184 N Taylor and H Fraser thinking which leads to animals being cast as inferior to humans They are mere animals to our cultured humanity, barbarians to our civility and nature to our culture This gives humans license to see themselves at the top of the food chain, presiding over all other animals who are enslaved and objectified Ecofeminist scholars have long chronicled the damage that has arisen from such binary worldviews, and it is a damage that affects both other species and groups of disenfranchised humans (for example, Gruen 1993) It is an outlook that justifies the oppression of those considered to be other and, to many, it is the foundation of multiple harms As Will Tuttle (2014, pp 20–21) argues, the underlying mentality causing our problems is injected into us via our cultural programming, and that it is not innate It’s animal agriculture Besides being the driving force behind global climate disruption, rainforest destruction, air and water pollution, soil erosion, desertification, collapse of ocean ecosystems, species extinction, world hunger, chronic disease, economic inequality, and war, animal agriculture is also the driving force in creating the inner mentality that drives conflict, injustice, competition, and the various forms of social injustice that plague our world we are injected with a cultural program of violence toward defenceless and enslaved animals, and the ripples of that radiate as exclusivism, speciesism, and the many forms of separateness and entitlement that we see around us Here Tuttle points to the ways in which the AIC is embroiled within, and often creates, systems of oppression that damage humans, animals and the environment Recognising these links takes some courage as it involves stepping outside the usual, human preoccupation Understanding the ideological underpinnings of the AIC is crucial to understanding how it is that the systematic and publicly endorsed slaughter of billions of animals can be accepted by the vast majority of people In particular, it sheds light on understanding this acceptance by people who are not otherwise particularly violent or cruel; people who may often demonstrate compassion for others, including other animals, such as their companion dogs or cats The AIC helps us to understand why animal abuse is accepted as normative Explanations When many people in the West consider themselves to be ‘animal lovers’, it may seem contentious to claim that slaughterhouse abuse is a legitimate category of abuse and that animal abuse is normative Similarly, it may seem