The Future of Justification: A Response to N. T. Wright pptx

240 1.1K 0
The Future of Justification: A Response to N. T. Wright pptx

Đang tải... (xem toàn văn)

Tài liệu hạn chế xem trước, để xem đầy đủ mời bạn chọn Tải xuống

Thông tin tài liệu

G;89HGHE8 \S =HFG<9<64G<BA =B;AC<C8E .?R`]\[`Ra\;AD_VTUa j FutureJustification.49645.i04.indd 1 9/26/07 1:51:59 PM God’s Passion for His Glory The Pleasures of God Desiring God The Dangerous Duty of Delight Future Grace A Hunger for God Let the Nations Be Glad! A Godward Life Pierced by the Word Seeing and Savoring Jesus Christ The Legacy of Sovereign Joy The Hidden Smile of God The Roots of Endurance The Misery of Job and the Mercy of God The Innkeeper The Prodigal’s Sister Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood What’s the Difference? The Justification of God Counted Righteous in Christ Brothers, We Are Not Professionals The Supremacy of God in Preaching Beyond the Bounds Don’t Waste Your Life The Passion of Jesus Christ Life as a Vapor A God-Entranced Vision of All Things When I Don’t Desire God Sex and the Supremacy of Christ Taste and See Fifty Reasons Why Jesus Came to Die God Is the Gospel Contending for Our All What Jesus Demands from the World Amazing Grace in the Life of William Wilberforce Battling Unbelief Suffering and the Sovereignty of God (with Justin Taylor) 50 Crucial Questions When the Darkness Will Not Lift Bo o k s B y Jo h n Pi P e r FutureJustification.49645.i04.indd 2 9/26/07 1:51:59 PM CROSSWAY BOOKS WHEATON, ILLINOIS G;89HGHE8 \S =HFG<9<64G<BA =B;AC<C 8E .?R`]\[`Ra\;AD_VTUa j FutureJustification.49645.i04.indd 3 9/26/07 1:51:59 PM The Future of Justification Copyright © 2007 by Desiring God Foundation Published by Crossway Books a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers 1300 Crescent Street Wheaton, Illinois 60187 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher, except as pro- vided by USA copyright law. Italics in biblical quotations indicate emphasis added. Cover design: Josh Dennis Cover photo: Bridgeman Art Library First printing, 2007 Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are from The Holy Bible, English Standard Version, ® copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Scripture quotations marked nasb are from The New American Standard Bible. ® Copyright © The Lockman Foundation 1960, 1962, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995. Used by permission. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Piper, John, 1946– The Future of Justification : a response to N.T. Wright / John Piper. p. cm. Includes index. ISBN 978-1-58134-964-1 (tpb) 1. Justification (Christian theology)—History of doctrines—20th century. 2. Wright, N. T. (Nicholas Thomas) II. Title. BT764.3.P57 2007 234'.7—dc22 2007029481 BP 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 08 07 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 FutureJustification.49645.i04.indd 4 9/26/07 1:52:00 PM In memory of my father  who preached the gospel of Jesus Christ for seventy years FutureJustification.49645.i04.indd 5 9/26/07 1:52:00 PM FutureJustification.49645.i04.indd 6 9/26/07 1:52:00 PM  Acknowledgments 9 Introduction 13 On Controversy 27  Caution: Not All Biblical-Theological Methods and Categories 33 Are Illuminating  The Relationship between Covenant and Law-Court Imagery 39 for Justication  The Law-Court Dynamics of Justication and the Meaning of 57 God’s Righteousness  The Law-Court Dynamics of Justication and the Necessity of 73 Real Moral Righteousness  Justication and the Gospel: When Is the Lordship of Jesus 81 Good News?  Justication and the Gospel: Does Justication Determine Our 93 Standing with God?  The Place of Our Works in Justication 103  Does Wright Say with Different Words What the Reformed 117 Tradition Means by “Imputed Righteousness”?  Paul’s Structural Continuity with Second-Temple Judaism? 133  The Implications for Justication of the Single Self-Righteous 145 Root of “Ethnic Badges” and “Self-Help Moralism”  “That in Him We Might Become the Righteousness of God” 163 FutureJustification.49645.i04.indd 7 9/26/07 1:52:00 PM  181  189  What Does It Mean That Israel Did Not “Attain the Law” 191 Because She Pursued It “Not by Faith But as though It Were by Works”? Thoughts on Romans 9:30–10:4  Thoughts on Law and Faith in Galatians 3 197  Thoughts on Galatians 5:6 and the Relationship between 203 Faith and Love  Using the Law Lawfully: Thoughts on 1 Timothy 1:5–11 207  Does the Doctrine of the Imputation of Christ’s Righteousness 211 Imply That the Cross Is Insufcient for Our Right Standing with God?  Twelve Theses on What It Means to Fulll the Law: 215 With Special Reference to Romans 8:4 Works of N. T. Wright Cited in This Book 227 Scripture Index 229 Person Index 235 Subject Index 237 A Note on Resources: Desiring God 240 FutureJustification.49645.i04.indd 8 9/26/07 1:52:00 PM  This is the year (2007) that my father died. Who can estimate the debt we owe our fathers? Bill Piper preached the gospel of grace for over seventy years, if you count the songs and testimonies at the nursing home. He was an evangelist—the old southern, independent, fundamentalist sort, without the attitude. He remains in my memory the happiest man I ever knew. In the last chapter of his ministry one of his favorite and most fruitful sermons was titled “Grace for the Guilty.” As I read it even today I realize again why, under God, my father must be acknowledged first at the beginning of this book. That great sermon comes toward its end with these simple words, “God clothes you with his righteous- ness when you believe, giving you a garment that makes you fit for heaven.” We all knew what he meant. He was a lover of the great, deep, power-laden old truths. He wielded them in the might of the Spirit to see thousands—I dare say tens of thousands—of people profoundly converted. For my father, the gospel of Christ included the news that there is a righteousness—a perfect obedience of Jesus Christ—that is offered freely to all through faith alone. And when faith is given, that righteousness is imputed to the believer once and for all. Together with the sin-forgiving blood of Jesus, this is our hope. From the moment we believed until the last day of eternity God is 100 percent for us on this basis alone—the sin-bearing punishment of Christ, and the righteousness-providing obedience of Christ. This my father preached and sang, and I believed with joy. O let the dead now hear Thy voice; Now bid Thy banished ones rejoice; Their beauty this, their glorious dress, Jesus, Thy blood and righteousness. 1 1 John Wesley, “Jesu, Thy Blood and Righteousness.” FutureJustification.49645.i04.indd 9 9/26/07 1:52:00 PM This book took its origin from the countless conversations and e-mails with those who are losing their grip on this great gospel. This has proved to be a tremendous burden for my soul over the past ten years. But I thank God for it. And I acknowledge him for any clar- ity and faith and worship and obedience that might flow from this effort. The book began to take shape while I was on sabbatical in the spring and summer of 2006 at Tyndale House in Cambridge, England. This is a very fruitful place to study, write, and interact with thoughtful scholars. The book was put in its final form during a month-long writ- ing leave in May, 2007. Without the support of the Council of Elders of Bethlehem Baptist Church I could not have done this work. I am writing these acknowledgments on the first day of my twenty-eighth year as pastor of Bethlehem, and my heart is full of thanks for a people that love the great truths of the gospel and commission me to study and write and preach these truths. Also indispensable were my assistants David Mathis and Nathan Miller. Reading the manuscript repeatedly, and making suggestions, and finding resources, and tracking down citations, and certifying references, and lifting dozens of practical burdens from my shoulders, they made this work possible. More than any other book that I have written, this one was cri- tiqued in the process by very serious scholars. I received detailed critical feedback to the first draft from Michael Bird, Ardel Caneday, Andrew Cowan, James Hamilton, Burk Parsons, Matt Perman, Joseph Rigney, Thomas Schreiner, Justin Taylor, Brian Vickers, and Doug Wilson. Most significant of all was the feedback I received from N. T. Wright. He wrote an 11,000-word response to my first draft that was very help- ful in clarifying issues and (I hope) preventing distortions. The book is twice the size it was before all of that criticism arrived. If it is not a better book now, it is my fault, not theirs. Thanks again to Carol Steinbach and her team for providing the indexes. The only other person who has touched more of my books more closely than Carol is my wife, Noël. Nothing of this nature would happen without her support. As usual it has been a deeply satisfying partnership to work 10   FutureJustification.49645.i04.indd 10 9/26/07 1:52:01 PM [...]... would add: the clearer the knowledge of the truth and the more deep the denial, the less assurance one can have that the God of truth will save him Owen’s words are not meant to make us cavalier about the content of the gospel, but to hold out hope that men’s hearts are often better than their heads John Owen, The Doctrine of Justification by Faith, chapter VII, “Imputation, and the Nature of It,” Banner... methods and categories of thought taken from historical and systematic theology may control and distort the way one reads the Bible But we don’t hear as often the caution that the methods and categories of biblical theology can do the same Neither systematic nor biblical theology must distort our exegesis But both can For example, suppose one took the category of “eschatology” from a traditional systematic... one way to say it Many people have been saved without hearing the language of justification The same is true with regard to the words and realities of “regeneration” and “propitiation” and “redemption” and “reconciliation” and “forgiveness.” A baby believer does not have to understand all of the glorious things that have happened to him in order to be saved But these things do all have to happen to him... PM 34 The Future of Justification Biblical theology, as over against systematic theology, is sometimes acclaimed as the discipline that has set us free from these possible distortions of systematic theology Biblical theology aims to read the authors of Scripture along the trajectory of redemptive history in light of the authors’ own categories that are shaped by the historical milieu in which they lived... I am quite capable of fear and pride But I do hope that, where I have made mistakes, I will be willing to admit it There are far greater things at stake than my fickle sense of gratification or regret Among these greater things are the faithful preaching of the gospel, the care of guilt-ridden souls, the spiritual power of sacrificial deeds of love, the root of humble Christian political and social... is an essential part of responsible exegesis and theology Those who submit their minds to the authority of Scripture, as N T Wright readily confesses that he does,2 will want to understand what the authors originally intended to say— not what they can be made to say by later reinterpretation A Not-So-Common Caution But, as far as I can see in these days, a similar caution about the possible distorting... writers themselves But it seems to me that there is a prima facie case for thinking that our interpretations of extra-biblical literature are more tenuous than our interpretations of the New Testament In general, 2“Out of sheer loyalty to the God-given text, particularly of Romans, I couldn’t go back to a Lutheran reading (Please note, my bottom line has always been, and remains, not a theory, not a tradition,... interpretation of Paul What Saint Paul Really Said: Was Saul of Tarsus the Real Founder of Christianity? (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997), 12–19 The same story can be told of the ever-changing interpretation of the quest for the historical Jesus For example, see the surveys in Ben Witherington III, The Jesus Quest: The Third Search for the Jew of Nazareth (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1995); Larry... that the last two hundred years of biblical scholarship is the story not just of systematic categories obscuring the biblical text, but, even more dramatically, of a steady stream of first-century ideas sweeping scholarship along and then evaporating in the light of the stubborn clarity of the biblical texts.4 Assuming Agreement with a Source When There Is No Agreement A second reason why an external... He is a remarkable blend of weighty academic scholarship, ecclesiastical leadership, ecumenical involvement, prophetic social engagement, popular Christian advocacy, musical talent, and family commitment.2 As critical as this book is of Wright s understanding of the gospel and justification, the seriousness and scope of the book is a testimony to the stature of his scholarship and the extent of his . not mean that the old reality is lost. It may or may not mean that the new way of saying things is more faithful to the apostles’ intentions. It may. my assistants David Mathis and Nathan Miller. Reading the manuscript repeatedly, and making suggestions, and finding resources, and tracking down citations,

Ngày đăng: 06/03/2014, 11:20

Từ khóa liên quan

Mục lục

  • Table of Contents

  • Acknowledgments

  • Introduction

  • On Controversy

  • 1. Caution: Not All Biblical-Theological Methods and Categories Are Illuminating

  • 2. The Relationship Between Covenant and Law-Court Imagery for Justification

  • 3. The Law-Court Dynamics of Justification and the Meaning of God's Righteousness

  • 4. The Law-Court Dynamics of Justification and the Necessity of Real Moral Righteousness

  • 5. Justification and the Gospel: When Is the Lordship of Jesus Good News?

  • 6. Justification and the Gospel: Does Justification Determine Our Standing with God?

  • 7. The Place of Our Works in Justification

  • 8. Does Wright Say with Different Words What the Reformed Tradition Means by "Imputed Righteousness"?

  • 9. Paul's Structural Continuity with Second-Temple Judaism?

  • 10. The Implications for Justification of the Single Self-Righteous Root of "Ethnic Badges" and "Self-Help Moralism"

  • 11. "That in Him We Might Become the Righteousness of God"

  • Conclusion

  • A Note on the Purpose of the Appendices

  • Appendix 1: What Does It Mean That Israel Did Not "Attain The Law" Because She Pursued It "Not By Faith But as Though It Were by Works"?

  • Appendix 2: Thoughts on Law and Faith in Galatians 3

  • Appendix 3: Thoughts on Galatians 5:6 and the Relationship Between Faith and Love

Tài liệu cùng người dùng

  • Đang cập nhật ...

Tài liệu liên quan