Thông tin tài liệu
This page intentionally left blank
SAVING THE CONSTITUTION FROM LAWYERS
This book is a sweeping indictment of the legal profession when it enters
the realm of constitutional interpretation. The adversarial, advocacy-based
American legal system is well-suited to American justice, where one-sided
arguments collide to produce a just outcome. But when applied to constitu-
tional theorizing, the result is selective analysis, overheated rhetoric, distorted
facts, and overstated conclusions. Such wayward theorizing finds its way into
print in the nation’s more than six hundred law journals – professional publi-
cations run by law students, not faculty or other professionals, and in which
peer review is almost never used to evaluate worthiness. The consequences
of this system are examined through three timely cases: the presidential veto,
the “unitary theory” of the president’s commander-in-chief power, and the
Second Amendment’s “right to bear arms.” In each case, law reviews were the
breeding ground for defective theories that won false legitimacy and political
currency. This book concludes with recommendations for reform.
Robert J. Spitzer is Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at
the State University of New York, College at Cortland. His books include
The Presidency and Public Policy, The Right to Life Movement and Third
Party Politics, The Presidential Veto, The Bicentennial of the U.S. Constitu-
tion, President and Congress, Media and Public Policy, The Politics of Gun
Control, Politics and Constitutionalism, The Right to Bear Arms, Essentials
of American Politics, and The Presidency and the Constitution.
Saving the Constitution
from Lawyers
HOW LEGAL TRAINING AND
LAW REVIEWS DISTORT
CONSTITUTIONAL
MEANING
Robert J. Spitzer
State University of New York, College at Cortland
CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo
Cambridge University Press
The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK
First published in print format
ISBN-13 978-0-521-89696-2
ISBN-13 978-0-521-72172-1
ISBN-13 978-0-511-47883-3
© Robert J. Spitzer 2008
2008
Information on this title: www.cambrid
g
e.or
g
/9780521896962
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the
provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part
may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy
of urls for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication,
and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain,
accurate or appropriate.
Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York
www.cambridge.org
p
a
p
erback
eBook
(
EBL
)
hardback
To
Jinny Spitzer and Tess Spitzer,
the two most brilliant and beautiful women I know
Contents
Acknowledgments page ix
Introduction 1
1 The Logic, and Illogic, of Law 9
Lawyers as Liars? 11
Thinking Like a Lawyer 14
The Adversary System, Advocacy, and Truth 17
Lawyering versus Scholarship 22
Social Sciences and the Rules of Inquiry 25
Conclusion 31
2 The Law Journal Breeding Ground 33
History 35
Students in Charge? 38
A Scholarly Enterprise? 41
How the System Works 44
Criticisms 46
Professional Peer Review: The Academic Gold Standard 49
The Problems with Student Control 53
Length, Redundancy, and Footnotes 56
Conclusion 58
3 The Inherent Item Veto 60
Colonial Precedents 63
Defining the Veto 69
vii
viii CONTENTS
What the Founders Understood about the Veto 72
The Veto as a “Revisionary” Power 81
An Eviscerated Veto? 84
Conclusion: Rescuing Constitutional Interpretation 85
4 The Unitary Executive and the Commander-in-Chief
Power 90
The Unitary Executive Theory: Article II on Steroids 92
The Constitutional Commander-in-Chief 99
The Commander-in-Chief According to Yoo 103
From Law Journal to Law 105
The Bush Commander-in-Chief 108
Distorting the Courts 109
What Hamilton Says 111
Other Cases 114
A Political Document or a Legal One? 121
Conclusion: Reinventing the Commander-in-Chief 125
5 The Second Amendent 129
The Meaning of the Second Amendment 131
Supreme Court Rulings 136
Other Court Rulings 141
The “Individualist” Critique 145
The “Right of Revolution” 148
Collateral Claims and the Research Record 153
Seeking Shelter under the Fourteenth Amendment 160
Public Policy Consequences 164
Interest-Group Involvement 172
Conclusion 175
6 Conclusion 177
Reform 179
Law Reviews Will Still Matter 186
About the Author 187
Index 189
[...]... doctrinal-oriented legal education “by emphasizing abstract theory at the expense of practical scholarship and pedagogy,” including such subjects as critical legal studies, feminist legal studies, and various “ law and movements” such as law and economics, law and literature, and law and sociology Harry T Edwards, The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession,” Michigan Law Review... lawyers practice law – when they apply their training and trade within the bounds of the civil and criminal justice systems or in similar, traditional legal activities But when individuals with those principles and training engage in academic scholarly analysis regarding the Constitution, the results may well be inimical to an accurate understanding of constitutional meaning This chapter examines the. .. coincided with another: the decline of apprenticeship as the standard process for joining the legal profession In 1870, only a quarter of those admitted to the bar attended law school, with the rest receiving their legal training through apprenticing themselves to lawyers By 1910, two-thirds of bar-admitted lawyers had graduated from law schools See Lawrence M Friedman, American Law in the 20th Century... analysis To understand the principles of legal training and the workings of law reviews is to understand why there are so few restraints on so much of its writing The presence of no little wayward writing on constitutional subjects in the professional writings of the legal discipline – at least, as I observed it in the two otherwise divergent subjects of the American presidency and gun control that... of the “importance of the distinction between morality and law with reference to a single end, that of learning and understanding the law. ” Holmes was not arguing that the law was itself immoral or amoral, for “[t]he law is the witness and external deposit of our moral life.” Rather, he believed that the separation of law and morals was “of the first importance for a right study and mastery of the. .. kind or quality of writing And, the principles and norms of the legal profession, as taught in law schools, are markedly different from – indeed, at odds with – those of every other academic discipline: legal training (understandably and properly) emphasizes and elevates the principles that are the hallmark of American law in practice, including the adversary principle and the preeminence of client... pedagogical underpinnings and core principles that compose legal training and then compares them with professional training in other academic fields These characteristics and traits of legal training are well known to lawyers and even to many in the general public, thanks – in part, at least – to the blizzard of movies, television programs, and other elements of popular culture that depict what lawyers do My purpose... and scholarly pursuits Legal training is fine for lawyering but inadequate for – even antithetical to – the conduct of academic and scholarly inquiry Thinking Like a Lawyer The discipline of law, as it is taught in American law schools, emanates from the nature of the legal profession According to a widely used law text, the teaching of legal reasoning” lies at the heart of a law school education It... legitimated in the pages of law reviews, a venue deigned to be “scholarly” rather than political or polemical Fourth, in each instance, the constitutional theories described reverberated beyond the academic world’s narrow confines, influencing national public debate, and even public policy, on these profoundly important constitutional matters And fifth, they are all based on constitutional and historical... to question the propriety or adequacy of legal training as preparation for a conventional career in law but rather to clearly identify these traits in order to explain how they contribute, even if unwittingly, to the distortion of constitutional knowledge, especially among the small 14 THE LOGIC, AND ILLOGIC, OF LAW number of lawyers who later engage in academic and scholarly . Politics and Constitutionalism, The Right to Bear Arms, Essentials
of American Politics, and The Presidency and the Constitution.
Saving the Constitution
from. Constitution
from Lawyers
HOW LEGAL TRAINING AND
LAW REVIEWS DISTORT
CONSTITUTIONAL
MEANING
Robert J. Spitzer
State University of New York, College at Cortland
CAMBRIDGE
Ngày đăng: 16/03/2014, 03:20
Xem thêm: Saving the Constitution from Lawyers: HOW LEGAL TRAINING AND LAW REVIEWS DISTORT CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING pptx, Saving the Constitution from Lawyers: HOW LEGAL TRAINING AND LAW REVIEWS DISTORT CONSTITUTIONAL MEANING pptx