... discussion L e m m a 5. 1 Let (H1) and (H4) hold Then there exists a constant C > O, depending only on L and T, such that for all 5, r >_ O, and (s, x, y) E [0, T] • IR2, it holds that (5. 2) ~Js'~(s,x,y) ... [0,T], uniformly (5. 4) and (5. 5) that inf ZCh~[s,T] = ] ( x , y) + > f ( x , y) - inf ZEZ~[s,T] c(1 + E L II(t, X(t), Y(t), Z(t))dt proving the lemma [] Next, for any x E ]R and r > 0, we define ... set r = Recall that by Proposition 3.6 and Theorem 3.7, for any p > 0, and fixed x E IR, we can first choose 5, e > depending only on x and Q~(1), so that (5. 7) O...