chụp cắt lớp chấn thương cột sống

104 1.6K 0
chụp cắt lớp chấn thương cột sống

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

Indications Who needs radiographic studies of the cervical spine? Indications for X-ray are: 1. Mental status less than alert or intoxicated 2. Reports neck pain 3. Midline neck tenderness 4. Neurologic signs and symptoms 5. Distracting injury (i.e. painful injuries elsewhere, e.g. extremity fractures) Not all trauma patients with a significant injury need c-spine films. Criteria for excluding cervical spine fractures on a clinical basis are: no neck pain, no neck tenderness on palpation, having full, painless, active range of motion of c-spine, no history of loss of consciousness, no mental status change, no neurologic deficit from neck injury, and no distracting symptoms. If patient meets all these criteria, cervical spine injury is excluded on clinical basis and the cervical collar may be removed. Question: A patient arrived at the ED on backboard and a cervical collar. He has a blood alcohol level of 0.2. He does not complain of any neck pain. Shoud he get a complete cervical series? (push the button for answer) Plain Films Plain films provide the quickest way to survey the cervical spine. An adequate spine series includes three views: a true lateral view (which must include all seven cervical vertebrae as well as the C7-T1 junction), an AP view, and an open-mouth odontoid view. These three views do not require the patient to move his neck, and should be obtained without the removal of the cervical collar. The Lateral View The single most important radiographic examination of the acutely injured cervical spine is the horizontal-beam lateral radiograph that is obtained before patient is moved. This film should be obtained and examed before any other films are taken. All 7 cervical vertebrae and C7-T1 junction must be visualized because the cervicothoracic junction is a common place for traumatic injury. Visualization of C7-T1 may be limited by the amount of soft tissue in the shoulder region and can be enhanced by: 1. traction on arms if no arm injury is present, or, 2. swimmer's view (taken with one arm extended over the head). Repeat lateral views with the cervical collar removed may also help in clarifying subtle abnormalities. The lateral view is obtained as follows: AP and Odontoid Views The complete radiographic examination includes AP and open-mouth views. If there are no obvious fractures or dislocations on the lateral view and the patient's condition permits, then proceed with the AP and the open-mouth views. It is important to obtain technically adequate films. The most frequent cause of overlooked injury is an inadequate film series. Patient should be maintained in cervical immobilization, and plain films should be repeated or CT scans obtained until all vertebrae are clearly visible. The AP view and Odontoid view are obtained as follows: Flexion and Extension Views What if no fracture is seen on initial films and pain is present? Flexion and extension views may be used if a pure soft tissue injury is suspected or an injury of questionable stability is noted. The patient should perform the flexion and extension voluntarily. Flexion/extension views are absolutely contraindicated in documented unstable injuries. CT Up to 20 % of fractures are missed on conventional radiographs. CT can help. CT scan is not mandatory for every patient with cervical spine injury. Most injuries can be diagnosed by plain films. However, if there is a question on the radiograph, CT of the cervical spine should be obtained. CT scan are particularly useful in fractures that result in neurologic deficit and in fractures of the posterior elements of the cervical canal (e.g. Jefferson's fracture) because the axial display eliminates the superimposition of bony structures. The advantages of CT are: 1. CT is excellent for characterizing fractures and identifying osseous compromise of the vertebral canal because of the absence of superimposition from the transverse view. The higher contrast resolution of CT also provides improved visualization of subtle fractures. 2. CT provides patient comfort by being able to reconstruct images in the axial, sagittal, coronal, and oblique planes from one patient positioning. The limitations of CT are: 1. difficult to identify those fractures oriented in axial plane (e.g. dens fractures). 2. unable to show ligamentous injuries. 3. relatively high costs. At the University of Virginia, the CT protocol for cervcial spine trauma to rule out fracture or dislocation is as follows: patient is put on a supine position in the CT scanner. Patient is scaned from top of the vertebral body above the fracture or question of fracture to bottom of the vertebral body below the fracture with slice thickness of 1.5 mm and 1.5 mm spacing. Sagittal and coronal reconstructions are done in all cases. Click here to see an example of coronal reconstruction. MRI MRI is indicated in cervical fractures that have spinal canal involvement, clinical neurologic deficits or ligamentous injuries. MRI provides the best visualization of the soft tissues, including ligaments, intervertebral disks, spinal cord, and epidural hematomas. The advantages of MRI are: 1. excellent soft tissue constrast, making it the study of choice for spinal cord survey, hematoma, and ligamentous injuries. 2. provides good general overview because of its ability to show information in different planes (e.g. sagital, coronal, etc.). 3. ability to demostrate vertebral arteries, which is useful in evaluating fractures involving the course of the vertebral arteries. 4. no ionizing radiation. The disadvantages of MRI are: 1. loss of bony details. 2. relatively high cost. At the University of Virginia, the protocol for MRI in cervical spine trauma follows five sequential scans: T1 turbo spin echo in sagittal plane, Turbo T2 in sagittal plane, 2D flash in sagittal plane, 2D flash in axial plane and T1 turbo spine echo in axial plane. Here is an example of a MRI image of the cervical spine demostrating a ligamentous injury. Notice that the spinal cord is also very well delinated. A dens fracture is not obvious on the lateral film, but is clearly revealed on MRI. Interpretation It is important to approach a cervical spine film series in a stepwise fashion. One can follow an easily remembered mnemoic AABCDS. On each film, sequentially evaluate adequacy, alignment, bone, cartilage, disc, and soft tissue. A adequacy, A alignment, B bone, C cartilage, D disc, and S soft tissue. The Lateral View The lateral view is the most important film of all. Interpretation follows the mnemonic AABCDS. First, is the film Adequate? An adequate film should include all 7 vertebrae and C7- T1 junction. It should also have correct density and show the soft tissue and bony structures well. Alignment Assess four parallel lines. These are: 1. Anterior vertebral line (anterior margin of vertebral bodies) 2. Posterior vertebral line (posterior margin of vertebral bodies) 3. Spinolaminar line (posterior margin of spinal canal) 4. Posterior spinous line (tips of the spinous processes) These lines should follow a slightly lordotic curve, smooth and without step-offs. Any malalignment should be considered evidence of ligmentous injury or occult fracture, and cervical spine immobilization should be maintained until a definitive diagnosis is made. Sometimes, misalignment may be physiological. Subluxation Pseudosubluxation

Ngày đăng: 01/07/2015, 22:24

Từ khóa liên quan

Mục lục

  • Indications Who needs radiographic studies of the cervical spine? Indications for X-ray are: 1. Mental status less than alert or intoxicated 2. Reports neck pain 3. Midline neck tenderness 4. Neurologic signs and symptoms 5. Distracting injury (i.e. painful injuries elsewhere, e.g. extremity fractures) Not all trauma patients with a significant injury need c-spine films. Criteria for excluding cervical spine fractures on a clinical basis are: no neck pain, no neck tenderness on palpation, having full, painless, active range of motion of c-spine, no history of loss of consciousness, no mental status change, no neurologic deficit from neck injury, and no distracting symptoms. If patient meets all these criteria, cervical spine injury is excluded on clinical basis and the cervical collar may be removed. Question: A patient arrived at the ED on backboard and a cervical collar. He has a blood alcohol level of 0.2. He does not complain of any neck pain. Shoud he get a complete cervical series? (push the button for answer)

  • Plain Films Plain films provide the quickest way to survey the cervical spine. An adequate spine series includes three views: a true lateral view (which must include all seven cervical vertebrae as well as the C7-T1 junction), an AP view, and an open-mouth odontoid view. These three views do not require the patient to move his neck, and should be obtained without the removal of the cervical collar.

  • The Lateral View The single most important radiographic examination of the acutely injured cervical spine is the horizontal-beam lateral radiograph that is obtained before patient is moved. This film should be obtained and examed before any other films are taken. All 7 cervical vertebrae and C7-T1 junction must be visualized because the cervicothoracic junction is a common place for traumatic injury. Visualization of C7-T1 may be limited by the amount of soft tissue in the shoulder region and can be enhanced by: 1. traction on arms if no arm injury is present, or, 2. swimmer's view (taken with one arm extended over the head). Repeat lateral views with the cervical collar removed may also help in clarifying subtle abnormalities. The lateral view is obtained as follows:

  • AP and Odontoid Views The complete radiographic examination includes AP and open-mouth views. If there are no obvious fractures or dislocations on the lateral view and the patient's condition permits, then proceed with the AP and the open-mouth views. It is important to obtain technically adequate films. The most frequent cause of overlooked injury is an inadequate film series. Patient should be maintained in cervical immobilization, and plain films should be repeated or CT scans obtained until all vertebrae are clearly visible. The AP view and Odontoid view are obtained as follows:

  • Flexion and Extension Views What if no fracture is seen on initial films and pain is present? Flexion and extension views may be used if a pure soft tissue injury is suspected or an injury of questionable stability is noted. The patient should perform the flexion and extension voluntarily. Flexion/extension views are absolutely contraindicated in documented unstable injuries.

  • CT Up to 20 % of fractures are missed on conventional radiographs. CT can help. CT scan is not mandatory for every patient with cervical spine injury. Most injuries can be diagnosed by plain films. However, if there is a question on the radiograph, CT of the cervical spine should be obtained. CT scan are particularly useful in fractures that result in neurologic deficit and in fractures of the posterior elements of the cervical canal (e.g. Jefferson's fracture) because the axial display eliminates the superimposition of bony structures. The advantages of CT are: 1. CT is excellent for characterizing fractures and identifying osseous compromise of the vertebral canal because of the absence of superimposition from the transverse view. The higher contrast resolution of CT also provides improved visualization of subtle fractures. 2. CT provides patient comfort by being able to reconstruct images in the axial, sagittal, coronal, and oblique planes from one patient positioning. The limitations of CT are: 1. difficult to identify those fractures oriented in axial plane (e.g. dens fractures). 2. unable to show ligamentous injuries. 3. relatively high costs. At the University of Virginia, the CT protocol for cervcial spine trauma to rule out fracture or dislocation is as follows: patient is put on a supine position in the CT scanner. Patient is scaned from top of the vertebral body above the fracture or question of fracture to bottom of the vertebral body below the fracture with slice thickness of 1.5 mm and 1.5 mm spacing. Sagittal and coronal reconstructions are done in all cases. Click here to see an example of coronal reconstruction.

  • MRI MRI is indicated in cervical fractures that have spinal canal involvement, clinical neurologic deficits or ligamentous injuries. MRI provides the best visualization of the soft tissues, including ligaments, intervertebral disks, spinal cord, and epidural hematomas. The advantages of MRI are: 1. excellent soft tissue constrast, making it the study of choice for spinal cord survey, hematoma, and ligamentous injuries. 2. provides good general overview because of its ability to show information in different planes (e.g. sagital, coronal, etc.). 3. ability to demostrate vertebral arteries, which is useful in evaluating fractures involving the course of the vertebral arteries. 4. no ionizing radiation. The disadvantages of MRI are: 1. loss of bony details. 2. relatively high cost. At the University of Virginia, the protocol for MRI in cervical spine trauma follows five sequential scans: T1 turbo spin echo in sagittal plane, Turbo T2 in sagittal plane, 2D flash in sagittal plane, 2D flash in axial plane and T1 turbo spine echo in axial plane. Here is an example of a MRI image of the cervical spine demostrating a ligamentous injury. Notice that the spinal cord is also very well delinated. A dens fracture is not obvious on the lateral film, but is clearly revealed on MRI.

  • Interpretation It is important to approach a cervical spine film series in a stepwise fashion. One can follow an easily remembered mnemoic AABCDS. On each film, sequentially evaluate adequacy, alignment, bone, cartilage, disc, and soft tissue. A adequacy, A alignment, B bone, C cartilage, D disc, and S soft tissue.

  • The Lateral View The lateral view is the most important film of all. Interpretation follows the mnemonic AABCDS. First, is the film Adequate? An adequate film should include all 7 vertebrae and C7-T1 junction. It should also have correct density and show the soft tissue and bony structures well.

  • Alignment Assess four parallel lines. These are: 1. Anterior vertebral line (anterior margin of vertebral bodies) 2. Posterior vertebral line (posterior margin of vertebral bodies) 3. Spinolaminar line (posterior margin of spinal canal) 4. Posterior spinous line (tips of the spinous processes) These lines should follow a slightly lordotic curve, smooth and without step-offs. Any malalignment should be considered evidence of ligmentous injury or occult fracture, and cervical spine immobilization should be maintained until a definitive diagnosis is made.

  • Atlanto-occipital Alignment Atlanto-occipital alignment The anterior margin of the foramen magnum should line up with the dens. A line projected downward from the dorsum sellae along the clivus to the basion should point to the dens. The posterior margin of foramen magnum should line up with the C1 spinolaminar line. The ratio of Basion - spinolaminar line of C1 to Opisthion - posterior cortex of C1 anterior arch normally ranges from 0.6 to 1.0, with the mean being 0.8. A ratio greater than 1.0 implies anterior cranio-cervical dislocation.

  • Bony Landmarks Trace the unbroken outline of each vertebrae (including Odontoid on C2). The vertebral bodies should line up with a gentle arch (normal cervical lordosis) using the anterior and posterior marginal lines on the lateral view. Each body should be rectangular in shape and roughly equal in size although some variability is allowed (overall height of C4 and C5 may be slightly less than C3 and C6) . The anterior height should roughly equal posterior height (posterior may normally be slightly greater, up to 3mm).

  • Bony Landmarks Pedicles project posteriorly to support the articular pillars, forming the superior and inferior margins of the intervertebral foramen. The left and right pedicels should superimpose on true lateral views. If fracture is suspected, get oblique views or CT. Facets: the articular pillars are osseous masses connected to the posterolateral aspect of vertebral bodies via the pedicles. The facet joints are formed between each lateral mass. On the lateral view, the lateral masses appear as rhomboid-shaped structures projecting downward and posterior. "Double cortical lines" results from slight obliquity from lateral projection. The distance of the joint space should be roughly equal at all levels. Lamina: the posterior elements are seen poorly on the lateral film. They are best demostrated by CT. Spinous process: generally get progressively larger in the lower vertebral bodies. The C7 cervical spine is usually the largest.

  • Cartilaginous Space The Predental space (distance from dens to C1 body) should not measure more than 3 mm in adults and 5mm in children. If the space is increased, a fracture of the Odontoid process or disruption of the transverse ligament is likely. If fracture is suspected, CT should be obtained. If ligamentous disruption is suspected, a MRI should be obtained.

  • Disc Spaces Disc spaces should be roughly equal in height at anterior and posterior margins. Disc spaces should be symmetric. Disc space height should also be approximately equal at all levels. In older patients, degenative diseases may lead to spurring and loss of disc height.

  • Soft Tissue Space Preverteral soft tissue swelling is important in trauma because it is usually due to hematoma formation secondary to occult fractures. Unfortunately, it is extremely variable and nonspecific. Maximum allowable thickness of preverteral spaces is as follows: Nasopharyngeal space (C1) - 10 mm (adult) Retropharyngeal space (C2-C4) - 5-7 mm Retrotracheal space (C5-C7) - 14 mm (children), 22 mm (adults). Soft tissue swelling in symptomatic patients should be considered an indication for further radiographic evaluation. If the space between the lower anterior border of C3 and the pharyngeal air shadow is > 7 mm, one should suspect retropharyngeal swelling (e.g. hemorrhage). This is often a useful indirect sign of a C2 fracture. Space between lower cervical vertebrae and trachea should be < 1 vertebral body.

  • Soft Tissue Swelling Some fractures can be very subtle, and soft tissue swelling may be the only sign of fracture. In this case, the lateral view shows only slight soft tissue swelling anterior to C2, and no obvious fracture is seen. On the subsequent CT, a type III dens fracture (fracture of the dens and extends into the body of C2) is demostracted.

  • The AP View Alignment on the A-P view should be evaluated using the edges of the vertebral bodies and articular pillars. The height of the cervical vertebral bodies should be approximately equal on the AP view. The height of each joint space should be roughly equal at all levels. Spinous process should be in midline and in good alignment. If one of the spinous process is displaced to one side, a facet dislocation should be suspected.

  • The Odontoid View First, assess if the film is Adequate. An adequate film should include the entire odontoid and the lateral borders of C1-C2. Then, examine the Alignment. Occipital condyles should line up with the lateral masses and superior articular facet of C1. The distance from the dens to the lateral masses of C1 should be equal bilaterally (see figure below). Any asymmetry is suggestive of a fracture of C1 or C2 or rotational abnormality. It may also be caused by tilting of the head, so if the vertebrae is shifted in on one side, then it should be shifted out on the other side. The tips of lateral mass of C1 should line up with the lateral margins of the superior articular facet of C2. If not, a fracture of C1 should be suspected. Finally, examine the Bony Margins. the Odontoid should have uninterrupted cortical margins blending with the body of C2.

  • PowerPoint Presentation

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

Tài liệu liên quan