what went wrong western impact and middle eastern response dec 2001

192 178 0
what went wrong western impact and middle eastern response dec 2001

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

What Went Wrong? W hat W ent W rong? Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response Bernard Lewis 2002 Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogotá Buenos Aires Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kolkata Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris São Paulo Shanghai Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Copyright © 2002 by Bernard Lewis Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lewis, Bernard. What went wrong? : western impact and Middle Eastern response / Bernard Lewis. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-19-514420-1 1. Middle East—History—1517- I. Title. DS62.4 .L488 2000 956´.015—dc21 2001036214 Printing (last digit): 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Preface vii Introduction 3 Chapter 1 The Lessons of the Battlefield 18 Chapter 2 The Quest for Wealth and Power 35 Chapter 3 Social and Cultural Barriers 64 Chapter 4 Modernization and Social Equality 82 Chapter 5 Secularism and the Civil Society 96 Chapter 6 Time, Space, and Modernity 117 Chapter 7 Aspects of Cultural Change 133 Conclusion 151 Afterword 161 Notes 163 Index 173 Contents Preface This book was already in page proof when the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington took place on September 11, 2001. It does not therefore deal with them, nor with their immediate causes and after-effects. It is however related to these attacks, examining not what happened and what followed, but what went before—the larger sequence and larger pattern of events, ideas, and attitudes that pre- ceded and in some measure produced them. B.L. Princeton, N.J. October 15, 2001 What Went Wrong? WHAT WENT WRONG? 2 [...]... from the Middle East as coffee and sugar, and to export them to their former suppliers The growing European presence in South and Southeast Asia accelerated and expanded this process, and old-established handicrafts faced the double challenge of Asian cheap labor and European commercial skills The Western trading company, helped by its business-minded government, represented 15 WHAT WENT WRONG? a new... remained In the seventeenth century, there was still Turkish pashas ruling in Budapest and Belgrade, and Barbary Corsairs from North Africa were raiding the coasts of England and Ireland and even, 11 WHAT WENT WRONG? in 1627, Iceland, bringing back human booty for sale in the slavemarkets of Algiers In the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries Persia once again became a factor of importance in... embassies in Istanbul, those of Britain and of the Netherlands The Ottomans at first were unwilling to accept what they regarded as Christian interference, but they soon learned to recognize and make use of such help The Western maritime and commercial states had no interest in the consolidation and extension of Austrian power and influence in Central and Eastern Europe, and thought it would be more to their... be some delay before 7 WHAT WENT WRONG? the lesson is understood and applied In Christendom the final defeat of the Moors in Spain in 1492 and the liberation of Russia from the rule of the Islamized Tatars were understandably seen as decisive victories Like the Spaniards and Portuguese, the Russians too pursued their former masters into their homelands, but with far greater and more enduring success... unaware of Western skills in weaponry and warfare The initial successes of the Crusaders in the Levant impressed upon Muslim war departments that in some areas at least Western arms were superior, and the inference was quickly drawn and applied Western prisoners 12 INTRODUCTION of war were set to work building fortifications; Western mercenaries and adventurers were employed, and a traffic in arms and other... appointed grand vizier During his term of office (1656–1661) and that of his son and successor Ahmed Köprülü (1661–1678) the Ottoman state underwent a remarkable transformation These skilled, energetic, and ruthless rulers were able to reorganize the armed forces of the Empire, stabilize its finances, and resume the struggle in Christian Europe An area of intensive activity was Poland and the Ukraine, and. .. Ottoman state to the time of the Crusades What was new was for the Ottomans to seek European help in training and equipping their forces, and to form alliances with European powers against other European powers 19 WHAT WENT WRONG? In the first half of the eighteenth century, the struggle was indecisive, and even brought some gains for the Ottomans In 1710 and 1711 they won a significant victory over... both the civilian and the military services of the state, and proposed reforms to deal with them.6 The basic fault, according to most of these memoranda, was falling away from the good old ways, Islamic and Ottoman; the basic remedy was a return to them This diagnosis and prescription still command wide acceptance in the Middle East But these memoranda were relatively calm in tone and primarily domestic... Islam, in search of merchandise or knowledge The lands and peoples beyond the northwestern frontier of Islam had little to offer of either, and such travel was in fact actively discouraged by the doctors of the Holy Law Western captives in the East who escaped or were ransomed and returned home produced a considerable literature telling of their adventures, of the lands they had seen and the people they... shattering defeat outside Vienna, the devastating loss of lives, stores, and equipment, and of course the cession of territory The lesson was clear, and the Turks set to work to learn and apply it 17 WHAT WENT WRONG? 1 The Lessons of the Battlefield The Treaty of Carlowitz has a special importance in the history of the Ottoman Empire, and even, more broadly, in the history of the Islamic world, as the first . Data Lewis, Bernard. What went wrong? : western impact and Middle Eastern response / Bernard Lewis. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-19-514420-1 1. Middle East—History—1517-. N.J. October 15, 2001 What Went Wrong? WHAT WENT WRONG? 2 INTRODUCTION 3 Introduction What went wrong? For a long time people in the Islamic world, es- pecially but not exclusively in the Middle East,. What Went Wrong? W hat W ent W rong? Western Impact and Middle Eastern Response Bernard Lewis 2002 Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogotá Buenos Aires Cape

Ngày đăng: 11/06/2014, 01:29

Từ khóa liên quan

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

Tài liệu liên quan