THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL 282, NO 37, pp 27181–27191, September 14, 2007 © 2007 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc Printed in the U.S.A Leupaxin Negatively Regulates B Cell Receptor Signaling* Received for publication, June 5, 2007, and in revised form, July 16, 2007 Published, JBC Papers in Press, July 19, 2007, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M704625200 Valerie Chew and Kong-Peng Lam1 From the Laboratory of Immune Regulation, Biomedical Sciences Institutes, Agency for Science, Technology and Research and Singapore Immunology Network, Singapore 138673, Singapore Engagement of the B cell antigen receptor (BCR)2 on B cells by antigen triggers first the activation of the Src family kinase Lyn (1– 4), which is known to phosphorylate the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs within the cytoplasmic domains of the Ig-␣ and Ig-␤ subunits that are part of the BCR complex (5) The phosphorylation of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif then leads to the activation of the tyrosine kinase Syk (6, 7), which leads in turn to the phosphorylation of various downstream proteins such as BLNK, phospholipase C␥2, and Btk (8) As a consequence of the activation of these signaling proteins, numerous second messengers * This work was supported by grants from the Biomedical Research Council of the Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact To whom correspondence should be addressed: Singapore Immunology Network, Lab 6-15, 61 Biopolis Dr., Proteos, Singapore 138673, Singapore Tel.: 65-6586-9649; Fax: 65-6478-9477; E-mail: lam_kong_peng@immunol a-star.edu.sg The abbreviations used are: BCR, B cell antigen receptor; JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; IL-2, interleukin-2; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; HA, hemagglutinin; LPXN, leupaxin; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 • VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 37 and intermediate signal-transducing proteins are activated, and together, they lead to the activation of several key transcription factors that regulate new gene expression in B lymphocytes and that drive unique B cell physiological responses such as proliferation, cytokine secretion, and differentiation either to memory B or antibody-producing plasma cells (9) Because BCR signaling can lead to the activation of B lymphocytes, there exist several mechanisms to down-regulate or modulate BCR signaling to prevent the overt or inappropriate activation of B cells Several phosphatases such as the membrane-bound CD45 and intracellular SHP-1 and SHIP-1 are known to dephosphorylate and hence deactivate key signal transduction molecules in the BCR signaling pathway (10) Recent studies also revealed that, in addition to its well established role in BCR signal initiation, Lyn can play a negative role in down-modulating BCR signaling (11, 12) Indeed, despite showing defects in B cell development, Lyn-deficient mice are also susceptible to autoimmune diseases, and Lyn-deficient B cells are hyper-responsive to BCR ligation (13–15) Another class of signal transduction molecules known as the adaptor proteins has also been shown to play critical roles in lymphocyte signal transduction These proteins not have enzymatic activities but mediate protein-protein and proteinlipid interactions to provide spatiotemporal modulation of BCR signaling (16) Some of these adaptors are positive regulators of signal transduction, and they facilitate the assembly of activating signaling complexes For example, BLNK has been widely established as an adaptor protein that couples Syk and Btk to activate phospholipase C␥2 upon BCR ligation, and this subsequently triggers downstream calcium fluxes and inositol 1,4,5trisphosphate production (17) On the other hand, other adaptors such as the Csk-binding protein and the Dok family members Dok-1, 2, and are known to play a negative role in immunoreceptor signaling (18) Most of these inhibitory adaptors recruit additional inhibitory effectors to the vicinity of positive regulator of signaling to shut down the signal transduction processes, e.g Csk-binding protein is known to recruit Csk, which inhibits the activation of the Src family tyrosine kinases (19), whereas Dok-3 is known to recruit SHIP, which dephosphorylates activated signaling molecules (20, 21) Given that certain adaptor proteins such as BLNK (22), Dok-1 (23), and Dok-3 (24) have been demonstrated to play key roles in the regulation of BCR signaling, it is conceivable that other adaptor proteins that have not been studied in the context of immunoreceptor signaling may also play a critical role in BCR signal transduction The paxillin family of adaptor proteins could be one such example Paxillin and its related family members Hic-5, leupaxin, and PaxB have not been demonJOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 27181 Downloaded from www.jbc.org at NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE on September 7, 2007 The role of the paxillin superfamily of adaptor proteins in B cell antigen receptor (BCR) signaling has not been studied previously We show here that leupaxin (LPXN), a member of this family, was tyrosine-phosphorylated and recruited to the plasma membrane of human BJAB lymphoma cells upon BCR stimulation and that it interacted with Lyn (a critical Src family tyrosine kinase in BCR signaling) in a BCR-induced manner LPXN contains four leucine-rich sequences termed LD motifs, and serial truncation and specific domain deletion of LPXN indicated that its LD3 domain is involved in the binding of Lyn Of a total of 11 tyrosine sites in LPXN, we mutated Tyr22, Tyr72, Tyr198, and Tyr257 to phenylalanine and demonstrated that LPXN was phosphorylated by Lyn only at Tyr72 and that this tyrosine site is proximal to the LD3 domain The overexpression of LPXN in mouse A20 B lymphoma cells led to the suppression of BCR-induced activation of JNK, p38 MAPK, and, to a lesser extent, Akt, but not ERK and NF␬B, suggesting that LPXN can selectively repress BCR signaling We further show that LPXN suppressed the secretion of interleukin-2 by BCR-activated A20 B cells and that this inhibition was abrogated in the Y72F LPXN mutant, indicating that the phosphorylation of Tyr72 is critical for the biological function of LPXN Thus, LPXN plays an inhibitory role in BCR signaling and B cell function Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Plasmid Construction—The cDNAs encoding Lyn, paxillin, and Hic-5 were cloned from a murine spleen cDNA library by PCR FLAG-tagged wild-type leupaxin was generated from the cDNA encoding wild-type leupaxin (provided by Dr A Gupta, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD) (34) FLAG-tagged leupaxin deletion mutants (⌬LD1, ⌬LD1–2, ⌬LD1–3, ⌬LD1– 4, and ⌬LD3) and tyrosine-to-phenylalanine mutants (Y22F, Y72F, Y198F, and Y257F) were generated by PCR All wild-type and mutated cDNAs were verified by DNA sequencing (data not shown) Cells and Transfections—HEK293T cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, mM L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin and transiently transfected using Effectene௡ transfection reagent (Qiagen Inc.) BJAB and A20 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, mM L-glutamine, and penicillin/ streptomycin For transfection of A20 B cells, ϫ 107 cells were mixed with 20 ␮g of plasmid DNA in 500 ␮l of RPMI 1640 27182 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY medium and electroporated in a 0.4-cm cuvette at 950 microfarads and 300 V using a Gene Pulser (Bio-Rad) Transfection efficiency was assessed with the pEGFP-N2 vector at 36 h posttransfection by flow cytometry and was determined to be between 30 and 40% Isolation of Subcellular Fractions—BJAB cells were lysed on ice for 20 in hypotonic buffer containing 15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.2 mM Na3VO4, and protease inhibitor mixture (Roche Applied Science) Cell lysates were homogenized through a 26-gauge needle and centrifuged at 500 ϫ g The supernatant was transferred to polycarbonate tubes and ultracentrifuged at 20,800 ϫ g for h at °C The supernatant containing the cytosol fraction was recovered, and the pellet containing the plasma membrane fraction was solubilized in 150 mM NaCl, 15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 0.2 mM Na3VO4, and protease inhibitors Antibodies—F(abЈ)2 fragments of goat anti-mouse IgG and goat anti-human IgM were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA) Monoclonal antibodies against human leupaxin (283C and 315G) were obtained from Dr A Gupta (32) and ICOS Corp (Bothell, WA) The following commercial antibodies were also used: anti-phospho Akt (Ser473/Thr308), anti-Akt-1, anti-ERK2, anti-I␬B␣, anti-JNK1, anti-Lyn, anti-phospho-ERK, anti-p38, and anti-␤tubulin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.); anti-phospho-stressactivated protein kinase (SAPK)/JNK (Thr183/Tyr185) and antiphospho-p38 (Thr180/Tyr182) (Cell Signaling Technology); anti-FLAG polyclonal and anti-hemagglutinin (HA) monoclonal (Sigma); horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-phosphotyrosine (4G10; Upstate Biotechnology); and Alexa 546conjugated goat anti-mouse and Alexa 488-conjugated chicken anti-rabbit (Molecular Probes) Cell Stimulation, Western Blotting, and Immunoprecipitations—Cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium at ϫ 106 cells/200 ␮l and serum-starved at 37 °C for h prior to stimulation with anti-Ig antibodies BJAB cells were stimulated with 10 ␮g/ml anti-human IgM F(abЈ)2 fragment, and A20 cells with 15 ␮g/ml anti-mouse IgG F(abЈ)2 fragment After stimulation, cells were lysed on ice for 10 in lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, mM EDTA, 0.2 mM Na3VO4, and protease inhibitor mixture and sonicated Cell homogenates were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 at °C, and supernatants were recovered for protein quantification using a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce) Proteins were electrophoresed on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride immunoblot membranes (Bio-Rad) The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 for h at room temperature and incubated separately with various antibodies recognizing the different molecules studied Protein bands were visualized using horseradish peroxidase-coupled secondary antibodies and the enhanced chemiluminescence ECL detection system (Amersham Biosciences) For immunoprecipitations, cell lysates were precleared with protein A/G Plus-agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) for h at °C For immunoprecipitation of endogenous proteins, anti-leupaxin (LPXN) monoclonal antibody 315G or anti-Lyn antibody VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 37 • SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 Downloaded from www.jbc.org at NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE on September 7, 2007 strated to play a role in BCR signaling so far Paxillin is a focal adhesion adaptor protein that plays an important role in growth factor- and integrin-mediated signaling pathways (25, 26) Despite its ability to bind Pyk2 and PTP-PEST, which are molecules known to play a role in BCR signaling, a previous report had indicated that paxillin is not tyrosine-phosphorylated in activated B cells (27) Thus, the role of paxillin in BCR signaling remains to be confirmed Another family member (Hic-5) was reported to be largely absent in lymphocytes (28), hence minimizing the possibility of its participation in BCR signaling On the other hand, leupaxin, which is most homologous to paxillin and detectable as a 45-kDa protein, is preferentially expressed in hematopoietic cells, including B cells (29) Similar to the other paxillin superfamily members, leupaxin contains multiple N-terminal Leu- and Asp-rich sequences (LD domains) and LIM domains (26, 30) Both LD and LIM domains had been shown to be important for protein-protein interactions, and in addition, LIM domains have also been shown to play a role in the focal adhesion targeting of paxillin superfamily members (31) Recent works also established a role for leupaxin in the function of osteoclasts (32) and in the migration of prostate cancer cells (33) Leupaxin is known to interact with Pyk2 (29); Src (34); PEST domain tyrosine phosphatase (PEP) (35); and PTP-PEST, pp125FAK, and the ADP-ribosylation factor (ARF) GTPase-activating protein p95PKL (32); and some of these proteins are known to be expressed in B cells In this study, we examined the possible role of leupaxin in BCR signaling We found that leupaxin was phosphorylated upon BCR engagement in human BJAB cells We show that leupaxin bound Lyn via its LD3 domain and that Lyn phosphorylated Tyr72 of leupaxin In addition, we demonstrate that leupaxin inhibited the JNK and p38 MAPK signaling pathways downstream of BCR signaling and suppressed the production of interleukin-2 (IL-2) by activated mouse A20 B cells and that the inhibition of cytokine secretion by leupaxin required the phosphorylation of Tyr72 Thus, leupaxin plays an inhibitory role in BCR signaling and B cell function Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling RESULTS Leupaxin Is Activated upon BCR Engagement in Human BJAB B Cells—It was shown previously that LPXN is preferentially expressed in hematopoietic cells (29) However, the role of LPXN in BCR signaling is not known We first observed that LPXN is highly expressed in human BJAB B lymphoma cells SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 • VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 37 FIGURE LPXN is phosphorylated and recruited to the plasma membrane of B cells upon BCR ligation A, tyrosine phosphorylation of LPXN in BJAB cells Cells were stimulated with 10 ␮g/ml anti-human IgM F(abЈ)2 fragment for various time points as indicated, and LPXN was immunoprecipitated (IP) and probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 or anti-LPXN monoclonal antibody 283C, respectively B, BJAB cells were stimulated with 10 ␮g/ml anti-human IgM F(abЈ)2 fragment for various time points, and cells lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody and immunoblotted (IB) with anti-LPXN and anti-Lyn antibodies C, membrane recruitment of LPXN upon BCR stimulation BJAB cells were stimulated with anti-human IgM F(abЈ)2 fragment for various time points, and their plasma membrane and cytoplasmic fractions were immunoblotted with anti-LPXN, anti-Lyn (used as a loading control for the plasma membrane fraction), and anti-␤-tubulin (used as a loading control for the cytoplasmic fraction) antibodies (Fig 1A), suggesting that it might have a role in some aspects of B cell physiology It is known from various studies that the engagement of BCR on B cells with anti-IgM antibodies or antigens leads to the tyrosine phosphorylation and hence activation of several downstream signaling proteins such as the tyrosine kinase Btk and the adaptor protein BLNK (37–39) LPXN is known to contain 11 tyrosine residues Therefore, to determine whether LPXN is involved in BCR signaling, we examined whether LPXN is tyrosine-phosphorylated upon the engagement of BCR on BJAB cells As shown in Fig 1A, treatment of BJAB cells with 10 ␮g/ml anti-human IgM F(abЈ)2 fragment led to the tyrosine phosphorylation of LPXN as shown by immunoprecipitating LPXN and immunoblotting it with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 The phosphorylation of LPXN occurred as early as after BCR stimulation of BJAB cells and appeared to peak at the 5- and 15-min time points before returning to the basal level at the 30-min time point Conversely, immunoprecipitating total cellular phosphotyrosine proteins from BCR-stimulated BJAB cells with antibody 4G10 followed by immunoblotting with anti-LPXN antibody also revealed a similar pattern in which LPXN was highly activated between and 15 min, as LPXN was maximally immunoprecipitated at these time points (Fig 1B) As a comparison, the tyrosine kinase Lyn (a known component of the BCR signal transduction system) was also shown to be tyrosine-phosphoJOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 27183 Downloaded from www.jbc.org at NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE on September 7, 2007 was coupled overnight to protein A/G Plus-agarose at °C and washed twice with lysis buffer before overnight incubation with precleared cell lysates at °C For other immunoprecipitations, agarose beads were covalently coupled with anti-phosphotyrosine or anti-FLAG antibody and washed twice with lysis buffer before incubation with precleared cell lysates Beads were then pelleted and washed three times with lysis buffer before boiling in loading buffer (1% SDS, 1% ␤-mercaptaethanol, 15% glycerol, and 0.01% bromphenol blue) for The released proteins were resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide gels Confocal Microscopy—BCR-stimulated BJAB cells were washed twice with cold 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed for 20 on ice with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS After permeabilization at room temperature for 10 with 0.2% saponin and 0.03 M sucrose in 1% BSA-containing PBS, cells were washed twice before being deposited onto slides Cells were blocked with 5% normal goat serum in 1% BSA-containing PBS at room temperature for h before overnight incubation with primary antibodies at °C The slides were washed three times with 1% BSA in PBS and incubated at room temperature for h with Alexa 546-conjugated goat anti-mouse or Alexa 488-conjugated chicken anti-rabbit antibody to reveal the respective primary antibodies Slides were washed three times with 1% BSA in PBS, mounted, and viewed under a Radiance 2000 confocal laser scanning microscope (Bio-Rad) Measurement of BCR-triggered IL-2 Production—105 transfected A20 cells in 200 ␮l of culture medium were stimulated for 24 h at 37 °C in 96-well plates in the presence or absence of 10 ␮g/ml anti-mouse IgG F(abЈ)2 fragment The resulting production of IL-2 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a mouse IL-2 ELISA kit (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s protocol All cytokine secretion assays were performed in triplicate and repeated three times To measure BCR-induced activation of the IL-2 promoter, A20 cells (10 ϫ 106) were transfected with an IL-2 promoter-luciferase plasmid as described previously (36) Briefly, cells were electroporated with 15 ␮g of IL-2 promoter-luciferase plasmid together with 10 ␮g of the indicated plasmids and 1.5 ␮g of pRL-TK (Renilla) plasmid (to standardize for transfection efficiency) After 40 h, ϫ 106 cells were stimulated for h with 10 ␮g of IgG F(abЈ)2 fragment Cells were harvested, and cell pellets were solubilized in passive lysis buffer (Promega Corp.) and incubated on a Spiramix roller mixer for 15 at room temperature Cell lysate (90 ␮l) was assayed for both firefly and Renilla luciferase activities using the Dual-Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega Corp.), and the relative light units were measured in a TD-20/20 single tube luminometer (Turner BioSystems, Sunnyvale, CA) Luciferase activity was calculated as increments (n-fold) in IgG F(abЈ)2 fragment-induced activity over basal activity obtained with unstimulated cells Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling 27184 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY peak between and 15 after BCR ligation in BJAB cells The binding of LPXN to Lyn appeared to occur in response to BCR cross-linking, as LPXN and Lyn could no longer be co-immunoprecipitated at the 30-min time point We were able to show that an equivalent amount of LPXN (used as a control) was immunoprecipitated at all time points examined Thus, Lyn binding to LPXN appears to be induced by BCR signaling To visualize the endogenous interaction of LPXN and Lyn, we performed immunofluorescence studies in BJAB cells LPXN (which stained red) was found to be evenly distributed in the cytoplasm of unstimulated BJAB cells (Fig 2C, upper panels) Upon ligation of BCR on BJAB cells, LPXN was recruited to the plasma membrane at the 5-min time point and remained there until after 15 However, by 30 min, LPXN was sequestered back to the cytoplasm (Fig 2C, upper panels) This observation was consistent with our membrane fractionation data shown in Fig 1C On the other hand, Lyn (which stained green) (Fig 2C, middle panels) was constitutively present in the membrane fractions, as has been reported in a previous study (17) Interestingly, the merging of the two panels revealed a pattern of BCR-induced co-localization of LPXN and Lyn upon cell activation (Fig 2C, lower panels, yellow) The co-localization of LPXN and Lyn was clearly visible in the plasma membrane of BJAB cells at the 5-min time point following BCR ligation and was slowly diminished from the 15-min time point onward as LPXN was slowly recruited back to the cytoplasm By the 30-min time point, the co-localization of LPXN and Lyn was minimal as LPXN was sequestered mostly away from the membrane and predominantly found localized in the cytoplasm Taken together, the data in Fig support the finding that LPXN interacts with Lyn and that the interaction likely occurs in the plasma membrane of B cells and is induced upon BCR activation Leupaxin Interacts with Lyn through Its LD3 Domain—Because LPXN is a multidomain adaptor protein containing four leucine-rich LD motifs and four LIM domains, we were interested in determining the specific domain within LPXN that is responsible for mediating the interaction with Lyn It has been shown previously that the LD2 domain of paxillin can bind several proteins, including kinases such as Src, focal adhesion kinase, and Pyk2 (25) The interaction of paxillin with Src has been shown to be either direct (near the proline-rich N terminus) or indirect (via focal adhesion kinase or Pyk2 near the LD2 domain) (31) More relevant to our study, a recent report also indicated that the LD2 domain of LPXN can interact with Src (34) Thus, we examined the specific LD domain(s) of LPXN that interact with Lyn To determine which LD domain(s) of LPXN are involved in binding Lyn, we constructed a series of FLAG-tagged truncation and deletion mutants of LPXN as shown in Fig 3A The FLAG-tagged ⌬LD1, ⌬LD1–2, ⌬LD1–3, ⌬LD1– 4, and ⌬LD3 deletion mutants of LPXN were overexpressed in HEK293T cells together with HA-tagged Lyn Western blot analyses (Fig 3B) indicated that all FLAG-tagged LPXN deletion mutants and HA-tagged Lyn proteins were expressed in the transfected cells The various FLAG-tagged LPXN mutants were thus immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG antibody and immunoblotted with anti-Lyn antibody As shown in Fig 3B, wild-type LPXN VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 37 • SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 Downloaded from www.jbc.org at NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE on September 7, 2007 rylated in BCR-activated BJAB cells However, in contrast to LPXN, the phosphorylation of Lyn seemed to be more prolonged and was extended to 30 after BCR ligation (Fig 1B) This might indicate that the activation of LPXN and hence its involvement in BCR signaling could be more transient compared with Lyn The tyrosine phosphorylation of LPXN also indicated that it could be a target of a protein-tyrosine kinase that was activated downstream of the BCR signaling pathway Besides the tyrosine phosphorylation of LPXN, we also observed the recruitment of LPXN to the plasma membrane of B cells upon BCR ligation Several proteins in the BCR signaling pathway, e.g the adaptor protein BLNK and the tyrosine kinase Btk, are known to locate to the plasma membrane and especially to the lipid raft fraction of B cells following BCR activation (17) Our results also indicated that LPXN was enriched in the membrane faction beginning at after anti-human IgM F(abЈ)2 fragment treatment of BJAB cells (Fig 1C) LPXN could still be found in the membrane fractions 15 after BCR ligation and was subsequently sequestered back to the cytoplasm beginning 30 after activation This is consistent with the tyrosine phosphorylation profile of LPXN as shown in Fig (A and B) Lyn, which is known to be constitutively present in the membrane fraction of B cells (40, 41), was used as a loading control for the membrane fractions, whereas ␤-tubulin was used as a control for the cytoplasmic fractions (Fig 1C) Thus, taken together, the data indicate that LPXN is tyrosine-phosphorylated and recruited to the plasma membrane following BCR cross-linking in B cells, suggesting that LPXN could play a role in BCR signaling Leupaxin Interacts with Lyn during BCR Signaling—Previous studies indicated that members of the paxillin superfamily of adaptors can interact with members of the Src family of tyrosine kinases, e.g paxillin was shown to bind Src either directly or via Pyk2 (31), Hic-5 can bind Fyn (42), and LPXN can interact with Src in osteoclasts (34) Because we demonstrated that LPXN was tyrosine-phosphorylated upon BCR cross-linking and it is known that Lyn is the predominant Src family tyrosine kinase found in B cells (43), we investigated whether LPXN can physically interact with Lyn To accomplish this, FLAG-tagged paxillin superfamily members (LPXN, Hic-5, and paxillin) were coexpressed with HAtagged Lyn in HEK293T cells, and whole cell lysates from the transfectants were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG antibody-agarose beads The immunoprecipitates were subsequently immunoblotted with anti-Lyn antibody As shown in Fig 2A, all three members of the paxillin superfamily interacted with Lyn, with Hic-5 co-immunoprecipitating a larger amount of Lyn, followed by LPXN and finally paxillin Used as a negative control, the FLAG tag alone did not show any nonspecific interaction with Lyn As LPXN bound Lyn in overexpression studies in HEK293T cells, we next examined whether endogenous interaction of LPXN and Lyn can occur in B cells upon BCR activation BJAB cells were treated with 10 ␮g/ml anti-human IgM F(abЈ)2 fragment for various time points, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-LPXN antibody and immunoblotted with anti-Lyn antibody As shown in Fig 2B, the interaction between LPXN and Lyn was detected as early as and seemed to Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 • VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 37 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 27185 Downloaded from www.jbc.org at NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE on September 7, 2007 suggested that the potential binding domain of LPXN for Lyn could be the LD3 domain To further confirm that the LD3 domain of LPXN binds Lyn, we specifically generated the ⌬LD3 mutant, in which only the LD3 domain of LPXN was deleted Indeed, as shown in Fig 3B (lane 7), deleting the LD3 domain of LPXN abolished the interaction of LPXN and Lyn, as the two proteins could no longer be co-immunoprecipitated We therefore concluded that the LD3 domain of LPXN is the domain responsible for interaction with Lyn Leupaxin Is Phosphorylated at Tyrosine 72 by Lyn—LPXN contains 11 potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites and has been shown to be a substrate of tyrosine kinases (29) Because LPXN was able to interact with Lyn (Figs and 3), we examined whether LPXN can be a substrate of and be phosphorylated by Lyn FLAG-tagged Lyn was hyperphosphorylated and constitutively active when transfected into HEK293T cells (Fig 4A, upper panel, lane 2) When FLAG-tagged LPXN was coexpressed with FLAGtagged Lyn in HEK293T cells, it was tyrosine-phosphorylated by Lyn, as shown by immunoblotting of whole cell lysates with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 (Fig 4A, lane 3) However, without the coexpression of FLAG-tagged Lyn, LPXN was not phosphorylated (Fig 4A, upper panel, lane 1) Interestingly, Lyn was also able to phosphorylate paxillin and Hic-5 (Fig 4A, lanes and 5), suggesting that Lyn can potentially interact with and phosphorylate all paxillin family memFIGURE Interaction of LPXN and Lyn A, binding of LPXN by Lyn HEK293T cells were transiently transfected bers As control immunoblotting with plasmids expressing various FLAG-tagged paxillin superfamily members and HA-tagged Lyn Anti-FLAG with anti-FLAG antibody indicated immunoprecipitates (IP) were subjected to immunoblotting (IB) with anti-Lyn antibody (upper panel) to exam- that all transfected proteins were ine co-immunoprecipitation and hence interaction of LPXN and Lyn Whole cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-FLAG or anti-HA antibody (middle and lower panels) to examine the expression of the transfected equivalently expressed in HEK293T plasmids B, interaction of endogenous LPXN and Lyn in BJAB cells Cells were stimulated with 10 ␮g/ml cells (Fig 4A, lower panel) anti-human IgM F(abЈ)2 fragment for the indicated time points, and cell lysates were subjected to immunopreBecause Lyn could bind and cipitation with anti-LPXN antibody and immunoblotted with anti-Lyn and anti-LPXN (used as a loading control) antibodies C, recruitment of LPXN to the plasma membrane upon BCR activation BJAB cells were stimulated phosphorylate LPXN, we next exwith 10 ␮g/ml anti-human IgM F(abЈ)2 fragment for various time points, cytospun onto glass slides, and stained amined the tyrosine residue(s) in with anti-LPXN (red) and anti-Lyn (green) antibodies Co-localization of the two proteins (as indicated in yellow) LPXN that can be phosphorylated was evident by merging the two panels by Lyn Among the 11 tyrosine resi(lane 2) and both the ⌬LD1 and ⌬LD1–2 LPXN deletion dues in LPXN, were identified as potential sites for phosphomutants (lanes and 4) were able to bind Lyn, whereas the rylation by kinases using the NetPhos 2.0 program, which pre⌬LD1–3 and ⌬LD1– mutants could not (lanes and 6) This dicts serine, threonine, and tyrosine phosphorylation sites in Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling eukaryotic proteins Of these tyrosine residues, Tyr22, Tyr72, Tyr198, and Tyr257 were the sites with the highest potential for phosphorylation To determine which tyrosine residue in LPXN is phosphorylated by Lyn, we mutated individually the tyrosine residues to phenylalanine to generate the FLAG-tagged Y22F, Y72F, Y198F, and Y257F mutants These LPXN mutants were cotransfected with HA-tagged Lyn into HEK293T cells, and whole cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 All four tyrosine-to-phenylalanine mutants were expressed equivalently in the transfected cells (Fig 4B, lower panel) Of the four LPXN tyrosine mutants examined, Y22F, Y198F, and Y257F remained phosphorylated in the presence of Lyn Interestingly, the tyrosine phosphorylation of LPXN was completely abolished in the Y72F mutant (Fig 4B, upper panel), suggesting that Lyn specifically phosphorylates Tyr72 and that this is the only tyrosine-phosphorylated site in LPXN 27186 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 37 • SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 Downloaded from www.jbc.org at NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE on September 7, 2007 FIGURE LPXN interacts with Lyn via its LD3 domain A, schematic illustration of the truncation and deletion mutants of LPXN domains ϩ, positive binding; Ϫ, no binding with Lyn B, co-immunoprecipitation of Lyn with mutant LPXN HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with plasmids expressing various FLAG-tagged mutants of LPXN and HA-tagged Lyn AntiFLAG immunoprecipitates (IP) of mutant LPXN were immunoblotted (IB) with anti-Lyn antibody to examine interaction and with anti-FLAG antibody to control for the expression of various mutants of LPXN Whole cells lysates were also immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody to control for Lyn expression WT, wild-type It was possible that by generating the Y72F mutant, we had disrupted the interaction between LPXN and Lyn To test this possibility, the various LPXN mutants and Lyn were co-immunoprecipitated from the transfected cells As shown in Fig 4C, all four tyrosine-to-phenylalanine mutants (and Y72F, in particular) co-immunoprecipitated with Lyn, suggesting that these mutants can still bind Lyn We therefore concluded that the lack of phosphorylation of LPXN by Lyn is not due to its inability to interact with Lyn and that the binding and phosphorylation of LPXN by Lyn are two separable events Furthermore, as shown in the schematic map of LPXN in Fig 4D, Tyr72 is proximal to the LD3 motif, which we had demonstrated above to be the domain of LPXN responsible for its interaction with Lyn (Fig 3, A and B) Leupaxin Selectively Inhibits JNK, p38 MAPK, and Akt Signaling in Mouse A20 B Cells—We have so far shown that LPXN was phosphorylated upon BCR engagement and that Lyn, a critical kinase in BCR signaling, bound and phosphorylated LPXN Thus, it is likely that LPXN plays a role in some aspects of BCR signaling BCR engagement in B cells is known to activate three major signaling pathways downstream of tyrosine kinase activation, and these include the phospholipase C␥2/ protein kinase C/calcium, phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt, Vav/ Rac, and Ras/Raf/MAPK pathways (39) The phospholipase C␥2/protein kinase C/calcium pathway further triggers the activation of NF␬B (44) To elucidate the role of LPXN in BCR signal transduction, we overexpressed LPXN in mouse A20 B lymphoma cells (Fig 5A) and examined the effect of LPXN overexpression on the activation of MAPKs, Akt, and NK␬B upon BCR ligation (Fig 5, B–D) First, we examined the relative level of ectopically expressed LPXN versus the endogenous protein A20 cells were transiently transfected with either FLAG vector or FLAGLPXN, and whole cell lysates were immunoblotted with antiLPXN antibody As shown in Fig 5A (left panels), the level of endogenous LPXN in A20 B cells was rather low, and LPXN expression in A20 cells was significantly enhanced upon transfection, thus making A20 cells ideal for assessing the effect of LPXN on BCR signaling A20 B cells transfected with FLAG vector or FLAG-LPXN (Fig 5A, right panel) were stimulated with 15 ␮g/ml goat antimouse IgG F(abЈ)2 fragment for various times, and cell lysates were immunoblotted with specific antibodies recognizing the phosphorylated and hence activated forms of JNK1, JNK2, p38 MAPK, ERK1, and ERK2 (Fig 5B) Our results indicate that A20 B cells overexpressing LPXN showed a decreased in the phosphorylation of JNK1, JNK2, and p38 MAPK at the 3-, 10-, and 30-min time points after BCR stimulation compared with control FLAG vector-transfected A20 cells However, the phosphorylation of ERK was largely unaffected upon the overexpression of LPXN, as at all three time points examined, the extent of ERK phosphorylation was comparable between FLAG- and FLAGLPXN-transfected A20 B cells We thus conclude that LPXN plays a negative role in the activation of JNK and p38 MAPK, but not ERK We next examined the effect of the overexpression of LPXN on the activation of Akt upon BCR ligation As shown in Fig 5C, the phosphorylation of Ser473 and Thr308 in Akt, which is indic- Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 • VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 37 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 27187 Downloaded from www.jbc.org at NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE on September 7, 2007 Leupaxin Inhibits IL-2 Production in A20 B Cells—Because LPXN appeared to inhibit the activation of JNK and p38 MAPK during BCR signaling, we were interested to determine the effect of LPXN expression on B cell function Previous studies indicated that the overexpression of the inhibitory adaptor Dok-3 in A20 B cells also reduces JNK phosphorylation and that this leads to a decrease in the production of IL-2 in BCR-stimulated A20 cells (20, 24) Because the overexpression of LPXN also inhibited JNK activation, we investigated whether the overexpression of LPXN could affect IL-2 secretion by activated A20 cells A20 cells were transiently transfected with FLAG vector and increasing amounts of FLAG-LPXN and stimulated with 10 ␮g/ml goat anti-mouse IgG F(abЈ)2 fragment at 37 °C for 24 h before culture supernatants were recovered and assayed for IL-2 production via ELISA As shown in Fig 6A, A20 B cells transfected with LPXN secreted less IL-2, and there was a dose-dependent reduction in IL-2 production with increasing amounts of LPXN transfected and expressed Thus, LPXN inhibited IL-2 secretion by activated A20 cells in a dose-dependent manner The total amount of FLAGtagged LPXN transfected into A20 B cells was verified by immunopreFIGURE LPXN is phosphorylated at Tyr72 by Lyn A, Lyn phosphorylates all members of the paxillin supercipitation with anti-FLAG antibody family of adaptors HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with plasmids expressing various FLAG-tagged paxillin superfamily members and Lyn The whole cells lysates were immunoblotted (IB) with anti-phosphoty- and immunoblotting with antirosine antibody 4G10 and anti-FLAG antibody B, LPXN is phosphorylated at Tyr72 HEK293T cells were tran- FLAG antibody Increasing amounts siently transfected with plasmids expressing various FLAG-tagged tyrosine-to-phenylalanine mutants of LPXN and HA-tagged Lyn Cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 to examine of LPXN were shown to be transthe phosphorylation of LPXN and with anti-FLAG and anti-HA antibodies to control for the expression of LPXN fected into A20 cells (Fig 6A) mutants and Lyn, respectively C, the Y72F mutant of LPXN can still bind Lyn HEK293T cells were transfected as To reaffirm our finding, we also indicated, immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-FLAG antibody, and immunoblotted with anti-HA antibody to performed an IL-2 promoterexamine the binding of mutant LPXN by Lyn D, Schematic map depicting the 11 tyrosine residues of LPXN WT, wild-type driven luciferase reporter assay with A20 cells overexpressing ative of Akt activation, was slightly reduced at the 10- and LPXN Compared with the ELISA, the IL-2 promoter-driven 30-min time points in BCR-stimulated A20 B cells overexpress- luciferase reporter assay provided a more sensitive way to ing LPXN compared with A20 cells transfected with the control measure the effect of LPXN overexpression on BCR signalFLAG vector However, the inhibitory effect of the overexpres- ing in A20 cells As shown in Fig 6B, control FLAG vectorsion of LPXN on Akt activation was not as drastic as that on transfected A20 cells up-regulated the production of IL-2 JNK and p38 MAPK activation By contrast, LPXN did not when stimulated via BCR as reflected by an increase in IL-2 appear to inhibit the activation of NF␬B, as the degradation of promoter activity in the luciferase reporter assay By conI␬B␣ was largely unaffected in A20 cells overexpressing LPXN trast, A20 cells overexpressing LPXN did not show any (Fig 5D) Thus, LPXN appears to play an inhibitory role in BCR increase in IL-2 production when measured in a similar signaling and seems to negatively regulate the activation of JNK, manner Thus, the overexpression of LPXN inhibits the prop38 MAPK, and, to a lesser extent, Akt, but not ERK and NF␬B duction of IL-2 by activated B cells Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling Tyrosine 72 of Leupaxin Is Important for Its Inhibitory Function—As shown above (Fig 4B), Tyr72 of LPXN was the only tyrosine site phosphorylated by Lyn Because LPXN was phosphorylated upon BCR signaling, Tyr72 could be important for the biological function of LPXN To examine whether this tyrosine site is important for the function of LPXN, we overexpressed wild-type LPXN and various tyrosine-to-phenylalanine mutants in A20 cells and analyzed their effect on BCR-induced IL-2 production First, we examined whether the Y72F LPXN mutant can be tyrosine-phosphorylated upon BCR stimulation A20 cells were transiently transfected with FLAG vector or FLAG-tagged wild-type LPXN or mutant Y22F or Y72F and 27188 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY FIGURE Overexpression of LPXN suppresses IL-2 production in BCRstimulated A20 B cells A, ELISA showing the reduction in IL-2 production by A20 B cells overexpressing LPXN A20 B cells were transiently transfected with different amounts of FLAG-LPXN and stimulated with 10 ␮g/ml anti-mouse IgG F(abЈ)2 fragment at 37 °C for 24 h IL-2 secretion was assayed by ELISA The data shown are averages of triplicates and are representative of three independent experiments Western blot data show the relative amounts of LPXN expressed in A20 cells transfected with various amounts of plasmids B, IL-2 promoter-driven luciferase reporter assay showing the inhibition of IL-2 production by LPXN overexpression A20 cells were transiently transfected with IL-2 promoter-luciferase and pRL-TK (Renilla) plasmids and with either FLAG or FLAG-LPXN and stimulated with 10 ␮g/ml anti-mouse IgG F(abЈ)2 fragment at 37 °C Luciferase activity was measured All assays were done in triplicate and repeated three times Statistical analysis was done using Student’s t test: *, p Ͻ 0.05; **, p Ͻ 0.01; ***, p Ͻ 0.005 IP, immunoprecipitation; IB, immunoblot stimulated via BCR The total cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG antibody-agarose beads and immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 As shown in Fig 7A (upper panel, lanes and 3), Y72F was not tyrosine-phosphorylated upon BCR stimulation The Y22F VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 37 • SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 Downloaded from www.jbc.org at NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE on September 7, 2007 FIGURE Overexpression of LPXN inhibits the phosphorylation of JNK, p38 MAPK, and Akt in A20 B cells upon BCR ligation A, expression of ectopically expressed LPXN versus endogenous protein in A20 cells A20 cells were transiently transfected with FLAG or FLAG-LPXN, and whole cell lysates were immunoblotted (IB) with anti-LPXN antibody and subsequently with anti-actin antibody as a loading control (left panels) or immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-FLAG antibody and immunoblotted with anti-LPXN antibody (right panel) B, LPXN inhibits JNK and p38 MAPK, but not ERK, during BCR signaling Transfected A20 cells were stimulated with 15 ␮g/ml anti-mouse IgG F(abЈ)2 fragment for various time points, and cell lysates were immunoblotted with antibodies that recognize the specific signaling proteins or their phosphorylated forms as indicated C, overexpression of LPXN reduces Akt activation during BCR signaling Transfected A20 cells were stimulated as described above and examined for Akt activation using antibodies that recognize phosphorylated Ser473 and Thr308 in Akt as well as total Akt-1 D, normal degradation of I␬B␣ in BCR-stimulated A20 cells overexpressing LPXN Whole cell lysates from transfected A20 cells were examined for the degradation of I␬B␣ in response to BCR stimulation The p38 blot was included as a control for the loading of whole cell lysates Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling FIGURE Tyr72 of LPXN is important for its inhibition of IL-2 production in BCR-stimulated A20 B cells A, Tyr72 is important for LPXN phosphorylation in A20 cells A20 cells were transiently transfected with FLAG-tagged wild-type LPXN and various mutants and stimulated via BCR Wild-type LPXN and the mutants were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-FLAG antibody and immunoblotted (IB) with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody 4G10 to examine their phosphorylation status B, ELISA showing the lack of inhibition of IL-2 production in BCR-stimulated A20 cells overexpressing the Y72F mutant of LPXN A20 cells were transiently transfected with various FLAG-tagged LPXN mutants and stimulated for 24 h with 10 ␮g/ml anti-mouse IgG F(abЈ)2 fragment at 37 °C Western blot data show the amounts of LPXN expressed in A20 cells transfected with various plasmids C, IL-2 promoter-driven luciferase reporter assay showing induction of IL-2 promoter activity in A20 B cells overexpressing the Y72F mutant, but not wild-type (WT) LPXN or the Y22F mutant A20 cells were transiently transfected with the IL-2 promoter-luciferase and pRL-TK (Renilla) plasmids and with FLAG-tagged mutant LPXN and examined for luciferase activity after BCR stimulation All assays were done in triplicate and repeated three times Statistical analysis was done using Student’s t test: *, p Ͻ 0.05; **, p Ͻ 0.01; ***, p Ͻ 0.005 mutant and wild-type LPXN (used as positive controls) were tyrosine-phosphorylated upon BCR stimulation (Fig 7A, upper panel, lanes 5, 6, 8, and 9) Immunoblotting with anti-FLAG antibody showed that equivalent amounts of various LPXN proteins were immunoprecipitated (Fig 7A, lower panel) Thus, the data indicate that Tyr72 is the tyrosine phosphorylation site SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 • VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 37 DISCUSSION We have demonstrated that LPXN, a member of the paxillin superfamily, was phosphorylated and recruited to the plasma membrane upon BCR ligation in human BJAB B lymphoma cells, indicating that LPXN can potentially play a role in B cell activation Previous studies had shown that members of the paxillin family can interact with members of the Src kinase family (31, 34, 42), and indeed, we also established an interaction between LPXN and Lyn, a Src family tyrosine kinase that plays a critical role in BCR signal transduction Although we have shown that Lyn also interacted with paxillin and another related family member, Hic-5 (Fig 2A), these interactions might not be physiologically significant in B cells compared with the interaction between Lyn and LPXN This is because the roles of paxillin and Hic-5 in BCR signaling remain controversial, as paxillin was not shown to be phosphorylated upon BCR ligation (27), whereas Hic-5 is largely absent in lymphocytes (28) On the other hand, LPXN is preferentially expressed in hematopoietic cells, including B cells, and we have shown here that it could be phosphorylated in B cells upon BCR activation Indeed, we further established an interaction between endogenous LPXN and Lyn upon BCR ligation in BJAB cells The induced nature of their interaction further strengthened our hypothesis that LPXN plays a role in BCR signaling Interestingly, the kinetics of the interaction between LPXN and Lyn, JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 27189 Downloaded from www.jbc.org at NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE on September 7, 2007 of LPXN upon BCR stimulation in A20 cells, consistent with our earlier results in 293T cells (Fig 4) Next, A20 cells were transiently transfected with FLAG alone or with FLAG-tagged wild-type LPXN and mutants Y22F and Y72F (Fig 7B) and stimulated with 10 ␮g/ml goat anti-mouse IgG F(abЈ)2 fragment at 37 °C for 24 h before culture supernatants were recovered and assayed for IL-2 production via ELISA A20 cells transfected with wild-type LPXN showed inhibition of BCR-induced IL-2 production (Fig 7B), consistent with our earlier results (Fig 6A) A20 cells transfected with the Y22F LPXN mutant also showed similar repression of BCRinduced IL-2 production compared with wild-type LPXN By contrast, the Y72F LPXN mutant showed no significant repression of IL-2 production and produced IL-2 at a level comparable with that produced by A20 cells transfected with the control FLAG vector (Fig 7B) These findings indicate that Tyr72 of LPXN, which was shown above to be phosphorylated by Lyn (Fig 4B), is important for LPXN-mediated repression of BCRinduced IL-2 production Similar results were also obtained when we measured IL-2 promoter-driven luciferase activity in A20 cells transfected with wild-type or mutant LPXN As demonstrated in Fig 7C, IL-2 promoter-driven luciferase activity was significantly suppressed in A20 cells transfected with wild-type and Y22F LPXN, whereas it was largely unaffected in cells transfected with the Y72F mutant Used as a control, FLAG-transfected A20 cells also had high levels of IL-2 promoter-driven luciferase activity Thus, this independent set of experiments further confirmed our hypothesis that Ty72 plays an important role in the function of LPXN and could be critical for mediating the inhibitory role of LPXN in repressing BCR-induced IL-2 production in A20 B cells Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling 27190 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY Consistent with our biochemical analyses suggesting that LPXN can selectively inhibit certain BCR signaling pathways, our functional studies showed that A20 B cells overexpressing LPXN secreted much less IL-2 when activated via their BCR compared with control cells The reduced production of IL-2 could be the result of the inhibition of JNK, p38 MAPK, and Akt signaling in A20 B cells overexpressing LPXN Indeed, previous reports correlated IL-2 production to JNK signaling in Jurkat T cells (47, 48), and there is also reduced JNK phosphorylation and IL-2 production in A20 B cells overexpressing another inhibitory adaptor, Dok-3 (20, 24) In addition, it has also demonstrated that the inhibition of p38 MAPK and Akt can affect IL-2 production in T cells (49 –51) and in B cells (52, 53) Therefore, we speculate that LPXN regulates IL-2 production in B cells via regulating JNK, p38 MAPK, and Akt activities and that Tyr72 of LPXN is critical for the inhibition of BCR-induced IL-2 production (Fig 7) The precise mechanisms governing the negative regulatory function of LPXN in BCR signaling are still largely unknown LPXN as a substrate of Lyn may affect the downstream signaling pathways shown previously to be initiated by Lyn Despite the established positive role of Lyn in BCR signal initiation, Lyn-deficient mice are susceptible to autoimmune disease, and Lyn-deficient B cells are hyper-responsive to BCR ligation (13– 15) Analyses of Lyn-deficient primary B cells showed increases in MAPK and Akt activation as well as enhanced calcium signaling (54) Lyn has since been described as having both a positive and a negative regulatory role in BCR signaling (11–14, 54) On the basis of these studies, we speculate that LPXN may play a role in enhancing the negative regulatory role of Lyn A negative signaling pathway regulated by Lyn during BCR signaling involves the phosphatase SHIP-1 Our preliminary data indicated that the phosphorylation of SHIP-1 was normal in cells overexpressing LPXN (data not shown), hence ruling out the possibility of LPXN acting on the SHIP-1 negative regulatory pathway It is also possible that LPXN may function in a novel pathway downstream of Lyn to enhance its negative regulatory role in BCR signaling It had been shown previously that members of the paxillin superfamily interact with the phosphatase PTP-PEST (31, 33, 55) Thus, it is possible that LPXN may exert its negative regulatory role via PTP-PEST, and this remains to be determined Alternatively, members of the paxillin superfamily (in particular, paxillin and Hic-5) have been shown to interact with Csk, which down-regulates Lyn activity in human and murine platelets (56) Again, LPXN could potentially exert its negative function via Csk Our preliminary data suggested that LPXN could interact with Csk (data not shown), but this awaits further experimentation and confirmation In conclusion, we have established a previously unknown involvement of LPXN, a member of the paxillin superfamily, in BCR signal transduction and demonstrated a novel inhibitory role for LPXN in BCR signaling and B cell function Acknowledgments—We greatly appreciate the gift of anti-leupaxin antibodies from Dr A Gupta and ICOS Corp We also thank CheeHoe Ng and Joy En-Lin Tan for technical assistance and members of the Lam laboratory for critical comments regarding this project VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 37 • SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 Downloaded from www.jbc.org at NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE on September 7, 2007 as well as LPXN recruitment to the plasma membrane, corresponded with LPXN phosphorylation by Lyn (Figs and 2) We further speculate that LPXN can be recruited to the plasma membrane by a yet unknown mechanism, where it would interact with plasma membrane-located Lyn and be phosphorylation by Lyn We further determined the specific domain of LPXN that interacts with Lyn In previous studies, the LD2 domain of paxillin was reported to be the domain responsible for its interaction with Src (31), whereas the LD2 domain of LPXN was demonstrated to bind Src in osteoclasts (34) However, using different truncations of the LD domains of LPXN, we found LD3 to be the domain of LPXN that binds Lyn The reason for the discrepancy between our finding and that published previously is unclear However, a possible explanation could be the involvement of different tyrosine kinases with different LD domains In the two previous studies, Src was bound by the LD2 domains of paxillin and LPXN In our study, we examined the interaction between Lyn and LPXN, and perhaps, Lyn can bind only to the LD3 domain of LPXN Thus, additional experiments may be needed to examine whether the LD3 domain of paxillin can also bind Lyn Using the NetPhos 2.0 phosphorylation prediction software, we identified six potential tyrosine phosphorylation sites among the 11 tyrosine residues in LPXN We chose to mutate tyrosine residues (Tyr22, Tyr72, Tyr198, and Tyr257) to assess their importance in the function of LPXN Among these, Tyr22 was predicted to be the critical tyrosine phosphorylation site, as it corresponds to Tyr31 of paxillin, which has been shown to be important for its activation and function (31, 45) However, our results show that Tyr72 is the tyrosine phosphorylation site important for the activation of LPXN The phosphorylation of Y72F mutant LPXN was completely abolished even in the presence of Lyn (Fig 4B) This apparent unexpected result marks a difference between LPXN and paxillin in terms of the tyrosine phosphorylation sites critical for their biological function This may indicate that the function of paxillin and LPXN can be very different At this moment, we cannot rule out the possibility that the other tyrosine sites can also be phosphorylated, perhaps by tyrosine kinases other than Lyn and in different cell types and in response to different receptor signaling Our biochemical studies also established a role for LPXN in BCR signaling The overexpression of LPXN in mouse A20 B lymphoma cells led to a decrease in JNK and p38 MAPK phosphorylation, whereas the activation of ERK was largely unaffected The specific inhibition of JNK and p38 activation indicates a specific role of leupaxin in BCR signaling The upstream kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase kinase (MEKK) is likely to be influenced by LPXN (46), and this will be addressed in future work The possible effect of LPXN on the activity of a downstream target of JNK, AP-1, also remains to be studied (47, 48) Besides the phosphorylation of JNK and p38, the phosphorylation of Akt was also reduced in BCR-stimulated A20 B cells overexpressing LPXN On the other hand, NF␬B activation was unaffected upon overexpression of leupaxin Thus, LPXN appears to function as an inhibitor of specific BCR signaling pathways Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling REFERENCES SEPTEMBER 14, 2007 • VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 37 29 Lipsky, B P., Beals, C R., and Staunton, D E (1998) J Biol Chem 273, 11709 –11713 30 Brown, M C., Curtis, M S., and Turner, C E (1998) Nat Struct Biol 5, 677– 678 31 Brown, M C., and Turner, C E (2004) Physiol Rev 84, 1315–1339 32 Gupta, A., Lee, B S., Khadeer, M A., Tang, Z., Chellaiah, M., Abu-Amer, Y., Goldknopf, J., and Hruska, K A (2003) J Bone Miner Res 18, 669 – 685 33 Sahu, S N., Nunez, S., Bai, G., and Gupta, A (2007) Am J Physiol 292, ´˜ C2288 –C2296 34 Sahu, S N., Khadeer, M A., Robertson, B W., Nunez, S M., Bai, G., and ´˜ Gupta, A (2007) Am J Physiol 292, C581–C590 35 Watanabe, N., Amano, N., Ishizuka, H., and Mashima, K (2005) Mol Cell Biochem 269, 13–17 36 Northrop, J P., Ullman, K S., and Crabtree, G R (1993) J Biol Chem 268, 2917–2923 37 Mohamed, A J., Nore, B F., Christensson, B., and Smith, C I (1999) Scand J Immunol 49, 113–118 38 Fu, C., Turck, C W., Kurosaki, T., and Chan, A C (1998) Immunity 9, 93–103 39 Kurosaki, T (1997) Curr Opin Immunol 9, 309 –318 40 Rajendran, L., and Simons, K (2005) J Cell Sci 118, 1099 –1102 41 Simons, K., and Toomre, D (2000) Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 1, 31–39 42 Ishino, M., Aoto, H., Sasaski, H., Suzuki, R., and Sasaki, T (2000) FEBS Lett 474, 179 –183 43 DeFranco, A L., Chan, V W., and Lowell, C A (1998) Semin Immunol 10, 299 –307 44 Weil, R., and Israel, A (2004) Curr Opin Immunol 16, 374 –381 45 Romanova, L Y., Hashimoto, S., Chay, K O., Blagosklonny, M V., Sabe, H., and Mushinski, J F (2004) J Cell Sci 117, 3759 –3768 46 Hagemann, C., and Blank, J L (2001) Cell Signal 13, 863– 875 47 Jhun, B S., Lee, J Y., Oh, Y T., Lee, J H., Choe, W., Baik, H H., Kim, S S., Yoon, K S., Ha, J., and Kang, I (2006) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 351, 986 –992 48 Kaminuma, O., Deckert, M., Elly, C., Liu, Y C., and Altman, A (2001) Mol Cell Biol 21, 3126 –3136 49 Perchonock, C E., Fernando, M C., Quinn, W J., III, Nguyen, C T., Sun, J., Shapiro, M J., and Shapiro, V S (2006) Mol Cell Biol 26, 6005– 6015 50 Yu, T C., Liu, Y., Tan, Y., Jiang, Y., Zheng, X., and Xu, X (2004) Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 36, 741–748 51 Cantrell, D (2002) Semin Immunol 14, 19 –26 52 Motoda, K., Takata, M., Kiura, K., Nakamura, I., and Harada, M (2000) Immunology 100, 370 –377 53 Gary-Gouy, H., Harriague, J., Dalloul, A., Donnadieu, E., and Bismuth, G (2002) J Immunol 168, 232–239 54 Xu, Y., Harder, K W., Huntington, N D., Hibbs, M L., and Tarlinton, D M (2005) Immunity 22, –18 55 Nishiya, N., Iwabuchi, Y., Shibanuma, M., Cote, J F., Tremblay, M L., and Nose, K (1999) J Biol Chem 274, 9847–9853 56 Rathore, V B., Okada, M., Newman, P J., and Newman, D K (2007) Biochem J 403, 275–281 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY 27191 Downloaded from www.jbc.org at NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE on September 7, 2007 Yamamoto, T., Yamanashi, Y., and Toyoshima, K (1993) Immunol Rev 132, 187–206 Burkhardt, A L., Brunswick, M., Bolen, J B., and Mond, J J (1991) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88, 7410 –7414 Yamanashi, Y., Fukui, Y., Wongsasant, B., Kinoshita, Y., Ichimori, Y., Toyoshima, K., and Yamamoto, T (1992) Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89, 1118 –1122 Wechsler, R J., and Monroe, J G (1995) J Immunol 154, 3234 –3244 DeFranco, A L., Richards, J D., Blum, J H., Stevens, T L., Law, D A., Chan, V W., Datta, S K., Foy, S P., Hourihane, S L., and Gold, M R (1995) Ann N Y Acad Sci 766, 195–201 Hutchcroft, J E., Harrison, M L., and Geahlen, R L (1992) J Biol Chem 267, 8613– 8619 Burg, D L., Furlong, M T., Harrison, M L., and Geahlen, R L (1994) J Biol Chem 269, 28136 –28142 Dal Porto, J M., Gauld, S B., Merrell, K T., Mills, D., Pugh-Bernard, A E., and Cambier, J (2004) Mol Immunol 41, 599 – 613 Tsubata, T., and Wienands, J (2001) Int Rev Immunol 20, 675– 678 10 Plas, D R., and Thomas, M L (1998) J Mol Med 76, 589 –595 11 Lowell, C A (2004) Mol Immunol 41, 631– 643 12 Nishizumi, H., Horikawa, K., Mlinaric-Rascan, I., and Yamamoto, T (1998) J Exp Med 187, 1343–1348 13 Chan, V W., Lowell, C A., and DeFranco, A L (1998) Curr Biol 8, 545–553 14 Chan, V W., Meng, F., Soriano, P., DeFranco, A L., and Lowell, C A (1997) Immunity 7, 69 – 81 15 Nishizumi, H., Taniuchi, I., Yamanashi, Y., Kitamura, D., Ilic, D., Mori, S., Watanabe, T., and Yamamoto, T (1995) Immunity 3, 549 –560 16 Kurosaki, T (2002) Nat Rev Immunol 2, 354 –363 17 Kabak, S., Skaggs, B J., Gold, M R., Affolter, M., West, K L., Foster, M S., Siemasko, K., Chan, A C., Aebersold, R., and Clark, M R (2002) Mol Cell Biol 22, 2524 –2535 18 Yamasaki, S., and Saito, T (2004) Semin Immunol 16, 421– 427 19 Xu, S., Huo, J., Tan, J E.-L., and Lam, K.-P (2005) Mol Cell Biol 25, 8486 – 8495 20 Robson, J D., Davidson, D., and Veillette, A (2004) Mol Cell Biol 24, 2332–2343 21 Ng, C.-H., Xu, S., and Lam, K.-P (2007) Blood 110, 259 –266 22 Kurosaki, T., and Tsukada, S (2000) Immunity 12, 1–5 23 Yoshida, K., Yamashita, Y., Miyazato, A., Ohya, K., Kitanaka, A., Ikeda, U., Shimada, K., Yamanaka, T., Ozawa, K., and Mano, H (2000) J Biol Chem 275, 24945–24952 24 Lemay, S., Davidson, D., Latour, S., and Veillette, A (2000) Mol Cell Biol 20, 2743–2754 25 Schaller, M D (2001) Oncogene 20, 6459 – 6472 26 Tumbarello, D A., Brown, M C., and Turner, C E (2002) FEBS Lett 513, 114 –118 27 Davidson, D., and Veillette, A (2001) EMBO J 20, 3414 –3426 28 Zhang, J., Zhang, L X., Meltzer, P S., Barrett, J C., and Trent, J M (2000) Mol Carcinog 27, 177–183 ... Thus, leupaxin plays an inhibitory role in BCR signaling and B cell function Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling RESULTS Leupaxin Is Activated upon BCR Engagement in Human BJAB B Cells—It... duction of IL -2 by activated B cells Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling Tyrosine 72 of Leupaxin Is Important for Its Inhibitory Function—As shown above (Fig 4B) , Tyr 72 of LPXN was the. .. Inhibitory Role of Leupaxin in BCR Signaling 27 184 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY peak between and 15 after BCR ligation in BJAB cells The binding of LPXN to Lyn appeared to occur in response to BCR