This page intentionally left blank
constituting equality
Gender Equality and Comparative Constitutional Law
Constituting Equality addresses the question, how would you write a constitution if
you really cared about gender equality? The book takes a design-oriented approach
to the broad range of issues that arise in constitutional drafting concerning gender
equality. Each section of the book examines a particular set of constitutional
issues or doctrines across a range of different countries to explore what works,
where, and why. Topics include (1) governmental structure (particularly electoral
gender quotas), (2) rights provisions, (3) constitutional recognition of cultural or
religious practices that discriminate against women, (4) domestic incorporation of
international law, and (5) the role of women in the process of constitution making.
Interdisciplinary in orientation and global in scope, the book provides a menu for
constitutional designers and others interested in how the fundamental legal order
might more effectively promote gender equality.
Susan H. Williams is the Walter W. Foskett Professor of Law at the Indiana Uni-
versity Maurer School of Law, where she also serves as the Director of the Center
for Constitutional Democracy. Professor Williams graduated from Harvard Law
School, where she served as the Supervising Editor of the Harvard Law Review and
then clerked for Hon. Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit (1985–1986). She has been a visiting faculty member
at the University of Paris II (Panthe´on-Assas) and a Fellow at Wolfson College,
Cambridge University, and at the European University Institute in Fiesole, Italy.
Professor Williams is the author of Truth, Autonomy, and Speech: Feminist
Theory and the First Amendment (2004). She has published numerous articles
on issues related to freedom of speech, feminist theory, freedom of religion,
and civil society. Her writing has appeared in the Stanford Law Review ,the
University of Pennsylvania Law Journal,theBerkeley Women’s Law Journal,the
Yale Journal of Law and Feminism,andtheMichigan Journal of Gender and Law.
At Indiana Law, Professor Williams teaches Property, First Amendment Law,
Feminist Jurisprudence, Constitutional Design, and a seminar on Comparative
Constitutional Law on Gender Equality. Professor Williams is actively involved
in constitutional advising for the Burmese democracy movement. She serves as a
constitutional advisor to the Women’s League of Burma, the Federal Constitution
Drafting Coordinating Committee, and the state constitution drafting committees
of all of the states of Burma. In this capacity, she teaches workshops, produces
educational materials, and works on drafting and revising constitutional language.
Constituting Equality
gender equality and comparative
constitutional law
Edited by
SUSAN H. WILLIAMS
Indiana University
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore,
São Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo
Cambridge University Press
The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK
First published in print format
ISBN-13 978-0-521-89836-2
ISBN-13 978-0-511-59638-4
© Cambridge University Press 2009
Information regarding prices, travel timetables, and other factual information
given in this work are correct at the time of first printing, but Cambridge
University Press does not guarantee the accuracy of such information thereafter.
2009
Information on this title: www.cambrid
g
e.or
g
/9780521898362
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the
provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part
may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy
of urls for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication,
and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain,
accurate or appropriate.
Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York
www.cambridge.org
eBook
(
NetLibrar
y)
Hardback
This book is dedicated to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who has
been for me, as for so many others, a mentor, a role model, and
an inspiration.
Contents
List of Contributors page ix
Acknowledgments xv
Introduction: Comparative Constitutional Law, Gender
Equality, and Constitutional Design 1
Susan H. Williams
section one: structure
1 Gender Quotas in Politics – A Constitutional Challenge 29
Drude Dahlerup and Lenita Freidenvall
2 Equality, Representation, and Challenge to Hierarchy:
Justifying Electoral Quotas for Women 53
Susan H. Williams
section two: rights
3 More than Rights 75
Helen Irving
4 Perfectionism and Fundamentalism in the Application of
the German Abortion Laws 93
Mary Anne Case
5 Moral Authority in English and American Abortion Law 107
Joanna N. Erdman
vii
viii Contents
section three: culture/religion and gender
equality
6 Must Feminists Support Entrenchment of Sex Equality?
Lessons from Quebec 137
Beverley Baines
7 Deconstructing the East/West Binary: Substantive Equality
and Islamic Marriage in a Comparative Dialogue 157
Pascale Fournier
8 Conflicting Agendas? Women’s Rights and Customary Law
in African Constitutional Reform 173
Aili Mari Tripp
9 Gender Equality and the Rule of Law in Liberia: Statutory
Law, Customary Law, and the Status of Women 195
Felicia V. Coleman
section four: constitutions and international law
10 Constitutional Incorporation of International and
Comparative Human Rights Law: The Colombian
Constitutional Court Decision C-355/2006 215
Ver
´
onica Undurraga and Rebecca J. Cook
11 Guatemalan Transnational Feminists: How Their Search for
Constitutional Equality Interplays with International Law 248
Christiana Ochoa
section five: women in the process of constitution
making
12 Women in the Constitutional Drafting Process in Burma 273
Thin Thin Aung and Susan H. Williams
13 Founding Mothers for a Palestinian Constitution? 290
Adrien Katherine Wing and Hisham A. Kassim
Conclusion: Gender Equality and the Idea of a Constitution:
Entrenchment, Jurisdiction, and Interpretation 312
Vicki C. Jackson
Index 351
. materials, and works on drafting and revising constitutional language.
Constituting Equality
gender equality and comparative
constitutional law
Edited.
This page intentionally left blank
constituting equality
Gender Equality and Comparative Constitutional Law
Constituting Equality addresses the question,
Ngày đăng: 23/03/2014, 05:23
Xem thêm: Constituting Equality gender equality and comparative constitutional law doc, C. Section three: culturereligion and gender equality, E. Section four: constitutions and international law, F. Section five: women in the process of constitution making, II. Frequency of gender quotas, IV. Voluntary candidate quotas in political parties, II. Models of equality and democratic representation, IV. The idea of challenge as an element of democracy and equality, VI. The emotional stance implicit in the focus on challenge, II. More than equality rights, IV. Freezing the conceptual imagination, I. German abortion law from the 1970s until german reunification, IV. My feminist fundamentalist concerns about the german compromise, V. Perfectionism and fundamentalism in the response of the catholic church, A. Abortion Rights and State Interests in Contrast and Comparison, A. The Moral Authorities: An Evidenced-Based Approach, B. The Moral Authorities: A Gendered Approach, A. The Moral Authority of Experience, B. Young Women's Moral Authority, B. The Production of Islamic Law, II. African women’s movement contributions to global rights discourses, A. Women Treated as Minors, I. Background: customary law and its adverse effects on women, A. AFELL and the Inheritance and Rape Laws: A Case Study in Reform, C. The Ruling of the Court, A. The Incorporation of International Human Rights Law into Domestic Constitutional Law, B. The Status of Prenatal Life under the Colombian Constitution and Constitutionalized Human Rights Treaties, C. The Status of Women's Rights under the Colombian Constitution and Constitutionalized Human Rights Treaties, D. How the Proportionality Principle Limits Legislative Power to Criminalize Abortion, III. The colombian decision as a model for other latin american courts, IV. The originality of the decision and challenges ahead, B. Constitutional History, Gender Equality, and Human Rights: Setting the Stage for Cosmopolitanism, B. International Encounters – The Notable Role of Trans-border Feminism, III. Continued cause for cosmopolitanism, I. A brief history of burmese constitutionalism, V. Wlb's strategy for women's participation, VII. Remaining challenges: where do we go from here?, I. The existing legal regime, II. The basic law and draft constitution, III. Suggestions for the founding mothers, I. Feminist theory and constitutional theory: rapprochement or disengagement?, A. Federal Jurisdiction – Hierarchy, Exclusivity, Concurrency