A legal analysis of the cross border trade in telemedicine the singapore perspective

234 443 0
A legal analysis of the cross border trade in telemedicine the singapore perspective

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE CROSS BORDER TRADE IN TELEMEDICINE: THE SINGAPORE PERSPECTIVE Brian K Sugg (A.B., Harvard; LL.B./M.B.A., Dalhousie) A THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LAWS FACULTY OF LAW NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE 2003 © Brian Keith Sugg, 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First, I wish to express my gratitude to my supervisor, Professor Terry Kaan for his assistance in this thesis. His affable nature and straightforward advice made the experience a pleasant one. His suggestion to make my thesis useful helped me regain my focus on many late nights. I also would like to thank the staff in the law library at the National University of Singapore. Their warmth and friendliness was surpassed only by their helpfulness. In the law school administrative offices, a special thanks to Chin Yee and Normah. I would also like to express my gratitude to the entire administration at the Faculty of Law for their patience and understanding behind the scenes during the difficulties that I have experienced in my life over the past few years. But most of all, I am eternally grateful to my wife, Ruby. Despite all the personal sacrifice, she has always been a source of constant support and encouragement as I struggled through the chapters of this thesis. The remaining chapters of our life together have yet to be written but I look forward to devoting my constant attention to her from now on. Although I am indebted to many for their assistance, I alone bear the responsibility for any shortcoming of this thesis. ii ABBREVIATIONS AELA Application of English Law Act (Singapore) ASEAN Association of South East Asian Nations ATFA ASEAN Free Trade Agreement CPC Central Product Classification (United Nations) DC Developed Country D2D Doctor-to-Doctor D2P Doctor-to-Patient EU European Union FSMB Federation of State Medical Boards (United States) GATS General Agreement on Trade in Services GATT General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade GDP Gross Domestic Product GNS Group of Negotiations on Services (GATS) HSWG Health Services Working Group (Singapore) ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network ITO International Trade Organization KBE Knowledge Based Economy LDC Less Developed Countries MASEAN Medical Associations of South East Asian Nations MFN Most Favoured Nation MTN Multilateral Trade Negotiation NAFTA North America Free Trade Agreement NGO Non-Governmental Organization NTB Non-Tariff Barrier OECD Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development SARS Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome TNC Trans-National Corporation TRIPS Trans-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights UNCTAD United Nations Conference on Trade and Development WHO World Health Organization WPPS Working Party on Professional Services (GATS) iii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CHAPTER I: TELEMEDICINE AND INTERNATIONAL FREE TRADE 15 A. B. C. 15 17 21 22 23 The Liberalisation of the Trade in Telemedicine Services The Origin of the GATS An Overview of the GATS 1. Cross Border Delivery: The Mode of Supply of Telemedicine 2. Most Favoured Nation (MFN) Treatment and Transparency: General Obligations a) The Most Favoured Nation clause 23 25 b) Transparency and the GATS 3. Market Access and National Treatment: Discretionary Obligations 26 a) Market Access b) National Treatment c) The Specific Commitment Approach of the GATS i) The Classification Structure ii) National Schedules iii) The Data Dilemma in Services Trade 28 28 31 32 33 40 4. Domestic Regulation and Recognition under the GATS 42 a) Balancing Domestic Regulation with Free Trade b) Recognition of International Standards and Procedures D. 43 45 5. Regional Economic Integration The GATS and International Telemedicine 47 48 CHAPTER II: LICENSING THE INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN TELEMEDICINE 50 A. B. C. 53 56 58 59 61 63 The Purpose of Medical Licensure The Classes of Telemedicine The Regulation of Cross Border Telemedicine 1. The Practice of Medicine 2. The Place of Telemedicine Practice 3. The Approaches to Licensure a) Unilateral Licensure i) The California Approach to Licensure ii) The Malaysian Telemedicine Act b) Joint Licensure i) Mutual Recognition in the European Union ii) Reciprocity in Australia iii) ASEAN and Mutual Recognition c) International Licensure D. E. F. 64 69 70 71 74 74 75 76 Licensure and the GATS The Telemedicine Business Model International Telemedicine, Licensure, and the Regulation of the Medical Profession in Singapore 80 87 94 iv CHAPTER III: CONFLICT OF LAWS I: MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE, JURISDICTION, AND INTERNATIONAL TELEMEDICINE A. B. 98 Whose Law is it Anyway? Jurisdiction of the Singapore Courts 1. General Aspects of Jurisdiction 2. Service Outside Singapore – Obtaining Leave of the Court 100 102 105 106 a) Establishing Singapore’s Jurisdiction – Can Singapore Courts Decide the Case? i) The Heads of Jurisdiction – Order 11 Rule a. Rule 1(f) b. The Location of the Tort c. Rule 1(f), Rule 1(p) and the Common Law: A Partial or Substantial Connection? ii) A Proper Case for Service Outside Singapore – Does the Case Have Merit? b) Should Singapore Courts Decide the Case? The Most Appropriate Forum C. 107 107 107 109 112 123 125 Jurisdiction and International Telemedicine 131 CHAPTER IV: CONFLICT OF LAWS II: MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE, CHOICE OF LAW, AND INTERNATIONAL TELEMEDICINE A. National Approaches to International Tort Law 1. The American Montage: Choice of Law Approaches to Tort Actions a) b) c) d) e) f) Place of the Tort (lex loci delicti) Restatement of Torts (Second) Approach – Closest Connection Law of the Forum (lex fori) Significant Contacts test Government Interest Analysis Better Law Method g) Combined Modern Approaches 142 143 145 146 146 147 147 2. Choice of Law in England and Singapore 150 a) The Origin of Choice of Law in England b) Choice of Law in Singapore c) English Choice of Law – The Statute Takes Over 150 160 161 3. The Canadian Approach 162 a) Background to Choice of Law in Canada b) Canada’s Radical Move to the Traditional Model: The Tolofson Decision B. C. 162 163 4. Choice of Law Down Under: The Australian Approach 5. European Choice of Law International Telemedicine and Choice of Law 1. A Double Locality Tort a) b) c) d) 137 141 141 170 172 173 175 The Foundation of the Doctor-Patient Relationship The Location of the Parties Administrative Factors Drawing on the Lessons from Products Liability i) The Canadian Approach to Choice of Law in International Products Liability ii) Choice of Law under the International Convention on Products Liability 178 180 181 184 184 186 2. The GATS and Choice of Law 3. A Pre-Existing Relationship A Choice of Law Direction for International Telemedicine in Singapore 187 190 193 CONCLUSION TABLES BIBLIOGRAPHY 195 204 211 v SUMMARY The government of Singapore has recently indicated its intention to build on Singapore’s reputation for medical excellence and transform the city-state into an Asian health care hub. This paper proposes that as an integral part of its hub strategy Singapore combine its strengths in health care and telecommunications to create a telemedicine strategy. The technology used in modern telemedicine continues to improve over time making telemedicine an increasingly practical and cost-effective form of delivering health care. The main impediment to the proliferation of telemedicine is no longer technological. Legal obstacles are now the greatest challenge to telemedicine’s global commercial development. This thesis focuses on the three major legal obstructions to the international trade in telemedicine, all of which must be resolved in advance in order to gain the confidence of telemedicine providers as well as their insurers and investors. The first impediment lies with the international services agreement itself. Chapter presents the mechanism of the GATS, the global instrument designed to liberalise the international trade in services. Under the GATS, nations must take positive steps to open up their health care sectors to the cross border trade of telemedicine. Before allowing foreign professionals to practice telemedicine within its borders, a country will want to ensure that the health and welfare of its citizens is adequately protected. In the field of health care, a country protects its people by regulating the individuals who are entitled to provide health care and by ensuring there is an available legal avenue for injured patients to receive compensation in the event that something goes wrong during treatment. The handling of these issues is equally important to telephysicians who face the prospect of civil liability and criminal punishment if they not comply with a country’s licensure requirements or find vi themselves in the midst of a medical negligence lawsuit. The cross border trade in telemedicine has the added dimension of double locality in which the physician and patient are located in different countries. Naturally, the separation raises important questions concerning which laws will apply to the issues of licensure and tort liability. Clarity and certainty in the law is of paramount importance to all parties involved. It enables countries to make calculated decisions as to whether they will open up their health care sector to foreign telemedicine providers. It also allows telemedicine providers to weigh the risks of practising across international borders. Chapter looks at the issues surrounding national licensure and considers several possible approaches to the cross border regulation of telemedicine. Chapters and consider the problems relating to the choice of forum and the choice of appropriate law for international tort cases, respectively. This paper addresses the issues telemedicine raises with respect to the GATS, national licensure and the conflict of laws. Bearing in mind Singapore’s plan to develop itself as a medical hub, this paper assesses the clarity and certainty of Singapore’s law in furtherance of this goal and the legal changes needed for telemedicine to form a key part of its strategy. vii INTRODUCTION The advent of telemedicine technologies has created immense new opportunities for the delivery of quality health care over far-reaching distances that will alter the very structure of health care. Telemedicine has been part of the health care profession since doctors began using radios and the telephone to consult with patients and other practitioners. The proliferation of information and telecommunication technologies in the 1990s transformed the nature of telemedicine in the same way that these technologies transformed other industries – allowing greater global reach, improving speed and quality of service, and lowering costs. Recent applications of telemedicine include monitoring a Japanese stroke patient’s blood pressure and electrocardiograms by a doctor in another part of the country, a Canadian surgeon conducting a complex anti-reflux stomach operation using robotic arms on a patient located 400 kilometres away, and American physicians diagnosing illnesses and providing healthcare advice to inhabitants of remote Alaskan villages without the need to be physically present. Essentially, telemedicine is the application of information and telecommunication technologies to the health care field. The innovation of telemedicine does not improve health care in the same way as the development of a new drug or medical procedure but, rather, it adds an important new dimension to the way in which health care is delivered. By using the new technologies, health care providers are able to consult, diagnose, and educate over vast distances. Current uses of telemedicine include diagnosing to and from remote locations, gaining access to medical information and expertise on a global scale, Sheryl WuDunn, “Japan Bets on a Wired World to Win Back Its Global Niche,” in The New York Times, 30 August 1999, p. A1 Joseph Brean, “Robot operates for doctor 400 km away: Hamilton hospital touts procedure as a world first, in The National Post, March 2003, p. A3; Bruce Gillespie, “Cost-cutting operation,” in The National Post, 12 May 2003, p. BE Tina Kelley, “Internet Showing Its Value In Remote Alaskan Villages,” in The New York Times, August 1999, p. G9 providing expert assistance in emergency situations, and delivering home health care. A World Health Organization (WHO) report provides a comprehensive definition for telemedicine as “the practice of medical care using audio, visual and data communications; this includes medical care delivery, consultation, diagnosis, treatment, education and the transfer of medical data.” Telemedicine has become an important issue in health care policy because it holds the potential of solving two of the key problems confronting modern health care, namely, cost and access. The enormous costs associated with health care have become an increasing burden on economies over the past few decades. The development of expensive life saving technologies coupled with populations that are living longer has caused national health care expenditures to soar. The fourteen OECD nations ∗ that reported health care statistics in 1960 showed an expansion of their total expenditures on health as a percentage of GDP from an average of less than 4.0% in 1960 to more than 8.6% in the year 2000. During the same period, these nations experienced unprecedented growth in their economies. In 1960, the total GDP for the OECD nations was slightly over US$ trillion. Forty years later, the GDP for these nations has grown to over US$ 27 trillion. As a result, health care expenditures are now receiving a bigger slice of a larger pie. Expenditure in the United States, for instance, jumped from 5.1% of GDP in 1960 to 13% today. During the same time, the GDP of the United States swelled Salah H. Mandil, “Telehealth: What is it? Will it propel cross-border trade in health services?” in International Trade in Health Services: A Development Perspective (Geneva: UNCTAD-WHO Joint Publication, 1998), at 86 Ibid ∗ Australia, Austria, Canada, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Health Data 2002, 4th edition (Paris: OECD, 2002) Organization of Co-operation and Development (OECD). Main Economic Indicators: Historical Statistics, 1955-1971 (Paris, OECD) at 500. The GDP in 1960 was US$1,009 billion Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Main Economic Indicators, Vol. 2002(1) (Paris: OECD, 2002) at 17 from US$ 527.4 billion in 1960 to over US$ 10.2 trillion in 2001. In particular, the last decade has shown enormous growth in health care expenditures in many countries. The per capita expenditure in the United States jumped from US$ 2,739 in 1990 to US$ 4,631 in 2000. 10 Even in non-OECD countries, the increase in health care expenditures has been dramatic. In Singapore, expenditures on health care amounted to over S$ 1.5 billion in 2002 11 compared with S$ 635 million in 1980 and S$ 85 million in 1960. 12 During this time period, Singapore’s total health expenditure as a percentage of GDP remained consistent even as Singapore experienced extraordinary economic growth rates. 13 Health care expenditures have also increased substantially in developing nations. Mexico’s expenditures nearly doubled in a decade from US$ 260 million in 1990 to US$ 490 million in 2000. 14 As the world economies spend increasing amounts on health care each year, delivery of health care by a more efficient and economical means has become a priority for many nations. 15 Greater access to health care is the other compelling benefit of telemedicine. With fewer financial resources available, less developed nations tend to be underserved by health care professionals and institutions. At a basic level, the number of health care professionals in developed countries is much higher than in developing countries. For instance, on a per capita basis, Canada has eight (8) times as many doctors than Cambodia or Myanmar and more than twelve (12) times the number of nurses than United States Department of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2002 at 417 OECD Health Data, supra footnote 11 Singapore Ministry of Health. Health Facts Singapore 2003 12 Singapore Ministry of Health Statistics cited in Toh Mun Heng and Linda Low, Health Care Economics, Policies and Issues in Singapore (Singapore: Times Academic Press for the Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore, 1991) at 25 13 Eva Liu and S.Y. Yue, Health Care Expenditure and Financing in Singapore, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Research and Library Services Division, Legislative Council Secretariat (09 July 1999) at 14 14 OECD Health Data, supra footnote 15 UNCTAD Secretariat, “International Trade in Health Services: Difficulties and Opportunities for Developing Countries,” in International Trade in Health Services: A Development Perspective (Geneva: UNCTAD-WHO Joint Publication, 1998) at 10 Pinsler, Jeffrey, Singapore Court Practice (Singapore: Butterworths Asia, 1999) – includes Supplements to (1999-2001). Pinsler, Jeffrey, ed., Singapore Civil Procedure, 2003 (Sinapore: Sweet & Maxwell Asia, 2003). Reimann, Mathias, Conflict of Laws in Western Europe, A Guide Through the Jungle (Irvington: Transnational Publishers, Inc., 1995). Singer, Sir Hans, Neelambar Hatti, and Rameshwar Tandon, eds., Trade in Services (Delhi: B.R. Publishing Corporation, 1999). Solis, Pedro P., Medical Jurisprudence (The Practice of Medicine and the Law) (Manila: R.P. Garcia Publishing Co., 1988). Stanberry, Ben, The Legal and Ethical Aspects of Telemedicine (London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited, 1998). Teo, Keang Sood, ed., Annual Review of Singapore Cases 2000, (Singapore: Singapore Academy of Law, 2001). Teo, Keang Sood, ed., Annual Review of Singapore Cases 2001, (Singapore: Singapore Academy of Law, 2002). Theall, Lawrence G., et al. Product Liability: Canadian Law and Practice (Aurora: Canada Law Book Inc., 2002). Tilbury, Michael, Gary Davis and Brian Opeskin, Conflict of Laws in Australia (Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2002). Toh, Mun Heng and Linda Low, Health Care Economics, Policies and Issues in Singapore (Singapore: Times Academic Press for the Centre for Advanced Studies, National University of Singapore, 1991). Yeo, Khee Quan, Medico-Legal Responsibility in Singapore (Singapore: Yeo Khee Quan, 2000) ----------, Restatement of the Law of Conflict of Laws (St. Paul: American Law Institute Publishers, 1934). ----------, Restatement of the Law Second, Conflict of Laws, 2d ed. (St. Paul, American Law Institute Publishers, 1971). Journal Articles Abu-Akeel, Aly K., “Definition of Trade in Services Under the GATS: Legal Implications,” (1999) 32:2 Geo. Wash. J. Int’l L. & Econ 189. 212 Adlung, Rudolf and Antonia Carzaniga, “Health Services under the General Agreement on Trade in Services,” (2001) 79:4 Bulletin of the World Health Organization: The International Journal of Public Health 352. Annamalai, Nagavalli, “Cyber Laws of Malaysia – The Multimedia Super Corridor,” (1997) 12:12 Journal of International Banking Law 473. Benz, Steven F., “Trade Liberalization and the Global Service Economy,” (1985) 19:2 J. World Trade Law 95. Blum, John D., “Symposium: The Role of Law in Global E-Health: A Tool for Development and Equity in a Digitally Divided World,” (2002) 46 St. Louis U. L. J. 85. Blum, John D., “Telemedicine Poses New Challenges for the Law,” (1999) 20:1 Health Law in Canada 115. Cameron, Kelly, “Facilitating International Telemedicine: the Way Forward,” (1998) 23:3 International Legal Practitioner 93. Caryl, Christopher J., “Malpractice and Other Legal Issues Preventing the Development of Telemedicine,” (1997-98) 12 J. L. & Health 173. Chanda, Rupa, “Trade in health services,” (2002) 80:2 Bulletin of the World Health Organization 158. Chang, Philip, Guy Karsenty, Aaditya Mattoo, and Jurgen Richtering, “GATS, the Modes of Supply and Statistics on Trade in Services,” (1999) 33:3 J. World Trade 93. Chew, SJ, HM Cheng, DSC Lam, ACK Cheng, ATS Leung, JKH Chua, CP Yu, WK Chan and V Balakrishnan, “OphthWeb – cost-effective telemedicine for ophthalmology,” (1998) 4:3 HKMJ 300. Chong Gek Sian David, “Forum Conveniens,” (1993) S.Ac.L.J. 1. Collins, Lawrence, “Some Aspects of Service Out of the Jurisdiction in English Law,” (1972) 21 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 656. Daley, Heather A., “Telemedicine: The Invisible Legal Barriers to the Health Care of the Future,” (2000) Annals of Health Law 73. Dickinson, Andrew, “Further Thoughts on Foreign Torts: Boys v. Chaplain Explained?” [1994] LMCLQ 463. Drake, William J. and Kalypso Nicolaidis, “Ideas, interests, and institutionalization: “trade in services” and the Uruguay Round,” (1992) 46:1 Int’l Org. 37. Fawcett, James, “The Interrelationships of Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in Private International Law,” (1991) 44 Current Legal Probs 39. 213 Fentiman, Richard, “Tort – Jurisdiction or Choice of Law?” in (1989) Cambridge L. J. 191. Footer, Mary E., “The International Regulation of Trade in Services Following Completion of the Uruguay Round,” (1995) 29:2 Int’l Law. 453. Granade, Phyllis Forrester, “Medical Malpractice Issues Related to the Use of Telemedicine – An Analysis of the Ways in which Telecommunications Affects the Principles of Medical Malpractice,” (1997) 73:1 N. D. L. Rev. 65. Gulick, Greg P., “The Development of a Global Hospital is Closer Than We Think: An Examination of the International Implications of Telemedicine and the Developments, Uses and Problems Facing International Telemedicine Programs,” (2000) 11 Ind. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 183. Johnson, David R. and David Post, “Law and Borders – The Rise of Law in Cyberspace,” in (1996) 48 Stan. L. Rev. 1367. Juenger, Friedrich K., “Forum Shopping, Domestic and International,” (1989) 63:3 Tul. L. Rev. 553. Karlinsky, Harry, “Telepsychiatry: Implications for Licensing and Credentialing,” (http://www.cpa-apc.org/Publications/Archives/Bulletin/2001/Mar/Technology.asp) Kincaid, Peter, “Jensen v. Tolofson and the Revolution in Tort Choice of Law,” (1995) 74:4 Can. B. Rev. 537. Landgreen Ian R., “’Do No Harm’: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Barriers to Corporate Clinical Telemedicine Providers in the United States, Australia, and Canada,” (2002) 30:2 Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 365. Lang, Jeffrey M., “The First Five Years of the WTO: General Agreement on Trade in Services,” (2000) 31:3 Law & Policy in Int’l Bus. 801. Laycock, Douglas, “Equal Citizens of Equal and Territorial States: The Constitutional Foundations of Choice of Law,” (1992) Colum. L. R. 249. Lazar, Fred, “Services and the GATT: US Motives and a Blueprint for Negotiations,” (1990) 24:1 J. World Trade Law 135. Lee, B R, D J C Png, L Liew, M Fabrizio, M K Li, J W Jarrett and L R Kavoussi, “Laparoscopic Telesurgery Between the United States and Singapore,” (2000) 29:5 Annals of the Academy of Medicine of Singapore 665. Lee, Joel, “International Tort Litigation: Revisiting Order 11 Rule 1(f),” (2000) S.J.L.S. 136. Leflar, Robert A., “Choice-Influencing Considerations in Conflicts Law,” (1966) 41 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 267. 214 Liu Chun Fai, “A Functional Review of Medical Negligence Law,” (1985) Sing. L. Rev. 188. Lugn, Nancy, “Medical Licensure and Telemedicine: Necessity or Barrier?” (2001) 25:1 Suffolk Transnat’l L. J. 165. Matta, Ali Mohammad, “Medical Negligence: New Issues and their Resolution,” [2000] Malayan L.J. 184. Mattoo, Aaditya, “National Treatment in the GATS – Corner-Stone or Pandora’s Box?” (1997) 31:1 J. World Trade 107. McEvoy, J.P., “Choice of law in Torts: The New Rule,” (1995) 44 U.N.B. L.J. 211. Morse, C.G.J., “Choice of Law in Tort: A Comparative Survey,” (1994) 32:1 Am. J. Comp. L. 51. Mukherjee Neela, “GATS and the Millenium Round of Multilateral Negotiations – Selected Issues from the Perspective of the Developing Countries,” (1999) 33:4 J. World Trade 87. Phang, Andrew, “Cementing the Foundations: The Singapore Application of English Law Act 1993,” (1994) 28:1 U.B.C. Law Review 205. Pinsler, Jeffrey, “An Analysis of the Rules of Court (Amendment No 3) Rules of 1997 and the Rules of Court (Amendment) Rules of 1998,” (1998) 10 S.Ac.L.J. 300. Poe, Kip, “Telemedicine Liability: Texas and Other States Delve into the Uncertainties of Health Care Delivery via Advanced Communications Technology,” (2001) 20:3 Rev. Litig. 681. Pong, Raymond W. and John C. Hogenbirk, “Licensing Physicians in Canada for Telehealth Practice: Issues and Policy Options,” (1999) 8:1 Health Law Review 3. Prosser, William L., “Interstate Publication,” (1953) 51:7 Mich. L. R. 969. Randhawa, P.S., “Punte del Este and After: Negotiations on Trade in Services and the Uruguay Round,” (1987) 21:4 J. World Trade 163. Rensberger, Jeffrey L., “Choice of Law, Medical Malpractice, and Telemedicine: The Present Diagnosis with a Prescription for the Future,” (2000) 55:1 U. Miami L. Rev. 31. Sanders, Dr. Jay H., “Telemedicine: Capabilities, Growth Projections and Attending Issues Surrounding its Use,” (1996) 6:1 Ohio N.U.J. Pharmacy & L. 3. Sauve, Pierre, “Assessing the General Agreement on Trade in Services – Half-Full or Half-Empty?” (1995) 29:4 J. World Trade 125. Sauve, Pierre, “Developing Countries and the GATS 2000 Round,” (2000) 34:2 J. World Trade 85. 215 Sein, Dr U Than and Mr Pak Chang Rim, “Multilateral Trade Agreements,” (2001) 5:2 Regional Health Forum (WHO South-East Asia Region). Smith, Gregory E., “Choice of Law in the United States,” (1987) 38:6 Hastings L. J. 1041. Stahl, Tycho H. E., “Liberalizing International Trade in Services: The Case for Sidestepping the GATT,” (1994) 19:2 Yale J. Int’l L. 405. Stephenson, Sherry M., “ASEAN and the Multilateral Trading System,” (1994) 25:2 Law & Pol’y Int’l Bus. 439. Sulentic, Alison M., “Crossing Borders: Practitioners,” (1999) 25:1 J. Legis. 1. The Licensure of Interstate Telemedicine Swan, John, “Federalism and the Conflict of Laws: The Curious Position of the Supreme Court of Canada,” (1995) 46:5 S.C. L. Rev. 923. Swatek Huie, Stacey, “Facilitating Telemedicine: Reconciling National Access with State Licensing Laws,” (1999) 18:2 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 377. Symeonides, Symeon C., “Choice of Law in the American Courts in 1988,” (1989) 37:3 Am. J. Comp. L. 457. Symeonides, Symeon C., “Choice of Law in the American Courts in 1995: A Year in Review,” (1996) 44:2 Am. J. Comp. L. 181. Symeonides, Symeon C., “Choice of Law in the American Courts in 1997,” (1998) 46:2 Am. J. Comp. L. 233. Symeonides, Symeon C., “Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2000: As the Century Turns,” (2001) 49:1 Am. J. Comp. L. 1. Symeonides, Symeon C., “Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2001: Fifteenth Annual Survey,” (2002) 50:1 Am. J. Comp. L. 1. Tan Yock Lin, “Choice of Law in a Question of Jurisdiction,” (1990) 32 Malaya L. R. 363. Toh Kian Sing, “Stay of Actions Based on Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses under English and Singapore Law (Part I),” (1991) S.J.L.S. 103. Toh Kian Sing, “Stay of Actions Based on Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses under English and Singapore Law (Part II),” (1991) S.J.L.S. 410. Trachtman, Joel P., “Trade in Financial Services under GATS, NAFTA and the EC: A Regulatory Jurisdiction Analysis,” (1995) 33:1 Colum. J. Transnat’l L. 37. Walker, Janet, “Are We There Yet? Towards a New Rule for Choice of Law in Tort,” (2000) 38:2 Osgoode Hall L. J. 331. 216 Walsh, Catherine, “Territoriality and Choice of Law in the Supreme Court of Canada: Applications in Products Liability Claims,” (1997) 76:1&2 Can. B. R. 91. Westbrook, Jay Lawrence, “Extraterritoriality, Conflict of Laws, and the Regulation of Transnational Business,” (1990) 25:1 Tex. Int’l L. J. 71. Yeo, Matthew S., “Distance Health Services Under the General Agreement on Trade in Services,” (2002) 35:1 Journal of Health Law 83 (Digital version). Yeo Meng Heong Stanley, “The Standard of Care in Medical Negligence Cases,” (1983) 25 Malaya L. R. 30. Yeo Tiong Min, “Jurisdiction Issues in International Tort Litigation: A Singapore View,” (1995) S.Ac.L.J 1. Yeo Tiong Min, “Private International Law: Recent Developments in Singapore,” (1997) SJICL 560. Yeo Tiong Min, “Tort Choice of Law Beyond the Red Sea: Whither the lex fori?” (1997) SJICL 91. The Center for Telemedicine Law, “Telemedicine and Interstate Licensure: Findings and Recommendations of the CTL Licensure Task Force,” (1997) 73:1 N.D. L. Rev. 109. Magazine and News Reports Blum, John D., “Telemedicine Poses New Challenges for the Law”, in 20:1 Health Law in Canada 115 (August 1999). Brean, Joseph, “Robot operates for doctor 400 km away: Hamilton hospital touts procedure as a world first,” in The National Post, March 2003, p. A3. ChannelNewsAsia, “ERC’s Working Group on healthcare services targets 1m foreign patients by 2012,” at http://global.factiva.com. Fortier, Claudette, “World first for remote robotic surgery,” in the Edmonton Journal, March 2003, p. A6. Freudenheim, Milt, “Hospitals Looking Abroad To Keep Their Beds Filled,” in The New York Times, 10 December 1996, p. A1. Gillespie, Bruce, “Cost-cutting operation,” in The National Post, 12 May 2003, p. BE1. Goldsmith, Lee S., “Telemedicine and changing medical law”, in Trial 49 (May 1998). Hampton, Mary Jane, “Who ya goin’ to call? Tele-doctor: Much health-care is being [sic] remotely. We need to ask some hard questions about the practice,” in the Halifax Daily News, 19 May 2003, p. 16 217 Kelley, Tina, “Internet Showing Its Value in Remote Alaskan Villages,” in The New York Times, August 1999, p. G9. Lee Kip Lee, “Revamp healthcare system using Mayo concept,” in Business Times Singapore, 27 September 2002. Murphy, Kate, “Telemedicine Getting a Test in Efforts to Cut Costs of Treating Prisoners,” in The New York Times, June 1998, p. D5. Nagourney, Eric, “Visiting the Doctor, via the Dining Room,” in The New York Times, April 1999, p. F7. Salma Khalik, “Gunning for the regional pie,” in The Singapore Straits Times, 14 December 2001. Salma Khalik and Sandra Davie, “Fighting for a piece of the services pie (III), in The Singapore Straits Times, 24 January 2003. The Economist, “Bugs and viruses,” 26 February 1998. The Economist, “The online doctor is in,” 22 March 2001. U.S. News and World Report, “America’s Best Hospitals,” 22 July 2002. Wong, Jacqueline, “Update – Singapore to boost finance, medical hub status,” at http://global.factiva.com. WuDunn, Sheryl, “Japan Bets on a Wired World to Win Back Its Global Niche,” in The New York Times, 30 August 1999, p. A1. Government Publications Adlung, Rudolf, “Health-Care Systems and the WTO: No Grounds for Panic,” Published on WHO website (27 March 2001) Australian Law Reform Commission, Choice of Law, Report No. 58 (Sydney: Robert Burton Printers Pty Ltd, 1992). Butkeviciene, Jolita and David Diaz, “GATS Commitments in the Health Services Sector and the Scope for Future Negotiations,” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development – World Health Organization Joint Publication. International Trade in Health Services: A Development Perspective (Geneva 1998). Chapter 9. Doc. UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/5 – WHO/TFHE/98.1. Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Telehealth/Telemedicine Market in Singapore,” (July 2000). Trade. “The European Commission, GATS The General Agreement on Trade in Services: A Guide for Business (1995). 218 Hoekman, Bernard and Carlos A. Primo Braga, “Protection and Trade in Services,” Policy Research Working Paper 1747, The World Bank, International Economics Department, International Trade Division (April 1997) – reprinted in Singer, Trade in Services. Liu, Eva and S.Y. Yue, “Health Care Expenditure and Financing in Singapore,” (09 July 1999), Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Research and Library Services Division, Legislative Council Secretariat. International Telecommunications Union. Telecommunication Development Bureau. Document 2/116-E (27 August 1999). International Trade Centre, UNCTAD/WTO, Business Guide to the Uruguay Round (1996). Mandil, Salah H., “Telehealth: What is it? Will it Propel Cross-Border Trade in Health Services,” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development – World Health Organization Joint Publication. International Trade in Health Services: A Development Perspective (Geneva 1998). Chapter 6. Doc. UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/5 – WHO/TFHE/98.1. Marconini, Mario, “Domestic capacity and International Trade in Health Services: The Main Issues,” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development – World Health Organization Joint Publication. International Trade in Health Services: A Development Perspective (Geneva 1998). Chapter 3. Doc. UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/5 – WHO/TFHE/98.1. Mattoo, Aaditya, “Shaping Future GATS Rules for Trade in Services,” World Bank Working Paper No. 2596 (20 April 2001). Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Health Data: 2002, 4th edition (Paris: OECD, 2002). Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Main Economic Indicators, Volume 2002(1) (Paris: OECD, 200) Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Main Economic Indicators: Historical Statistics, 1955-1971 (Paris: OECD). Singapore Ministry of Health. Health Facts Singapore, 2003. Singapore Parliament. Recommendations by the Services Industry Subcommittee Economic Review Committee on Developing Singapore’s Education Industry. 16 September 2002. (Includes Annex – Developing Singapore as the Compelling Hub for Healthcare Services in Asia). Southeast Asian Medical Information Center. SEAMIC Health Statistics, 1999. (Tokyo: International Medical Foundation of Japan, 2000). SEAMIC Publication No. 83. United Kingdom. The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (Working Paper No. 87 and Consultative Memorandum No. 62). Private International Law: Choice of Law in Tort and Delict. (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1984). 219 United Kingdom. The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (Law Com. No. 193 and Scot. Law Com. No. 129). Private International Law: Choice of Law in Tort and Delict. (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1990). United States Central Intelligence Agency, The World Factbook, 2001. United States Department of Commerce and United States Department of Health and Human Services. Joint Working Group on Telemedicine. “Telemedicine Report to Congress,” 31 January 1997. United States Department of Commerce. “Telemedicine: The Promise and the Challenge,” Remarks of Larry Irving, Assistant Secretary of Information and Communications, National Telecommunications and Information Administration. 05 March 1997. United States Department of Commerce. Prepared Statement of Ambassador David Aaron, Under Secretary for International Trade, U.S. Department of Commerce, Before the Senate Finance Committee, Subcommittee on International Trade. 21 October 1999. United States Department of Commerce. Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2002. United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice. Telemedicine Can Reduce Correctional Health Care Costs: An Evaluation of a Prison Telemedicine Network. Research Report (March 1999). United States Department of State. Industry Sector Analysis. Malaysia: Commercial Opportunities in Telemedicine. 01 June 1998. United States Department of State. Industry Sector Analysis. Singapore: Health Care Services. 01 April 1999. United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations, Transnational Corporations, Services and the Uruguay Round (1990). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Handbook of International Trade and Development Statistics, 1996-97. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Handbook of Statistics, 2001. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development/World Trade Organization. Business Guide to the Uruguay Round. Geneva, 1996. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development – World Health Organization Joint Publication. International Trade in Health Services: A Development Perspective (Geneva 1998). Doc. UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/5 – WHO/TFHE/98.1. UNCTAD Secretariat, “International Trade in Health Services: Difficulties and Opportunities for Developing Countries,” in United Nations Conference on Trade and Development – World Health Organization Joint Publication. International Trade in Health Services: A Development Perspective (Geneva 1998). Chapter 1. Doc. UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/5 – WHO/TFHE/98.1 220 United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division. Statistical Yearbook, 2001. United Nations.Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, Central Product Classification Version 1.0, ST/ESA/STAT/Ser.M/77/Ver.1.0,E.9 as amended by Version 1.1. United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report 2002: Deepening democracy in a fragmented world. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Economic and Social Survey of Asia and the Pacific, 2003. Asia Pacific Economies: Resilience in Changing Times. United Nations Population Division and World Health Organization, Demographic Yearbook, 1999, 2001. United Nations. Population Division of the United Nations Secretariat. World Population Proposals: The 2000 Revision. Wolvaardt, Gustaaf, “Opportunities and Challenges for Developing Countries in the Health Sector,” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development – World Health Organization Joint Publication. International Trade in Health Services: A Development Perspective (Geneva 1998). Chapter 4. Doc. UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/5 – WHO/TFHE/98.1. World Health Organization, Estimates of Health Personnel, 1996-1999. World Health Organization, Press Release WHO/65, WHO Director-General Highlights Potential of Telemedicine, 16 September 1997. World Trade Organization. Council for Trade in Services. Health and Social Services. Document No. S/C/W/50 (18 September 1998). World Trade Organization. Group of Negotiations on Services, Services Sectoral Classification List. Doc. MTN.GNS/W/120, 10 July 1991. World Trade Organization. Group of Negotiations on Services, GNS Explanatory Note – Scheduling of Initial Commitments in Trade in Services. Doc. MTN.GNS/W/164, September 1993. World Trade Organization. International Trade Statistics, 2001. International Agreements Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services, (15 December 1995), Bangkok, Thailand. Hague Convention on Private International Law: Convention on the Law Applicable to Products Liability (1972) I.L.M. 1283 221 General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), 30 October 1947, 61 Stat. A-11, T.I.A.S. 1700, (1950) 55 U.N.T.S. 194. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT), 15 April 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, 1867 U.N.T.S. 187, 33 I.L.M. 1153. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) Punta del Este Ministerial Declaration, (1986) 25 I.L.M. 1623. General Agreement on the Trade in Services (GATS), 15 April 1994, Marraksh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, 1869 U.N.T.S. 183, 33 I.L.M. 1167. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), 01 January 1994, (1994) 32 I.L.M. 289, 605. Legislation Australia Mutual Recognition Act 1992, No. 198 of 1992. Brunei Medical Practitioners and Dentists Act, Revised Statutes 1984, Cap. 112. Canada Alberta Medical Profession Act, R.S.A. c. M-11. British Columbia Medical Practitioners Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 285. Manitoba Medical Act, C.C.S.M, c. M90. New Brunswick Medical Act, S.N.B. 1981. Nova Scotia Medical Act, R.S.N.S. 1995-96, c. 10. Ontario Medicine Act, S.O. 1991, c. 30. European Union European Economic Community Council Directive 93/16/EEC to Facilitate the Free Movement of Doctors and the Mutual Recognition of their Diplomas, Certificates and Other Evidence of Formal Qualifications, 1993. 222 European Union Directive 97/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 93/16/EEC to Facilitate the Free Movement of Doctors and the Mutual Recognition of their Diplomas, Certificates and Other Evidence of Formal Qualifications, 1997. Ireland Medical Practitioners Act, 1978. Malaysia Medical Act, 1971, as amended, c. 50. Telemedicine Act, 1997 (Act 564) New Zealand Medical Practitioners Act 1995 No. 95. The Philippines Board of Medicine, Professional Regulation Commission, Board Resolution No. 31 of 1983 (cited in (1985) 36(2) International Digest of Health Legislation 393). Singapore Application of English Law Act, Cap. 7A, Rev. Ed. 1994. Medical Registration Act, Cap. 174, Rev. Ed. 1998. Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act, Cap. 264, Rev. Ed. 1985. Reciprocal Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, Cap. 265, Rev. Ed. 2001. Singapore Rules of Court, (made pursuant to the Supreme Court of Judicature Act, Cap. 322, Rev. Ed. 1999, s. 80.) Subordinate Courts Act, Cap. 321, Rev. Ed. 1999. Supreme Court of Judicature Act, Cap. 322, Rev. Ed. 1999. United Kingdom Civil Procedure Rules (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2002). Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995, Chapter 42. United States Business and Professions Code (California). Chapter – Medicine. 223 Kentucky Revised Statutes, K.R.S. Title XXVI – Occupations and Professions, Chapter 311 – Physicians, Osteopaths, Podiatrists and Related Medical Professionals, par. 311.571 – Qualifications for licenses Cases Australia Breavington v. Godleman and Others (1988), 169 C.L.R. 41, 80 A.L.R. 362 (Aust. H.C.) John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v. Rogerson, (2000) 203 CLR 503, 172 A.L.R. 625 (Aust. H.C.) Regie National des Usines Renault SA and Another v. Zhang (2002), 187 A.L.R. (Aust. H.C.) Canada Hanlan v. Sernesky, (1998) 38 O.R. (3d) 479, 41 C.C.L.T. (2d) 168 (Ont. C.A.) Tolofson v. Jensen, [1994] S.C.R. 1022, 120 D.L.R. (4th) 289, [1995] W.W.R. 609, 175 N.R. 161 (S.C.C.) McLean v. Pettigrew, [1945] S.C.R. 62, [1945] D.L.R. 65 (S.C.C.) Moran v. Pyle National (Canada) Ltd., [1975] S.C.R. 393, [1974] W.W.R. 586, 43 D.L.R. (3d) 239, N.R. 122 (S.C.C.) Ostroski v. Global Upholstery Co.,[1995] O.J. No. 4211 Court File No. 7235/94 (Ont. Gen. Div., 14 Dec. 1995) Somers v. Fournier (2002) 214 D.L.R. (4th) 611 (Ont. C.A.) Wong v. Lee (2002), 211 D.L.R. (4th) 69, 58 O.R. (3d) 398 (Ont. C.A.) England Castree v. E R Squibb & Sons Ltd and another, [1980] All E.R. 589, [1980] W.L.R. 1248 (C.A.) Chaplin v. Boys, [1971] A.C. 356, [1969] W.L.R. 322, [1969] All E.R. 1085 (H.L.) Cordoba Shipping Co. Ltd. v. National State Bank, Elizabeth, New Jersey (The “Albaforth”), [1984] Lloyd’s L. R. 91 (C.A.) 224 Distillers Co. (Biochemicals) Ltd. v. Laura Anne Thompson, [1971] All E.R. 694, [1971] A.C. 458, [1971] W.L.R. 441 (P.C.) Machado v. Fontes, [1897]2 Q.B. 231 (C.A.) Metall und Rohstoff AG v. Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette Inc and Another, [1990] Q.B. 391, [1989] W.L.R. 563, [1989] All E. R. 14 (C.A.) Phillips v. Eyre (1870), L.R. Q.B. (Ex. Ch.) Red Sea Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bouygues S.A. and others, [1995] A.C. 190; [1994] W.L.R. 926; [1994] All E.R. 749 (P.C.) Seaconsur Far East Ltd. v. Bank Markazi Jonhouri Islami Iran, [1993] W.L.R. 756 (H.L.) Spiliada Maritime Corporation v. Cansulex Ltd., [1987] A.C. 460, [1986] W.L.R. 972, [1986] All E.R. 843 (H.L.) The Abidin Daver, [1984] A.C. 398, [1984]1 All E.R. 470, [1984] W.L.R. 196; [1984] Lloyd’s Rep. 339 (H.L.) The Eleftheria, [1969] Lloyd’s Rep. 237 Malaysia Mohamad Toufik Al-Ozeir & Anor. v American Express Bank Ltd., [1994] MLJ 687. Singapore Bradley Lomas Electrolok Ltd. v Colt Ventilation East Asia Pte Ltd & Ors, [2000] SLR 673 (C.A.) Brinkerhoff Maritime Drilling Corp & Anor. v PT Airfast Services Indonesia and another appeal, [1992] SLR 776 (C.A.) Eng Liat Kiang v Eng Bak Hern & Ors, [1995] SLR 577 (H.C.) Eng Liat Kiang v Eng Bak Hern & Ors, [1995] SLR 97 (C.A.) Goh Chok Tong v Tang Liang Hong, [1997] SLR 641 (H.C.) J H Rayner (Mincing Lane) Ltd v. Teck Hock & Co (Pte) Ltd & Ors, [1989] SLR 1174; [1990] MLJ. 142 (H.C.) Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. v. Hartadi Angkosubroto, [1999] SLR 427 (H.C.) Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Bhavani Stores Pte Ltd, [1998] SLR 253 (C.A.) 225 Overseas Union Insurance Ltd v Turegum Insurance Co, [2001] SLR 330 (H.C.) RSP Architects Planners & Engineers v. Ocean Front Pte Ltd, [1996] SLR 113 (C.A.) The Hung Vuong-2; Owners of the Ship or Vessel ‘Hung Vuong-2’ v. Owners of Cargo Lately laden on Board the Ship or Vessel ‘Hung Vuong-3’ (The Hung Vuong-2) [2001] SLR 146 (C.A.) United States Babcock v. Johnson [1963], 191 N.E. 2d 279, 12 N.Y. 2d 473, Lloyd’s Rep 286 (N.Y. App. Ct.) Reference Guides American Jurisprudence, a modern comprehensive text statement of American law, State and Federal, 2d ed., 16 Am. Jur. 2d, Conflict of Laws (St. Paul, Minn.: WestGroup, 1998). Halsbury’s Laws of Singapore, Vol. - Civil Procedure (Singapore: LexisNexis, 2002). Halsbury’s Laws of Singapore, Vol. 18 – Tort (Singapore: Butterworths Asia, 2000). Other American Medical Association. Excerpts of Reports Received by the American Tort Reform Association on the Crisis in Medical Liability at www.ama-assn.org. American Nursing Association. Telehealth Legislation. 1997 Report to House of Delegates available at http://www.ana.org/gova/hod97/telehlth.htm. ASEAN website at http://www.aseansec.org Federation of State Medical Boards. Draft Model Act to Regulate the Practice of Telemedicine Across State Lines. October 1995. available at http://www.netreach.net/~wmanning/fsmb.htm. International Bar Association Section on Legal Practice. Committee (Medicine and Law). Draft International Convention on Telemedicine and Telehealth (22 July 1999) available at http://www.mcguirewoods.com/new-resources/publications/products_liability/article493.asp. MASEAN website at http://www.masean.org. Medical Association of South East Asian Nations (MASEAN), 9th MASEAN Conference, Panel Discussion on Registration of Doctors, (30th October 1999) Ha Noi, Viet Nam. 226 Medical Association of South East Asian Nations (MASEAN). 9th MASEAN Conference, Resolutions Regarding the Implication of the Implementation of AFTA on the Practice of Medicine in ASEAN Countries, (31st October 1999) Ha Noi, Viet Nam. Medical Association of South East Asian Nations (MASEAN). 9th Mid-Term Conference, (17-18 November 2000) Yangon, Myanmar. Medical Association of South East Asian Nations (MASEAN). 2nd Meeting of the MASEAN Task Force on Liberalisation of Healthcare Services in ASEAN, (27 January 2001) Singapore. Milstein, Robert, “Telemedicine – Creating Virtual certainty out of Remote Possibilities: An International, Comparative Analysis of Policy, Regulatory and Medico-legal Obstacles and Policy Solutions,” An Abridged Version of a Report for the Department of Human Services (State of Victoria). January 1999, available at http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/ahs/archive/telemed. National Initiative for Telehealth Guidelines. National Initiative for Telehealth (NIFTE) Framework of Guidelines. (Ottawa: NIFTE, 2003) – available at http://www.nifte.ca/framework/english/ Organization of Provincial Medical Licensing Authorities – Symposium presentation by Dr. John Carlisle. Presented at Canada E-health 2000: From Vision to Action Conference. 24 October 2000. The Federation of Medical Licensing Authorities of Canada. Policy Statements and Guidelines – Telemedicine available at http://www.fmlac.com. The World Medical Association, World Medical Association Statement on Accountability, Responsibilities and Ethical Guidelines in the Practice of Telemedicine (October 1999) available at http://www.wma.net/e/policy/a7.htm. WorldCare Clinical, Inc. information page available at http://www.worldcare.com. 227 [...]... principles of private international law, these chapters present Singapore s jurisdictional requirements for bringing an international tort action It also canvasses a broad range of choice of law approaches from around the world as a backdrop for an assessment of the current approach of the Singapore courts As a final introductory note, my analysis limits the scope of professional coverage of this thesis... paper looks at the main issues affecting the trade in telemedicine from both the international and the Singapore perspectives The first chapter begins with a look at telemedicine within the framework of the international agreement recently negotiated on trade in services – the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) Chapter 1 also considers the viability of the GATS as an effective framework agreement... prosperity and limit political conflict between nations In March, 1948, the Havana Charter established the International Trade Organization (ITO) as the international agency that would oversee international trade issues and the GATT 47 The initial set of trade rules came into force in January 1948 as the Protocol of Provisional Application of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 46 47 Despite the. .. protect their citizens will only stunt the growth of international telemedicine Therefore, the spread of telemedicine on an international basis depends on a fair and just legal accord between nations but even more importantly, an arrangement that is both transparent and definite In many ways, Singapore is the ideal nation on which to base a legal study of international telemedicine Being a small city-state,... on the effective regulation of all aspects of the trade in international telemedicine as a single integrated activity The perils of focussing too narrowly on individual regulatory issues in analysing global trade was colourfully described by Westbrook in his essay on regulating transnational business The literature describing each field recalls the old saw about the blind men and the elephant, because... fears? The answer lies in formulating a clear and definite approach to licensing of foreign telemedicine providers and creating a set of predictable rules to resolve international tort disputes involving telemedicine Without an international telemedicine agreement, it falls to the laws of individual nations to bring order to the cross border trade in telemedicine The decentralisation of the regulatory... because each body of doctrine is analysed with only a minimal acknowledgement of the larger problem of which it is a part The lack of articulation of the dominant problem has contributed to muddy analyses in each of these areas Failure to recognize that they all have the same problem in common has made them inconsistent with one another and deprived each of the insights to be found in the others Appreciation... considered in relation to each other as well as to the overall issue of international telemedicine Analysis that, for example, proposes a choice of law model for disputes arising out of international telemedicine without reference to the GATS is flawed from the outset because it ignores an important and related part of the overall activity In the end, the goal of this thesis is to look at all of the major legal. .. C(3) (a) (iii) infra – The Data Dilemma in Services Trade Benz, supra footnote 39 at 99-101 44 Ibid at 98-99 45 Stahl, supra footnote 42 at 411 16 Other service areas such as legal services and health care are also subject to heavy governmental regulation in many countries B The Origin of the GATS Central to an understanding of the creation of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) in international... Appreciation that regulation of transnational business lies at the heart of each of these component fields will improve analysis within each field and lead to cross- fertilization among them The elephant of transnational economic activity has grown ever larger while the legal components of its regulation have remained largely separate The tail scholars describe it in tail-talk and the trunk scholars apply . shortcoming of this thesis. ii ABBREVIATIONS AELA Application of English Law Act (Singapore) ASEAN Association of South East Asian Nations ATFA ASEAN Free Trade Agreement CPC Central Product. telemedicine agreement, it falls to the laws of individual nations to bring order to the cross border trade in telemedicine. The decentralisation of the regulatory function of an international business. global trade in telemedicine depends on the effective regulation of all aspects of the trade in international telemedicine as a single integrated activity. The perils of focussing too narrowly

Ngày đăng: 16/09/2015, 14:04

Từ khóa liên quan

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

Tài liệu liên quan