lin et al - national intellectual capital and the financial crisis in france, germany, ireland, and the united kingdom (2014)

132 557 0
lin et al - national intellectual capital and the financial crisis in france, germany, ireland, and the united kingdom (2014)

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

SPRINGER BRIEFS IN ECONOMICS Carol Yeh-Yun Lin · Leif Edvinsson Jeffrey Chen · Tord Beding National Intellectual Capital and the Financial Crisis in France, Germany, Ireland, and the United Kingdom SpringerBriefs in Economics For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/8876 http://avaxhome.ws/blogs/ChrisRedfield Carol Yeh-Yun Lin Leif Edvinsson Jeffrey Chen Tord Beding • • National Intellectual Capital and the Financial Crisis in France, Germany, Ireland, and the United Kingdom 123 Carol Yeh-Yun Lin Department of Business Administration National Chengchi University Taipei Taiwan Leif Edvinsson Universal Networking Intellectual Capital Norrtälje Sweden ISSN 2191-5504 ISBN 978-1-4614-8180-5 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-8181-2 Jeffrey Chen Accenture Chicago, IL USA Tord Beding TC-Growth AB Karlstad Sweden ISSN 2191-5512 (electronic) ISBN 978-1-4614-8181-2 (eBook) Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013941349 Ó The Author(s) 2014 This work is subject to copyright All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Foreword I The economic crisis is a consequence of many parallel factors which are all related to globalization and digitalization My main concern, assessing this in more detail from the European perspective, is that revolutionary global forces have not been taken early nor seriously enough by most national and regional decision makers The Heads of European States and Governments have once again recalled the importance of fiscal consolidation, structural reform, and targeted investment to put Europe back on the path of smart, sustainable, and inclusive growth The main question is how capable and ready are the national governments to tackling the complex and manifold issues of crises and to renewing even radically many of our public and private structures and processes The first basic requirement is that all the European Union Member States remain fully committed to taking the actions required at the national level to achieve the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy The second basic requirement is that the national and regional governments, as well as people, are ready for radical changes This booklet, and the other 11 booklets by the experienced authors, focus on National intellectual capital (NIC) and give necessary insights and facts for us the readers and especially for our in-depth systemic thinking of the interrelationships of NIC and economic recovery How should the national and regional decision makers tackle the existing knowledge of intangible capital? The focus needs to be more on the bottom-up approach stressing the developments on local and regional levels I highlight our recent statements by the EU Committee of the Regions The key priorities are to get more innovations out of research and to encourage mindset change towards open innovation The political decision makers are finally aware that the traditional indicators created for and used in industrial production cannot be applied to a knowledgeintensive, turbulent, and innovativeness-based global enterprise environment Indicators that perceive the intangible dimensions of competitiveness—knowledge capital, innovation knowledge and anticipation of the future—have been developed around the world, but their use has not yet become established in practice This booklet accelerates the development and the use of these indicators v vi Foreword I This helps the local and regional, as well as central, governments in taking brave leaps forward on a practical level—giving greater ownership and involving all the stakeholders This means the need of actions towards increasing the structural and relational capital of regions, both internally in communities of practice and in collaboration with others The new generation innovation activities are socially motivated, open, and collectively participated, complex and global by nature The regions need to move towards open innovation, within a human-centered vision of partnerships between public and private sector actors, with universities playing a crucial role Regions should be encouraged to develop regional innovation platforms, which act as demand-based service centres and promote the use of international knowledge to implement the Europe 2020 Strategy, smart specialization and European partnerships according to the interests and needs of regions For this to happen, we need to apply the new dynamic understanding of regional innovation ecosystems, in which companies, cities, and universities as well as other public and private sector actors (the ‘‘Triple Helix’’) learn to work together in new and creative ways to fully harness their innovative potential New innovative practices not come about by themselves One major potential is the use of public procurement The renewing of the European wide rules must increase the strategic agility and activities of municipalities and other public operators as creators of new solutions Especially, the execution of precommercial procurement should be reinforced even more in combination with open innovation to speed up the green knowledge society development, i.e., for common re-usable solutions in creating the infrastructures and services modern real-world innovation ecosystems are built upon Conditions must be created that also allow for extensive development projects which address complex societal challenges and which take the form of risk-taking consortia One of our working instruments within the Committee of the Regions is the Europe 2020 Monitoring Platform, which broadly reviews and reflects the opinions and decisions on a regional level all around Europe It gives a flavor of cultural and other socioeconomic differences inside the EU This brings an important perspective to the intellectual capital, namely the values and attitudes needed for citizens supporting policymakers on appropriate long-term investments and policies Emphasizing the importance of these issues, decision makers in all countries and regions worldwide need a deep and broad understanding of the critical success factors affecting the NIC With all the facts and frames for thinking this booklet gives a valuable insight in today’s challenges Markku Markkula Advisor to the Aalto University Presidents Member of the EU Committee of the Regions Former Member of the Parliament of Finland Foreword II Financial crisis—words very much heard today What is all this about, actually, and how to get a grip on what we experience today? The booklet gives an important insight on the factors affecting competitiveness and productivity in modern knowledge society We need to see behind the obvious, and we need to have increasingly ‘‘qualified guesses’’ as the character of the society and industry has fundamentally changed What is very important to notice is the shift towards intangible value creation beyond the deterministic phenomena we saw very clearly in the industrial era Cost drivers were the important ones throughout the industry Mass production, bigger is better; very traditional productivity factors, was the mantra However, the production picture is changing Increasingly value is created by the intangibles, often services related to the tangible components, and even totally in immaterial value creation, where perceptions and expectations determine the market value of the ‘‘extended product’’ We also see rapid change in organizational forms, we see new type of entrepreneurship growing besides the traditional industry clusters, we see smart specialization of regions and countries This means also that there will be clearly different and complementary roles of the actors in innovation and value creation ecosystems Large companies, small ones and even microenterprises together with the public sector are traditionally seen as the active partners in such innovation environments The real issue in the dynamic markets is, however, that the end users are increasingly to be taken on board as active subjects for innovation, and not merely treated as objects, customers Markets need to be shaped and created in much more dynamic way than ever before Open innovation beyond cross-licensing includes the societal capital as an important intangible engine for productivity growth Innovation happens only when the offering is meeting the demand Otherwise, we can only speak about inventions or ideas We need to have a close look at the intellectual capital and the different factors within it when we design our policy approaches Short-term investments in process capital (infrastructures) and market capital seem to be very important for the manufacturing base as such, but at the same time measures for longer term intellectual capital development and efficiency need to be taken vii viii Foreword II Increasingly, important is the structure and the open processes related to intangible capital and knowledge pools For sustainable long-term development both the human capital and renewal capital are crucial, as they are directly related to the innovation capability of the region The correlation between these factors and the GDP growth is undisputable In knowledge intense industries talent is attracting talent, and the connectivity which modern ICT provides makes this talent pool fluid across disciplines, organizations, and geographical settings It is imperative to modernize the innovation systems enabling the full dynamics needed for success in knowledge intense industries, beyond the traditional boundaries Measuring performance of innovation systems becomes increasingly complex due to the mash-up of different disciplines, having new types of actors and interactions between them Hence, the importance of analysis of the various components of the National intellectual capital (NIC) (and equally on national innovation capability) as done in this booklet cannot be underestimated when making qualified guesses for operational choices to create functioning innovation ecosystems The only predictable in true innovation is the unpredictability and the surprises The role of the public sector is to drive strategy and measures enabling the unpredictable, and to catalyze a fluid, seamless and frictionless innovation system to grow, with strong interplay with the surrounding society We need to have courage to experiment, to prototype in real-world settings, to have all stakeholders involved to find and remove the friction points of innovation and to achieve sustainable innovation ecosystems for knowledge-intensive products and services I wish you interesting reading with this mind opening report Bror Salmelin Advisor, Innovation Systems European Commission DG CONNECT Foreword III The 2008 global financial crisis hit the whole world with unprecedented speed, causing widespread financial panic Consumer confidence dropped to the lowest level since the Great Depression Taiwan, with an export-dependent economy, was seriously impacted by the crisis and the unemployment rate hiked while household consumption levels dropped At the onset of the financial crisis, Prof Lin was the Dean of Student Affairs here at National Chengchi University in Taipei, Taiwan She was the dean in charge of financial aid and student loans and thus saw firsthand the direct impact the financial crisis had upon our students The crisis was so devastating that Prof Lin, along with the university, was compelled to launch several new initiatives to raise money and help students weather the difficult times I am very glad that she took this painful experience to heart and set herself upon the task of investigating the impact of the crisis; trying to look into the causes and consequences for policy implications, not only for Taiwan but for an array of 48 countries In particular, she approaches the crisis from the perspective of ‘‘national intellectual capital (NIC)’’ which is very important in today’s knowledge-driven economy Taiwan is an example of a knowledge economy and has enjoyed the fame of being referred to as a ‘‘high-tech island’’ Without an abundance of natural resources, Taiwan’s hardworking and highly educated population is the single most precious resource that the island has Acknowledging the value of such human resources and intellectual capital, we established the Taiwan Intellectual Capital Research Center (TICRC) under my leadership in 2003 Ever since then, Taiwan’s government has continuously funded the university to conduct relevant research projects aimed at enhancing the intellectual capital of Taiwan Having been thus endowed with the responsibility of nourishing future leaders in the public and private sectors, we have focused on building up our strength in innovation, entrepreneurship, and technology management related research and education To enhance intellectual capital research, we recently formed a joint team of professors for a 4-year project in order to leverage their respective research capabilities Through this project we hope to provide policy suggestions for the government by exploring the creativity, innovation, and intellectual capital at ix x Foreword III national, regional, city and county levels The goal is to come up with an intangible assets (IA) agenda for Taiwan’s future sustainability Professor Lin is an integral member in this research team Following her 2011 book National Intellectual Capital: A Comparison of 40 Countries, this booklet series is Prof Lin’s second attempt at presenting her research, conducted under the sponsorship of TICRC, to international readers As the Founding Director of TICRC and her President, I am honored to give a brief introduction of the value of this booklet series In comparison to her 2011 book, this series increased the number of countries studied to 48 and particularly focuses on the impact of intellectual capital on the 2008 global financial crisis Rarely has an economic issue been systematically studied from the view point of IA, particularly at such a large scale of 48 countries The research results show without a doubt that NIC is indeed an important economic development enhancer In particular, the fact that countries with higher NIC experienced faster recoveries from the 2008 financial crisis provides a strong message for the policymakers In addition to providing insights to national policy, the booklet also summarizes the background of each country before the crisis, the key events during the crisis, economic development afterwards, and future prospects and challenges Each volume affords readers a holistic picture of what happened in each country in an efficient manner The linkage between NIC and this financial crisis also provides a different perspective of the crisis We are happy that Prof Lin continues to share her valuable research results with international readers I sincerely hope that her insights can garner more attention concerning the benefits of developing NIC for the well-being of every nation Se-Hwa Wu Professor, Graduate Institute of Technology and Innovation Management President, National Chengchi University Taipei, Taiwan 6.420 1.217 Score 7.145 8.040 6.471 7.581 5.345 6.964 6.538 4.871 7.312 7.123 7.936 4.772 6.393 6.882 5.829 5.530 7.144 4.708 6.524 8.385 7.575 Mean SD Country Ireland Israel Italy Japan Jordan Korea Malaysia Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia Singapore South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland 16 28 10 37 19 26 42 12 18 43 29 22 32 33 17 45 27 11 Ranking Human capital (continued) 2005–2010 6.816 5.954 4.155 4.820 5.341 5.123 6.410 4.491 6.761 5.999 6.055 4.464 4.246 4.801 4.219 3.860 8.306 4.976 4.649 6.563 6.481 Score 1.085 5.409 16 44 34 26 29 39 15 14 40 41 35 42 46 30 37 Ranking Market capital 6.711 6.454 5.184 6.209 4.411 5.282 5.567 3.226 6.879 6.460 7.008 3.317 3.895 5.470 3.806 3.588 7.506 4.472 5.033 7.174 7.374 Score 1.454 5.345 11 17 27 18 32 26 23 45 10 16 43 38 24 39 41 31 30 Ranking Process capital 4.101 7.091 2.745 6.473 2.212 4.595 2.186 1.237 5.163 3.701 4.961 1.268 1.819 2.467 1.685 2.349 5.416 1.677 2.787 7.780 7.988 Score 2.056 3.658 21 26 30 19 31 48 13 22 15 47 35 27 38 28 11 39 25 Ranking Renewal capital 9.768 9.414 9.479 9.576 7.865 9.383 8.740 8.781 9.739 9.380 9.987 7.481 8.945 9.224 8.594 8.822 9.961 8.472 9.484 9.673 9.753 Score 0.690 9.115 24 22 19 45 25 35 33 26 47 30 28 39 31 41 21 12 Ranking Financial capital 34.541 36.953 28.035 34.659 25.174 31.348 29.442 22.606 35.855 32.662 35.947 21.302 25.299 28.844 24.133 24.150 38.334 24.306 28.476 39.575 39.172 Score 5.840 29.946 NIC (continued) 16 28 15 33 22 24 43 10 21 46 32 26 39 38 37 27 Ranking Appendix 6: National Intellectual Capital Scores 97 6.420 1.217 Score 7.244 5.310 4.703 6.939 7.695 4.884 Mean SD Country Taiwan Thailand Turkey United Kingdom USA Venezuela 13 38 46 21 41 Ranking Human capital (continued) 2005–2010 5.823 5.524 5.227 5.440 5.348 2.761 Score 1.085 5.409 17 22 27 24 25 48 Ranking Market capital 6.026 4.365 4.167 6.090 6.558 2.545 Score 1.454 5.345 20 33 34 19 13 48 Ranking Process capital 5.425 1.436 1.666 4.697 6.715 1.277 Score 2.056 3.658 10 43 40 18 46 Ranking Renewal capital 9.526 8.304 8.690 9.626 9.886 8.625 Score 0.690 9.115 20 43 36 15 38 Ranking Financial capital 34.044 24.938 24.453 32.793 36.202 20.092 Score 5.840 29.946 NIC 18 34 36 20 48 Ranking 98 Appendix 6: National Intellectual Capital Scores Appendix Country Profile: Additional Statistics International Reserves in Millions of US$ Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 France Germany Ireland United Kingdom 33,877 48,502 2,695 39,025 28,728 43,552 694 38,361 43,904 41,683 758 43,434 49,650 47,399 766 50,670 25,163 42,702 795 39,931 48,072 60,205 1,825 57,628 Source: Global Finance http://www.gfmag.com/ GDP per capita (ppp) Current international dollar Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 France Germany Ireland United Kingdom 30,546 30,508 38,391 32,084 32,086 32,658 40,707 33,856 33,597 34,590 43,251 35,561 34,175 35,666 41,827 36,079 33,432 34,415 38,685 34,396 34,077 36,033 38,550 34,920 Source: World Economic Outlook Database http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28 GDP (PPP)—share of world total_percent Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 France Germany Ireland United Kingdom 3.28 4.40 0.28 3.41 3.20 4.34 0.28 3.33 3.11 4.27 0.28 3.25 3.02 4.19 0.27 3.16 2.97 4.01 0.25 3.04 2.87 3.96 0.24 2.93 Source: World Economic Outlook Database http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28 C Y.-Y Lin et al., National Intellectual Capital and the Financial Crisis in France, Germany, Ireland, and the United Kingdom, SpringerBriefs in Economics, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8181-2, Ó The Author(s) 2014 99 100 Appendix 7: Country Profile: Additional Statistics Gross domestic expenditure on R&D as a percent of GDP Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 France Germany Ireland United Kingdom 2.16 2.49 1.19 1.88 2.13 2.51 1.25 2.55 2.12 2.51 1.32 1.76 2.08 2.53 1.31 1.76 2.02 2.53 1.43 1.88 2.21 2.82 1.77 1.87 Source: IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2006–2011 Household saving rates Percent of disposable household income Country 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 France Germany Ireland United Kingdom 14.8 10.7 1.7 3.8 14.8 10.8 -0.9 3.2 15.4 11.0 -0.1 2.8 15.6 11.7 5.5 3.2 16.5 11.1 10.1 7.8 16.1 11.3 8.9 7.6 Source: Global Finance http://www.gfmag.com/ Glossary ASPA Activating Senior Potential in Aging Europe Basel II Basel II is the second of the Basel Accords, which are recommendations on banking laws and regulations issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Basel II, initially published in June 2004, was intended to create an international standard for banking regulators to control how much capital banks need to put aside to guard against the types of financial and operational risks banks face Basel III Basel III is a global regulatory standard on bank capital adequacy, stress testing, and market liquidity risk agreed upon by the members of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in 2010–2011, and scheduled to be introduced from 2013 to 2018 The third installment of the Basel Accords was developed in response to the deficiencies in financial regulation revealed by the 2008 financial crisis Basel III strengthens bank capital requirements and introduces new regulatory requirements on bank liquidity and bank leverage Basel III requires banks to hold 4.5% of common equity (up from 2% in Basel II) and 6% of Tier I capital (up from 4% in Basel II) of risk-weighted assets BBC British Broadcasting Corporation CIA The USA Central Intelligence Agency CPI Consumer price inflation ECB European Central Bank EFSF European Financial Stability Facility EFSM European Financial Stabilization Mechanism EIB European Investment Bank C Y.-Y Lin et al., National Intellectual Capital and the Financial Crisis in France, Germany, Ireland, and the United Kingdom, SpringerBriefs in Economics, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8181-2, Ó The Author(s) 2014 101 102 Glossary EIF European Investment Fund ESM European Stabilization Mechanism EU European Union FDI Foreign direct investment FJF Future Jobs Fund in the United Kingdom GCI GCI Global Competitiveness Index (published by World Economic Forum) GDP Gross domestic product GDP per capita (ppp) Gross domestic product per capita adjusted by purchasing power parity IMD International Institute for Management Development IMF International Monetary Fund ISE The Irish Stock Exchange HC Human capital Long-term NIC Long-term oriented national intellectual capital, represented by human capital and renewal capital MC Market capital NAMA National Asset Management Agency in Ireland NIC National intellectual capital OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development PC Process capital ppp Purchasing power parity R&D Research and development RC Renewal capital SD Standard Deviation Short-term NIC Short-term oriented national intellectual capital, represented by market capital and process capital SMEs Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Glossary 103 Three time periods For the convenience of comparing ranking changes, the years data were separated into three time periods, namely 2005–2006, 2007–2008, and 2009–2010 Two years each represents ‘‘before, during, and after’’ the 2008 global financial crisis Although Euro zone is still in sovereign debt trouble as of mid-2012, the time partition is based on the financial crisis progression in the epicenter The signs of financial trouble appeared in 2007 and the crisis was declared over in the third quarter of 2009 USPTO United States Patent and Trademark Office VAT Value-added tax YOY Year-on-year References Aldrich P (2012) OECD slashes UK growth forecasts, the telegraph http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ finance/economics/9705235/OECD-slashes-UK-growth-forecasts.html Accessed 27 Nov 2012 Barnes S (2010) Resolving and avoiding unsustainable imbalances In: OECD economic surveys: euro area 2010 http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/economics/oecdeconomic-surveys-euro-area-2010/resolving-and-avoiding-unsustainableimbalances_eco_surveys-euz-2010-5-en BBC News (2009) Huge protest over Irish economy, BBC News http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/ europe/7903518.stm Accessed 21 Feb 2009 BBC News (2010) Republic of Ireland confirms EU financial rescue deal, BBC News http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11807730 Accessed 22 Nov 2010 BBC News (2010) UK economy growth to slow in 2011—Chambers of Commerce, BBC News http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11920548 Accessed Dec 2010 BCC (British Chambers of Commerce) (December 4, 2012) BCC economic forecast: UK growth upgraded for 2012 but revised down for 2013 and 2014, British Chambers of Commerce http://www.britishchambers.org.uk/press-office/press-releases/bcc-economic-forecast-ukgrowth-upgraded-for-2012-but-revised-down-for-2013-and-2014.html#.URY7Tx2Tzug Accessed Dec 2012 Boulhol H, Egert B (2011) OECD economic surveys France, Economic and development review committee of the OECD Breuss F, Kaniovski S, Schratzenstaller M (2009) Macro-economic effects of the fiscal stimulus measures in Austria, WIFO (Austrian Institute of Economic Research) study commissioned by the Federal Ministry of Economics, Families and Youth http://fritz.breuss.wifo.ac at/Breuss_Kaniovski_Schratzenstaller_Macro-economic_Effects_Fiscal_Stimulus_Austria_ AEQ_4_2009.PDF Business (2012) IMF: Irish economy to grow but unemployment will remain high in 2013, business economy, technology and companies http://businessetc.thejournal.ie/irish-economygrowth-imf-627860-Oct2012/ Accessed Oct 2012 Busch A (2010) United Kingdom country report In: Bertelsmann Stiftung (ed) Managing the crisis A comparative assessment of economic governance in 14 economies Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh http://www.bertelsmann-transformation-index.de/pdf/UK.pdf Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2011, 2012) The world factbook, U.S.A central intelligence agency https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (2012) Macro economic outlook (MEV) 2013 http://www.cpb.nl/en/publication/macro-economic-outlook-2013 Accessed 18 Sep 2012 C Y.-Y Lin et al., National Intellectual Capital and the Financial Crisis in France, Germany, Ireland, and the United Kingdom, SpringerBriefs in Economics, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8181-2, Ó The Author(s) 2014 105 106 References DB (Deutsche Bundesbank) (June 2012) Outlook for the German economy—Macroeconomic projections for 2012 and 2013, Deutsche Bundesbank retrieved from http://www.bundes bank.de/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Publications/Monthly_Report_Articles/2012/2012_06_ outlook.pdf? blob=publicationFile Doerig HU (2009) In a better position than before the crisis: The Swiss financial market has ‘AAA’ opportunities for the future, Credit Suisse Group https://www.credit-suisse com/news/doc/speech_doerig_nzz_en.pdf Accessed 11 Sept 2009 Edvinsson L, Malone MS (1997) Intellectual capital: realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower Harper Business, New York EFI (October 2009) Ministry of the economy, finance and industry (EFI), France Why has France withstood the global economic crisis comparatively well? http://www.tresor.bercy.gouv fr/france_politique_eco/fpe1009_en.pdf Accessed Oct 2009 Elliott, L (November 7, 2012a) European commission predicts UK recovery in 2013, The Guardian, retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov/07/eurozone-growthnext-year-ec Accessed Nov 2012 Elliott L (2012b) UK economic recovery will be slow, OECD warns, the guardian http://www guardian.co.uk/business/2012/nov/27/uk-economic-recovery-slow-oecd Accessed 27 Nov 2012 Europa (2008) The Commission launches a major recovery plan for growth and jobs, to boost demand and restore confidence in the European economy http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleases Action.do?reference=IP/08/1771&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en Accessed 26 Nov 2008 European Commission (2012) The EU economy: sailing through rough waters, European commission news http://ec.europa.eu/news/economy/121107_en.htm Accessed Nov 2012 Flynn D (2012) France posts surprise Q3 GDP growth, outlook still weak, Reuters http:// www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/15/us-france-economy-gdp-idUSBRE8AE0MC20121115 Accessed 15 Nov 2012 First Post (2011) PIIGS http://www.firstpost.com/topics/piigs-56382.html Fottrell Q (2009) Irish GDP rises 0.3% but crisis lingers Wall Str J http://online.wsj.com/ article/SB126105744446795437.html Accessed 17 Dec 2009 Fuentes A, Ramskogler P, Silgner MA (2011) The Swiss economy’s resilience to crisis and its lessons for Austria Monet Policy Econ Q2/11, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (OeNB) http://www.oenb.at/en/img/mop_2011_q2_analyse04_fuentes_tcm16-235937.pdf German Center for Research and Innovation (GCRI) New York (2010) Annual report 2010 www.germaninnovation.org Global Finance (2013) Ireland country report Glob Finan http://www.gfmag.com/gdp-datacountry-reports/251-ireland-gdp-country-report.html#axzz2QJ7HgFDl Government of the Netherlands (n.d.) How did the Netherlands hand the credit crisis, Ministry of Finance, Government of the Netherlands http://www.government.nl/issues/financialpolicy/how-did-the-netherlands-hande-the-credit-crisis Gurria A (2011) Overview of the economic survey of the United Kingdom 2011 OECD http://www.oecd.org/document/38/0,3746,en_2649_34327_47283558_1_1_1_1,00.html Gurria A (14 Feb 2012) Launch of the 2012 OECD’s economic survey of Germany OECD http://www.oecd.org/document/26/0,3746,en_21571361_44315115_49669530_1_1_1_1,00 html Accessed 14 Feb 2012 Harrington C (2011) The Spanish financial crisis The University of Iowa Center for International Finance and Development http://blogs.law.uiowa.edu/ebook/content/spanish-financial-crisis Accessed 20 Apr 2011 Herd R, Koen V, Noord P (2011) China’s emergence as a market economy: achievements and challenges OECD contribution to the China Development Forum 20–21 March 2011, Beijing Heritage Foundation (2012) Index of economic freedom http://www.heritage.org/index/ranking References 107 Hufner F (2010) The German banking system: lessons from the financial crisis OECD economics department working paper No 788 http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/display documentpdf/?cote=eco/wkp(2010)44&doclanguage=en International Labor Office (2010a) G20 country briefs: France’s response to the crisis G20 meeting of labor and employment ministers, Washington, D.C 20–21 April 2010 http://www.dol.gov/ilab/media/events/G20_ministersmeeting/G20-France-brief.pdf International Labor Office (2010b) G20 country briefs: Germany’s response to the crisis G20 meeting of labor and employment ministers, Washington, D.C 20–21 April 2010 http://www.dol.gov/ilab/media/events/G20_ministersmeeting/G20-Germany-brief.pdf International Labor Office (2010c) G20 country briefs: United Kingdom’s response to the crisis G20 meeting of labour and employment ministers, Washington, D.C., 20–21 April 2010 http://www.dol.gov/ilab/media/events/G20_ministersmeeting/G20-uk-brief.pdf International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2013) World economic outlook update: gradual upturn in global growth during 2013 Int Monet Fund http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/ update/01/index.htm Accessed 23 Jan 2013 Kehoe T (2010) The current financial crisis in Spain: what should we learn from the great depressions of the twentieth century? University of Minnesota and Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 18th Barcelona Lecture, Barcelona G.S.E and Banc Sabadell, Feb 2010 Kennedy J (2011) 50,000 knowledge economy jobs predicted for Northern Ireland, Silicon Republic http://www.siliconrepublic.com/careers-centre/item/24245-50-000-knowledge-economy/ Accessed 27 Oct 2011 Koske I (2010) After the crisis: bringing German public finances back to a sustainable path OECD economics department working paper no 766 http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/ displaydocumentpdf/?cote=eco/wkp(2010)22&doclanguage=en Koske I, Wörgötter A (2010) Germany’s growth potential, structural reforms and global imbalances OECD economics department working paper no 780 http://www.oecd.org/ officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ECO/WKP(2010)36&docLanguage=En Kredittilsynet (2009) The financial market in Norway 2008: Risk outlook http://www.finan stilsynet.no/Global/English/Reports/Risk%20Outlook%20Reports/Risk%20Outlook%20 2008.pdf Leaman J (2010) Germany country report In: Bertelsmann Stiftung (ed) Managing the crisis A comparative assessment of economic governance in 14 economies Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh Lin CYY, Edvinsson L (2011) National intellectual capital: a comparison of 40 countries Springer, New York Magan A (2011) EFSF releases € 3.6 billion to Ireland, finance news http://www.financenews co.uk/investments/efsf-releases-e3-6-billion-to-ireland/ Accessed June 2011 Mendonỗa JR (2010) The impact of the international financial crisis on Brazil http://www realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_eng/Content?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/ elcano/elcano_in/zonas_in/international+economy/ari38-2010 Moloney N (2010) EU financial market regulation after the global financial crisis: ‘‘More Europe’’ or more risks? Common Mark Law Rev 47:1317–1383 Nanto DK (2009) The global financial crisis: analysis and policy implications CRS report for congress, congressional research service 7-5700, RL34742, Oct 2009 Neuger JG (2012) EU cuts 2013 growth forecast as crisis weighs on Germany, Bloomberg http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-07/eu-cuts-2013-growth-forecast-as-crisis-weighson-germany.html Accessed Nov 2012 OECD (2008a) Economic survey of Ireland 2008: executive summary OECD http://www oecd.org/document/18/0,3746,en_33873108_33873500_40420434_1_1_1_1,00.html Accessed 16 April 2008 OECD (2008b) Economic survey of Ireland, 2008 In: OECD policy brief http://www.oecd org/dataoecd/38/12/40448199.pdf Accessed Apr 2008 108 References OECD (2009b) Economic survey of the United Kingdom 2009: policies to overcome the crisis OECD http://www.oecd.org/document/55/0,3746,en_33873108_33873870_43125751_1_1_1_1,00.html OECD (2011a) OECD economic surveys Ireland 2011 OECD http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/8/17/48861848.pdf OECD (2011b) Overview of economic survey of Ireland 2011 OECD http://www.oecd org/document/63/0,3746,en_2649_34569_48842623_1_1_1_1,00.html OECD (2011c) Ireland coming out of the crisis, but challenges remain OECD http://www oecd.org/document/39/0,3746,en_21571361_44315115_48879527_1_1_1_1,00.html Accessed 14 Oct 2011 OECD (2011d) OECD economic survey United Kingdom OECD http://www.oecd.org/ eco/47319830.pdf Accessed Mar 2011 Palkamo A (2011) WEF ranks Finland as the fourth most competitive nation Tekes http://www tekes.fi/en/community/News/482/News/1344?name=WEF+ranks+Finland+as+the+fourth+ most+competitive+nation Accessed Aug 2011 Quinn E (2012) Ireland lowers 2013 economic outlook Wall Str J http://blogs.wsj.com/ eurocrisis/2012/11/14/ireland-lowers-2013-economic-outlook/ Accessed 14 Nov 2012 Reavis C (2009) The global financial crisis of 2008–2009: the role of greed, fear and oligarchs MIT sloan management case #09-093 Accessed 22 July 2009 Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS (2009) This time is different: eight centuries of financial folly Princeton University Press, Princeton ISBN 9780691142166 RTE News (2008) Banking guarantee bolsters Irish market, RTE News Ireland http://www.rte.ie/ news/2008/0930/economy.html Accessed 30 Sept 2008 RTE News (2009) ISEQ falls to 14-year low, RTE News Ireland http://www.rte.ie/news/ 2009/0224/markets.html Accessed 24 Feb 2009 RTE News (2010) Government statement on EU/IMF rescue deal, RTE News http://www rte.ie/news/2010/1128/govtstatement.html Accessed 28 Nov 2010 Schwab K (ed) (2011) The global competitiveness report 2011–2012 World Economic Forum, Geneva Spiegel (2012) Obeying EU rules: German budget deficit plunges to percent of GDP, Spiegel Online International http://www.spiegel.de/international/business/obeying-eu-rules-germanbudget-deficit-plunges-to-1-percent-of-gdp-a-817363.html Accessed 24 Feb 2012 Warwick Institute for Employment Research (2013) Activating senior potential in ageing Europe, 2008–2011 http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/ier/research/aspa/ Accessed Feb 2013 Witton Z (2013) France outlook: struggling for competitiveness, Moody’s analytics https://www economy.com/home/login/ds_proLogin_4.asp?script_name=/dismal/pro/ article.asp&cid=237084&tkr=1302090520 Accessed 23 Jan 2013 White R (2009) Irish banking liabilities In: Davy research report: Irish economy http://www davy.ie/content/pubarticles/econcr20090217.pdf Accessed 17 Feb 2009 World Bank (2012) GDP growth (annual %) of the United Kingdom, World Bank online data http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG Xiao Y (2009) French banks amid the global financial crisis International monetary fund working paper, WP/09/201 http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2009/wp09201.pdf Author Index A Aldrich, P., B Barnes, S., 13 Boulhol, H., 56, 57, 64, 68 Breuss, F., Busch, A., 16–18, 61, 67, 72 E Edvinsson, L., Edvinsson, L S., 2, 31 Egert, B., 56, 57, 64, 68 Elliott, L., 1, F Flynn, D., Fottrell, Q., 16 Fuentes, A., K Kaniovski, S., Kehoe, T., 55 Kennedy, J., 68 Koen, V., 57 Koske, I., 57, 58, 65, 69 L Leaman, J., 13, 14, 58, 65 Lin, C Y Y., 2, 31 M Magan, A., 59 Malone, M S., Mendonỗa, J R., 21 Moloney, N., 56 N Nanto, D K., 12, 14, 17, 75, 78 Neuger, J G., 4, Noord, P., 57 G Gurria, A., 57, 58, 61, 78 P Palkamo, A., H Harrington, C., 56 Herd, R., 57 Hufner, F., 14, 58, 65 Q Quinn, E., 5, 60 C Y.-Y Lin et al., National Intellectual Capital and the Financial Crisis in France, Germany, Ireland, and the United Kingdom, SpringerBriefs in Economics, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8181-2, Ó The Author(s) 2014 109 110 R Ramskogler, P., Reavis, C., Reinhart, C M., Rogoff, K S., S Schratzenstaller, M., Silgner, M A., Author Index W White, R., 15 Witton, Z., Worgotter, A., 65, 69 X Xiao, Y., 56, 64 Subject Index A Austerity, 56, 58, 60, 61 B Bailout, 5, 16, 21, 53, 55, 59, 77 Benchmarking, 51, 52 C Capital adequacy ratio, 13 Capital availability, 45, 47, 50, 51 Consumer price inflation, 7, 8, 10 Current account surplus, 13 D Deficiency factors, 52 3D landscape, 19, 41 E Efficiency drivers, 41, 51–53 Financial capital, 19, 21, 25, 28, 36, 37, 40, 52, 77 Energy-efficient, 8, 14, 75 Enhancing factors, 41, 47, 50, 51 European Central Bank, 5, 15, 55, 64 F Financial capital, 19, 21, 25, 28, 36, 37, 40, 52, 77 G German financial market stabilization fund, 14 Global competitiveness index, H High capability region, 42, 45, 47, 50 Human capital, 19, 21, 24, 26, 29, 30–34, 36, 37, 40–42, 44, 47, 50, 51, 72, 77, 79 I Impeding factors, 41, 44, 45, 47, 50–52 International Monetary Fund (IMF), 59 Innovation driven, International competitiveness, 37, 40, 77 L Long-term NIC, 32, 47, 50, 77 Low capability region, 44, 45 M Market capital, 19, 21, 24, 30, 31, 33, 34, 37, 39–44, 47, 51, 52, 75, 77 Middle capability region, 42, 44 N National development, 77, 79 NIC development trajectory, 41 NIC turning point, 44 C Y.-Y Lin et al., National Intellectual Capital and the Financial Crisis in France, Germany, Ireland, and the United Kingdom, SpringerBriefs in Economics, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8181-2, Ó The Author(s) 2014 111 112 Subject Index P Process capital, 19, 21, 25, 26, 30, 31, 33, 37, 40, 42, 44, 45, 47, 50, 74, 77, 79 S Short-term NIC, 33, 77 Stimulus package, 7, 10, 12, 14, 17, 74–76, 78 R Renewal capital, 19, 21, 25, 26, 30–33, 36, 37, 40–42, 45, 47, 50, 74, 79 T Trade unions, 13 ... Kingdom is also relatively weak in market capital C Y.-Y Lin et al. , National Intellectual Capital and the Financial Crisis in France, Germany, Ireland, and the United Kingdom, SpringerBriefs in Economics,... mutually reinforcing elements: first, short-term measures to boost demand, save jobs that C Y.-Y Lin et al. , National Intellectual Capital and the Financial Crisis in France, Germany, Ireland, and. .. capital, market capital, process capital, and ranking changes in the United Kingdom Renewal capital, financial capital, average NIC, and ranking changes in the United Kingdom

Ngày đăng: 01/11/2014, 16:23

Từ khóa liên quan

Mục lục

  • Foreword I

  • Foreword II

  • Foreword III

  • Preface I

  • Preface II

  • Executive Summary

  • Contents

  • List of Figures

  • List of Tables

  • Appendices

  • Abstract

  • 1 Introduction

    • Economic Background

  • 2 Impact of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis

    • Comparisons of the Four Countries

      • France

      • Germany

      • Ireland

      • The United Kingdom

  • 3 National Intellectual Capital Development of the Four Large European Countries

    • National Intellectual Capital Development

      • Human CapitalHuman Capital

      • Market CapitalMarket Capital

      • Process CapitalProcess Capital

      • Renewal CapitalRenewal Capital

      • Financial CapitalFinancial Capital

    • The Relationship Between Each Individual Capital and GDP Per Capita (ppp)

    • Long-TermLong-termLong-term NIC and Short-Term National Intellectual Capital

    • Dynamics of National Intellectual Capital in Three Time Periods

    • 3-Dimensional National Intellectual Capital Trajectory

  • 4 Beyond the 2008 Global Financial Crisis

    • France

    • Germany

    • Ireland

    • The United Kingdom

  • 5 Future Perspectives and Policy Implications

    • Prospects

      • France

      • Germany

      • Ireland

      • The United Kingdom

    • Challenges

      • France

      • Germany

      • Ireland

      • The United Kingdom

    • Policy Implications

    • Concluding Remarks and Emerging Insights

  • Appendix 1 Summary of the Main Stimulus Packages for the Four Large European Countries

  • Appendix 2 Important Meetings Held by World Leaders to Address the 2008 Global Financial Crisis

  • Appendix 3 Indicators in Each Type of Capital

  • Appendix 4 Definition of the 29 Indicators

  • Appendix 5 48 Countries by Cluster and by Continent

  • Appendix 6 National Intellectual Capital Scores and Ranking for 48 Countries (2005--2010)

  • Appendix 7 Country Profile:: Additional Statistics

  • Author Index

  • Subject Index

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan