical Paper Series No 19, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics [5] Arif G M and Farooq S., 2012 Dynamics of rural poverty in Pakistan: Evidence from three waves of the panel survey Pakistan Institute of Development Economics , Islamabad [6] Bhatta S D and Sharma S K., 2006 The determinants and consequences of chronic and transient poverty in Nepal CPRC Working Paper 66, Chronic Poverty Research Centre [7] Bogale A et al., 2005 Determinants of poverty in rural Ethiopia Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 44(2), pp 101-120 [8] Bradshaw T.K., 2006 Theories of poverty and anti-poverty programs in community development RPRC Working Paper No 06-05, Rural Poverty Research Center http://www.vistacampus.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/37/PovertyInAmerica/The ories_Pov_AntiPov_Programs.pdf [9] Cuong Nguyen Viet et al., 2010 Urban poverty in Vietnam: Determinants and policy implications Paper No 40767, MPRA [10] Cuong Nguyen Viet, 2012 Poverty of ethnic minorities in the poorest areas of Vietnam Paper No 45737, MPRA [11] Chaudhry I.S et al., 2009 The impact of socioeconomic and demographic variables on poverty: A village study The Lahore Journal of Economics, 14(1), pp 39-68 [12] Datt G and Jolliffe D., 1999 Determinants of poverty in Egypt: 1997 FCND Discussion Paper No 75, International Food Policy Research Institute [13] Datt G et al., 2000 Determinants of poverty in Mozambique: 1996 1997 FCND Discussion Paper No 78, International Food Policy Research Institute [14] David L., M Andy and J Okidi, 2005 Poverty persistence and transitions in Uganda: A combined qualitative and quantitative analysis Global Poverty Research Group [15] Dudek H and Lisicka I., 2013 Determinants of poverty - Binary logit model with interaction terms approach Ekonometrica Economics, 3(41), pp 1507-3866 [16] Ennin C.C et al., 2011 Trend analysis of determinants of poverty in Ghana: Logit approach Research Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 3(1), pp 20-27 [17] Gaiha R., Imai K and Woojun K., 2007 Vulnerability and poverty dynamics in Vietnam Economics Discussion Paper No 0708, The university of Manchester [18] Gibson J and Rozelle S., 2003 Poverty and access to roads in Papua New Guinea Economic Development and Cultural Change, 52(1), pp 151-185 [19] Glewwe P et al., 2002 An analysis of poverty and inequality trends Development Research Group, The World Bank [20] Gounder N., 2012 The determinants of household comsumption and poverty in Fiji Discussion Paper No 2012-05, Griffith Business School [21] Green W H., 2002 Econometric analysis, 5th edition Jew Jersey 07458: Pearson Education [22] Grootaert C., 1999 Social capital, household welfare and poverty in Indonesia Working Paper No 6, The World Bank [23] Gujarati D., 2004 Basic econometrics, 4th edition New York: McGrawHill [24] Gujarati D., 2011 Econometrics by example Palgrave Macmillan [25] Haughton J and Khandker S R., 2009 Handbook on poverty and inequality The World Bank [26] Hulme D., K Moore and A Shepherd, 2001 Chronic poverty: meanings and analytical frameworks CPRC Working Paper No 2, Chronic Poverty Research Centre [27] Jalan J and M Ravallion, 1998 Determinants of transient and chronic poverty: Evidence from rural China Policy Research Working Paper Series No 1936, The World Bank [28] Jalan J and M Ravallion, 2000 Is transient poverty different? Evidence for rural China Journal of Development Studies, 36(6), pp 82-99 [29] Johannes T A., 2009 Does social capital determine poverty? Evidence from Cameroon household survey Faculty of Economics and Management, Senegal [30] Kimsun T., 2011 Analyzing chronic poverty in rural Cambodia: Evidence from panel data EADN Working Paper No 48, Cambodia Development Research Institute [31] Kotikula A., Narayan A and Zaman H., 2007 Explaining poverty reduction in the 2000s: an analysis of the Bangladesh household income and expenditure survey A background paper for Bangladesh Poverty Assessment, South Asia Region, The World Bank [32] Lanjouw P and Ravallion M., 1994 Poverty and household size Policy Research Working Paper No 1332, The World Bank [33] Lanjouw P., 1998 poverty Policy Research Working Paper No 1094, The World Bank [34] Lawson D., 2004 The influence of ill health on chronic and transient poverty: Evidence from Uganda CPRC Working Paper No.41, Chronic Poverty Research Centre [35] Lawson D et al., 2006 Poverty persistence and transitions in Uganda: A combined qualitative and quantitative analysis Journal of Development Studies, 42(7), pp 1225-1251 [36] McCulloch N and Baulch B., 1999 Distinguishing the chronically from the transitory poor - evidence from Pakistan IDS working paper No 97, Brington: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex [37] Minot N et al., 2006 Poverty and Inequality in Vietnam: Spatial patterns and geographic determinants Research Report No 148, International Food Policy Research Institute [38] Morduch J., 2005 Handbook on poverty statistics: Concepts, methods and policy use (Chapter II & III) United Nations Statistics Division [39] Muyanga M., Ayiekox M and Bundiy M., 2006 Determinants of transient and chronic poverty: Evidence from Kenya PMMA Network Session Paper, PEP Research Network General Meeting [40] Oaxaca R., 1973 Male - Female wage differentials in urban labor markets International Economic Review, 14(3), pp 693-709 [41] Ogwumike F O and Akinnibosun M K., 2013 Determinants of poverty among farming households in Nigeria Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), pp 365-373 [42] Okinmadewa F.Y et al., 2005 Social captial and poverty reduction in Nigeria Africa Economic Research consortium (AERC) Nairobi, Kenya [43] Quach M H., Mullineux A W and Murinde V., 2005 Access to credit and household poverty reduction in rural Vietnam: A cross-sectional study The Birmingham Business school, Birmingham: University of Birmingham [44] Ravallion M and Bidani B., 1993 How robust is a poverty profile? The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper No.1223 [45] Ravallion M., 1996 Issues in measuring and modeling poverty The World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper No 1615 [46] Runsinarith P., 2007 Infrastructure development and poverty reduction: Nagoya University [47] Teguh D and Nurkholis N., 2012 Finding out of the determinants of poverty dynamics in Indonesia: Evidence from panel data MPRA Paper No 41185 [48] Warr P., 2005 Road development and poverty reduction: The case of Lao PDR ADB Institute, Research Paper Series(64) [49] Weber B et al., 2007 and labor markets Rural Studies Program, Working Paper Series(RSP 07-01) [50] Wooldridge J M., 2002 Introcductory econometrics: A modern approach, 2nd edition South-Western [51] Yang D T., 2004 Education and allocative efficiency: Household income growth during reforms in China Journal of Development Economics, 74(2004), pp 137-162 [52] Zhang L et al., 2002 Employment, emerging labor markets and the role of education in rural China China Economics Review, 13(2002), pp 313-328 [1] AusAID, 2004 Long [2] - [3] [4] - [5] Theo tham gia : [6] g4 : [7] (2007-2011) : [8] [9] [10] [11] , -21 Variable Obs Mean Std Dev Min Max Y 573 0,389 0,488 DAN_TOC 573 0,511 0,500 PHU_THUOC 573 2,136 1,391 NAMHOC_BQ 573 4,393 2,588 11,25 LAO_DONG 573 2,876 1,455 GIOITINH_CH 573 0,190 0,393 TUOI_CH 573 48,127 14,719 16 93 PHI_NN 573 0,106 0,309 DNN_BQ 573 1,793 2,544 21,125 TIN_DUNG 573 0,216 0,412 TUOI_TIEU 573 0,525 0,500 VUNG_2 573 0,132 0,339 VUNG_3 573 0,290 0,339 VUNG_4 573 0,106 0,309 VUNG_5 573 0,023 0,149 VUNG_6 573 0,094 0,292 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 Y 1,000* DAN_TOC 0,308* 1,000 PHU_THUOC -0,264* -0,221* 1,000* NAMHOC_BQ 0,336* 0,289* -0,432* 1,000* -0,141* -0,345* 0,177* 0,044* GIOITINH_CH 0,069* 0,243* -0,156* -0,034* -0,304* 1,000* TUOI_CH 0,087* 0,292* -0,110* -0,001* -0,107* 0,278* 1,000* PHI_NN 0,084* 0,021* 0,040* -0,039* -0,017* -0,023* -0,103* 1,000* DNN_BQ -0,035* -0,381* 0,043* -0,073* 0,190* -0,141* -0,161* -0,051* 1,000* 10.TIN_DUNG -0,150* -0,088* 0,049* -0,100* 0,027* -0,060* -0,148* 0,025* -0,018* 1,000* 11.TUOI_TIEU 0,157* 0,406* -0,176* 0,176* -0,175* 0,122* 0,126* -0,035* -0,210* -0,061* 1,000* 12.VUNG_2 0,152* 0,321* -0,075* 0,252* -0,190* 0,073* 0,146* 0,032* -0,177* -0,068* 0,052* 1,000* 13.VUNG_3 0,043* 0,347* 0,016* 0,081* -0,189* 0,112* 0,160* -0,058* -0,223* -0,046* 0,168* -0,250* 1,000* 14.VUNG_4 -0,078* -0,263* 0,227* -0,179* 0,068* -0,009* -0,076* -0,027* 0,139* -0,017* -0,114* -0,135* -0,220* 1,000* 15.VUNG_5 0,023* 0,079* 0,019* -0,062* -0,003* -0,014* 0,121* -0,015* -0,060* 0,005* 0,026* -0,060* -0,097* -0,053* 1,000* 16.VUNG_6 0,110* 0,232* -0,156* -0,094* -0,009* 0,102* 0,077* 0,024* -0,099* -0,010* 0,103* -0,126* -0,206* -0,111* -0,049* 16 LAO_DONG : 1,000* Number of obs = 573 LR chi2(15) = 134,22 Prob > chi2 = 0,000 Pseudo R2 = 0,175 Y Coef H ng s Std.Err z [95% Conf Interval] -1,696 0,583 -2,91 0,004 -2,839 -0,554 0,855 0,305 2,81 0,005 0,258 1,452 PHU_THUOC -0,194 0,089 -2,16 0,031 -0,369 -0,018 NAMHOC_BQ 0,244 0,048 5,07 0,000 0,150 0,339 LAO_DONG -0,159 0,083 -1,93 0,054 -0,322 0,003 GIOITINH_CH -0,091 0,263 -0,35 0,729 -0,605 0,424 TUOI_CH 0,003 0,007 0,45 0,652 -0,011 0,018 PHI_NN 0,808 0,329 2,46 0,014 0,164 1,453 DNN_BQ 0,086 0,042 2,08 0,039 0,005 0,168 TIN_DUNG -0,595 0,253 -2,35 0,019 -1,091 -0,098 TUOI_TIEU 0,115 0,214 0,54 0,590 -0,305 0,535 VUNG_2 0,205 0,391 0,52 0,600 -0,562 0,972 VUNG_3 0,010 0,323 0,03 0,975 -0,622 0,643 VUNG_4 0,450 0,369 1,22 0,223 -0,273 1,172 VUNG_5 0,666 0,688 0,97 0,333 -0,683 2,015 VUNG_6 0,774 0,413 1,87 0,061 -0,036 1,584 DAN_TOC Number of obs = 573 LR chi2(8) = 130,93 Prob > chi2 = 0,000 Pseudo R2 Y H ng s = 0,171 Coef Std.Err z [95% Conf Interval] -1,412 0,405 -3,49 0,000 -2,206 -0,618 0,922 0,236 3,91 0,000 0,459 1,384 PHU_THUOC -0,184 0,087 -2,12 0,034 -0,355 -0,014 NAMHOC_BQ 0,238 0,046 5,15 0,000 0,148 0,329 -0,155 0,079 -1,97 0,049 -0,309 -0,000 PHI_NN 0,772 0,321 2,40 0,016 0,143 1,401 DNN_BQ 0,083 0,041 2,02 0,044 0,002 0,163 -0,626 0,250 -2,51 0,012 -1,115 -0,137 0,660 0,341 1,94 0,053 -0,007 1,328 DAN_TOC LAO_DONG TIN_DUNG VUNG_6

Ngày đăng: 27/08/2015, 18:21

Từ khóa liên quan

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...