Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)
If 98% of the users can’t see a textshadow, it doesn’t matter, but it’ll be a nice enrichment for the 2% of users who can. Progressive means progressive Fallback solutions (JS on and off?) Enhancements only become features when the majority of users are experiencing them Use progressive enrichment in your dull, corporate sites — the sexy stuff is an addon, so it’s fine Do websites need to look exactly the same in every browser? Websites will never look consistent across all browsers Rendering engines, operating systems, and userspecific variables like screen settings and resolution will always stand in the way. Designers will use technologies like Flash, PDF, and hacks like embedding type in images because they won’t have to deal with painful inconsistencies between user agents; the bane of the browser wars, and in this instance, the bane of web typography in what seems like the age of the raster wars
What are we worried about? What are we worried about? Some users see ‘broken’ sites. What are we worried about? Some users see ‘broken’ sites. Don’t build broken sites: basic support can be offered as long as it doesn’t look broken. If it’s a real problem for older browsers, use universalie6.css, a warning message, or something similar What are we worried about? Some users see ‘broken’ sites. Don’t build broken sites: basic support can be offered as long as it doesn’t look broken. If it’s a real problem for older browsers, use universalie6.css, a warning message, or something similar But this visual treatment is integral to the brand! What are we worried about? Some users see ‘broken’ sites. Don’t build broken sites: basic support can be offered as long as it doesn’t look broken. If it’s a real problem for older browsers, use universalie6.css, a warning message, or something similar But this visual treatment is integral to the brand! Then include it (if not, don’t worry) What are we worried about? Some users see ‘broken’ sites. Don’t build broken sites: basic support can be offered as long as it doesn’t look broken. If it’s a real problem for older browsers, use universalie6.css, a warning message, or something similar But this visual treatment is integral to the brand! Then include it (if not, don’t worry) Missing rounded corners don’t matter! Take Your Design To The Next Level With CSS3 j.mp/smashingcss3 Fearful forabeautifulweb.com/s/598 Great article, thanks but I think to wait that the most of browsers support CSS3 totally to develop websites for my clients. Comments from Smashing Magazine readers on j.mp/smashingcss3 “ ” [...]... in the way “ Jon Tan: Designers will use [technologies like Flash, PDF, and hacks like embedding type in images] [ ] because they won’t have to deal with painful inconsistencies between user agents; the bane of the browser wars, and in this instance, the bane of web typography in what seems like the age of the raster wars Display Type & the Raster Wars j.mp/jontan ” Bookmark these URLs Jon Tan: Web. .. solutions (JS on and off?) Enhancements only become features when the majority of users are experiencing them Progressive means progressive Fall-back solutions (JS on and off?) Enhancements only become features when the majority of users are experiencing them Use progressive enrichment in your dull, corporate sites — the sexy stuff is an add -on, so it’s fine! Do websites need to look exactly the same... Typography tag jontangerine.com/log/tag /web- typography Web Typography (Richard Rutter) webtypography.net Do websites need to look exactly the same in every browser? Websites will never look consistent across all browsers Rendering engines, operating systems, and user-specific variables like screen settings and resolution will always stand in the way So stop trying to reach the unreachable! Embrace the differences... real project Unfortunately I’m going to be stuck with things as they are for the time being as I wait for my clients to catch up I expect this will be the case for most designers for the time being Comments from Smashing Magazine readers on j.mp/smashingcss3 ” “ CSS3 looks really good however because of IE it will be long time before I start using it Comments from Smashing Magazine readers on j.mp/smashingcss3... dowebsitesneedtolookexactlythesameineverybrowser.com Do websites need to look exactly the same in every browser? Websites will never look consistent across all browsers Do websites need to look exactly the same in every browser? Websites will never look consistent across all browsers Rendering engines, operating systems, and user-specific variables like screen settings and resolution will always stand... j.mp/smashingcss3 ” These arguments are complete and utter bullshit If 98% of the users can’t see a text-shadow, it doesn’t matter, but it’ll be a nice enrichment for the 2% of users who can Tap Tap Tap taptaptap.com Tweet CC tweetcc.com Fusion Ads fusionads.net Fusion Ads fusionads.net Progressive means progressive Progressive means progressive Fall-back solutions (JS on and off?) Barclaycard online admin... So stop trying to reach the unreachable! Embrace the differences Usability vs aesthetics Usability / accessibility / functionality = very important Usability vs aesthetics Usability / accessibility / functionality = very important But don’t underestimate the importance of beauty! The experience The experience Beauty is the experience’s visual layer ... be a standard in the near future, right now you cant really use anything of it ’cause not every browser supports it Comments from Smashing Magazine readers on j.mp/smashingcss3 ” “ CSS 3 rocks Unfortunately we need to stay at least 5 more years with CSS 2.1 if we want to offer the same design to each user (what in most ‘commercial’ projects is necessary) Comments from Smashing Magazine readers on j.mp/smashingcss3