Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. DOE issues a combined permit satisfying both state and federal requirements. This permit may include a Short Term Modification. (e) Short Term Modification. This permit is advised when the project activities may temporarily degrade water quality and a Waste Discharge Permit or Water Quality Certification is not necessary. This permit exempts WSDOT from being cited for violating water quality standards as long as the project complies with the prescribed terms and provisions. (f) Appropriation of Water. A water right permit must be obtained from DOE before surface or ground water is appropriated for beneficial use. If the use is for construction purposes, such as dust control or batch plant operation, the permit is temporary and expires when the project is complete. The contractor usually applies for a temporary water permit but, if the usage is specifically required by WSDOT, the district acquires the permit before awarding the contract. If WSDOT needs to develop a permanent water supply, such as for a rest area or maintenance facility, the district applies to the DOE regional office for a permit to develop a water source. After the source is put to use, DOE issues a certificate establishing a water right in perpetuity. (4) Procedures The district determines which permits are applicable to the project, assembles the pertinent design information, and applies to the DOE regional office for a permit. If the information is inadequate, the DOE requests further information. If the application was appropriate, the DOE acts upon the request. If other DOE permits are required, the DOE will inform the district. The headquarters Project Development Office may be requested to assist in resolving differences with the DOE. If the DOE has not responded to a permit request within 30 days, they should be contacted to determine the cause for delay and how to expedite a response. The district sends copies of correspondence and the permit to the headquarters Project Development Office. (5) Water Pollution Control Plan (WPCP) The WPCP contains design details of water pollution control measures for a project. (a) Procedures. The district arranges a meeting with the appropriate DOE region and a headquarters Project Development Office representative at least annually to review upcoming projects that may have potential for water pollution. The district presents sufficient information to enable the DOE to determine whether a WPCP is necessary and what permits may be required. After the review, the district notifies the headquarters Project Development Office of projects requiring a WPCP. When the district prepares the actual plan they will coordinate with the DOE region and, as needed, get technical assistance from the headquarters Project Development Office. The completed plan is sent to the headquarters Project Development Office for review and approval. After approval, the district submits the WPCP to the DOE region for approval along with a copy of or reference to the approved SEPA document. After DOE approves the WPCP, the district incorporates the relevant contents of the approved WPCP into the Contract Documents. As outlined in the Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction (Section 1-07), the district also reviews, approves, and implements the contractor’s Temporary Water Pollution Control Plan. Temporary Water Pollution Control Plans should be carefully checked for compliance with the DOE approved WPCP in the contract documents. Any substantive deviations from the DOE approved WPCP should be discussed with DOE Regional representatives prior to approval of the contractor’s plan. Construction activities should be monitored by the district to ensure that the DOE approved WPCP and the contractor’s Temporary Water Pollution Control Plan are followed and water quality is not adversely impacted. Additional measures to protect water qual- ity may be needed as construction progresses and should be implemented when required. For projects that involve rest area or maintenance site sewage disposal systems, the district shall submit plans and specifications to the DOE, DSHS, or local agency, depending on the volume of the system. See Figures 240-1a and 1b for the Permits and Approvals listing. After a mechanical or lagoon treatment facility is constructed, the district will submit an Operation and Maintenance Manual to DOE as per WAC 173-240. (b) Contents of WPCP. • Location and description of the project using a vicinity map and a detailed site map showing wells, streams and other water bodies, water and sewer lines, existing and proposed drainage, pollution control facilities, and access routes to these facilities. • A list of wells, streams, and water bodies that might be impacted by the project, including their water quality classification and use. • A list of permits or other documentation required for the project, such as Corps of Engineers, Shoreline, and Hydraulic Project Approval. • Describe the construction and operation of stormwater systems including design storms and runoff quantities, drainage system sizes Design Manual 240-7 September 1990 and capacities, and locations of discharges to receiving waters. • Discuss construction and operation of erosion control methods, including maximum disturbed areas, contributing areas, and proposed main- tenance. • Discuss construction and operation of sediment control including methods, location, size, design criteria, and proposed maintenance. • Oil and buoyant material control methods and proposed maintenance including hazardous spill control locations, methods, capacities, and clean-up procedures. • Woodwaste fill and stockpile locations, construction procedures, drainage, and leachate control and prevention methods. • Waste disposal methods and locations. • Timing for installation of pollution control facilities. 240.11 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) (1) General The DNR administers the Forest Practice Act, the state’s natural resources, and certain state-owned lands. These lands include tidelands and shorelands, school trust lands, Forest Board lands, escheat lands, and certain Federal Land Grants provided by the Enabling Act. When any DNR lands are needed for highway purposes, WSDOT negotiates for that use with the Commissioner of Public Lands. Except for obtaining rights of entry to do surveys and studies, all coordination and negotiations for DNR lands are made by the WSDOT Land Manage- ment Office. (2) Lease Property When WSDOT requires highway materials from DNR land, the district submits one copy of SF-4046, Applica- tion to Purchase Materials Upon State Lands, through the Land Management Office to DNR. The application includes estimates of quantities, time periods, and a map showing site details. DNR reviews the application and negotiates a royalty with WSDOT. Both agencies sign a nonexclusive contract (lease) for a specified time, allow- ing WSDOT to extract material from the site. Every six months for the life of the extraction lease, the district sends a “Removal Report” to DNR stating amount of material removed and includes payment for that material. The permit or lease normally allows WSDOT to stockpile materials at the site if room is available. Prior to using the site, WSDOT must also complete a reclamation plan as shown in Chapter 510 and the Plans Preparation Manual. When WSDOT uses their own land for surface mining, a DNR operating permit for surface mining is required. Details for obtaining the permit are found in the Plans Preparation Manual. (3) Right of Entry When WSDOT determines that access to land is needed from the DNR, the district requests a Right of Entry from the local DNR office. A copy of the request is also sent to the Land Management Office. The district will not enter upon DNR land to survey or appraise until the Right of Entry is obtained. (4) Transfer of Jurisdiction When the district determines that DNR land is required for the project, the district will develop the appropriate right of way maps indicating DNR land involved. When the district is ready to appraise the property, they will contact a DNR appraiser to jointly inspect the parcel so appraisal issues can be immediately identified and dis- cussed. The Land Management Office determines the need for timber cruises or other special studies. With the appraisal process complete, the Land Management Office submits maps, legal description, letter indicating intent to acquire, and WSDOT offer to DNR. The DNR should respond in 60 days. If accepted, WSDOT receives a Transfer of Jurisdiction. If rejected, the Land Manage- ment Office continues negotiations. If lands are needed for a marine facility the WSDOT must only file a map of required area with DNR in accordance with RCW 47.12.026. If any of the above actions involve leased DNR land, the WSDOT must get a release or waiver from the lessee before the DNR will act. (5) Washington Forest Practice (a) General. The DNR administers and enforces the Washington Forest Practices Rules and Regulations, except as otherwise provided in the Forest Practice Act. WAC 222, “Washington Forest Practices Rules and Regulations,” is available in booklet form through the DNR. Lands may be private or publicly owned lands on which activities are planned that are subject to the authority of the Forest Practices Regulations. All Forest Practices Regulations are promulgated to achieve compliance with the water quality laws. Forest Land is land that is capable of supporting a merchantable stand of timber and is not being actively used for a purpose incompatible with timber growing. Forest Practice is any activity conducted on or directly pertaining to forest land and relating to growing, harvesting, or processing timber such as road and trail construction, harvesting (final and intermediate), precommercial thinning, refores- tation, fertilization, prevention and suppression of 240-8 Design Manual September 1990 diseases and insects, salvage of trees, and brush control. When any land that can be defined as Forest Land is altered or becomes the site of construction, the district may be required to fill out a Forest Practices Appli- cation/Notification form and submit it to the DNR area office. If the contractor fills out the application, it must still be signed by the District Administrator. Permit application forms are available from DNR. Locations and addresses are shown on Figure 240-3. (b) Permit Procedures. The types of Forest Practices for the determination of permit application and notifica- tion requirements are divided into four classes: • Class I Forest Practice operations are those with no direct potential for damaging a public resource. Class I requires no application or noti- fication but does require compliance with all other Forest Practice Regulations. • Class II Forest Practice operations are those that are determined to have a less than ordinary potential to damage a public resource. Class II requires a notification to DNR. Operations may begin five calendar days after the notification is sent. • Class III Forest Practice operations are those that are not listed under Classes I, II or IV. Class III requires an application that must be approved or disapproved within fourteen calendar days of receipt by DNR. • Class IV Forest Practice operations are those that are determined to have potential for a substantial impact on the environment. Class IV Forest Practices are divided into two groups; Class IV Special and Class IV General. Each requires an application to DNR that is approved or disap- proved within thirty calendar days. Class IV Special requires an additional evaluation by DNR to determine whether a detailed environ- mental impact statement is necessary. Additional time is generally required when a detailed environmental impact statement is necessary. 240.12 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES (1) General When WSDOT has need to store explosives, the district obtains a storage license from the State Department of Labor and Industries (L&I). (2) License The district files an “Application for License to Operate a Storage Magazine for Explosives.” The application is available through any office of L&I and must be submit- ted with detailed plans of the storage facility showing itsˇdistance from inhabited buildings, public highways, and other facilities. The approximate quantity, in pounds, of stored material or storage capacity should also be identified. (3) Procedures The district completes the application and sends it to the Olympia Office of L&I. The district also takes the lead in coordinating with any other agency that may be involved to secure approval of the storage facilities. If the stored material involves projectiles or military explosives, the facility plan must be coordinated with and reviewed by the U.S. Department of Defense. Concurrence to store explosives must also be obtained from the property owner where the facility is on lands that WSDOT does not own, such as U.S. Forest Service Land, DNR land, etc. 240.13 LOCAL AGENCIES (1) General Many local agencies have miscellaneous use permits and regulations that they have instituted to maintain orderly growth and development. WSDOT complies with per- mits, approvals, or licenses delegated to the local agency by the state, such as building, air pollution, and shorelines permits. The Department of Transportation, as a state agency, is not legally obligated and will not obtain permits and approvals enacted at local discretion. However, in main- taining a working relationship with local agencies, the district coordinates project development activities with the local agencies, seeking to obtain their views, comments, and input. (2) Change of Grade Permit Whenever WSDOT construction entails a change in street grades in an incorporated city or town, the state is obli- gated by law to present the plans of new grades to the city or town for adoption by ordinance. To eliminate project delays, the district should send plans to the local agency for approval during the design report stage. On limited access facilities, no grade approval is usually required for the highway itself. However, plans must be submitted to any incorporated city or town for grade approval for connecting streets, frontage roads, streets outside the limited access, and streets or connections within interchange areas, including any roadway passing over or under the facility but having no connection to it. (3) Shoreline Substantial Development Permit (a) General. Local governments, delegated the authority by DOE, issue a Shorelines Permit for projects that involve substantial development on waters of the state or shorelines of the state. Shorelines of the state Design Manual 240-9 September 1990 include the water areas of the state and their associ- ated wetlands, including lands within 200 feet of the high-water mark and associated marshes, bogs, swamps, floodways, river deltas, and flood plains. Streams with a mean annual flow of less than 20 cfs or lakes smaller than 20 acres (including the adjacent wetlands) are exempt. Substantial development means any development of which the total cost, or fair market value, exceeds $2500; or, any develop- ment that materially interferes with normal public use of the water or shorelines of the state. DOE has maps showing areas affected by the Shoreline Development Permit. A Conditional Use Permit or Variance (RCW 36.70, “Planning Enabling Act”) is required when the proj- ect or an element of the project does not conform to the Shoreline Master Plan. For this permit, DOE makes the decision whether to approve or deny the permit based on the local agency’s recommendation. (b) Process. The district applies for a Shoreline Substan- tial Development permit from the local agency when sufficient design information is available. The local agency will schedule a hearing on the application to solicit any comments. When responses to comments are satisfied and the local agency receives WSDOT’s final environmental document, the local agency then takes action on the shorelines permit. If the permit is denied, WSDOT may appeal to the Shorelines Hear- ings Board. Construction in the shoreline area cannot begin until 30 days after the permit has been approved. 240.14 UTILITY AGREEMENTS To complete projects to the contract stage, it is frequently necessary to enter into agreements with numerous other entities. Most frequently used are Utility Agreements, Detour and Haul Road Agreements, and Railroad Agree- ments. The initiation of these agreements is done by the district Utilities Section. Further information is available in the Utilities Manual, M 22-87. V:DM2 240-10 Design Manual September 1990 Permits and Approvals Permit Who Approval Grantor Conditions Requiring When To Initiate Applies References Section 10 Army Corps of Engineers Obstruction, alteration, or improvement Early stages of project District Rivers and Harbors of any navigable water (rechanneling, development Act — 1899 piers, wharfs, dolphins, bulkheads, 33 USC 401 S 10 buoys ) Section 404 Army Corps of Engineers Discharging, dredging, or placing fill Early stages of project District Sec. 404 FWPCA material within waters of the USA or development 1972 adjacent wetlands 33 USC 1344 Coast Guard Coast Guard Bridges and causeways in navigable After design HQ Bridge Rivers and Harbors Section 9 waters, including all tidal influenced Division Act — 1899 streams 33 USC S 9 FAA Airport/ FAA Airspace intrusion of highway facility During design/prior District FHPM 6-1-1-2 Highway (proposed construction in the vicinity to work FAA Regs. P.77 Clearance of public use/military airports may require FAA notice) Restricted FERC Utilize land from a FERC licensed During preparation District 18 CFR Part 2.13 Hydro-Electric project of environmental Land document Fish & Wildlife USFWS Consultation required when any waters During preparation District FWCA S 2 Coordination are proposed to be modified or con- of environmental 33 USC 66., 662 trolled document Wetlands USFWS Impact to lowlands covered with During preparation District 49 USC 1651 Report shallow and sometimes temporary/ of environmental requests EO 11990 (Protection intermittent waters (swamps, marshes, document HQ of Wetlands) bogs, sloughs, potholes ) Endangered/ USFWS/NMFS Plant or animal species that are During preparation District 16 USC 1531-1543 Threatened suspected to be, or actually are, of of environmental requests Species the endangered or threatened status document HQ Prime & Soil Conservation Service Lands impacted are of prime or unique During preparation District 7 CFR 650 Unique status of environmental Farmland document 4(f) FHWA and Affected Agency Use of park and recreation lands, During preparation District 49 USC 1651 (f) wildlife and waterfowl refuges, and of environmental DOT Act of 1966 S 4 historic sites of national, state, or local document (Amended 5/19/78) significance FHPM 7-7-2(20) 23 CFR 138 Historic OAHP Suspected/actual historic/archaeologi- During preparation District to RCW 43.51.750 Section 106 cal properties impacted by project of environmental HQ 36 CFR 800 document 16 USC 470 Historic Preservation ActS106 Sole Source EPA Any activity which may affect the During preparation District SDWA Aquifer aquifer recharge zone of environmental P.L. 93-523 document Hydraulic Dept. of Fisheries and Projects that will use, divert, obstruct, After/during preparation District RCW 75.20.100 Dept. of Wildlife or change the natural flow or bed of of environmental any state waters (culvert work, realign- document ment, bridge replacement, etc.) Water Quality DOE Prior to issuance of a federal permit/ During project DOE FWPCA S 401 Certification license for activity which involves development issues w/o RCW 90.48.260 discharge into navigable waters, requests WAC 173-225 certification of compliance with state water quality standards is necessary Floodplains DOE/Counties Any structure/activity which may After/during preparation District State-Flood Control adversely affect the flood regime of environmental Zone Act of 1935 of stream within the flood zone document Federal-EO 11988 (Flood plain Mgmt.) Figure 240-1a Design Manual 240-11 September 1990 Permit Who Approval Grantor Conditions Requiring When To Initiate Applies References CZMA DOE Applicants for federal permit/license When applying for permit District CZMA Sec. 307 are required to certify that the activity 16 USC 145 will comply with the state’s Coastal RCW 90.58 Zone Management program (Shoreline Management Act) NPDES DOE Discharge of pollutants into state During design District WAC 173-220 surface waters FWPCA S 402 33 USC 1344 RCW 90.48.260 State Waste DOE Discharge of waste material from sand During design District RCW 90.48.160 Disposal and gravel washing, pit dewatering, or WAC 173-220 (Discharge) cement/asphalt plant discharge into state waters Short-Term DOE Short-term activities which may result During design District WAC 173-201-035(8)(e) Modification (Regional) in temporary reduction of water quality WAC 173-201-035(5)(a) standards and activities not subject to WAC 173-102-100(2) a waste discharge permit or water quality certification Water Rights DOE Appropriation of ground water or Prior to putting water to District or RCW 90.44 Appropriation surface water use Contractor RCW 90.03.250 Forest Practices DNR Public/private land capable of sup- Environmental document Contractor WAC 222 Approval (Area Offices) porting merchantable timber — some phase/prior to activities — road construction, pits, commencing pesticide use, hydraulic permits, shoreline permits, reforestation, etc. Operating DNR Surface mining (pit and quarry sites) — After approval of the HQ RCW 78.44 Permit for more than 3 acres disturbed at one ultimate reclamation plan Surface Mining time or pit walls are more than 30 feet high and steeper than 1:1 Shoreline Counties/Cities Shoreline development or construction During preparation of District RCW 90.58 Management DOE valued at $2,500 or more, or materially environmental document RCW 36.70 interfering with normal public use of water. Development within 200 feet of water must be consistent with the local Shoreline Master Plan. Temporary Air Local Air Pollution Pollutants above allowed levels for Prior to work commencing Contractor RCW 70.94 Pollution Control Authority/DOE temporary periods New Source DOE Air pollution from point source (asphalt Prior to work commencing Contractor RCW 70.94.152 Construction plants, rock crushers, etc.) Building County/City Construction of any building — value Prior to work commencing Contractor RCW 36.21.080 of materials over $500 Sewage DOE/DSHS/County Construction/modification of domestic/ Prior to work commencing District/ RCW 90.48.110 Facilities industrial wastewater facilities (sewer Contractor WAC 173-240 relocation, rest area construction ) DOE: greater than 14,500 gpd, surface water discharge, or a mechanical treatment process involvement. DSHS: 3.500 gpd to 14,500 gpd. County: less than 3,500 gpd. CFR — Code of Federal Regulations NMFS — National Marine Fisheries Service (Dept. of Commerce) CZMA — Coastal Zone Management Act NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System DNR — Department of Natural Resources OAHP — Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation DOE — Department of Ecology RCW — Revised Code of Washington EO — Executive Order SDWA — Safe Drinking Water Act EPA — Environmental Protection Agency USFWA — U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service (Dept. of Interior) FERC — Federal Energy Regulatory Commission WAC — Washington Administration Code FHWA — Federal Highway Administration FWCA — Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act FWPCA — Federal Water Pollution Control Act Figure 240-1a V:DM2 240-12 Design Manual September 1990 FAA NOTICE REQUIREMENT RELATED TO HIGHWAYS Figure 240-2 Design Manual 240-13 June 1989 DNR AREA MANAGEMENT UNITS Figure 240-3 240-14 Design Manual June 1989 Design Manual Value Engineering August 1998 Page 315-1 315 Value Engineering function, generate alternatives through the use of creative thinking, and provide the needed func- tions to accomplish the original purpose; thus assuring the lowest life cycle cost without sacri- ficing safety, necessary quality, or environmental attributes. Value Engineering is sometimes referred to as Value Analysis (VA) or Value Management (VM). Project The portion of a transportation facility that WSDOT proposes to construct, reconstruct, or improve as described in the State Highway System Plan or applicable environmental docu- ments. A project may consist of several contracts or phases over several years that are studied together as one project. 315.04Procedure The VE process uses the Eight-Phase Job Plan inFigure 315-1. Only the phases 1 and 7 are discussed in this chapter. A detailed discussion of phases 2 through 6 is in the VE training manual entitled Introduction To Value Engineering Principles and Practices. (1) Selection Phase (a)Project Selection Projects for VE studies may be selected from anyof the categories identified in the Highway Construction Program including, Preservation orImprovement projects, depending on the size and/or complexity of the project. In addition to the cost, other issues adding to the complexity of the project design are considered in the selection process. These complexities include: critical constraints, difficult technical issues, expensive solutions, external influences, and complicated functional requirements. A VE study is required for any federally funded NHS project with an estimated cost of $25 million or more (CFR 23 Part 627). Other types of projects that usually provide the highest potential for value improvement have a prelimi- nary estimate exceeding $2 million and include one or more of the following: 315.01 General 315.02 References 315.03 Definitions 315.04 Procedure 315.05 Documentation 315.01General Value Engineering is a systematic process designed to focus on the major issues of a com- plex project or process. It uses a multidisciplined team to develop recommendations for the impor- tant decisions that must be made. The primary objective of a Value Engineering study is Value Improvement. For projects, the value improvements might be improvements in scope definition, functional design, constructibility, coordination (both internal and external), or the schedule for project development. Other possible value improvements are reduced environmental impact, reduced public (traffic) inconvenience, or reduced project cost. The Value Engineering process incorpo- rates, to the extent possible, the values of the design engineer, construction engineer, mainte- nance engineer, contractor, state and federal approval agencies, local agencies, other stake- holders, and the public. Important design decisions are formulated from the recommen- dations of the Value Engineering team. 315.02References CFR 23 Part 627 Value Engineering Value Engineering for Highways, Study Workbook, U. S. Department of Transportation, FHWA Introduction To Value Engineering Principles and Practices, Transportation Partnership in Engineering Education Development (TRANSPEED), University of Washington. 315.03Definitions Value Engineering (VE) A systematic application of recognized techniques by a multidisiplined team to identify the function of aproduct or service, establish a worth for that Value Engineering Design Manual Page 315-2 August 1998 • Projects with alternative solutions that vary the scope and cost • New alignment or bypass sections • Capacity improvements that widen an existing highway • Major structures • Interchanges on multilane facilities • Projects with extensive or expensive environmental or geotechnical requirements • Materials that are difficult to acquire or require special efforts • Inferior materials sources • Major reconstruction • Projects requiring major traffic control • Projects with multiple stages (b) Statewide VE Study Plan On a biennial basis, the state VE manager coordi- nates with the region VE coordinators to prepare the two-Year VE Study Plan with specific projects scheduled by quarter. The VE Study Plan is the basis for determining the projected VE program needs including team members, team leaders, and training. The Statewide VE Study Plan is a working document and close coordination is necessary between the Olympia Service Center (OSC) and the regions to keep it current. The regional VE coordinator: • Identifies potential projects for VE studies from the Project Summaries and the available planning documents for future work. • Makes recommendations for the VE study timing • Presents a list of the identified projects to regional management to prioritize into a regional Two-Year VE Study Plan. (VE studies other than projects are also included in the plan.) The State Design Engineer: • Reviews the regional Two-Year VE Study Plan regarding the content and schedule of the plan. The state VE Manager: • Incorporates the regional Two-Year VE Study Plans and the OSC Study Plans to create the Statewide VE Study Plan. (c) VE Study Timing Selecting the project at the appropriate stage of development (the timing of the study) is very important to the success of the VE program. Value can be added by performing a VE study any time during project development; however, the WSDOT VE program identifies three win- dows of opportunity for performing a VE study. 1. Problem Definition Stage As soon as preliminary engineering informa- tion is available and the specific deficiencies or “drivers” are identified, the project scope and preliminary cost are under consideration. This is the best time to consider the various alternatives or design solutions and there is the highest potential that the related recom- mendations of the VE team can be implemented. At the conclusion of the VE study, the project scope, preliminary cost, and major design decisions can be based on the recommendations. When conducting a study in the problem definition stage, the VE study focuses on issues affecting project “drivers.” This stage often provides an opportunity for building consensus with stakeholders. 2. Conceptual Design Stage At the conceptual design stage, the project scope and preliminary cost have already been established and the major design decisions have been made. Some PS&E activities might have begun and coordination has been initiated with the various service units that will be involved with the design. At this stage, the established project scope, prelimi- nary cost, and schedule will define the limits of the VE study. There is still opportunity for a VE study to focus on the technical issues for each of the specific design elements. [...]... 3. 40 27.28 15.19 95.99 0.60 37 .16 34 .87 9.89 2.90 0 .38 10.55 4 .34 8. 73 3.51 13. 52 5.25 1.84 270.26 12. 13 30 .32 10 .33 0.94 5.96 3. 83 7.56 8.09 29. 83 3.20 12.06 3. 35 4.72 3. 81 1.14 12. 83 24.68 5.20 5.14 30 .49 4.52 2.20 15.16 1.09 8.02 1.50 10 .31 0.10 End ARM 3. 38 28.60 15.19 93. 37 0.54 10.57 33 .10 9.89 0. 23 0 .38 10.55 1.69 8.89 3. 24 13. 50 5.25 1.84 275.09 12. 13 30 .30 10 .32 0.94 5.96 3. 42 7.58 8.09 33 .11... 101.02 101.05 29.19 29. 13 50.89 0.00 27.91 59.54 55.67 4.00 133 . 53 133 .51 29.77 132 .60 299.82 9.44 0.52 61.44 33 6.48 2.68 2 13. 62 32 6.64 0.87 0. 63 1. 53 59.81 62.27 276.62 20.67 98.08 0.24 21.28 430 .76 0 .35 100. 93 0 .39 27.01 0 .39 43. 40 0. 53 28.41 59.49 7.78 3. 31 133 .61 0.07 33 .91 132 .57 297.52 7.45 0.52 61 .30 32 1.62 0.09 0.26 18 .35 26.04 0.00 28.89 87.49 249.65 0.20 0.00 0.00 6.09 0. 03 0.00 14.70 22.40 0.00... design level applies See Chapter 820 (11) See Chapter 1120 (12) Impact attenuators are considered as terminals (16) For design elements not in the matrix headings, apply full design level as found in the applicable Design Manual chapters Design Matrix 5 Non-Interstate Interchange Areas Figure 32 5-8 l Design Documentation, Approval, and Process Review 33 0 33 0.01 33 0.02 33 0. 03 330 .04 33 0.05 33 0.06 33 0.07... I-90 SR 281 Spur SR 281 to I-90 SR 30 3 SR 3 to SR 30 4 SR 30 4 SR 16 to Bremerton Ferry SR 30 5 SR 3 to Winslow Ferry SR 30 7 SR 30 5 to SR 104 SR 31 0 SR 3 to SR 30 4 US 39 5 Congressional High Priority Route SR 401 SR 101 to SR 4 I-405 I-5 to I-5 SR 432 SR 4 to I-5 SR 433 Oregon State Line to SR 432 SR 500 I-5 to SR 5 03 SR 501 I-5 to Port of Vancouver SR 502 I-5 to SR 5 03 SR 5 03 SR 500 to SR 502 SR 509 SR 99... 0.00 93. 61 98.00 19. 93 0.00 0 .33 0.00 100.66 0.00 28.74 7. 43 2.20B 0.00 0.00 47.89 0.70 0.00 133 .44 0.00B 0.00 1.94 1.99 0.00 0.00B 133 .90 2.59 2 13. 36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93. 52 0.00 19. 93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0. 53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 118.80 0.00 0.00 33 4.51 1.64 288.08 290.72 60.02 62.28 276.56 20.67 98.17 98.25 21.28 434 .19... project ** If field trip is not possible, provide video of project VE Study Team Tools Figure 31 5 -3 Design Manual August 1998 Value Engineering Page 31 5-7 32 5 32 5.01 32 5.02 32 5. 03 325.04 32 5.05 32 5.06 Design Matrix Procedures General Terminology Design Matrix Procedures Selecting a Design Matrix Project Type Using a Design Matrix replacement; joint and shoulder repair; and bridge work such as crack sealing,... 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.77 43. 60 0.46 36 7.41 91.66 251 .32 29.67 30 .25 6.09 6.76 27.05 2 .30 15.12 39 .84 0.46 36 5.78 4.17 1.67 29.14 30 .29 6.08 0.67 27.05 2 .30 NHS Highways in Washington Figure 32 5-2a Design Matrix Procedures Page 32 5-6 Metric Version Design Manual May 2001 State Route NHS Route Designation SR 166 Naval Fuel Depot SR 167 I-5 to I-405 I-182 I-82 to US 39 5 US 195 Idaho State Line to... Approvals, Design Figure 33 0-3a Design Manual May 2001 Design Documentation, Approval, and Process Review Metric Version Page 33 0-9 Notes: X Normal procedure [2] Refer to Figure 33 0-1 for design approval level [3] Applies to new/reconstruction projects on Interstate routes [4] OSC Program Management [5] Submit to OSC Materials Branch for review and approval [6] Approved by Regional Administrator [7] See M 23- 03, ... Preservation Roadway (3- 1) Non-Interstate Freeway (3- 2) ACP/PCCP/BST Overlays (3- 3) Repl ACP w/ PCCP at I/S Structures (3- 4) Bridge Replacement (3- 5) Bridge Deck Rehab DE/F B B B F B B B F B B B B Improvements (16) Metric Version Mobility (3- 6) Non-Interstate Freeway F (3- 7) Urban F (2) (3- 8) Rural F (2) (3- 9) HOV F (2) (3- 10) Bike/Ped Connectivity (5) Safety (3- 11) Non-Interstate Freeway F (3- 12) All Others... 30 .30 10 .32 0.94 5.96 3. 42 7.58 8.09 33 .11 4.42 12.06 3. 35 4.99 3. 42 1.14 12.82 24.68 5 .32 0.50 30 .72 4.52 2.20 15.16 1.09 8.02 1.50 10 .31 0.10 NHS Highways in Washington (continued) Figure 32 5-2b Design Manual May 2001 Metric Version Design Matrix Procedures Page 32 5-7 Highway Capital Preservation Program P Preservation P1 Roadway P2 Structures P3 Other Facilities Paving Preservation Rest Areas Unstable . I-90 2.65 0.00 4 .34 1.69 SR 30 3 SR 3 to SR 30 4 0.00B 0.00 8. 73 8.89 SR 30 4 SR 16 to Bremerton Ferry 0.00 0.00 3. 51 3. 24 SR 30 5 SR 3 to Winslow Ferry 0.02 0.00 13. 52 13. 50 SR 30 7 SR 30 5 to SR 104. 4.00 3. 31 SR 26 I-90 to US 195 0.00 0.00 133 . 53 133 .61 SR 26 Spur SR 26 to US 195 133 .44 0.00 133 .51 0.07 SR 28 SR 2 to SR 281 0.00B 0.00 29.77 33 .91 I-82 I-90 to Oregon State Line 0.00 0.00 132 .60. 5.25 SR 31 0 SR 3 to SR 30 4 0.00 0.00 1.84 1.84 US 39 5 Congressional High Priority Route 13. 05 13. 05 270.26 275.09 SR 401 SR 101 to SR 4 0.00 0.00 12. 13 12. 13 I-405 I-5 to I-5 0.00 0.00 30 .32 30 .30 SR