... TelefaxNo.DanaCarreraNo.94C4094JUdgecastilloPlaintiffsDefendant.vs.SelmaS.BUYCKS-ROBERSON,)ReneeBROOKSandCalvinROBERSON)onbehalf of themselvesand)otherssimilarlysituated,))))))))))))CITIBANKFEDERALSAVINGSBANK,IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICTCOURTFOR THE NORTHERNDISTRICT OF ILLINOISEASTERNDIVISIONSECONDAMENDEDCOMPLAINTPlaintiffsSelmaS.Buycks-Roberson,ReneeBrooksandCalvinR.Roberson,onbehalf of themselvesandotherssimilarlysituated,byandthroughtheirattorneys,make this SecondAmendedComplaintagainstDefendant,citibankFederalSavingsBank("Citibank").NATURE OF THE ACTION1. This is acivilactionbroughtbySelmaS.Buycks-Roberson,ReneeBrooksandCalvinR.Robersononbehalf of themselvesandallotherAfrican-Americanswhosehomeloanapplicationstocitibankoriginatedfrom the Chicagometropolitanareaandwhoseapplicationswererejectedbecause of theirraceorcolororbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated. This actionseeksinjunctivereliefandmonetarydamagesforviolations of 42u.S.C.§§1981and1982;42U.S.C.§3605and15U.S.C.§169l(a).JURISDICTIONANDVENUE2.Jurisdiction of this courtarisesunder28U.S.C.§1343(a)(4),42U.S.C.§3613(a)(1)(A)and15U.S.C.§1691e(f).3.Venue is properin the NorthernDistrict of Illinoissincesome of the actsandtransactionscomplained of occurredin this district. THE PARTIES4.PlaintiffSelmaS.Buycks-Roberson is anAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinBroadview,Illinois.5.PlaintiffReneeBrooks is anAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinChicago,Illinois.6.PlaintiffCalvinR.Roberson is anAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinChicago,Illinois.7.Defendantcitibank is afederalsavingsbankthatoffersresidentialmortgageloans("homeloans").CLASSACTIONSALLEGATIONS8.(a)Plaintiffsarecitibankhomeloanapplicants;theybring this actiononbehalf of themselvesandallotherAfrican-Americanhomeloanapplicantssimilarlysituated. This action is broughtasaclassactionpursuanttoRule23(b)(2)andRule23(b)(3) of the FederalRules of CivilProcedure.(b) The classconsists of allAfrican-Americanswhofiledapplicationsforhomeloanstocitibankandwererejectedonor after July6,1992becausetheyareAfrican-Americanand/or2because the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocatedwaspredominantlyAfrican-American.(c) The class is sonumerousthatjoinder of allpersons is impracticable.PlaintiffsareinformedandbelievethatmanyhomeloanapplicationstoDefendantbyAfrican-Americanswereillegallyrejected.Oninformationandbelief,Defendantrejected the homeloanapplications of manydozens of African-Americanapplicantsbecause of theirraceorcolor,and/orbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated.(d)Plaintiffswillfairlyandadequatelyprotect the interests of allclassmembers,astheyaremembers of the classandtheirclaimsaretypical of the claims of allclassmembers.Plaintiffsareincensedby the treatmenttheyhavereceivedandwillaggressivelypursuetheiraswellas the class'sinterests.Plaintiffs'interestsinobtaininginjunctivereliefandmonetarydamagesfor the violations of the above-mentionedfederalstatutesareconsistentwithandnotantagonistictothose of anypersonwithin the class.(e) The commonquestions of lawandfactinclude:(i)whetherDefendanthadapolicy,practiceorproceduretorejecthomeloanapplicationson the basis of the applicants'raceoron the basis of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated;(ii)whether the conductallegedherein is inviolation of Title42U.S.C.§§1981and1982;42U.S.C.§3605and15U.S.C.3§1691(a);and(iii)whetherPlaintiffsareentitledtoanaward of actual,compensatoryorpunitivedamages.(f) The wrongfulconductallegedhereinhasbeentakengenerallyagainstallmembers of the classinthatAfrican-Americanhomeloanapplicantshavehadtheirloanapplicationsrejectedon the basis of theirraceorcolor,orbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated,orboth,pursuantto the policies,practicesorprocedures of Defendant.(g) The commonquestions of factandlawpredominateoverquestionsaffectingonlyindividualclassmembers.(h)Aclassaction is superiortootheravailablemethodsfor the fairandefficientadjudication of the controversyinthat:(i)amUltiplicity of suitswithconsequentburdenon the courtsandDefendantshouldbeavoided;and(ii)itwouldbeundulyburdensomeforallclassmemberstointerveneasparties-plaintiffsin this action. THE FACTSMs.Buycks-Roberson9.OnoraboutApril4,1992,PlaintiffSelmaBuycks-Robersonappliedforahomeloan of approximately$43,700fromcitibank.10. The purpose of the loanwastorefinanceanexistingmortgage of approximately$43,500onMs.Buycks-Roberson'shome,locatedat2057South25thAvenueinBroadview,Illinois.11. The propertythatMs.Buycks-Robersonattemptedtorefinance is locatedinaneighborhoodinwhich the African-4Americanrepresentation is growingandcurrentlyconstitutesoverfiftypercent(50%) of thatneighborhood'spopulation.12.Ms.Buycks-Robersonprovidedtocitibankextensivefinancialdocumentationconcerningherfinancialabilityand the property,includingdocumentsshowingannualincome of over$47,000.13.OnoraboutApril28,1992,Ms.Buycks-RobersonreceivedfromDefendantcitibankaletterthatinformedherthathermortgageloanapplicationhadbeendeniedbecause of delinquentcreditobligationsandotheradversecredit.14.OnJune19,1992,Ms.'Buycks-Robersonreappliedfor the homeloan,andagainprovidedtocitibankextensivefinancial.documentationconcerningherannualincome,financialabilityandadditionalinformationconcerninghercreditworthiness.15.Onor after July10,1992,Ms.Buycks-Robersonreceivedfromcitibankaletterthatinformedherthathermortgageloanapplicationhadbeendeniedbecauseher"income[did]notsupport the amount of creditrequested."16.Ms.Buycks-Robersonwasqualifiedtoreceive the loanshesoughtfromcitibank.Ms.Brooks17.OnoraboutNovember25,1993,PlaintiffReneeBrooksappliedforahomeloan of approximately$95,000fromcitibank.18.Ms.BrooksprovidedCitibankwithalldocumentationthatCitibankrequired.519. The purpose of the loanwastorefinanceanexistingmortgage of approximately$95,000onMs.Brooks'scondominium,locatedat5000SouthCornellStreetinChicago,Illinois.20. The propertythatMs.Brooksattemptedtorefinance is locatedinaneighborhoodinwhichthere is asignificantAfrican-Americanpopulation.21.OnoraboutMarch8,1994,Ms.Brooks'sapplicationforahomeloanwasdeniedon the groundsthatshehadinadequatecollateral,andon the groundsthatshehadsubmittedanincompleteapplication.22.Ms.Brookswasqualifiedtoreceive the homeloanshesoughtfrom'citibank.Mr.Roberson23.OnoraboutJuly9,1993,PlaintiffCalvinRobersonappliedforahomeloan of approximately$43,000fromcitibank.24. The purpose of the loanwastorefinanceanexistingmortgage of approximately$43,000onMr.Roberson'shome,locatedat2847West85thStreetinChicago,Illinois.25. The propertywhichMr.Robersonattemptedtorefinance is loc~tedinaneighborhoodinwhich the African-Americanrepresentation is growing.26.Mr.Robersonprovidedcitibankwithalldocumentationthatcitibankrequested,includingdocumentsshowinganannualincome of approximately$69,000fromhismanagementpositionatAT&T,and the equityinhishomevaluedatapproximately$75,000.Mr.Robersonalsoprovided"documentationshowingadditionalliquidassetswellinexcess of the amount of the loanrequested.6Mr.Roberson'sincomewasmorethansufficienttoenablehimtomeethiscreditobligations.27.'OnoraboutJuly9,1993,Mr.Robersonreceivedaletterfrom'citibank,denyinghisapplicationforrefinancingon the groundsthatitwas"incomplete,"andon the groundsthatDefendantcitibankdidnot"make this type of loan.".28.Mr.Robersonwasqualifiedtoreceive the loanhesoughtfromcitibank.COUNTIEQUALCREDIT ... TelefaxNo.DanaCarreraNo.94C4094JUdgecastilloPlaintiffsDefendant.vs.SelmaS.BUYCKS-ROBERSON,)ReneeBROOKSandCalvinROBERSON)onbehalf of themselvesand)otherssimilarlysituated,))))))))))))CITIBANKFEDERALSAVINGSBANK,IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICTCOURTFOR THE NORTHERNDISTRICT OF ILLINOISEASTERNDIVISIONSECONDAMENDEDCOMPLAINTPlaintiffsSelmaS.Buycks-Roberson,ReneeBrooksandCalvinR.Roberson,onbehalf of themselvesandotherssimilarlysituated,byandthroughtheirattorneys,make this SecondAmendedComplaintagainstDefendant,citibankFederalSavingsBank("Citibank").NATURE OF THE ACTION1. This is acivilactionbroughtbySelmaS.Buycks-Roberson,ReneeBrooksandCalvinR.Robersononbehalf of themselvesandallotherAfrican-Americanswhosehomeloanapplicationstocitibankoriginatedfrom the Chicagometropolitanareaandwhoseapplicationswererejectedbecause of theirraceorcolororbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated. This actionseeksinjunctivereliefandmonetarydamagesforviolations of 42u.S.C.§§1981and1982;42U.S.C.§3605and15U.S.C.§169l(a).JURISDICTIONANDVENUE2.Jurisdiction of this courtarisesunder28U.S.C.§1343(a)(4),42U.S.C.§3613(a)(1)(A)and15U.S.C.§1691e(f).3.Venue is properin the NorthernDistrict of Illinoissincesome of the actsandtransactionscomplained of occurredin this district. THE PARTIES4.PlaintiffSelmaS.Buycks-Roberson is anAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinBroadview,Illinois.5.PlaintiffReneeBrooks is anAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinChicago,Illinois.6.PlaintiffCalvinR.Roberson is anAfrican-Americancitizen of the united States whoresidesinChicago,Illinois.7.Defendantcitibank is afederalsavingsbankthatoffersresidentialmortgageloans("homeloans").CLASSACTIONSALLEGATIONS8.(a)Plaintiffsarecitibankhomeloanapplicants;theybring this actiononbehalf of themselvesandallotherAfrican-Americanhomeloanapplicantssimilarlysituated. This action is broughtasaclassactionpursuanttoRule23(b)(2)andRule23(b)(3) of the FederalRules of CivilProcedure.(b) The classconsists of allAfrican-Americanswhofiledapplicationsforhomeloanstocitibankandwererejectedonor after July6,1992becausetheyareAfrican-Americanand/or2because the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocatedwaspredominantlyAfrican-American.(c) The class is sonumerousthatjoinder of allpersons is impracticable.PlaintiffsareinformedandbelievethatmanyhomeloanapplicationstoDefendantbyAfrican-Americanswereillegallyrejected.Oninformationandbelief,Defendantrejected the homeloanapplications of manydozens of African-Americanapplicantsbecause of theirraceorcolor,and/orbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated.(d)Plaintiffswillfairlyandadequatelyprotect the interests of allclassmembers,astheyaremembers of the classandtheirclaimsaretypical of the claims of allclassmembers.Plaintiffsareincensedby the treatmenttheyhavereceivedandwillaggressivelypursuetheiraswellas the class'sinterests.Plaintiffs'interestsinobtaininginjunctivereliefandmonetarydamagesfor the violations of the above-mentionedfederalstatutesareconsistentwithandnotantagonistictothose of anypersonwithin the class.(e) The commonquestions of lawandfactinclude:(i)whetherDefendanthadapolicy,practiceorproceduretorejecthomeloanapplicationson the basis of the applicants'raceoron the basis of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated;(ii)whether the conductallegedherein is inviolation of Title42U.S.C.§§1981and1982;42U.S.C.§3605and15U.S.C.3§1691(a);and(iii)whetherPlaintiffsareentitledtoanaward of actual,compensatoryorpunitivedamages.(f) The wrongfulconductallegedhereinhasbeentakengenerallyagainstallmembers of the classinthatAfrican-Americanhomeloanapplicantshavehadtheirloanapplicationsrejectedon the basis of theirraceorcolor,orbecause of the racialcomposition of the neighborhoodsinwhichtheirpropertieswerelocated,orboth,pursuantto the policies,practicesorprocedures of Defendant.(g) The commonquestions of factandlawpredominateoverquestionsaffectingonlyindividualclassmembers.(h)Aclassaction is superiortootheravailablemethodsfor the fairandefficientadjudication of the controversyinthat:(i)amUltiplicity of suitswithconsequentburdenon the courtsandDefendantshouldbeavoided;and(ii)itwouldbeundulyburdensomeforallclassmemberstointerveneasparties-plaintiffsin this action. THE FACTSMs.Buycks-Roberson9.OnoraboutApril4,1992,PlaintiffSelmaBuycks-Robersonappliedforahomeloan of approximately$43,700fromcitibank.10. The purpose of the loanwastorefinanceanexistingmortgage of approximately$43,500onMs.Buycks-Roberson'shome,locatedat2057South25thAvenueinBroadview,Illinois.11. The propertythatMs.Buycks-Robersonattemptedtorefinance is locatedinaneighborhoodinwhich the African-4Americanrepresentation is growingandcurrentlyconstitutesoverfiftypercent(50%) of thatneighborhood'spopulation.12.Ms.Buycks-Robersonprovidedtocitibankextensivefinancialdocumentationconcerningherfinancialabilityand the property,includingdocumentsshowingannualincome of over$47,000.13.OnoraboutApril28,1992,Ms.Buycks-RobersonreceivedfromDefendantcitibankaletterthatinformedherthathermortgageloanapplicationhadbeendeniedbecause of delinquentcreditobligationsandotheradversecredit.14.OnJune19,1992,Ms.'Buycks-Robersonreappliedfor the homeloan,andagainprovidedtocitibankextensivefinancial.documentationconcerningherannualincome,financialabilityandadditionalinformationconcerninghercreditworthiness.15.Onor after July10,1992,Ms.Buycks-Robersonreceivedfromcitibankaletterthatinformedherthathermortgageloanapplicationhadbeendeniedbecauseher"income[did]notsupport the amount of creditrequested."16.Ms.Buycks-Robersonwasqualifiedtoreceive the loanshesoughtfromcitibank.Ms.Brooks17.OnoraboutNovember25,1993,PlaintiffReneeBrooksappliedforahomeloan of approximately$95,000fromcitibank.18.Ms.BrooksprovidedCitibankwithalldocumentationthatCitibankrequired.519. The purpose of the loanwastorefinanceanexistingmortgage of approximately$95,000onMs.Brooks'scondominium,locatedat5000SouthCornellStreetinChicago,Illinois.20. The propertythatMs.Brooksattemptedtorefinance is locatedinaneighborhoodinwhichthere is asignificantAfrican-Americanpopulation.21.OnoraboutMarch8,1994,Ms.Brooks'sapplicationforahomeloanwasdeniedon the groundsthatshehadinadequatecollateral,andon the groundsthatshehadsubmittedanincompleteapplication.22.Ms.Brookswasqualifiedtoreceive the homeloanshesoughtfrom'citibank.Mr.Roberson23.OnoraboutJuly9,1993,PlaintiffCalvinRobersonappliedforahomeloan of approximately$43,000fromcitibank.24. The purpose of the loanwastorefinanceanexistingmortgage of approximately$43,000onMr.Roberson'shome,locatedat2847West85thStreetinChicago,Illinois.25. The propertywhichMr.Robersonattemptedtorefinance is loc~tedinaneighborhoodinwhich the African-Americanrepresentation is growing.26.Mr.Robersonprovidedcitibankwithalldocumentationthatcitibankrequested,includingdocumentsshowinganannualincome of approximately$69,000fromhismanagementpositionatAT&T,and the equityinhishomevaluedatapproximately$75,000.Mr.Robersonalsoprovided"documentationshowingadditionalliquidassetswellinexcess of the amount of the loanrequested.6Mr.Roberson'sincomewasmorethansufficienttoenablehimtomeethiscreditobligations.27.'OnoraboutJuly9,1993,Mr.Robersonreceivedaletterfrom'citibank,denyinghisapplicationforrefinancingon the groundsthatitwas"incomplete,"andon the groundsthatDefendantcitibankdidnot"make this type of loan.".28.Mr.Robersonwasqualifiedtoreceive the loanhesoughtfromcitibank.COUNTIEQUALCREDIT ... COUNTIIICIVILRIGHTS39.Plaintiffsadoptandreallege~~1through28 of this complaintandincorporatethembyreferenceas~39 of CountIII.40.CountIII is broughtpursuantto the ThirteenthAmendment of the united states Constitutiontoredress the deprivation&apos ;of rights,privilegesandimmunitiessecuredthereby.CountIII is alsobroughtpursuantto42U.S.C.§§1981and1982tosecure the right of Plaintiffstomakeandenforcecontractson the samebasisthatsuchrightsareenjoyedbywhitecitizens,andtoenforce the right of Plaintiffstoinherit,purchase,lease,sell,hold,andconv~yrealandpersonalpropertyon the samebasisaswhitecitizens.41.Defendant,on the basis of raceandcolor,hasdeprivedPlaintiffs of the fullandequalenjoyment of goods,services,facilities,privileges,advantages,andaccommodations,including the righttoenforcecon~ractsandtohaveinterestinproperty,asareenjoyedbywhitecitizens.Defendant'srefusaltoprovidePlaintiffahomeloanwasintentionalandwillfulwith the purposeandintent of deprivingPlaintiff of herconstitutionalrighttofreelypurchasepropertywithoutregardtorace.42.Asadirectandproximateresult of the wrongfulactsby the Defendant,Plaintiffshavesufferedactualdamagesandwillcontinuetosufferdamagesfrom the humiliationand.embarrassmentcausedby the Defendant'srefusaltodealwiththembecause of theirraceorcolor,and the deprivationbyDefendant of Plaintiffs'constitutionalandstatutoryrightsfreelytoobtainhomeloanswithoutregardtorace.1043.Because of the Defendant'smaliciousrefusaltodealwithPlaintiffsanditspolicy of discriminationagainstPlaintiffsbecause of raceorcolor,Plaintiffsclaimpunitiveorexemplarydamages.WHEREFORE,PlaintiffsaskjUdgmentagainstDefendantfor:(a)Actualdamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(b)Compensatorydamagesinanamounttobeprovedattrial;(c)Punitivedamages;(d)Appropriateinjunctiverelief;(e)Reasonableattorneys'feesandcosts of suit;and(f)Furtherreliefas this Courtdeemsjustandproper.SELMAS.BUYCKS-ROBERSON;...