Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)
Superconducting quantum interference device is used to measure extremely weak signals with a device called Josephson junction. Josephson junction made up of two superconductors lightly separated that pairs of electrons can tunnel through the junction in order to generate the current called Josephson current between 2 superconductors at applied voltage is zero.
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225375454 Effect of a SiO 2 coating on the magnetic properties of Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles Article in Journal of Physics Condensed Matter · June 2012 DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/26/266007 · Source: PubMed CITATIONS READS 24 91 4 authors, including: Silvia Larumbe J I Pérez-Landazábal Universidad Pública de Navarra Universidad Pública de Navarra 21 PUBLICATIONS 107 CITATIONS 145 PUBLICATIONS 1,175 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: J I Pérez-Landazábal Retrieved on: 27 August 2016 Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience Effect of a SiO2 coating on the magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles This article has been downloaded from IOPscience Please scroll down to see the full text article 2012 J Phys.: Condens Matter 24 266007 (http://iopscience.iop.org/0953-8984/24/26/266007) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 130.206.165.223 The article was downloaded on 18/06/2012 at 16:22 Please note that terms and conditions apply IOP PUBLISHING JOURNAL OF PHYSICS: CONDENSED MATTER J Phys.: Condens Matter 24 (2012) 266007 (6pp) doi:10.1088/0953-8984/24/26/266007 Effect of a SiO2 coating on the magnetic properties of Fe3O4 nanoparticles S Larumbe, C G´omez-Polo, J I P´erez-Landaz´abal and J M Pastor Departamento de Fisica, Universidad P´ublica de Navarra, Campus de Arrosad´ıa, 31006 Pamplona, Spain E-mail: gpolo@unavarra.es Received 16 December 2011, in final form 26 April 2012 Published 14 June 2012 Online at stacks.iop.org/JPhysCM/24/266007 Abstract In this work the effect of a SiO2 coating on the magnetic properties of Fe3 O4 nanoparticles obtained by the sol–gel method is analyzed Two sets of samples were prepared: Fe3 O4 nanoparticles and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 core–shell composites The samples display the characteristic spinel structure associated with the magnetite Fe3 O4 phase, with the majority of grain sizes around 5–10 nm At room temperature the nanoparticles show the characteristic superparamagnetic behavior with mean blocking temperatures around 160 and 120 K for Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 , respectively The main effect of the SiO2 coating is reflected in the temperature dependence of the high field magnetization (µ0 H = T), i.e deviations from the Bloch law at low temperatures (T < 20 K) Such deviations, enhanced by the introduction of the SiO2 coating, are associated with the occurrence of surface spin disordered effects The induction heating effects (magnetic hyperthermia) are analyzed under the application of an AC magnetic field Maximum specific absorption rate (SAR) values around 1.5 W g−1 were achieved for the Fe3 O4 nanoparticles A significant decrease (around 26%) is found in the SAR values of the SiO2 coated nanocomposite The different heating response is analyzed in terms of the decrease of the effective nanoparticle magnetization in the Fe3 O4 @SiO2 core–shell composites at room temperature (Some figures may appear in colour only in the online journal) Introduction biocompatible organic or inorganic coatings are employed (polymers, dextran, chitosan or silica [2, 4, 5]) Silica coating is relatively easy to prepare through a sol–gel method using metal alkoxides as precursors This synthesis procedure is able to synthesize in one step the magnetite nanoparticles with the silica coating and optimize the size of nanoparticles and their structure through the synthesis conditions However, the immersion of the magnetic nanoparticles within the silica matrix is usually associated with a decrease in the net magnetization [6, 7] This effect is correlated with the occurrence of surface spin disorder induced by the silica coating Such a core–shell structure modifies the magnetic response of the nanoparticles and determines their magnetic characteristics In this work, the effect of the silica coating on the magnetic properties of magnetite nanoparticles is studied Two samples of Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 were synthesized by a sol–gel method The magnetic properties of both samples Ferrite nanoparticles have been extensively explored for different applications, for example in magnetic hyperthermia due to their biocompatibility and for their special magnetic properties as nanosized systems Different synthesis methods are employed in the preparation of magnetite nanoparticles, including chemical methods (sol–gel, coprecipitation, hydrothermal ) or physical methods (laser ablation, mechanical ball milling, sputtering) [1–3] For biomedical applications, the nanoparticle systems should be biocompatible and easily eliminated by the organism In this sense, it is of great importance to prevent their agglomeration by reducing the particle diameter to the superparamagnetic range [1] Hence, two aspects are relevant: the size of the magnetic nanoparticles and the magnetic interaction between them Furthermore, to combine the biocompatible characteristics and reduce particle agglomeration, different 0953-8984/12/266007+06$33.00 c 2012 IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK & the USA J Phys.: Condens Matter 24 (2012) 266007 S Larumbe et al were analyzed and their self-heating features (magnetic hyperthermia) were evaluated in terms of the values of the specific absorption rate (SAR) Experimental procedure All reagents supplied by Sigma Aldrich were of analytical grade and were used without any further purification Ferrite nanoparticles were synthesized via an autocombustion sol–gel method Citric acid was used as a fuel to promote the crystallization of the spinel through its combustion and ferric nitrate was employed as the chemical precursor salt After the hydrolysis of the nitrate in distilled water with a hydrolysis rate of 130, citric acid with a molar ratio of 1:2 and 1:1 (ferric nitrate:citric acid) for Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles, respectively, was added as fuel These molar ratios were found to be the optimum values to obtain a single spinel phase Afterwards, an ethanolic solution of the silica precursor, TEOS (tetraethyl orthosilicate), was dropped into the dark brown solution to give the SiO2 composite Taking into account the relative molar concentrations (ferric nitrate:TEOS) employed during the process, the SiO2 content was approximately 23% by weight with respect to the magnetite weight The reaction was performed in an acid medium (pH ≈ 1) to reduce the nanoparticle diameter (decrease in the condensation rate) The calcination temperature leading to the decomposition of the organic matrix was determined by thermogravimetric analysis (HI-RES 2950 TA Instruments) The dark brown as-synthesized gel was calcined in an inert atmosphere to prevent the oxidation of the sample to maghemite or hematite The structure of the calcined samples was analyzed by x-ray diffraction (Siemens D-5000) with Cu Kα ˚ and the mean diameter was estimated radiation (1.5418 A) through the Debye–Scherrer equation Transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM 2100 HT at the ICTS Centro Nacional de Microscop´ıa Electr´onica UCM, Spain) confirms the nanometric size of the calcined nanoparticles Magnetic measurements were carried out with a SQUID magnetometer (Quantum Design MPMS XL7) The induction heating curves under an AC field (magnetic hyperthermia) were measured with a home-made set up, composed of a water refrigerated coil with six turns (N = 100 turns m−1 ) connected to a kW RF power amplifier (Electronic and Innovation, model 1240L) The temperature rise of the nanoparticles (powder) was measured with a fiber optic thermometer (Neooptix, model T1) under an AC magnetic field (amplitude 170–340 Oe, frequency 340 kHz) Figure TG thermograms (—) and derivative curves (◦) for (a) Fe3 O4 and (b) Fe3 O4 @SiO2 gels the derivative curves a deeper analysis about the effect of the silica matrix in the decomposition temperatures can be performed Both samples display a peak below 200 ◦ C related to the evaporation of solvents The second peaks observed at 238 ◦ C and 218 ◦ C for Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 , respectively, correspond to the oxidation of citric acid by nitrates, whose heat combustion leads to the crystallization of the spinel phase [8, 9] The third peak at 373 ◦ C and 334 ◦ C (Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 , respectively) is due to the decomposition of the excess of citric acid added to the initial solution, taking into account that the molar ratio between the citric and iron salts was 2:1 Finally, the peak at 635 ◦ C only observed in the precursor gel of the Fe3 O4 sample would correspond to the dehydroxylation of the OH groups located at the surface of the nanoparticles [10] In the Fe3 O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles, the covalent interaction between the Si atoms and the magnetite surface decreases the number of surface hydroxyl groups at the surface, giving rise to a decrease in the final decomposition temperature at which all the hydroxyl groups disappear [10] Thus, according to the present thermogravimetric characterization (see figure 1), optimum calcination temperatures (complete decomposition of the organic matrix) of 650 ◦ C and 400 ◦ C are obtained for Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 , respectively Accordingly, the as-synthesized gels were calcined at the indicated temperatures for h In order to prevent the Results and discussion Firstly, in order to estimate the optimum calcination conditions associated with the decomposition temperature of the solvents and the organic matrix, the thermograms (TG) of the initial gels were analyzed employing heating and Ar flow rates of 20 ◦ C min−1 and 60 ml min−1 , respectively Figure shows the TG (weight loss) and the derivative curves of the gels for both nanoparticle systems Through J Phys.: Condens Matter 24 (2012) 266007 S Larumbe et al At room temperature both samples display the characteristic anhysteretic behavior of superparamagnetic nanoparticles The decrease of temperature promotes a noticeable increase in the coercivity, HC , as a result of the blocking of the nanoparticle magnetization (see figure 4(b)) Figure displays the temperature dependence of HC for both nanoparticles The coercive field displays the characteristic temperature decay of superparamagnetic systems In fact, a mean estimation of the blocking temperature, TB , can be performed through the fitting of the temperature dependence of HC to the T 1/2 law of uniaxial non-interacting single domain particles [12]: HC = HK − Figure X-ray diffraction patterns for the calcined samples T TB 1/2 (1) where HK = 2Keff /MS , with Keff the effective anisotropy constant and MS the saturation magnetization The solid lines in figure represent the data fitting according equation (1) with the following fitting parameters: (i) Fe3 O4 , HK = (670 ± 50) Oe, TB = (160 ± 20 K); (ii) Fe3 O4 @SiO2 , HK = (530 ± 40) Oe, TB = (120 ± 10 K) The slight increase in TB for the Fe3 O4 sample would correspond to the higher value of the mean nanoparticle size with respect to the Fe3 O4 @SiO2 sample However, a clear dispersion in the coercivity fitting for both nanoparticles for measuring temperatures above the estimated TB should be noticed This behavior could be explained in terms of the contribution of the nanoparticles with higher mean size However, it should be kept in mind that equation (3) is strictly valid for uniaxial non-interacting single domain particles Thus, the occurrence of magnetic (dipolar) interactions would also contribute to the detected behavior In order to analyze this effect in further detail, the zero field cool–field cooled (ZFC–FC) magnetization curves were analyzed under an applied magnetic field of mT As figure shows, the ZFC–FC magnetization curves not display the characteristic features of a defined superparamagnetic blocking temperature The irreversible behavior found for temperatures above the estimated TB should be associated with the magnetization contribution of the larger blocked nanoparticles In fact, some features of the Verwey transition are detected around TV ≈ 120 K in the Fe3 O4 sample with higher mean nanoparticle size [13] Additionally, the occurrence of strong interactions between the calcined nanoparticles would also contribute to the anomalous shape of the ZFC–FC curves However, the main effect of the silica coating is detected in the temperature dependence of the high field magnetization (measured at µ0 H = T) As figure shows, at low temperatures the Bloch law, MS (T) = MS (0)(1 − BT α ), with MS (0) the saturation magnetization at K and B the Bloch constant, is not followed and the experimental data can be suitably fitted through the introduction of an additional exponential term [14, 15]: oxidation of the sample to maghemite or hematite an inert atmosphere was employed during the calcination procedure Figure shows the x-ray diffraction patterns of the calcined Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles A single spinel phase (PDF card number 01-089-0691 from the PDFWIN database), with lattice parameters close to the ˚ is observed in both reported bulk magnetite (a = 8.39 A) ˚ for Fe3 O4 calcined nanoparticles: a = 8.39 and 8.40 A and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 , respectively Lattice parameters were estimated using the Bragg law reflection peaks A linear decrease in the lattice parameter of the spinel is reported with the ˚ (magnetite: oxygen vacancies (δ; Fe3(1−δ) O4−δ ) from 8.39 A ˚ Fe3 O4 ) to 8.35 A; maghemite: Fe2 O3 ) [11] This result confirms the Fe3 O4 composition of the calcined nanoparticles and therefore the effectiveness of the heating procedure in an inert atmosphere to prevent the oxidation of the samples On the other hand, the large width of the diffraction peaks indicates the nanometric size of the samples Mean values of crystallite size, d, of 12 and 11 nm were obtained for Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 , respectively, employing the kλ Debye–Scherrer equation, d = β cos θ , where k = 0.9, λ is the ˚ β is full width at wavelength of the Cu Kα line (1.5418 A), half maximum and θ is the diffraction angle corrected with the instrumental width (βinst ); β = βexp − βinst ) In order to check the morphology and mean crystallite size, the calcined nanoparticles were analyzed by TEM Figure shows the TEM micrographs for the Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles (figures 3(a) and (c), respectively) As can be seen, low particle size dispersion is detected with mean sizes close to the estimated values by x-ray diffractometry (d = and 7.5 nm for Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 –SiO2 , respectively) Thus, the close match between the estimated x-ray and TEM sizes indicates the single crystalline structure of the nanoparticles Energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDX) confirms the presence of the SiO2 in the Fe3 O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles (see figure 3(d)) With respect to the magnetic behavior of the samples, the hysteresis loops were analyzed in the temperature range from to 300 K using a maximum applied magnetic field, µ0 H = T As an example, figures 4(a) and (b) display the hysteresis loops of the calcined nanoparticles at high (300 K) and low (5 K) temperatures, respectively ( −T T ) MS (T) = MS (0)[(1 − BT α ) + A0 e f ] (2) This deviation is explained by the presence of spin surface disordered effects and the occurrence in the nanoparticles of a core–shell structure Thus, the spins J Phys.: Condens Matter 24 (2012) 266007 S Larumbe et al Figure TEM images for (a) Fe3 O4 and (c) Fe3 O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles EDX analyses are shown in (b) and (d) images Figure Coercive field, HC , versus temperature, T at the surface will display a disordered state mainly due to the broken exchange bonds at the nanoparticle surface (shell) area [16–20] Accordingly, the constant A0 in equation (2) would represent a measurement of the fraction of the disordered surface and Tf the characteristic freezing temperature below which the deviations are observed Table displays the obtained fitting parameters for both samples It should be remarked that the estimated saturation magnetization MS (0) is below the reported value in bulk magnetite (MS (0) = 92 emu g−1 ) [21] Such a decrease is inherent in nanoparticle systems and is correlated to the existence of spin disordered effects [17] Moreover, the best fitting is obtained in both samples for α = 2, Figure Hysteresis loops (M–H) at (a) 300 K and (b) K for both nanoparticles J Phys.: Condens Matter 24 (2012) 266007 S Larumbe et al Figure Temperature rise, T, versus time, t, under an AC magnetic field (initial temperature 18 ◦ C) Figure ZFC–FC magnetization (M) curves (applied magnetic field mT) and subtracting the 23% weight of the SiO2 coating, the saturation magnetization in this sample would reach a value of 48 emu g−1 This value is still far below the estimated magnetization in the Fe3 O4 system (MS (0) = 72 emu g−1 ; see table 1) With respect to the induction heating effects (magnetic hyperthermia), figure shows the temperature rise, T, versus time, t, in both nanoparticle systems under the application of an AC magnetic field (amplitude, HAC = 340 Oe and frequency, f = 340 kHz) The samples were in powder form (negligible Brownian contribution) and the T versus t curves were registered five times in order to estimate the mean value and its dispersion The SAR was calculated through the initial slope of the heating curve: Figure Temperature (T) dependence of the high field magnetization M (applied magnetic field T) Sample MS (0) (emu g−1 ) B×106 (K−2 ) A0 Tf (K) Fe3 O4 Fe3 O4 @SiO2 72 37 1.1 3.2 3.3 × 10−3 0.116 15 T t c m i i i SARFe3 O4 = cFe3 O4 Table Parameters obtained from the fitting to the modified Bloch’s law (see equation (2)) SARFe3 O4 @SiO2 = mFe3 O4 T t (3) with ci the heat capacity of each component (magnetite 0.937 J g−1 K−1 [23]; silica 0.713 J g−1 K−1 [24]), T/ t the initial slope of the heating curve and mFe3 O4 the mass of magnetite in the samples [25, 26] For the Fe3 O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles the average heat capacity is calculated taking into account the relative mass of silica in the sample (23%) Thus, SAR values of 1.5 ± 0.1 and 1.08 ± 0.04 W g−1 were obtained, respectively, for Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles However, the spin disorder surface effects and the fact that not all the Fe3 O4 nanoparticles mass contribute to the magnetic heating around room temperature should be taken into account In fact, considering the high field magnetization values at 300 K (65 and 32 emu g−1 for Fe3 O4 and Fe3 O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles, respectively) and the mass correction of the silica in the Fe3 O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles, just a 67% of the mass of Fe3 O4 nanoparticles in this silica coated system would be magnetically active for the heating process at room temperature If this mass correction is introduced in the SAR estimation through equation (3), values around 1.6 W g−1 are obtained for the Fe3 O4 @SiO2 sample indicating a faster decrease of magnetization with temperature than in the bulk state This increase in the α exponent has been previously reported in other ferrite nanoparticles and is associated with finite size effects and a lack of magnetic coordination at the surface [14, 22] With respect to the disordered surface contribution, as figure shows, the silica coating gives rise to a clear enhancement of the low temperature magnetization deviations This enhancement is directly reflected in the highest value of the A0 parameter for the magnetite nanoparticles dispersed in the silica matrix (see table 1) [6, 7] Besides this, the reduction in magnetization with respect to the bulk value is also enhanced with the introduction of the silica coating The surface spin disorder contribution is enhanced for thicker silica shells, giving rise to an increase in the effective anisotropy constant of the nanoparticles [6, 7] Taking the estimated value of MS (0) J Phys.: Condens Matter 24 (2012) 266007 S Larumbe et al field indicates the main contribution of the N´eel relaxation to the heating process Acknowledgment This work was has been performed within the framework of the project MET-NANOEFA17/08 (POCTEFA) References [1] Tartaj P, Puerto Morales M, Veintemillas-Verdaguer S, Gonz´alez T and Carre˜no C J 2003 J Phys D: Appl Phys 36 R182 [2] Gupta A K and Gupta M 2005 Biomaterials 26 3995 [3] L´evy M, Wilhelm C, Siaugue J M, Horner O, Bacri J C and Gazeau F 2008 J Phys.: Condens Matter 20 204133 [4] Frimpong R A and Hilt J Z 2011 Nanomedicine 1401 [5] Thakur M, De K, Giri S, Si S, Kotal A and Mandal T K 2006 J Phys.: Condens Matter 18 9093 [6] Coskun M, Korkmaz M, Firat T, Jaffari G H and Shah S I 2010 J Appl Phys 107 09B523 [7] Mitra S, Mandal K and Kumar P A 2006 J Magn Magn Mater 306 254 [8] Chen D H and He X R 2001 Mater Res Bull 36 1369 [9] Srivastave S, Hubey C and Ogha A K 2009 Mater Chem Phys 118 174 [10] Guo Z, Lei K, Li Y, Ng H W, Prikhodko S and Hahn H T 2008 Compos Sci Technol 68 1513 [11] Belin T, Guigue-Millot N, Caillot T, Aymes D and Niepce J C 2001 J Solid State Chem 163 459 [12] Battle X, Garc´ıa del Muro M, Tejada J, Pfeiffer H, G¨oand P and Sin E 1993 J Appl Phys 74 3333 [13] Goya G F, Berqu´o T S, Fonseca F C and Morales M P 2003 J Appl Phys 94 3520 [14] V´azquez-V´azquez C, L´opez-Quintela M A, Buj´an-N´un˜ ez M C and Rivas J 2011 J Nanopart Res 13 1673 [15] Aquino R, Depeyrot J, Sousa M H, Tourinho F A, Dubois E and Perzynski R 2005 Phys Rev B 72 184435 [16] Suzuki M, Fullem S I and Suzuki I S 2009 Phys Rev B 79 024418 [17] Cotica L F, Santos I A, Girotto E M, Ferri E V and Coelho A A 2010 J Appl Phys 108 064325 [18] Berkowitz A E, Kodama R H, Makhlouf S A, Parker F T, Spada F E, McNiff E J and Foner S Jr 1999 J Magn Magn Mater 196–197 591 [19] Kodama R H 1999 J Magn Magn Mater 200 359 [20] Kodama R H, Berkowitz A E, McNiff E J and Foner S Jr 1996 Phys Rev Lett 77 394 [21] Verg´es M A, Costo R, Roca A G, Marco J F, Goya G F, Serna C J and Morales M P 2008 J Phys D: Appl Phys 41 134003 [22] Fern´andez-Garc´ıa M P, Gorria P, Sevilla M, Fuertes A B, Gren`eche J M and Blanco J A 2011 J Alloys Compounds 509 S320 [23] Baker I, Zeng Q, Li W and Sullivan C R 2006 J Appl Phys 99 08H106 [24] Inaga S, Oda S and Morinaga K 2001 J Non-Cryst Solids 306 42 [25] Hosono T, Takahashi H, Fujita A, Justin J R, Tohji K and Jevadevan B 2009 J Magn Magn Mater 321 3019 [26] Li Z, Kawashita M, Araki N, Mitsumori M, Hiraoka M and Doi M 2010 Mater Sci Eng C 30 990 [27] Hergt R, Dutz I and R¨oder M 2008 J Phys.: Condens Matter 20 385214 [28] Carrey J, Mehdaoui and Respaud M 2011 J Appl Phys 109 083921 Figure Dependence of the SAR on the amplitude of magnetic field HAC The line represents the fitting to HAC In order to evaluate the main relaxation mechanisms associated with the heating process, the heating curves were determined as a function of the amplitude of the applied AC magnetic field, HAC Figure displays the estimated SAR values as a function of HAC , where the described mFe3 O4 mass correction was introduced in the Fe3 O4 @SiO2 system As figure shows, both samples show similar SAR values in the range of the applied HAC field taking into account the mass correction Moreover, the samples display the characteristic quadratic field dependence of the superparamagnetic nanoparticles (N´eel relaxation) [24, 27]: SAR(HAC , f ) ∝ χ (f )HAC ρ (4) with χ the imaginary component of the magnetic susceptibility and ρ the electrical resistivity Similar quadratic dependences are obtained within the framework of a general hysteresis model, taking into account the linear response theory [28] It should be noted that in spite of the wide size distribution in both nanoparticle systems, the contribution of the largest nanoparticles to the self-heating effects can be disregarded In this case, the field dependence of the SAR should depart from the quadratic field dependence experimentally found in the analyzed magnetite nanoparticles Conclusions The effect of the silica matrix on the magnetic properties and on the induction heating (magnetic hyperthermia) of magnetite nanoparticles was evaluated At room temperature the samples display the characteristic superparamagnetic behavior of magnetite nanoparticles Surface spin disorder is evidenced by the deviations in the temperature dependence of the saturation magnetization in the low temperature range These disordered effects are greatly enhanced with the silica coating of the nanoparticles As a result of a lower fraction of Fe atoms being magnetically active at room temperature, the Fe3 O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles display lower SAR values with respect to the sample without silica Moreover, the quadratic dependence of the SAR on the amplitude of the AC magnetic