This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This PDF document was made available from www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND Corporation. 6 Jump down to document THE ARTS CHILD POLICY CIVIL JUSTICE EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SUBSTANCE ABUSE TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details For More Information Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution Support RAND This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND mono- graphs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND monographs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Cross-Cultural Skills for Deployed Air Force Personnel Defining Cross-Cultural Performance Chaitra M. Hardison, Carra S. Sims, Farhana Ali, Andres Villamizar, Ben Mundell, Paul Howe PROJECT AIR FORCE Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R ® is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2009 RAND Corporation Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND permissions page (http://www.rand.org/publications/ permissions.html). Published 2009 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: order@rand.org The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract FA7014-06-C-0001. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN 978-0-8330-4606-2 iii Preface Air Force senior leadership recognizes that cross-cultural competence is critical in preparing airmen to accomplish a variety of missions in foreign environments. is recognition has led to strong interest in ensuring that the Air Force provides the cross-cultural skills its airmen need through training and education. RAND was asked to provide a definition of cross-cultural performance as the foundation for the design of the Air Force’s cross-cultural training and education. e resulting definition is a first step toward clarifying what airmen should be able to do to be considered cross-culturally competent. e research reported here was sponsored by the Air Force Directorate of Airman Devel- opment (AF/A1D) and conducted within the Manpower, Personnel, and Training Program of RAND Project AIR FORCE as part of a fiscal year 2008 study titled “Building Better Airmen rough Enhanced Force Development Policies and Processes.” is monograph should be of interest to those involved in or interested in providing culture and language training for inter- national assignments: Air Force leadership and staff, the broader defense community, govern- ment agencies involved in international assignments, and any public or private organizations operating in an international environment. RAND Project AIR FORCE RAND Project AIR FORCE (PAF), a division of the RAND Corporation, is the U.S. Air Force’s federally funded research and development center for studies and analysis. PAF pro- vides the Air Force with independent analyses of policy alternatives affecting the development, employment, combat readiness, and support of current and future aerospace forces. Research is performed in four programs: Force Modernization and Employment; Manpower, Personnel, and Training; Resource Management; and Strategy and Doctrine. e research reported here was prepared under contract FA7014-06-C-0001. Additional information about PAF is available at http://www.rand.org/paf/ v Contents Preface iii Figures vii Tables ix Summary xi Acknowledgments xiii Abbreviations xv CHAPTER ONE Introduction 1 Defining the Problem 2 Our Approach 3 CHAPTER TWO Defining Cross-Cultural Job Performance 5 Examining Frameworks for Differentiating Cultures 5 e Lack of Cross-Cultural Performance Training Evaluations 6 e 14 Cross-Cultural Behavior Categories 7 Enabling Behaviors 7 Goal-Oriented Behaviors 10 Additional Issues to Consider 12 Defining Culture During Training 12 Training, Education, Development, and Experience 12 Training Occurring Over an Airman’s Career and Just Prior to Deployment 13 Culture-General and Culture-Specific Training 13 Training for Current Missions and Future Missions 14 CHAPTER THREE Cross-Cultural Performance Survey 15 Goals 15 Method 15 Participants 15 Survey Measures 16 Weighting Procedure 18 Results 18 Importance of the Categories 18 Importance of the Categories by AFSC, Grade, and Deployment Location 20 vi Cross-Cultural Skills for Deployed Air Force Personnel: Defining Cross-Cultural Performance Perceptions of Training 25 Perceptions of Training by AFSC, Grade, and Deployment Location 28 Language Skills 31 Comprehensiveness of the 14 Categories of Behavior 34 CHAPTER FOUR Conclusions and Recommendations 39 ree Levels of Training 40 Next Steps 41 Set Performance Standards 41 Develop Training Content to Address Each of the 14 Behaviors 42 Tools for Measuring Skills of Air Force Personnel 44 Evaluate the Success of Current Training Efforts Against the Standards 44 Track Airmen’s Skills and Training 46 Establish the Appropriate Availability of Training 46 Institutionalize Training (Systematic Effort) 46 APPENDIXES A. Survey Population and Sample 49 B. Survey Instrument 55 C. Survey Items Grouped by Scale 65 D. Summary Statistics 69 E. Survey Results 71 F. Regression Results 141 G. Open-Ended Comment emes 179 References 181 vii Figures 3.1 Perceived Importance of Categories of Behavior 19 3.2 Training Received in Behavior Categories 28 3.3 Helpfulness of Training in Behavior Categories 29 [...]... acknowledges that cross-cultural performance is important, it has not yet provided a clear definition of what cross-cultural performance is 1 2 Cross-Cultural Skills for Deployed Air Force Personnel: Defining Cross-Cultural Performance Defining the Problem In response to the DoD guidance for all services to improve the cross-cultural performance of their forces, the Air Force Directorate of Airman Development... forces in numerous countries, particularly in current operations, the Air Force and other services have begun taking steps to integrate cross-cultural training into existing curricula This call for cross-cultural skills has led Air Force leaders to acknowledge the need for much improvement in the Air Force s training of cross-cultural performance 1 Although the Air Force clearly acknowledges that cross-cultural. .. of cross-cultural training We approached the problem through three main questions: 1 What is cross-cultural performance, or behavior? 4 Cross-Cultural Skills for Deployed Air Force Personnel: Defining Cross-Cultural Performance 2 Which cross-cultural behaviors do airmen identify as important to their deployed jobs? 3 Do all airmen, regardless of job requirements, need the same type and/or amount of cross-cultural. .. constantly improve one’s cross-cultural performance No training program will ever be comprehensive enough to preclude additional learning, so this is a way for individuals to continue to augment their train- 10 Cross-Cultural Skills for Deployed Air Force Personnel: Defining Cross-Cultural Performance ing and improve their performance while deployed It can take the form of volunteering for or requesting additional... regard both onduty and off-duty conduct of Air Force personnel as important Moreover, the inclusion of off-duty conduct is particularly important because all of the behavior of Air Force personnel in a foreign country can influence how the Air Force and the United States are perceived Our definition of Air Force cultural performance therefore includes both on- and off-duty behavior in a foreign country 3 On... the Air Force s capability for measuring or accounting for the existing cross-cultural skills of its force is limited A good starting point for closing these gaps is a systematic inventory of the Air Force s cross-cultural training objectives A comprehensive examination of all possible definitions of cross-cultural performance is needed to facilitate communication between those requesting cross-cultural. .. predeployment training Rather, culture-specific training can occur in both over-career and predeployment training Similarly, cultural-general training can occur in both over-career and predeployment training 14 Cross-Cultural Skills for Deployed Air Force Personnel: Defining Cross-Cultural Performance Both culture-general and culture-specific training should be included in all cross-cultural training courses,... Kondo, Luo, and Hu, 1998; Gelfand, Erez, and Aycan, 2007) 12 Cross-Cultural Skills for Deployed Air Force Personnel: Defining Cross-Cultural Performance Additional Issues to Consider In developing a comprehensive program for cross-cultural performance training, several additional concepts about cross-cultural training are worth noting; therefore, we expand on the meaning and relevance of these terms... in cross-cultural courses to understand and apply course material For further discussion of this issue, see Chapter Two’s section on additional issues for consideration 5 6 Cross-Cultural Skills for Deployed Air Force Personnel: Defining Cross-Cultural Performance effectiveness of current training interventions based on these approaches has not been thoroughly investigated The Lack of Cross-Cultural Performance. .. in combination with informal focus groups and discussions with various Air Force personnel, helped us identify our 14 categories of cross-cultural behavior The 14 Cross-Cultural Behavior Categories Our review of the existing literature and discussions with various Air Force subject-matter experts made it clear that the terms cross-cultural job performance and cross-cultural job skills brought to people’s . is call for cross-cultural skills has led Air Force leaders to acknowledge the need for much improvement in the Air Force s training of cross-cultural performance. 1 Although the Air Force clearly. that cross-cultural performance is important, it has not yet provided a clear definition of what cross-cultural performance is. 2 Cross-Cultural Skills for Deployed Air Force Personnel: Defining Cross-Cultural. Etiquette 146 x Cross-Cultural Skills for Deployed Air Force Personnel: Defining Cross-Cultural Performance F.4 Regression Results for AFSC, Grade, Deployment Location, and Deployed Mission Predicting